skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702155acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
note

Barriers and Negative Nudges: Exploring Challenges in Food Journaling

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although food journaling is understood to be both important and difficult, little work has empirically documented the specific challenges people experience with food journals. We identify key challenges in a qualitative study combining a survey of 141 current and lapsed food journalers with analysis of 5,526 posts in community forums for three mobile food journals. Analyzing themes in this data, we find and discuss barriers to reliable food entry, negative nudges caused by current techniques, and challenges with social features. Our results motivate research exploring a wider range of approaches to food journal design and technology.

References

  1. Cordeiro F, Bales E, Cherry E, & Fogarty J. RethinkingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. the Mobile Food Journal: Exploring Opportunities for Lightweight Photo-Based Capture. CHI 2015, to Appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Grimes A & Harper R. Celebratory Technology?: New Directions for Food Research in HCI. CHI 2008, 467--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Helander E, Kaipainen K, Korhonen I, & Wansink B. Factors Related to Sustained Use of a Free Mobile App for Dietary Self Monitoring With Photography and Peer Feedback: Retrospective Cohort Study. J Med Internet Res 16, 4 (2014), e109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mamykina L, Mynatt ED, Davidson PR, & Greenblatt D. MAHI?: Investigation of Social Scaffolding for Reflective Thinking in Diabetes Management. CHI 2008, 477--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Noronha J, Hysen E, Zhang H, & Gajos KZ. PlateMate: Crowdsourcing Nutrition Analysis from Food Photographs. UIST 2011, 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rooksby J, Rost M, Morrison A, & Chalmers M. Personal Tracking as Lived Informatics. CHI 2014, 1163--1172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Siek KA, Connelly KH, Rogers Y, Rohwer P, Lambert D, & Welch JL. When Do We Eat? An Evaluation of Food Items Input into an Electronic Food Monitoring Application. PervasiveHealth 2006, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Thaler RH & Sunstein CR. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tsai CC, Lee G, Raab F, Norman GJ, Sohn T, Griswold WG, & Patrick K. Usability and Feasibility of PmEB: A Mobile Phone Application for Monitoring Real Time Caloric Balance. Mobile Networks and Applications 12, 2-3 (2007), 173--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Barriers and Negative Nudges: Exploring Challenges in Food Journaling

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • note

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader