Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie 1/2015

01.02.2015 | Operative Techniken

Impaction bone grafting for the reconstruction of large bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty

verfasst von: M. Rudert, MD, B.M. Holzapfel, E. von Rottkay, D.E. Holzapfel, U. Noeth

Erschienen in: Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Regeneration of autologous bone stock and formation of a stable implant bed by impaction of morselized bone allograft.

Indications

Bone loss after septic and aseptic loosening or tumour resection.

Contraindications

Persistent infection, one-stage septic revision, poor therapeutic compliance, extensive uncontained metaphyseal defects with cortical thinning of the diaphysis.

Surgical technique

Whilst the surgeon removes the loose prosthesis, the assistant prepares the graft. The medullary canal is sealed with a cement restrictor. Graft particles of different sizes are densely impacted around a trial stem. The highest level of stability is achieved by using large particles interspersed with small filler particles. Low-viscosity cement facilitates cement penetration and ensures strong interdigitation with the impacted graft mass after implantation of the prosthesis. Uncontained metaphyseal defects are treated with prosthetic augments.

Postoperative management

Gait training, physiotherapy with isometric quadriceps exercises, partial weight-bearing for 6 weeks, resistance training begins 8 weeks postoperatively.

Results

Between 2010 and 2012, 28 patients with large bone defects [Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) grade: 21 × F3, 3 × F2, 13 × T3, 8 × T2] underwent total knee revision with impaction bone grafting. The mean follow-up was 27.7 months (range 21–47 months). On average, patients had undergone 2.5 previous revisions. Implant survival was 82.0 % (95 % CI = 62.5 %–92.1 %) for any reason of revision as the endpoint and 93.1 % (95 % CI = 74.5–98.4 %) for aseptic revision as the endpoint. The mean postoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score was 35.4 (range 3.3–101.6, SD ± 26.2). The mean KSS was 70.6 (range 20–100, SD ± 26.8).
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Institut A (2013) 17/7—Knieendoprothesenwechsel und -Komponentenwechsel; Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr 2012. https://www.sqg.de/downloads/Bundesauswertungen/2012/bu_Gesamt_17N7-KNIE-WECH_2012.pdf. Accessed 03 Mar 2014 Institut A (2013) 17/7—Knieendoprothesenwechsel und -Komponentenwechsel; Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr 2012. https://​www.​sqg.​de/​downloads/​Bundesauswertung​en/​2012/​bu_​Gesamt_​17N7-KNIE-WECH_​2012.​pdf.​ Accessed 03 Mar 2014
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00222CrossRefPubMed Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00222CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Reish TG, Clarke HD, Scuderi GR et al (2006) Use of multi-detector computed tomography for the detection of periprosthetic osteolysis in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 19(4):259–264CrossRefPubMed Reish TG, Clarke HD, Scuderi GR et al (2006) Use of multi-detector computed tomography for the detection of periprosthetic osteolysis in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 19(4):259–264CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Holzapfel BM, Reichert JC, Schantz JT et al (2013) How smart do biomaterials need to be? A translational science and clinical point of view. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65(4):581–603. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.009CrossRefPubMed Holzapfel BM, Reichert JC, Schantz JT et al (2013) How smart do biomaterials need to be? A translational science and clinical point of view. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65(4):581–603. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.009CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Toms AD, Barker RL, Jones RS, Kuiper JH (2004) Impaction bone-grafting in revision joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(9):2050–2060 Toms AD, Barker RL, Jones RS, Kuiper JH (2004) Impaction bone-grafting in revision joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(9):2050–2060
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hastings DE, Parker SM (1975) Protrusio acetabuli in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 108:76–83CrossRefPubMed Hastings DE, Parker SM (1975) Protrusio acetabuli in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 108:76–83CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Slooff TJ, Huiskes R, Horn J van, Lemmens AJ (1984) Bone grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusion. Acta Orthop Scand 55(6):593–596CrossRefPubMed Slooff TJ, Huiskes R, Horn J van, Lemmens AJ (1984) Bone grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusion. Acta Orthop Scand 55(6):593–596CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Buma P, Verdonschot N (2001) Basic science of bone impaction grafting. Instr Course Lect 50:211–220PubMed Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Buma P, Verdonschot N (2001) Basic science of bone impaction grafting. Instr Course Lect 50:211–220PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS et al (1993) Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(1):14–21PubMed Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS et al (1993) Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(1):14–21PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ullmark G, Hovelius L (1996) Impacted morsellized allograft and cement for revision total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary report of 3 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 67(1):10–12CrossRefPubMed Ullmark G, Hovelius L (1996) Impacted morsellized allograft and cement for revision total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary report of 3 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 67(1):10–12CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Benjamin J, Engh G, Parsley B et al (2001) Morselized bone grafting of defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:62–67CrossRefPubMed Benjamin J, Engh G, Parsley B et al (2001) Morselized bone grafting of defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:62–67CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley GW (2000) Revision total knee arthroplasty by impaction bone grafting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:113–118CrossRefPubMed Bradley GW (2000) Revision total knee arthroplasty by impaction bone grafting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:113–118CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Heyligers IC, Haaren EH van, Wuisman P (2001) Revision knee arthroplasty using impaction grafting and primary implants. J Arthroplasty 16(4):533–537. doi:10.1054/arth.2001.22391CrossRefPubMed Heyligers IC, Haaren EH van, Wuisman P (2001) Revision knee arthroplasty using impaction grafting and primary implants. J Arthroplasty 16(4):533–537. doi:10.1054/arth.2001.22391CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lonner JH, Lotke PA, Kim J, Nelson C (2002) Impaction grafting and wire mesh for uncontained defects in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:145–151CrossRefPubMed Lonner JH, Lotke PA, Kim J, Nelson C (2002) Impaction grafting and wire mesh for uncontained defects in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:145–151CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lotke PA, Carolan GF, Puri N (2006) Technique for impaction bone grafting of large bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(4 Suppl 1):57–60. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.019CrossRefPubMed Lotke PA, Carolan GF, Puri N (2006) Technique for impaction bone grafting of large bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(4 Suppl 1):57–60. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.019CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Steens W, Loehr JF, Wodtke J, Katzer A (2008) Morselized bone grafting in revision arthroplasty of the knee: a retrospective analysis of 34 reconstructions after 2–9 years. Acta Orthop 79(5):683–688. doi:10.1080/17453670810016713CrossRefPubMed Steens W, Loehr JF, Wodtke J, Katzer A (2008) Morselized bone grafting in revision arthroplasty of the knee: a retrospective analysis of 34 reconstructions after 2–9 years. Acta Orthop 79(5):683–688. doi:10.1080/17453670810016713CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Loon CJ van, Wijers MM, Waal Malefijt MC de et al (1999) Femoral bone grafting in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 65(3):357–363PubMed Loon CJ van, Wijers MM, Waal Malefijt MC de et al (1999) Femoral bone grafting in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 65(3):357–363PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tagil M, Aspenberg P (2004) Impaction grafting: how does it work? In: Delloye C, Bannister G (eds) Impaction bone grafting in revision arthroplasty, 1st edn. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 205–224 Tagil M, Aspenberg P (2004) Impaction grafting: how does it work? In: Delloye C, Bannister G (eds) Impaction bone grafting in revision arthroplasty, 1st edn. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 205–224
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Phemister DB (2008) The classic: repair of bone in the presence of aseptic necrosis resulting from fractures, transplantations, and vascular obstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(5):1021–1033. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0206-7PubMed Phemister DB (2008) The classic: repair of bone in the presence of aseptic necrosis resulting from fractures, transplantations, and vascular obstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(5):1021–1033. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0206-7PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang JS, Tagil M, Aspenberg P (2000) Load-bearing increases new bone formation in impacted and morselized allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 378:274–281CrossRefPubMed Wang JS, Tagil M, Aspenberg P (2000) Load-bearing increases new bone formation in impacted and morselized allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 378:274–281CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tagil M, Aspenberg P (1998) Impaction of cancellous bone grafts impairs osteoconduction in titanium chambers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 352:231–238PubMed Tagil M, Aspenberg P (1998) Impaction of cancellous bone grafts impairs osteoconduction in titanium chambers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 352:231–238PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tagil M, Aspenberg P (2001) Fibrous tissue armoring increases the mechanical strength of an impacted bone graft. Acta Orthop Scand 72(1):78–82. doi:10.1080/000164701753606743CrossRefPubMed Tagil M, Aspenberg P (2001) Fibrous tissue armoring increases the mechanical strength of an impacted bone graft. Acta Orthop Scand 72(1):78–82. doi:10.1080/000164701753606743CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cornu O, Schubert T, Libouton X et al (2009) Particle size influence in an impaction bone grafting model. Comparison of fresh-frozen and freeze-dried allografts. J Biomech 42(14):2238–2242. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.045CrossRefPubMed Cornu O, Schubert T, Libouton X et al (2009) Particle size influence in an impaction bone grafting model. Comparison of fresh-frozen and freeze-dried allografts. J Biomech 42(14):2238–2242. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.045CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu ZJ, Chen LY, Zhong C et al (2011) Mechanical properties of 7–10 mm bone grafts and small slurry grafts in impaction bone grafting. J Orthop Res 29(10):1491–1495. doi:10.1002/jor.21357CrossRefPubMed Xu ZJ, Chen LY, Zhong C et al (2011) Mechanical properties of 7–10 mm bone grafts and small slurry grafts in impaction bone grafting. J Orthop Res 29(10):1491–1495. doi:10.1002/jor.21357CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Brewster NT, Gillespie WJ, Howie CR et al (1999) Mechanical considerations in impaction bone grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(1):118–124CrossRefPubMed Brewster NT, Gillespie WJ, Howie CR et al (1999) Mechanical considerations in impaction bone grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(1):118–124CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunlop D (2004) Impaction bone grafting: a mechanical appraisal with reference to soil engineering. In: Delloye C, Bannister G (eds) Impaction bone grafting in revision arthroplasty. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 57–74 Dunlop D (2004) Impaction bone grafting: a mechanical appraisal with reference to soil engineering. In: Delloye C, Bannister G (eds) Impaction bone grafting in revision arthroplasty. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 57–74
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Engh GA (1997) Bone defect classification. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 63–120 Engh GA (1997) Bone defect classification. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 63–120
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1998) Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation: knee. Orthop Clin North Am 29(2):205–217CrossRefPubMed Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1998) Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation: knee. Orthop Clin North Am 29(2):205–217CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Schafer P, Fink B, Sandow D et al (2008) Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy. Clin Infect Dis 47(11):1403–1409. doi:10.1086/592973CrossRefPubMed Schafer P, Fink B, Sandow D et al (2008) Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy. Clin Infect Dis 47(11):1403–1409. doi:10.1086/592973CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF et al (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(11):2992–2994. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF et al (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(11):2992–2994. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW et al (2011) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(14):1355–1357. doi:10.2106/JBJS.9314eboCrossRef Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW et al (2011) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(14):1355–1357. doi:10.2106/JBJS.9314eboCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Servien E, Viskontas D, Giuffre BM et al (2008) Reliability of bony landmarks for restoration of the joint line in revision knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(3):263–269. doi:10.1007/s00167-007-0449-yCrossRefPubMed Servien E, Viskontas D, Giuffre BM et al (2008) Reliability of bony landmarks for restoration of the joint line in revision knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(3):263–269. doi:10.1007/s00167-007-0449-yCrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Spierings Orthopaedics: Noviomagus Bone Mill. http://www.spierings.biz/index.php/de/products/noviomagus-bone-mill. Accessed 02 Jun 2014 Spierings Orthopaedics: Noviomagus Bone Mill. http://​www.​spierings.​biz/​index.​php/​de/​products/​noviomagus-bone-mill.​ Accessed 02 Jun 2014
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Petheram TG, Howell JR (2014) The Exeter method-acetabular impaction grafting with cemented reimplantation. Oper Orthop Traumatol 26(2):114–125. doi:10.1007/s00064-013-0273-0CrossRefPubMed Petheram TG, Howell JR (2014) The Exeter method-acetabular impaction grafting with cemented reimplantation. Oper Orthop Traumatol 26(2):114–125. doi:10.1007/s00064-013-0273-0CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Donk S van der, Buma P, Slooff TJ et al (2002) Incorporation of morselized bone grafts: a study of 24 acetabular biopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 396:131–141CrossRefPubMed Donk S van der, Buma P, Slooff TJ et al (2002) Incorporation of morselized bone grafts: a study of 24 acetabular biopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 396:131–141CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunlop DG, Brewster NT, Madabhushi SP et al (2003) Techniques to improve the shear strength of impacted bone graft: the effect of particle size and washing of the graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(4):639–646 Dunlop DG, Brewster NT, Madabhushi SP et al (2003) Techniques to improve the shear strength of impacted bone graft: the effect of particle size and washing of the graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(4):639–646
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Donk S van der, Weernink T, Buma P et al (2003) Rinsing morselized allografts improves bone and tissue ingrowth. Clin Orthop Relat Res 408:302–310CrossRefPubMed Donk S van der, Weernink T, Buma P et al (2003) Rinsing morselized allografts improves bone and tissue ingrowth. Clin Orthop Relat Res 408:302–310CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Holzapfel BM, Noth U, Rudert M (2014) A simple technique to seal the medullary canal in cemented revision arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. doi:10.1007/s00590-014-1530-0 Holzapfel BM, Noth U, Rudert M (2014) A simple technique to seal the medullary canal in cemented revision arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. doi:10.1007/s00590-014-1530-0
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Holzapfel BM, Prodinger PM, Hoberg M et al (2010) Periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty: classification, diagnosis and therapy strategies. Orthopade 39(5):519–535. doi:10.1007/s00132-010-1612-6CrossRefPubMed Holzapfel BM, Prodinger PM, Hoberg M et al (2010) Periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty: classification, diagnosis and therapy strategies. Orthopade 39(5):519–535. doi:10.1007/s00132-010-1612-6CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Stiehl JB, Cherveny PM (1996) Femoral rotational alignment using the tibial shaft axis in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:47–55CrossRefPubMed Stiehl JB, Cherveny PM (1996) Femoral rotational alignment using the tibial shaft axis in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:47–55CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Vince KG, Droll KP, Chivas D (2007) Your next revision total knee arthroplasty: why start in flexion? Orthopedics 30(9):791–792PubMed Vince KG, Droll KP, Chivas D (2007) Your next revision total knee arthroplasty: why start in flexion? Orthopedics 30(9):791–792PubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Hube R, Mayr HO, Kalteis T, Matziolis G (2011) Extension first technique for TKA implantation. Oper Orthop Traumatol 23(3):241–248. doi:10.1007/s00064-011-0036-8CrossRefPubMed Hube R, Mayr HO, Kalteis T, Matziolis G (2011) Extension first technique for TKA implantation. Oper Orthop Traumatol 23(3):241–248. doi:10.1007/s00064-011-0036-8CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH et al (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15(12):1833–1840PubMed Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH et al (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15(12):1833–1840PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Impaction bone grafting for the reconstruction of large bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty
verfasst von
M. Rudert, MD
B.M. Holzapfel
E. von Rottkay
D.E. Holzapfel
U. Noeth
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0934-6694
Elektronische ISSN: 1439-0981
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-014-0330-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.