skip to main content
research-article

Wireless noncontact ECG and EEG biopotential sensors

Published:03 July 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Wearable, unobtrusive and patient friendly physiological sensors will be a key driving force in the wireless health revolution. Cardiac (ECG) and brain (EEG) signals are two important signal modalities indicative of healthy and diseased states of body and mind that directly benefit from long-term monitoring. Despite advancements in wireless and embedded electronics technology, however, ECG/EEG monitoring devices still face problems with patient compliance and comfort from the use wet/gel electrodes. We have developed two wireless biopotential instrumentation systems using noncontact electrodes that can operate without direct skin contact and through thin layers of fabric. The first system is a general purpose replacement for traditional ECG/EEG telemetry systems and the second is a compact, fully self-contained wireless ECG tag. All of the issues relating to the design of low noise, high performance noncontact sensors are discussed along with full technical details, circuit schematics and construction techniques. The noncontact electrode has been integrated into both a wearable ECG chest harness as well an EEG headband and characterized in a battery of experiments that represent potential health applications including resting ECG, exercise ECG and EEG directly against standard clinical adhesive Ag/AgCl electrodes. With careful design and secure mechanical harnesses the noncontact sensor is capable of approaching the quality of conventional electrodes.

References

  1. Chi, Y. and Cauwenberghs, G. 2009. Micropower non-contact EEG electrode with active common-mode noise suppression and input capacitance cancellation. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 4218--4221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chi, Y., Deiss, S., and Cauwenberghs, G. 2009. Non-contact low power EEG/ECG electrode for high density wearable biopotential sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks. 246--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chi, Y. M., Ng, P., Kang, E., Kang, J., Fang, J., and Cauwenberghs, G. 2010a. Wireless non-contact cardiac and neural monitoring. In Proceedings of the Conference on Wireless Health. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chi, Y., Jung, T.-P., and Cauwenberghs, G. 2010b. Dry-contact and noncontact biopotential electrodes: Methodological review. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 3, 106--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Clippingdale, A., Clark, R. J., and Watkins, C. 1994. Ultrahigh impedance capacitively coupled heart imaging array. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65, 1, 269--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Feild, D. Q., Feldman, C. L., and Horáček, B. M. 2002. Improved EASI coefficients: Their derivation, values, and performance. J. Electrocardiology 35, 4, Part 2, 23--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Gravitz, L. 2010. Biosensors comfortable enough to wear 24--7. MIT Tech. Rev.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Harland, C. J., Clark, T. D., and Prance, R. J. 2002. Electric potential probes - new directions in the remote sensing of the human body. Meas. Sci. Technol. 13, 2, 163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. He, B. and Cohen, R. 1992. Body surface Laplacian ECG mapping. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39, 11, 1179--1191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kim, K. K., Lim, Y. K., and Park, K. S. 2005. Common mode noise cancellation for electrically noncontact ECG measurement system on a chair. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 5881--5883.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee, J., Pearce, F., Morrissette, C., Hibbs, A., and Matthews, R. 2005. Evaluating a capacitively coupled, noncontact electrode for ECG monitoring. Sensors Mag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, H. and Tan, J. 2006. Body sensor network based context aware qrs detection. In Proceedings of the Pervasive Health Conference and Workshops. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lopez, A. and Richardson, P. C. 1969. Capacitive electrocardiographic and bioelectric electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 16, 1, 99--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Matthews, R., McDonald, N., Hervieux, P., Turner, P., and Steindorf, M. 2007. A wearable physiological sensor suite for unobtrusive monitoring of physiological and cognitive state. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 5276--5281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. MettingVanRijn, A. C., Peper, A., and Grimbergen, C. 1994. Amplifiers for bioelectric events: A design with a minimal number of parts. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Park, C., Chou, P., Bai, Y., Matthews, R., and Hibbs, A. 2006. An ultra-wearable, wireless, low power ECG monitoring system. In Proceedings of the IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference. 241--244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Searle, A. and Kirkup, L. 2000. A direct comparison of wet, dry and insulating bioelectric recording electrodes. Physiol. Meas. 21, 2, 271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sullivan, T., Deiss, S., and Cauwenberghs, G. 2007. A low-noise, non-contact EEG/ECG sensor. In Proceedings of the IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference. 154--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sullivan, T., Deiss, S., Jung, T.-P., and Cauwenberghs, G. 2008. A brain-machine interface using dry-contact, low-noise EEG sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. 1986--1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Valchinov, E. and Pallikarakis, N. 2004. An active electrode for biopotential recording from small localized bio-sources. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 3, 1, 25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Winter, B. B. and Webster, J. G. 1983. Driven-right-leg circuit design. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 30, 1, 62--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Wireless noncontact ECG and EEG biopotential sensors

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
        ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems  Volume 12, Issue 4
        Special Section on Wireless Health Systems, On-Chip and Off-Chip Network Architectures
        June 2013
        288 pages
        ISSN:1539-9087
        EISSN:1558-3465
        DOI:10.1145/2485984
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 July 2013
        • Accepted: 1 September 2011
        • Revised: 1 June 2011
        • Received: 1 January 2011
        Published in tecs Volume 12, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader