skip to main content
10.1145/2468356.2468749acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Embodying neuroplastic change

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Groundbreaking neuroplasticity research demonstrates how interactive technologies can be used to leverage and increase our brain's capacity to learn. Importantly, unless specific physical pathologies are being addressed, this research remains screen-based, overlooking the rich multi-modal capacities of the human body. Embodied interaction affords multi-sensory experiences and heightened engagement. It allows for a broad palette of activities, as well as powerful leverage of the indelible intertwining of body and brain. This paper argues that embodied interaction, in particular poetic-kinaesthetic engagement in artistic activities, may powerfully compliment existing techniques for stimulating neuroplastic change.

References

  1. TEI conference. http://www.tei-conf.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, K., Wilde, D. Circles and Props: making unknown technology. Interactions, 19, 3 (2012), 60--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Andreasen, N. C. A Journey into Chaos: Creativity and the Unconscious. MSM; 9(1): 42--53. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrowsmith-Young, B. The Woman Who Changed Her Brain. Free Press, New York, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bach-y-Rita, P. Brain plasticity as a basis for therapeutic procedures. Hans Huber, Bern 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bach-y-Rita, P., Collins, C. C., Saunders, F. A., White, B. and Scadden, L. Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature, 221, 5184, (1969), 963--964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, J. The enchantment of modern life. Princeton U. Press, Princeton, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Butler, J. P. Giving an account of oneself. Fordham University Press, NY, USA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. C., Yap, A. J. Power Posing: Brief Nonverbal Displays Affect Neuroendocrine Levels and Risk Tolerance. Psych. Science, 21, 10 (2010), 1363--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Clarke, A. C. Profiles of the Future. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, NY, USA, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Danto, A. C. The transfiguration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art. Harvard U. Press, Cambridge, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. Art as Experience. Putmans, NY, 1958.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Diamond, M. C. Enriching heredity: The impact of the environment on the anatomy of the brain. Free Press, NY, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Doidge, N. The Brain That Changes Itself. Viking Penguin NY, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dowler, L. Improvising on the Ward. Foundation for Community Dance, UK. Winter 2009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellul, J., C. Watkins, N. Ferguson, Barer, D., Row, J. Increasing patient engagement in rehabilitation activities. Clinical Rehabilitation, 7, (1993), 297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Gallagher, S. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gao, Y. and Mandryk, R. L. The Acute Cognitive Benefits of Casual Exergame Play. In Proc. CHI 2012. ACM Press, NY (2012) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Gaver, W. Designing for Homo Ludens. 13 Magazine, 12, (2002), 2--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Genzlinger, N. Learning His Body, Learning to Dance. The New York Times, NY, Nov 25 2009, C1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Gibson, J. J. The Theory of Affordances In Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hebb, D. O. The organization of behavior. Wiley & Sons, NY, USA, 1949.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Helmer, R. J. N. Position and Motion Sensing for Sport, Entertainment and Rehab. In Proc. CIMTEC, (2008)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Helmer, R. J. N., Mestrovic, M.A., Taylor, K., Philpot, B., Wilde, D. and Farrow, D. Physiological Tracking, Wearable Interactive Systems and Human Performance. In Proc. ICART, The Virtual Reality Society of Japan, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hewitt-Parsons, S. Unintentional Therapy, Unexpected Results. In Poc. ArtAbilitation. Reading University (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, S. Where Good Ideas come From. Riverhead, NY, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jordan, J. E. Briggs, A. M., Brand, C. A., Osborn, R. H. Enhancing patient engagement in chronic disease selfmanagement support initiatives in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 189, 10, (2008), 9--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kauffman, S. Investigations. Oxford U. P., NY, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelly, K. What Technology Wants. Viking, NY, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kilgard, M. P., Merzenich, M. M. Cortical map reorginization enabled by nucleus basalis activity. Science, 279, 5357, (1998), 1714--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. McCarthy, J., Wright, P., Wallace, J., Dearden, A. The experience of enchantment in human-computer interaction. Pers. & Ubiq. 10, (2006), 369--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Merleau-Ponty, M. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, UK, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Merzenich, M. USC publications list: http://profiles. ucsf.edu/ProfileDetails.aspx?Person=5135507.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Michael Merzenich, et. al. Posit Science: http://www.positscience.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Preminger, S. Transformative art: art as a means for long-term neurocognitive change. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 96, (2012), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., Ilmoniemi, R. J. Functional links between motor and language systems. Neuroscience (EU), 21,3, (2005) 793--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramachandran, V. S., Rogers-Ramachandran, D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 263, 1369 (1996), 377--386.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Renner, M. J. and Rosenzweig, M. R. Enriched and impoverished environments Springer Verlag, NY, (1987).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Rock, I. and Harris, C. S. Vision and Touch. Scientific American, 216, 5 (1967), 96--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenzweig, M. R., Krech, D., Bennet, E. L., Diamond, M. C. Effects of environmental complexity and training on brain chemistry and anatomy. Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, (1962), 429--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Sheets-Johnstone, M. The Primacy of Movement. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Sheets-Johnstone, M. Why Is Movement Therapeutic? American Journal of Dance Therapy, 32, 1 (2010), 2--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Shklovsky, V. Art as Technique. In Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays. U. Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Taub, E., Uswatte, G. and Pidikiti, R. ConstraintInduced Movement Therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation--a clinical review. Rehabilitation R&D., 36, 3, (1999), 237--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Varela, F., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E. The Embodied Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Wilde, D. The hipdiskettes : Learning (through) Wearables. In Proc. OZCHI 2008. ACM Press (2008) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Wilde, D. Extending Body & Imagination : moving to move. IJDHD 10, 1, (2011), 31--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Wilde, D. Swing that thing : moving to move. PhD. Diss., Monash University and CSIRO, Australia, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilde, D. hipDisk: understanding the value of ungainly, embodied, performative, fun. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012, ACM (2012), 111--120 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Wilde, D., Cassinelli, A., Zerroug, A., Helmer, R. J. N., Ishikawa, M. Light Arrays: a system for extended engagement. In Proc. ICDVRAT (2010). U. Reading, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilde, D., Andersen, K. Doing things backwards: the OWL project. In Proc. OZCHI 2009. ACM Press (2009) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Wilde, D., Andersen, K. Part Science Part Magic. In Proc. OZCHI 2009. ACM Press (2010) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Wilde, D., Schiphorst T., and Klooster, S. Move to Design " Design to Move. Interactions, 18, 4 (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Wressle, E., Eeg-Olofsson, A. M., Marcusson, J., Henriksson, C. Improved Client Participation in the Rehabilitation Process Using a Client-Centred Goal Formulation Structure. Rehab. Med., 34, (2002), 5--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Embodying neuroplastic change

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            April 2013
            3360 pages
            ISBN:9781450319522
            DOI:10.1145/2468356

            Copyright © 2013 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 27 April 2013

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI EA '13 Paper Acceptance Rate630of1,963submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader