skip to main content
10.1145/354324.354354acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Investigating the applicability of user models for motion-impaired users

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 November 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper considers the differences between users with motion-impairments and able-bodied users when they interact with computers and the implications for user models. Most interface design and usability assessment practices are based on explicit or implicit models of user behaviour. This paper studies the applicability of an existing interface design user model to motion-impaired users for the relatively straightforward task of button activation. A discussion of the empirical results is provided and the paper concludes that there are significant differences between the behaviour of motion-impaired users and the accepted modelling theory.

References

  1. 1.Blessing, L.T.M., Chakrabarti, A., Wallace, K.M. A design research methodology, in Proceedings of ICED '95, (Prague, Czech Republic, 1995), 502-507.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Buhler, C. Robotics for Rehabilitation - A European(?) Perspective. Robotica 16, 5 (Sept 1998), 487-490. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Keates, S., Clarkson P.J., Robinson P. Developing a methodology for the design of accessible interfaces, in Proceedings of the 4th ERCIM Workshop, (Stockholm, Sweden, 1998), 1-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Mahoney, R. Robotic products for rehabilitation: Status and strategy, in Proceedings of ICORR '97, (Bath, UK, 1997), 12-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Nielsen, J. Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Rosenbaum, D.A. Human Motor Control, Academic Press, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Stary, C. The role of design and evaluation principles for user interfaces for all, in Proceedings of HCI Int'l '97, (San Francisco, USA, 1997), 477-480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Stephanidis, C. Towards the next generation of UIST: Developing for all users, in Proceedings of HCI Int'l '97, (San Francisco, USA, 1997) 473-476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Investigating the applicability of user models for motion-impaired users

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              Assets '00: Proceedings of the fourth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies
              November 2000
              203 pages
              ISBN:1581133138
              DOI:10.1145/354324

              Copyright © 2000 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 13 November 2000

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader