skip to main content
10.1145/2615569.2615682acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Skim reading: an adaptive strategy for reading on the web

Published:23 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

It has been suggested that readers spend a great deal of time skim reading on the Web and that if readers skim read they reduce their comprehension of what they have read. There have been a number of studies exploring skim reading, but relatively little exists on the skim reading of hypertext and Webpages. In the experiment documented here, we utilised eye tracking methodology to explore how readers skim read hypertext and how hyperlinks affect reading behaviour. The results show that the readers read faster when they were skim reading and comprehension was reduced. However, the presence of hyperlinks seemed to assist the readers in picking out important information when skim reading. We suggest that readers engage in an adaptive information foraging strategy where they attempt to minimise comprehension loss while maintaining a high reading speed. Readers use hyperlinks as markers to suggest important information and use them to read through the text in an efficient and effective way. This suggests that skim reading may not be as damaging to comprehension when reading hypertext, but it does mean that the words we choose to hyperlink become very important to comprehension for those skim reading text on the Web.

References

  1. Burgess, C., & Livesay, K. The effect of corpus size in predicting reaction time in a basic word recognition task: Moving on from Kucera and Francis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30 (1998), 272--277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brysbaert, M., Drieghe, D., & Vitu, F. Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In Underwood, G. ed. Cognitive processes in eye guidance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2005, 53--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Carr, N. G. The Shallows. W. W. Norton, New York, NY, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carver, R. P. Rauding theory predictions of amount comprehended under different purposes and speed reading conditions. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 2 (1984), 205--218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Duggan, G. B, & Payne, S. J. Text skimming: The process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 3 (2009) 228--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Dyson, M. C., & Haselgrove, M. The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen. Journal of Research in Reading. 23, 2 (2000) 210--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fitzsimmons, G., Weal, M. J., & Drieghe, D. On measuring the impact of hyperlinks on reading. In 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, (Paris, France, 2013), Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Inhoff, W. A., & Rayner, K. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception psychophysics, 40, 6 (1986) 431--439.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Allyn and Bacon, Newton, MA, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Liversedge, S., & Findlay, J. Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4, 1 (2000), 6--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lui, Z. Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61, 6 (2005) 700--712.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Masson, M. E. J. Cognitive processes in skimming stories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 5 (1982) 400--417.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Matin, E. Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis. Psychological bulletin, 81, 12 (1974), 899--917.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Milne, D., & Witten, I. Learning to link with Wikipedia. Proc. CIKM '08, ACM Press, (2008), 509--518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Morkes, J., & Nielsen, J. Concise, SCANNABLE, and Objective: How to write for the Web. Nielsen Norman Group(1997) http://www.nngroup.com/articles/concise-scannable-and-objective-how-to-write-for-the-web/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nikolova, O. R. Effects of Visible and Invisible Hyperlinks on Vocabulary Acquisition and Reading Comprehension for High- and Average-Foreign. Apprentissage des langues et systèmes d'information et de communication, 07 (2004), 29--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pirolli, P., & Card, S. Information foraging. Psychological Review 106, 4 (1999) 643--675.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. R Development Core Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Rayner, K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological bulletin, 124, 3 (1998), 372--422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rayner, K. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 62, 8 (2009), 1457--506.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Reader, W. R., & Payne, S. J. Allocating time across multiple texts: Sampling and satisficing. Human-Computer Interaction 22, 3 (2007) 263--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Simola, J., Kuisma, J., Oörni, A., Uusitalo, L., & Hyönä, J. The impact of salient advertisements on reading and attention on web pages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 2 (2011), 174--90Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Skim reading: an adaptive strategy for reading on the web

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WebSci '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science
        June 2014
        318 pages
        ISBN:9781450326223
        DOI:10.1145/2615569

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 June 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WebSci '14 Paper Acceptance Rate29of144submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader