Denys J.C. Matthies
Marian Haescher
Suranga Nanayakkara
ABSTRACT
Smartwatches enable spatial user input, namely for the continuous tracking of physical activity and relevant health parameters. Additionally, smartwatches are experiencing greater social acceptability, even among the elderly. While step counting is an essential parameter to calculate the user's spatial activity, current detection algorithms are insufficient for calculating steps when using a rollator, which is a common walking aid for elderly people. Through a pilot study conducted with eight different wrist-worn smart devices, an overall recognition of ~10% was achieved. This is because characteristic motions utilized by step counting algorithms are poorly reflected at the user's wrist when pushing a rollator. This issue is also present among other spatial activities such as pushing a pram, a bike, and a shopping cart. This paper thus introduces an improved step counting algorithm for wrist-worn accelerometers. This new algorithm was first evaluated through a controlled study and achieved promising results with an overall recognition of ~85%. As a follow-up, a preliminary field study with randomly selected elderly people who used rollators resulted in similar detection rates of ~83%. To conclude, this research will expectantly contribute to greater step counting precision in smart wearable technology.
Supplemental Material
- &gesund. M-Health GmbH. Berlin, Germany. URL: https://und-gesund.de/enGoogle Scholar
- Adonis, A., & Taylor, G. P. (2016). Assessing Walking Ability in People with HTLV-1-Associated Myelopathy Using the 10 Meter Timed Walk and the 6 Minute Walk Test. In PloS one, 11(6), e0157132.Google ScholarCross Ref
- b-cared. Caregency GmbH. Vienna, Austria. URL: https://b-cared.comGoogle Scholar
- Ballesteros, J., Urdiales, C., Martinez, A. B., & van Dieën, J. H. (2016). On Gait Analysis Estimation Errors Using Force Sensors on a Smart Rollator. In Sensors, 16(11), 1896. MDPI.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bieber, G., Haescher, M., Hanschmann, P., Matthies, D.J.C. (2018). Exploring Accelerometer-based Step Detection By using a Wheeled Walking Frame. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction in Rostock, Germany (iWOAR 2018). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boletsis, C., McCallum, S., & Landmark, B. F. (2015). The use of smartwatches for health monitoring in home-based dementia care. In International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. 15-26. Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cindy Ng, L. W., Jenkins, S., & Hill, K. (2012). Accuracy and responsiveness of the stepwatch activity monitor and ActivPAL in patients with COPD when walking with and without a rollator. Disability and rehabilitation, 34(15), 1317--1322.Google Scholar
- Clarke, C. L., Taylor, J., Crighton, L. J., Goodbrand, J. A., McMurdo, M. E., & Witham, M. D. (2016). Validation of the AX3 triaxial accelerometer in older functionally impaired people. In Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 1--7. Springer.Google Scholar
- Collins, S. H., Adamczyk, P. G., & Kuo, A. D. (2009). Dynamic arm swinging in human walking. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276(1673), 3679--3688.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dijkstra, B., Zijlstra, W., Scherder, E., & Kamsma, Y. (2008). Detection of walking periods and number of steps in older adults and patients with Parkinson's disease: accuracy of a pedometer and an accelerometry-based method. In Age and ageing, 37(4), 436--441. Oxford AcademicGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Ehrler, F., Weber, C., & Lovis, C. (2016). Influence of Pedometer Position on Pedometer Accuracy at Various Walking Speeds: A Comparative Study. In Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(10), e268. JMIR Publications.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Feng, Y., Wong, C. K., Janeja, V., Kuber, R., & Mentis, H. M. (2017). Comparison of triaxial accelerometers step-count accuracy in slow walking conditions. In Gait & Posture, 53, 11--16. Elsevier.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Floegel, T. A., Florez-Pregonero, A., Hekler, E. B., & Buman, M. P. (2016). Validation of Consumer-Based Hip and Wrist Activity Monitors in Older Adults with Varied Ambulatory Abilities. In The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, glw098. Oxford Academic.Google Scholar
- Gijbels, D., Alders, G., Van Hoof, E., Charlier, C., Roelants, M., Broekmans, T., ... & Feys, P. (2010). Predicting habitual walking performance in multiple sclerosis: relevance of capacity and self-report measures. In Multiple Sclerosis. SAGE journals.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kurtzke, J. F. (1983). Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology, 33(11), 1444--1444.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Living Safely. Blackham, UK. URL: http://www.livingsafely.comGoogle Scholar
- Marschollek, M., Goevercin, M., Wolf, K. H., Song, B., Gietzelt, M., Haux, R., & Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. (2008). A performance comparison of accelerometry-based step detection algorithms on a large, non-laboratory sample of healthy and mobility-impaired persons. In 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 1319--1322. IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martins, M., Santos, C. P., Page, S., Saint-Bauzel, L., Pasqui, V., & Mézière, A. (2015). Real-time gait assessment with an active depth sensor placed in a walker. In IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). 690--695. IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mathie, M. J., Coster, A. C., Lovell, N. H., & Celler, B. G. (2004). Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement. In Physiological measurement, 25(2), R1. IOP Publishing.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Milenković, A., Otto, C., & Jovanov, E. (2006). Wireless sensor networks for personal health monitoring: Issues and an implementation. In Computer communications, 29(13), 2521--2533. Elsevier. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mortazavi, B. J., Pourhomayoun, M., Alsheikh, G., Alshurafa, N., Lee, S. I., & Sarrafzadeh, M. (2014). Determining the single best axis for exercise repetition recognition and counting on smartwatches. In 11th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks. 33--38. IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Next Step Dynamics AB. Malmö, Sweden. URL: http://www.nextstepdynamics.comGoogle Scholar
- Pau, M., Caggiari, S., Mura, A., Corona, F., Leban, B., Coghe, G., ... & Cocco, E. (2016). Clinical assessment of gait in individuals with multiple sclerosis using wearable inertial sensors: Comparison with patient-based measure. In Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 10, 187--191. Elsevier.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Revolutionary Tracker. USA. URL: http://www.revolutionarytracker.comGoogle Scholar
- Safe Link. Ottawa, USA. URL: http://safelinkgps.comGoogle Scholar
- Schlesinger, S., Neuhaus, A., Thiele, A., Kippnich, M., Rashid, A., Griewing, B., & Daumer, M. (2011). Sind Mobilitätseinschränkungen bei Patienten mit Multipler Sklerose messbar? In Klinische Neurophysiologie, 42(01), 17--21. Thieme.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shimmer (2016). Shimmer3 Wireless Sensor Plattform (The Shimmer Sensors used were Schimmer3 Sensors. With +-2g of range for the accelerometer sensor. A sensitivity of 1100 LSB/Ga at +-1.3 and a Resolution of 16-bit.) URL: https://tinyurl.com/shimmer3Google Scholar
- Soaz, C., & Diepold, K. (2016). Step detection and parameterization for gait assessment using a single waist-worn accelerometer. In IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 63(5), 933--942. IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Susi, M., Renaudin, V., & Lachapelle, G. (2013). Motion mode recognition and step detection algorithms for mobile phone users. In Sensors, 13(2), 1539--1562. MDPI.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Trimpop, J., Schenk, H., Bieber, G., Lämmel, F., Burggraf, P. (2017). Smartwatch based Respiratory Rate and Breathing Pattern Recognition in an End-consumer Environment. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction in Rostock, Germany (iWOAR 2017). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Williams, K. L., Choy, N. L. L., & Brauer, S. G. (2016). Are Changes in Gait and Balance Across the Disease Step Rating Scale in Multiple Sclerosis Statistically Significant and Clinically Meaningful?. In Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 97(9), 1502--1508. Elsevier.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhao, N. (2010)._Full-featured pedometer design realized with 3-axis digital accelerometer. Analog Dialogue, 44(06), 1--5.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Step Detection for Rollator Users with Smartwatches
Recommendations
Smartwatches: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly?
CHI EA '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWearable computers are expected to become the next big thing but popular press is divided on whether they will be successful. In this paper we review the existing literature on one type of wearable -- smartwatches -- and extend their definition, in ...
Mobile Assisted Living: Smartwatch-based Fall Risk Assessment for Elderly People
iWOAR '18: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and InteractionWe present a novel Smartwatch-based approach, to enable Mobile Assisted Living (MAL) for users with special needs. A major focus group for this approach are elderly people. We developed a tool for caregivers applicable in home environments, nursing care,...
Exploring Accelerometer-based Step Detection by using a Wheeled Walking Frame
iWOAR '18: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and InteractionStep detection with accelerometers is a very common feature that smart wearables already include. However, when using a wheeled walking frame / rollator, current algorithms may be of limited use, since a different type of motion is being excreted. In ...
Comments