skip to main content
10.1145/2468356.2468388acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Combining social strategies and workload: a new design to reduce the negative effects of task interruptions

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Being interrupted by notifications and reminders is common while working. In this study we consider whether system politeness reduces (negative) effects of being interrupted by system requests. We carried out a 2 (polite vs. neutral system request) x 2 (high vs. low mental load) between-participants experiment. We measured annoyance, frustration and mental effort. Our results suggest that social strategies can mitigate some of the negative effects, but that this depends on the difficulty of the task. We discuss the implications of these results for the design of interruptive system messages and for further research into social computing.

References

  1. P. Adamczyk and B. Bailey. If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. In Proc. of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, page 278. ACM, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. E. Arroyo, T. Selker, and A. Stouffs. Interruptions as multimodal outputs: which are the less disruptive? In Proc. of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pages 479--482, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B. Bailey and J. Konstan. On the need for attentionaware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(4):685--708, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. T. W. Bickmore, D. Mauer, F. Crespo, and T. Brown. Persuasion, task interruption and health regimen adherence. In de Kort et al. {26}, pages 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. Brown and S. Levinson. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge Univ Pr, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. H. Cramer, V. Evers, T. van Slooten, M. Ghijsen, and B. Wielinga. Trying too hard: effects of mobile agents' (Inappropriate) social expressiveness on trust, affect and compliance. In Proc. of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1471--1474. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. Cramer, J. Goddijn, B. Wielinga, and V. Evers. Effects of (in) accurate empathy and situational valence on attitudes towards robots. In Proc. of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pages 141--142. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. De Guzman, M. Sharmin, and B. Bailey. Should I call now? Understanding what context is considered when deciding whether to initiate remote communication via mobile devices. In Proc. of Graphics interface 2007, pages 143--150. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Fischer. Studying and tackling temporal challenges in mobile HCI. In Proc. of the 28th of the international conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 2927--2930. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Grandhi and Q. Jones. Technology-mediated interruption management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(5):288--306, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. Hone. Empathic agents to reduce user frustration: The effects of varying agent characteristics. Interacting with Computers, 18(2):227--245, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Iqbal and B. Bailey. Effects of intelligent notification management on users and their tasks. In Proc. of the 26th SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 93--102. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Kalyanaraman, J. Ivory, and L. Maschmeyer. Interruptions and online information processing: The role of interruption type, interruption content, and interruption frequency. In Proc. of 2005 Annual Meeting of International Communication Association, volume 2005, pages 1--32, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. F. Keller, S. Gunasekharan, N. Mayo, and M. Corley. Timing accuracy of web experiments: A case study using the webexp software package. Behavior Research Methods, 41:1--12, 2009. 10.3758/BRM.41.1.12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. Klein, Y. Moon, and R. Picard. This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results. Interacting with computers, 14(2):119--140, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. D. McFarlane. Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in humancomputer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 17(1):63--139, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C. Miller. Etiquette and Politeness in Human-Human and Human-Machine Interactions: A Summary of Work at SIFT. In Proc. of the IUI workshop on Enculturating Conversational Interfaces, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. H. Nguyen and J. Masthoff. Designing persuasive dialogue systems: Using argumentation with care. Persuasive Technology, pages 201--212, 2008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Combining social strategies and workload: a new design to reduce the negative effects of task interruptions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3360 pages
      ISBN:9781450319522
      DOI:10.1145/2468356

      Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '13 Paper Acceptance Rate630of1,963submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader