skip to main content
10.1145/3154862.3154929acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Activating people with dementia using natural user interface interaction on a surface computer

Published:23 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Reminiscence Therapy can act as an effective and conducive method for increasing the Quality of Life (QoL) of people with dementia (PwD) when implemented properly. In addition to non-digital approaches, digitally enhanced systems can be built to elicit positive memories as well as emotions using multimodal interaction and digital content. In the same line, interactive multimedia systems can also be used to provide meaningful, engaging and joyful activities for PwD in order to further increase well-being and QoL.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether using natural user interfaces (NUI) provides benefits to interactive multimedia systems for PwD. Elaborated interaction possibilities should further facilitate the physical and mental activation of PwD as well as stimulate positive feelings, empowerment and joy. Since there are no applications available that satisfy the particular requirements of our user group, we developed an interactive aquarium application as our study object. The application supports touch gestures as well as tangible object interaction.

The application can be used to playfully activate and engage PwD. It can help to establish and to improve communication with PwD, promote positive feelings and, last but not least, be fun. The study demonstrated that interactive multimedia systems using NUI and object interaction are a promising approach to improve the QoL of PwD.

References

  1. Norman Alm, Arlene J. Astell, Maggie Ellis, Richard Dye, Gary Gowans, and Jim Campbell. 2004. A cognitive prosthesis and communication support for people with dementia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 14, 1--2 (2004), 117--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Arlene J. Astell. 2009. REAFF - A framework for developing technology to address the needs of people with dementia. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 499. 5--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Arlene J. Astell, Norman Alm, Gary Gowans, Maggie P Ellis, Philip Vaughan, Richard Dye, and Jim Campbell. 2009. Working with people with dementia to develop technology: The CIRCA and Living in the Moment projects. Vol. 17. Hawker Publications Ltd, 36--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Roland Bischoff, Michael Simm, and Rolf A. Zell. 2004. Der Kampf gegen das Vergessen - Demenzforschung im Fokus. PDF. (2004). Retrieved Febuary 20, 2017 from http://www.gesundheitsforschung-bmbf.de/_media/Demenzforschung.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Joshua Blake. 2012. Natural User Interfaces in .Net. Manning Publications Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Justine Cassell. 1998. A Framework for Gesture Generation and Interpretation. Cambridge University Press, 191--216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining "Gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (MindTrek '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hans Förstl and Christoph Lang. 2011. Was ist ≫Demenz≪"? Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jane Fossey, Lesley Lee, and Clive Ballard. 2002. Dementia care mapping as a research tool for measuring quality of life in care settings: psychometric properties. International journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 17, 11 (2002), 1064--1070.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Deutsche Alzheimer Gesellschaft. 2016. Die nicht-medikamentöse Behandlung von Demenzerkrankungen. PDF. (2016). Retrieved March 14, 2017 from https://www.deutsche-alzheimer.de/fileadmin/alz/pdf/factsheets/infoblatt6_nichtmedikamentoese_behandlung.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Peter Gregor, Alan F. Newell, and Mary Zajicek. 2002. Designing for Dynamic Diversity: Interfaces for Older People. In Proceedings of the Fifth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Assets '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Elmar Gräßel, Jelena Siebert, and Gudrun Ulbrecht. 2013. Was leisten nicht-medikamentöse Therapien bei Demenz? Ein Überblick über aktuelle Projekte. Informationsdienst Altersfragen 40, 2 (2013), 9--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hans Gutzmann and Richard Mahlberg. 2011. Rationelle Therapie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 299--315.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Alina Huldtgren, Anja Vormann, and Christian Geiger. 2015. Reminiscence map: Insights to design for people with dementia from a tangible prototype. In ICT4AgeingWell 2015 - Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health. 233--242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Alzheimer's Disease International. 2016. World Alzheimer Report 2016. PDF. (2016). Retrieved Febuary 15, 2017 from https://www.alz.co.uk/research/worldalzheimerreport2616sheet.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin Kaltenbrunner, Till Bovermann, Ross Bencina, and Enrico Costanza. 2005. TUIO: A Protocol for Table-Top Tangible User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Gesture in Human-Computer Interaction and Simulation. Vannes, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. André Luiz Satoshi Kawamoto, Valéria Farinazzo Martins, and Flavio Soares Corrěa da Silva. 2014. Converging Natural User Interfaces Guidelines and the Design of Applications for Older Adults. International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (2014), 2328--2334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Alessandro Leone, Andrea Caroppo, and Pietro Siciliano. 2014. A virtual trainer by natural user interface for cognitive rehabilitation in dementia. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 8515 LNCS. 300--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Craig A. Lindley. 2004. Ludic Engagement and Immersion as a Generic Paradigm for Human-Computer Interaction Design. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Stephen Lindsay, Katie Brittain, Daniel Jackson, Cassim Ladha, Karim Ladha, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Empathy, Participatory Design and People with Dementia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Bruno Loureiro and Rui Rodrigues. 2011. Multi-touch as a Natural User Interface for elders: A survey. 6th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI 2011) (2011), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Bruno Loureiro and Rui Rodrigues. 2014. Design Guidelines and Design Recommendations of Multi-Touch Interfaces for Elders. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions. 41--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Fabian Mertl, Bastian Dewitz, Uli Braas, Arthur Glomb, Alina Huldtgren, Anja Vormann, and Christian Geiger. 2015. Erinnerungsfenster für Demenzkranke. In Mensch und Computer 2015 -- Proceedings, Sarah Diefenbach, Niels Henze, and Martin Pielot (Eds.). De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin, Germany, 295--298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Outi Mäki and Päivi Topo. 2009. User needs and user requirements of people with dementia: Multimedia application for entertainment. Dementia, design and technology: Time to get involved (2009), 61--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Masahiro Mori, Karl F. MacDorman, and Norri Kageki. 2012. The Uncanny Valley {From the Field}. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine 19, 2 (2012), 98--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Patrizia Murko and Cristophe Kunze. 2015. Tangible Memories: Exploring the use of tangible interfaces for occupational therapy in dementia care. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Design4Health, Sheffield 13-16th July 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kanvar Nayer, Arthur de Bono, Selby Coxon, Eva van der Ploeg, and Daniel O'Connor. 2014. Memory Box: A Personalised Multimedia Device for Individuals with Dementia. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 333--341. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Tanja Schultz, Felix Putze, Ralf Mikut, Nora Weinberger, Katrin Boch, Eric Schmitt, Michael Decker, Dagmar Lind-Matthäus, and Brigitte R. Metz. 2014. Technische Unterstützung für Menschen mit Demenz - Ein Überblick. In Technikkompatibilität von Netzwerken in der ambulanten Pflege von Menschen mit Demenz, T. Schultz, F. Putze, and A. Kruse (Eds.). KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Panote Siriaraya and Chee Siang Ang. 2014. Recreating Living Experiences from Past Memories Through Virtual Worlds for People with Dementia. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3977--3986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Andrew J. Sixsmith, Grant Gibson, Roger D. Orpwood, and Judith M. Torrington. 2007. Developing a technology "wish-list" to enhance the quality of life of people with dementia. Gerontechnology 6, 1 (2007), 2--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Ponnusamy Subramaniam and Bob Woods. 2012. The impact of individual reminiscence therapy for people with dementia: systematic review. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 12, 5 (2012), 545--555.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Päivi Topo. 2009. Technology Studies to Meet the Needs of People With Dementia and Their Caregivers. Journal of Applied Gerontology 28, 1 (2009), 5--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Norman Villaroman, Dale Rowe, and Bret Swan. 2011. Teaching natural user interaction using OpenNI and the Microsoft Kinect sensor. Proceedings of the 2011 conference on Information technology education - SIGITE '11 (2011), 227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Daniel Wigdor and Dennis Wixon. 2011. Brave NUI world: designing natural user interfaces for touch and gesture. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, Mass. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Bob Woods, Aimee E. Spector, Catherine A. Jones, Martin Orrell, and Stephen P. Davies. 2005. Reminiscence therapy for dementia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PervasiveHealth '17: Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
    May 2017
    503 pages
    ISBN:9781450363631
    DOI:10.1145/3154862

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate55of116submissions,47%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader