skip to main content
10.1145/57167.57177acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

A case study of CSCW in a dispersed organization

Published:01 May 1988Publication History

ABSTRACT

Pacific Bell conducted a trial of The Coordinator, a tool for computer-supported cooperative work. The trial group had diverse job functions and was dispersed across a variety of geographical locations and computing environments. The trial attempted to both measure the effectiveness of The Coordinator as a communications tool and to evaluate the speech act communications paradigm on which it is based. Only the first of these two goals was realized. Changes in subjects' cognition were assessed using a series of semantic differential scales. One negative cognitive shift was supported by the data. However, the anecdotal evidence was far more negative, suggesting that the experimental methodology be enhanced to include measurement of affective dimensions of group dynamics. Implementation and support for cooperative work systems were found to be more difficult than anticipated. The test group was not convinced that The Coordinator offered functionality that was worth the effort involved in learning to use the product. An improved interface, more flexible terminology, and better implementation support is needed for successful installation of The Coordinator, or similar products.

References

  1. 1.Austin (1962). How To Do Things With Words. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Baroudi,J.J.,M.H. OlsonandB. Ives, (1986) "An Empirical Study of the Impact of User Involvement and System Usage and Information Satisfaction", Communications of the ACM, 29(3), 232-238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Conrath, David, and James H. Bair (1974). "The Computer as an Interpersonal Communication Device: A Study of Augmentation Technology and its Apparent Impact on Organizational Communication". Proceedings Second International Conference on Computer Communications., Stockholm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Flores, Femando (1982). Management andCommunication in the Office of the Future. Logonet, Berkeley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Flores, Fernando, andTerry Winograd. Understanding Computers and Cognition. Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Goffman, E. Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, New York, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Grantham, C.E., Social Networks and Marital Interaction, 21st Century, Palo Alto, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.arid J.J. Vaske, Predicting the Usage of an Advanced Communications Technology, (1985). Behavior and Information Technology. 4(4): 327-336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. 9.Johnson, Bonnie, Margrethe Olson and Geraldine Weaver. Using A Computer-Based Tool To Support Collaboration: A Field Experiment (1986). MCC Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Austin, December 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Kemper, T. D. (1978). Toward a Sociology of Emotions: Some Problems and Some Solutions. The American Sociologist. 13, 30-41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Meeker, Barbara,"Decision andExchange.'" American Sociological Review, V. 36, pp. 485-495, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Myers, I. (1962). Manual: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, California. Consulting Psychologists Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Osgood, C.E., G.J. Suci, and P.H. Tannenbaum. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Rouse, William B. and Nancy M. Morris (1986). "Understanding and Enhancing User Acceptance of Computer Technology". IEEE Transactions on System, Man, & Cybernetics. Vol. 16(6), Nov-Dec. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Scheff, T., (1986), "Micro-Linguistics and Social Structure: A Theory of Social Action", Sociological Theory, 4, pp.71-83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. 16.Schmeideck, R.A., (1978), The Personal Sphere Model, New York, Grune and Stratton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Sproull, Lee and Sara Kiesler(1986). Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication. Management Science, November 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.Vaske, J.j. and Grantham, C.E.(1987), Socializing the Human Computer Environment. Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Winograd, Terry. "A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work"Report STAN-CS-87- 1158. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, May 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A case study of CSCW in a dispersed organization

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '88: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 1988
            292 pages
            ISBN:0201142376
            DOI:10.1145/57167

            Copyright © 1988 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 May 1988

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI '88 Paper Acceptance Rate39of187submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader