skip to main content
10.1145/637069.637115acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decisionmaking: status of use and problems in development

Published:03 December 1986Publication History

ABSTRACT

Application of computer and information technology to cooperative work and group decisionmaking has grown out of three traditions: computer-based communications, computer-based information service provision, and computer-based decision support. This paper provides an overview of the various kinds of systems that have been configured to meet the needs of groups at work, evaluates the status of these systems in the United States, evaluates the experience with them, assesses barriers to their further development and use, and draws conclusions about future work in this area that should be undertaken. An extensive set of references is provided.

References

  1. Adelman, Leonard 1982. Real time computer support of decision analysis in a group setting. Paper presented at the ORSA/TIMS meeting, Detroit, MI, April 18--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Adelman, Leonard. 1984. Real time computer support for decision analysis in a group setting: Another class of decisiol support systems, Interfaces, 14(2): 75--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Adelman, Leonard, Michael L. Donnell, John F. Patterson and Jonathan J. Weiss. 1981. Issues in the Design and Evaluation of Decision-Analytic Aids. Technical Report TR 81-1-304. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Administrative Management, 1982. New ideas in conference rooms. September: 30--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Allardyce, Linda B., Dorothy M. Amey, Phillip H. Feuerwerger and Roy M. Gulick. 1979. Documentation of Decision-Aiding Software: DECISION Functional Description. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Allardyce, Linda B., Dorothy M. Amey, Phillip H. Feuerwerger and Roy M. Gulick. 1979. Documentation of Decision-Aiding Software: EVAL Functional Description. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Amey, Dorothy M., Phillip H. Feuerwerger and Roy M. Gulick. 1979. Documentation of Decision-Aiding Software: INFER Functional Description. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Amey, Dorothy M., Phillip H. Feuerwerger and Roy M. Gulick. 1979. Documentation of Decision-Aiding Software: OPINT Functional Description. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Amey, Dorothy M., Phillip H. Feuerwerger and Roy M. Gulick. 1979. Documentation of Decision-Aiding Software: RAM Functional Description. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Amey, Dorothy M., Phillip H. Feuerwerger and Roy M. Gulick. 1979. Documentation of Decision-Aiding Software: SCORING RULE Functional Description. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Applegate, Lynda M., Benn R. Kosynski and Jay F. Nunamaker. 1986. Knowledge management in organizational planning. Working paper #PL-16. Tucson, AZ: Department of Management Information Systems, University of Arizona.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Applegate, Lynda M., Benn R. Kosynski and Jay F. Nunamaker. 1986. A group decision support system for idea generation and issue analysis in organizational palnning. Working paper #PL-17. Tucson, Arizona: Department of Management Information Systems, University of Arizona. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Bode, Joseph J. 1983. An executive information system: a DSS case study, in George P. Huber (ed.), DSS-83 Transactions, Third International Conference on Decision Support Systems, June 27--29, Boston, MA. Austin, TX: Institute for Advancement of Decision Support Systems, pp. 129--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Brea, City of. 1982. A communications master plan for the Brea civic cultural center. Brea, CA: March, mimeo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, Rex V. 1978. Research on Decision-Analytic Technology. Final Report PR 78-11-25. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Buede, Dennis M. Undated. Decision conferences at Decisions and Designs, Incorporated. 6 pages plus overhead slides.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Buede, Dennis M. 1979. Decision analysis: engineering science clinical art? Paper prepared for Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, November. 48 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Buede, Dennis M. and Kathleen A. Waslov. 1981. Decision Analytic Workshops. Final Report PR 81-15-324. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Business Week, 1976. Corporate war rooms plug into the computer. August 23: 65,67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. CACI, Inc. 1978. CACI further development of evaluation methodologies for an interactive computer-based group decision making aid, final report. Arlington, VA: CACI, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Chastain, Jean L. 1983. Creation of an information center, DSS-83 Transactions, Third International Conference on Decision Support Systems, June 27--29, Boston, MA. Austin, TX: Institute for Advancement of Decision Support Systems, pp. 97--107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Dalkey, Norm C. 1977. Group decision making. Rep. UCLA-ENG-7749. Los Angeles, CA: School of Engineering and Applied Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Dalkey, Norm C. 1975. Group decision analysis. Rep. UCLA-ENG-7571. Los Angeles, CA: School of Engineering and Applied Science. 40 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. DeSanctis, Geraldine and Brent Gallupe. 1985. GDSS: A brief look at a new concept in decision support, 21st Annual Computer Personnel Research Conference, SIGCPR and SIGBDP, May 2--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Elfont, Mark 1982. Group decision aid: an interactive comuter approach to decision making. Paper presented at the ORSA/TIMS Meeting, Detroit, MI, April 18--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Fischer, Gregory W., Ward Edwards and Clinton W. Kelly, III. 1978. Decision Theoretic Aids for Inference, Evaluation, and Decision Making: A Review of Research and Experience. Technical Report TR 78-1-30. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Fischoff, Baruch, Bernard Goitein and Zur Shapira. 1981. Subjective expected utility: a model of decision making, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(September):391--399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Gardiner, P.C. and W. Edwards. 1975. Public values: multiattribute utility management for social decision making. In Schwartz and Kaplan, eds., Human Judgment and decision Processes. New York: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Gray, Paul 1983. Initial observations from the decision room project. In George P. Huber (ed.), DSS-83 Transactions, Third International Conference on Decision Support Systems, June 27--29, Boston, MA, Transactions, pp. 135--138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Gray, P., Aronofsky, J.S. Berry, N., Hehner, O., Kane, G.R. and Perkins, T.E. 1981. The SMU decision room project. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Decision Support Systems, Execucom Systems Corporation, Austin, TX, pp. 122--129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Grindlay, Andrew. 1980. Information centres, Business Quarterly, Winter:84--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Hammond, Kenneth R. Undated. Externalizing the parameters of quasirational thought. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, mimeo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Hammond, Kenneth R., J.L. Mumpower, and T.H. Smith. 1977. Linking environmental models with models of human judgment; a symmetrical decision aid, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 7(5):358--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Hammond, L.W. 1982. Management considerations for an information center, IBM Systems Journal, 21(2):131--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Hiltz, S.R. and M. Turoff 1981. The evolution of user behavior in a computerized conferencing system. Communications of the ACM. 24(2): 739--751. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Hogarth, Robin M., and Spyros Makridakis. 1981. The value of decision making in a complex environment, Management Science, 27(1):93--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Houston, V. 1983. Survey: Three DSS Products Similar. MIS Week, September 14, Section II, 2--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Howard, R.A. 1980. An assessment of decision analysis, Operations Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Huber, George P. 1980. Organizational science contributions to the design of decision support systems. In Goran Fick and Ralph H. Sprague, Jr., eds., Decision Support Systems: Issues and Challenges. New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 45--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Huber, George P. 1982a. Group decision support systems as aids in the use of structured group management techniques. In Gary Dickson (ed.), DSS-82, Second International Conference on Decision Support Systems Transactions, June 14--16, San Francisco, CA, pp. 96--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Huber, George P. 1982b. Decision support systems: their present nature and future applications. In Gerardo R. Ungson and Daniel N. Braunstein (eds.), Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Inquiry. Belmont, CA: Kent Publishing Company, pp. 249--262.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Huber, George P. 1981a. The nature of organizational decisionmaking and the design of decision support systems. MIS Quarterly, 5(2), June, pp. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Huber, George P. 1981b. Integrating the design of organizations and the design of decision support systems. Paper presented at the ORSA/TIMS meeting, Houston, TX, October 11--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Huber, George P. 1984. Issues in the design of group decision support systems. MIS Quarterly, 8(3):195--204Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Huber, George P. and Andre Delbecq, 1972. Guidelines for combining the judgments of individual members in decision conferences, Academy of Management Journal, (June): 161--174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Institute of Government and Policy Studies (undated). Decision Techtronics Group: The New Perspective. Albany, NY: Nelson A. Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy, State University of New York. 5 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Jerving, J. 1980. Electronic technology speeds decision making, Association Management, 32(6):108--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Jones, Kirk, M. 1981. Technology to support group decision making. Paper presented at the ORSA/TIMS Meeting, Houston, TX, October 11--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaplan, M.F. and S. Schwartz, eds. 1975. Human Judgment and Decision Processes. New York: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaplan, M.F. and S. Schwartz, eds. 1977. Human Judgment and Decision Processes in Applied Settings. New York: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Kelly, Clinton W., Roy M. Gulick and Richard R. Stewart. 1980. The Decision Template Concept. Final Technical Report PR 80-17-99. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Kerr, E. B. and S. R. Hiltz. 1982. Computer-Meditated Communication Systems: Status and Evaluation. New York: Academic Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. King, John Leslie, 1983. Report of visit to SUNY, Albany Decision Techtronics Group, Albany, NY, September 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. King, John Leslie, 1983. Report of visit to First National Bank of Chicago Headquarters, Chicago, IL, September 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. King, John Leslie, 1983. Report of visit to the Gould Corporation, Rolling Meadows, IL, September 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. King, John L. and Kenneth L. Kraemer. 1983. Information Systems and Intergovernmental Relations. In Trudi Miller (ed), Governmental Performance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Kraemer, Kenneth L. 1982. Telecommunications/transportation substitution and energy conservation, Telecommunications Policy, (March): 39--59Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Kraemer, Kenneth L., Dickhoven, Siegfried, Fallows, Susan E. and King, John L. 1983. Computers, Planning Models and Policymaking. Irvine, CA: Public Policy Research Organization, University of California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Kucia, Richard J. 1983. Designing an information center for a new headquarters, in George P. Huber (ed.), DSS-83 Transactions, Third International Conference on Decision Support Systems, June 27--29, Boston, MA. Austin, TX: The Institute for Advancement of Decision Support Systems, pp. 116--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Kunreuther, H.C., and P.J.H. Schoemaker. 1982. Decision analysis for complex systems: integrating descriptive and prescriptive components. In G.R. Ungson and D.N. Braunstein (eds.), Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Inquiry. Belmont, CA: Kent Publishing Company, pp. 263--279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Leal, Antonio, Steven Levin, Steven Johnson, Marcy Agmon, and Gershon Weltman. 1978. An interactive computer aiding system for group decision making. Tech. Rep. PQTR-1046-78-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Leal, Antonio and Judea Pearl. 1977. An interactive program for conversational elicitation of decision structures, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-7 (May): 368--376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Mackinnon, W.J., and L.M. Anderson. 1976. The SPAN III computer program for synthesizing group decisions: weighting participants' judgments in proportion to confidence, Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 8(4):409--410.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Manilla, James. 1980. The meeting room of the future, Public Relations Journal, 36(9): 29--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Marling, W. 1976. Advice and the consensor, MBA, 10(8):32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Martin, Anne W., Terry A. Bresnick and Dennis M. Buede. 1981. Evaluation of Command and Control Centers. Interim Technical Report TR 81-3-328. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Mau, Sonya. 1982. The information center, Access, 82:153--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Merkhofer, M.W., B. Robinson, and R.J. Korsan. 1979. A computer-aided decision structuring process. Tech. Rep. 7320. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Moore, Craig W. An integrated DSS for sales, marketing and planning, in George P. Huber (ed.), DSS-83 Transactions, Third International Conference on Decision Support Systems, June 27--29, Boston, MA. Austin, TX: The Institute for Advancement of Decision Support Systems, pp. 22--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Morris, P.A., and R.D. Smallwood, 1981. A task force decision analysis, Operations Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Moss, Lynn 1982. Marketing News, November 26:Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Nickerson, R.S. and C.E. Feehrer, 1975. Decision making and training: a review of theoretical and empirical studies of decision making and their implications for the training of decision makers. Tech. Rep. NAVTRAEQUIPCEN 73-C-0128-1. Cambridge, MA: BBN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Participation Systems, Inc. 1983. Participate: a tool for managers, 8 pages, mimeo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Patterson, John F., Scott L. Randall, and Richard R. Steward. 1981. Advisory Decision Aids: A Prototype. Technical Report PR 80-27-312. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Pferd, W., L.A. Peralta, and F.X. Predergast. 1979. Interactive graphics teleconferencing, Computer, 18(10):62--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Quinn, Robert E. 1978. Towards a theory of changing: a means-ends model of the organizational improvement process, Human Relations, 3l(5):395--416.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Quinn, Robert E. and Michael R. McGrath 1982. Moving beyond the single-solution perspective: the competing values approach as a diagnostic tool, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18(4):463--472. Quinn, Robert, John Rohrbaugh and Michael R. McGrath. 1985. Automated decision conferencing: How it works, Personnel, 62(11):49--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Robinson, Patrick J. and Brent Stidsen. 1971. Experience with a management information and control laboratory. In Kriebel, Charles H., Richard Van Horn and J. Timothy Heames, Management Information Systems: Progress and Perspectives. Pittsburgh, PA: Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie-Mellon University, pp.253--277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Rohrbaugh, John 1981. hnproving the quality of group judgment: social judgment analysis and the nominal group technique, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28:272--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Rohrbaugh, John 1979. hnproving the quality of group judgment: social judgment analysis and the Delphi technique, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24:73--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Rohrbaugh, John and Paul Wehr. 1978. Judgment analysis in policy formation: a new method for improving public participation, Public Opinion Quarterly, pp. 521--532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Rouse, William B. 1973. Group-computer interaction, Proceedings of the 1973 International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, pp. 145--146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Rouse, William B. 1974. GRPRNK: A group-computer interactive package for ranking of alternatives. Cambridge, MA MIT Community Dialog Project Report No. 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Rouse, William B. 1973a. TAXPKG: A group-computer interactive package for decision making on income taxation policy Cambridge, MA: MIT Community Dialog Project Report No. 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Rouse, William B. 1973b. SOLVER: A group-computer interactive package for general problem solving. Cambridge, MA MIT Comnmnity Dialog Project Report No. 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Rouse, William B. and Thomas B. Sheridan 1973. Utility Approach to Group Decision Making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Community Dialog Project Report No. 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Rouse, William B. and Thomas B. Sheridan 1975. Computer-aided group decision making: theory and practice, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 7:113--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Saleh, J., A. Leal, J. Kim, and J. Pearl. 1979. Progress towards a goal-directed decision support system. UCLA-ENG CSL-7973. Los Angeles, CA: Cognitive Systems Lab, UCLA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Sarin, Sunil. 1984. Interactive on-line conferences. Ph.D. thesis, MIT/LCS/TR-330. Cambridge, MA: Laboratory for Computer Science, MIT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Sarin, Sunil and Irene Grief. 1985. Computer-based real time conferencing systems, Computer, 18(10):33--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Seaver, D.A. 1977. How groups can assess uncertainty: human interaction versus mathematical models. Los Angeles, CA Social Science Research Institute, University of Southern California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Sheridan, Thomas B. 1973. Progress report of the MIT Community Dialog Project, Proceedings of the 1973 International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, Boston, MA, pp. 139--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Sheridan, Thomas B. 1975a. Man-Machine Systems: Information Control and Decision Models of Human Performance Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Sheridan, Thomas B. 1971. New technology for group dialog and social choice, Proceedings of the 1971 Fall Joint Computer Conference, pp. 327--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Sheridan, Thomas B. 1975b. Community dialog technology, Proceedings, IEEE Special Issue on Social Systems Engineering 63(3) (March): 463--475.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Simmons, William W. 1979. "The consensor: a new tool for decision-makers, The Futurist, April: 91--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Sprague, R.H. 1980. "A Framework for the Development of Group Decision Support Systems," MIS Quarterly, 4(4): 1:26Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Steeb, Randall 1978. Automated management of communications with remote systems: a decision analysis approach {source is cu rrently unknown}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Steeb, Randall and Steven C. Johnston. 1981. A computer-based interactive system for group decisionmaking. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11(8):544--552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. Stefik, Mark, Gregg Foster, Daniel G. Bobrow, Kenneth Kahn, Stan Lanning, and Luch Suchman. 1985. Beyond the chalk board: Computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings. Palo Alto: Intelligent Systems Laboratory Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Sticha, Paul J., and John F. Patterson. 1981. Evaluation of Video Teleconference Systems. Final Technical Report TR 80-8-317. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Sticha, Paul J., and John F. Patterson. 1980. Video Teleconference Design Evaluation. Interim Report PR 80-19-317 McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Sticha, Paul J., Scott L. Randall, and Gregory M. Hunter. 1980. Research into Teleconferencing. Final Technical Report TR 80-9-314. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Stodolsky, D., 1981. "Automatic Mediation in Group Problem Solving." Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 13(2): 235:242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Sumner, Mary. 1985. Organization and management of the information center: Case studies. In James C. Wetherbe (ed.) Proceeding of the Twenty-First Annual Computer Personnel Research Conference, May 2--3, 1985, pp.38--49. New York Association for Computing Machinery. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. Telephone interview with Richard G. Miltner, Associate Director - Program Planning, Decision Techtronics Group, SUNY Albany, 6-23-83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Telephone interview with Robert Quinn, Executive Director, Institute of Government and Policy Studies, SUNY, Albany 6-23-83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Torgler, Robert H. 1983. The information center, Information Processing, 2(1): 12--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Turoff, M. 1972. Delphi conferencing: computer-based conferencing with anonymity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 3:159--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  110. Turoff, M. and S.R. Hiltz 1982. Computer support systems for group versus individual decisions. IEEE Transactions on Communications. 30(1): 82--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  111. Ulvila, Jacob W. 1975. A Pilot Survey of Computer Programs for Decision Analysis. Technical Report 75-2. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Ungson, G.R., and D.N. Braunstein (eds). 1982. Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Inquiry. Belmont, CA: Kent Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. U.S. News and World Report 1981, November, 23:Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Von Winterfeldt, D. 1975. An overview, integration, and evaluation of utility theory for decision analysis. Res. Rep. 75-9. Los Angeles, CA: Social Science Research Institute, University of Southern California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Van Nievelt, M.C. Augustus, 1982. Marketing goes on-line: a DSS case study, in Gary W. Dickson, DSS-82 Transactions, Second International Conference on Decision Support Systems, June 14--16, 1982, San Francisco, CA, pp 84--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. Waltrip, R. 1983. The HOBO System. Sacramento, CA: County Data Processing Department.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Weiss, Jonathan J. 1980. QVAL and GENTREE: Two Approaches to Problem Structuring in Decision Aids. Technical Report TR 80-3-97. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. Weiss, Jonathan J., and Clinton W. Kelly, III. 1980. RSCREEN and OPGEN: Two Problem Structuring Decision Aids which Employ Decision Templates. Technical Report TR 80-4-97. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. Youstra, Ray and Enid Squire. 1983. Information Center Implementation Guide, IBM Technical Bulletin, April. New York: The IBM Corporation, 82 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decisionmaking: status of use and problems in development

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CSCW '86: Proceedings of the 1986 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work
            December 1986
            390 pages
            ISBN:9781450373654
            DOI:10.1145/637069
            • Conference Chair:
            • Herb Krasner,
            • Program Chair:
            • Irene Greif

            Copyright © 1986 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 3 December 1986

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,986of7,449submissions,27%

            Upcoming Conference

            CSCW '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader