skip to main content
article
Free Access

Diversity in the use of electronic mail: a preliminary inquiry

Published:01 October 1988Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper describes a series of interviews that examine the ways that professional office workers use electronic mail to manage their daily work. The purpose is to generate hypotheses for future research. A number of implications for the design of flexible mail systems are discussed.

Two principal claims are made. First, the use of electronic mail is strikingly diverse, although not infinitely so. Individuals vary both in objective measures of mail use and in preferred strategies for managing work electronically. Feelings of control are similarly diverse and are related to the size of the user's inbox, numbers of folders, and subscriptions to distribution lists. This diversity implies that one's own experiences with electronic mail are unlikely to provide sufficient understanding of other's uses of mail. Mail designers should thus seek flexible primitives that capture the important dimensions of use and provide flexibility for a wide range of users.

The second claim is that electronic mail is more than just a communication system. Users archive messages for subject retrieval, prioritize messages to sequence work activities, and delegate tasks via mail. A taxonomy of work management is proposed in which mail is used for information management, time management, and task management activities. Directions for future research are suggested.

References

  1. 1 ABELSON, P.H. Coping with the information explosion. Science (1966), 75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 ALLEN, W.J. Managing the Flow of Technology. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 COTTLE, W.J. Perceiving Time. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 CRAWFORD, A. Corporate electronic mail--A communication-intensive application of information technology. MIS Quarterly (Sept. 1982), 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 CROWSTON, K., MALONE, T., AND LIN, F. Cognitive science and organizational design: A case study of computer conferencing. Human-Computer Interaction 3 (1988), 59-85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 DENNING, P. Electronic junk. Commun. ACM 23, 3 (Mar. 1982), 163-165. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 FELDMAN, M. Constraints on communication and electronic messaging. In Proceedings of the Conference for Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Austin, Tex., Dec. 3-5). ACM, New York, 1986, pp. 73-90. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 HILTZ, S. R., AND TUROFF, M. Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload. Commun. ACM 28, 7 (7), (July 1985), 680-689. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 KOEHLER, J. W., ANATOL, K. W., AND APPLEBAUM, R. L. Organizational Communication: Behavioral Perspectives. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 MACKENZIE, R.A. The Time Trap. Amacom, New York, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 MALONE, T.W. How do people organize their desks? Implications for the design of office information systems. ACM Trans. Off. Inf. Syst. 1, 1 (Jan. 1983), 99-112. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 MALONE, T. W., GRANT, K. R., LAI, K. Y., RAO, R., AND ROSENBLITT, D.R. Semistructured messages are surprisingly useful for computer-supported coordination. ACM Trans. Off. Inf. Syst. 5, 2 (Apr. 1987), 115-131. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 MALONE, T. W., GRANT, K. R., TURBAK, R. A., BROBST, S. A., AND COHEN, M.D. Intelligent information-sharing systems. Commun. ACM 30 (June 1987), 484-497. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 SPROULL, L., AND KIESLER, S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Manage. Sci. 32, 11 (1986) 1492-1512. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 STASZ, C., AND BIKSON, T. Computer-supported cooperative work: Examples and issues in one federal agency, in Proceedings of the Conference for Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Austin, Tex., Dec. 3-5). ACM, New York, 1986, pp. 318-324. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 TRICKETT, J.M. A more effective use of time. California Management Review 4, 4, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 TRIGG, R. H., AND IRISH, P.M. Hypertext habitats: Experiences of writers in NoteCards. In Proceedings of Hypertext '87 (Chapel Hill, N.C., Nov. 13-15). ACM Press, New York, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 VON HIPPEL, E. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Manage. Sci. 32, 7 (1986), 791-805. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 WEBBER, R.A. Time and Management. Van Nostrand Rineholt, New York, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20 WEICK, K. E. The twigging of overload. In People and Information, H. B. Pepinsky, Ed., Pergamon, New York, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 WILSON, G. L., GOODALL, H. L., AND WAAGEN, C.L. Organizational Communication. Harper and Row, New York, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Diversity in the use of electronic mail: a preliminary inquiry

        Recommendations

        Reviews

        Alan Daniel Wexelblat

        This tantalizing paper presents the results of preliminary surveys of electronic mail users taken just before the MIT Information Lens was introduced into their environment. The questions it raises are interesting enough to make the reader want to hear more, but no answers are available yet. The Lens organizes and filters mail messages both before and after the user reads them; it uses rules and semistructured templates designed by and for the user to help people deal with a previously unstructured electronic world. To determine the effects of this software on a group of professional office workers, Mackay conducted a series of interviews measuring their pre-Lens states. The results, as reported in this paper, are inconclusive but suggest future research directions. Mackay acknowledges repeatedly that the survey results do not answer any questions. Instead, she notes, they generate hypotheses for future testing. The data seem to suggest that electronic mail has diverse uses, though the diversity is constrained. People vary widely in their feelings of control over the environment, ranging from those who feel “in control,” through those who are “on the edge,” to some who freely admit that their electronic mail is completely out of control. I found this paper worthwhile despite preliminary nature and look forward to seeing the end results of the study.

        Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

        Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
          ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 6, Issue 4
          Oct. 1988
          112 pages
          ISSN:1046-8188
          EISSN:1558-2868
          DOI:10.1145/58566
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1988 ACM

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 October 1988
          Published in tois Volume 6, Issue 4

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader