Introduction
Incidence of AKI in ECMO
Pathophysiology of AKI in ECMO
Factors | Pathophysiological mechanisms |
---|---|
Patient-related variables | Hypoperfusion Loss of autoregulation Hypoxia Hypercapnia Nephrotoxins Systemic inflammation Cardiorenal syndrome Increased intrathoracic pressure Increased intra-abdominal pressure Neuro-hormonal effects |
IMV-related factors | Biotrauma |
ECMO-related factors | PEEP |
Hemodynamic variables | Continuous flow (VA-ECMO) Ischemia–reperfusion injury |
Hormonal variables | RAAS dysregulation ANP downregulation |
Circuit-related factors | Blood shear stress Rhabdomyolysis Hemolysis and oxidative stress Embolism Aortic dissection |
Systemic inflammation | Systemic inflammation Renal macro/microcirculatory dysfunction Bioincompatibility Blood/air/surface interaction Hypercoagulable state |
Patient factors and critical illness
Impact of mechanical ventilation
ECMO-related factors
Risk factors for AKI
RRT and ECMO
Indications
Timing
Modality
Modality | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
IHD | Integration in ECMO circuit possible Reduced filter downtime Lower costs than CRRT | Need for more rapid fluid removal Risk of hemodynamic instability Disequilibrium syndrome |
PIRRT | Integration in ECMO circuit possible Reduced filter downtime Lower costs than CRRT Slower volume and solute removal than IHD | Risk of hemodynamic instability in high-risk patients |
CRRT | Integration in ECMO circuit possible Continuous fluid and solute removal Allows more precise control of fluid balance Better hemodynamic stability | Patient immobilization Increased risk of hypothermia High costs |
PD | Better hemodynamic stability Technically simple Lower cost No addition of anticoagulation | Less experience in adult patients Requires specific intraperitoneal catheters Risk of peritonitis Risk of hyperglycemia May interfere with diaphragmatic movements |
Techniques
Techniques | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
In-line hemofilter | Low cost Generates large volumes of UF No need for separate anticoagulation Small priming volume | No pressure monitoring Requires external infusion device to control UF and deliver replacement fluid Less precise UF Limited solute clearance Flow turbulence and risk of hemolysis |
Independent RRT access (parallel system) | Allows fine-tune adjustment of solute and fluid removal Able to provide RRT independent of ECMO Allows use of regional anticoagulation Simplified circuit changing without need for perfusionist Mode of solute clearance not restricted | Need for separate vascular access Risk of mechanical and infectious complications Higher extracorporeal blood volume Technically more complex to manage two separate circuits |
RRT connected to ECMO circuit (integrated system) | Allows fine-tune adjustment of solute and fluid removal Mode of solute clearance not restricted No need for separate vascular access Avoids complications related to line insertion | Pressure alarms (low pressure alarms if connected pre-pump and high pressure alarms when connected post-pump) Requires a RRT machine capable of adjusting alarm settings Risk of air entrapment if access line is connected before centrifugal pump Flow turbulence with risk of hemolysis and thrombus formation Generation of shunt within ECMO circuit Recirculation |