skip to main content
10.1145/1882992.1883026acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using electronic health record systems in diabetes care: emerging practices

Published:11 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

While there has been considerable attention devoted to the deployment of electronic health record (EHR) systems, there has been far less attention given to their appropriation for use in clinical encounters --- particularly in the context of complex, chronic illness. The Department of Veterans' Affairs (VA) has been at the forefront of EHR adoption and, as such, provides a unique opportunity to examine a mature EHR system in widespread use. Moreover, with a high prevalence of diabetes in its patient population, the VA provides a useful platform for examining EHR use in the context of chronic disease care. We conducted a sequential, exploratory qualitative study at two VA Medical Centers in the Midwest. First, we conducted observations of 64 clinical consultations with diabetes patients. These observations involved 31 different health care providers. Second, using insights from these observations, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 39 health care providers focusing on their use of information in diabetes patient care. Field notes and interview transcripts were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Our analysis generated several categories of EHR use in clinical encounters: priming, structuring, assessing, informing, and continuing. We also outline some mismatches between EHR system design and VA diabetes care practices. We conclude by discussing implications of these emergent system uses for improving the software design of EHRs to better support chronic disease care, as well as for our understanding of the integration of technologies in health care.

References

  1. Aarts, J., Ash, J. and Berg, M. 2007. Extending the understanding of computerized physician order entry: implications for professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care. Int. J. Med. Inform., 76, Suppl. 1, S4-S13. DOI= 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Akrich, M. 1992. The description of technical objects. In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. W. Bijker, and J. Law, eds. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, 1992, 205--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Akrich, M. and Latour, B. 1992. A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. W. Bijker, and J. Law, eds. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, 1992, 259--264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Amarasingham, R., Plantinga, L., Diener-West, M., Gaskin, D.J. and Powe, N.R. 2009. Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study. Arch. Int. Med., 169, 2, 108--114. DOI= 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Arar, N.H., Wen, L., McGrath, J., Steinbach, R. and Pugh, J.A. 2005. Communicating about medications during primary care outpatient visits: the role of electronic medical records. Inform. Prim. Care, 13, 1, 13--22. DOI= 10.1370/afm.16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ash, J.S., Sittig, D.F., Campbell, K., Guappone, K. and Dykstra, R. 2006. An unintended consequence of CPOE implementation: shifts in power, control, and autonomy. in AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc., (Washington, DC, Nov. 11-15). AMIA '06, AMIA, Bethesda, MD, 11--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ash, J.S., Sittig, D.F., Dykstra, R.H., Guappone, K., Carpenter, J.D. and Seshadri, V. 2007. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int. J. Med. Inform., 76, Suppl. 1, S21--27. DOI=10.1234/12345678.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Beck, R. S., Daughtridge, R. and Sloane, P.D. 2002. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J. Am. Board Fam. Pract., 15, 1, 25--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Berg, M., Aarts, J. and van der Lei, J. 2003. ICT in health care: sociotechnical approaches. Methods Inf. Med., 42, 4, 297--301. DOI= 10.1267/METH03040297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Blumenthal, D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. 2009. N. Engl. J. Med., 360, 15, 1477-9. DOI= 10.1056/NEJMp0901592.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Blumenthal, D. and Tavenner, M. 2010. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N. Engl. J. Med., 363, 6, 501--4. DOI= 10.1056/NEJMp1006114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Campbell, E.M., Sittig, D.F., Ash, J.S., Guappone, K.P. and Dykstra, R.H. 2006. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 13, 5, 547--556. DOI=10.1197/jamia.M2042.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Wu, S., Maglione, M., Mojica, W., Roth, E., Morton, S.C. and Shekelle, P.G. 2006. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann. Int. Med., 144, 10, 742--752.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Chen, C., Garrido, T., Chock, D., Okawa, G. and Liang, L. The Kaiser Permanente electronic health record: Transforming and streamlining modalities of care. Health Aff., 28, 2, 323--333. DOI= 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.323.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ciechanowski, P.S., Katon. W.J., Russo JE and Walker, E.A. 2001. The patient-provider relationship: attachment theory and adherence to treatment in diabetes. Am. J. Psychiatry, 158, 1, 29--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Coiera, E. Building a national health IT system from the middle out. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 16, 3, 271--273. DOI= 10.1197/jamia.M3183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A.L. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Los Angeles, CA, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. DesRoches, C.M., Campbell, E.G., Rao, S.R., Donelan, K., Ferris, T.G., Jha, A., Kaushal, R., Levy, D.E., Rosenbaum, S., Shields, A.E. and Blumenthal, D. 2008. Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians. N. Engl. J. Med., 359, 1, 50--60. DOI= 10.1056/NEJMsa0802005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Dourish, P. and Bellotti, V. 1992. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, Toronto, 1992. 107--114. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/143457.143468, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Dykstra, R.H. 2002. Computerized physician order entry and communication: reciprocal impacts. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc., (San Antonio, TX, Nov. 9-13). AMIA '02, AMIA, Bethesda, MD, 230--234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Epstein, R.M. 2000. Time, autonomy, and satisfaction. J. Gen. Intern. Med., 15, 7, 517--518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. A. de Gruyter, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Grant, R. W. and Meigs, J. B. 2002. The use of computers in population-based diabetes management. J. Clin. Outcomes Manag., 9, 7, 2002, 390--396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Greatbatch, D., Luff, P., Heath, C.C. and Campion, P. 1993. Interpersonal communication and HCI: an examination of the use of computers in medical consultations. Interact. Comput, 5, 2, 193--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Han, Y., Carcillo, J. and Venkataraman, S. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system {published correction appears in Pediatrics. 2006; 117:594}. Pediatrics, 116. 1506--1512. DOI=10.1542/peds.2005-1287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Haskard, K.B., Williams, S.L. and DiMatteo, M.R. 2009. Physician-patient communication: psychosocial care, emotional-well being and health outcomes. In Communicating to Manage Health and Illness, D.E. Brashers, D.E. and D.J. Goldsmith, eds. Routledge, New York, NY, 15--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Heath, C. and Luff, P. 1996. Documents and professional practice: 'bad' organizational reasons for 'good' clinical records. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, (Boston, MA, 1996), 354--363. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/240080.240342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ibrahim, M. A., Savitz, L. A., Carey, T. S. and Wagner, E. H. 2001. Population-based health principles in medical and public health practice. J. Public Health Manag. Pract., 7, 3, 75--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Johnson, K., Serwint, J., Fagan, L., Thompson, R., Wilson, M. and Roter, D. 2008. Computer-based documentation: effects on parent-provider communication during pediatric health maintenance encounters. Pediatrics, 122, 3, 590--598. DOI= 10.1542/peds.2007-3005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Jones, M.R. 2003. "Computers can land people on Mars, why can't they get them to work in a hospital?" Implementation of an Electronic Patient Record System in a UK Hospital. Methods Inf. Med., 42, 4, 410--415. DOI= 10.1267/METH03040410.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Kaushal, R., Jha, A.K., Franz, C., Glaser, J., Shetty, K.D., Jaggi, T., Middleton, B., Kuperman, G.J., Khorasani, R., Tanasijevic, M. and Bates, D.W. 2006. Return on investment for a computerized physician order entry system. J Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 13, 3, 261--266. DOI= 10.1197/jamia.M1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Kaushal, R., Shojania, K.G. and Bates, D.W. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch. Int. Med., 163, 12, 1409--1416. DOI= 10.1001/archinte.163.12.1409.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Koppel, R., Metlay, J.P., Cohen, A., Abaluck, B., Localio, A.R., Kimmel, S.E. and Strom, B.L. 2005. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medical errors. JAMA, 293, 10, 1197--1203. DOI= 10.1001/jama.293.10.1197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Kupersmith, J., Francis, J., Kerr, E., Krein, S., Pogach, L., Kolodner, R.M. and Perlin, J.B. 2007. Advancing evidence-based care For diabetes: lessons from the Veterans Health Administration. Health Aff., 26, 2, w156--168. DOI= 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.w156,Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Lorenzi, N.M., Kouroubali, A., Detmer, D.E. and Bloomrosen, M. 2009. How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 9, 15. DOI= 10.1186/1472-6947-9-15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Makoul, G., Curry, R.H. and Tang, P.C. 2001. The use of electronic medical records: communication patterns in outpatient encounters. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 8, 6, 610--615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Margalit, R.S., Roter, D., Dunevant, M.A., Larson, S. and Reis, S. 2006. Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Educ. Couns., 61, 1, 134--141. DOI= 10.1016/j.pec.2005.03.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Menachemi, N., Saunders, C., Chukmaitov, A., Matthews, M.C. and Brooks, R.G. 2007. Hospital adoption of information technologies and improved patient safety: a study of 98 hospitals in Florida. J. Healthc. Manag., 52, 6, 398--409.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. 2009. Chronic diseases: the power to prevent, the call to control - at a glance. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. National Research Council. 2009. Computational technology for effective health care: Immediate steps and strategic directions. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Niazkhani, Z., Pirnejad, H., Berg, M. and Aarts, J. 2009. The impact of computerized provider order entry systems on inpatient clinical workflow: a literature review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 16, 4, 539--549. DOI= 10.1197/jamia.M2419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Parente, S. 2009. Health information technology and patient safety: evidence from panel data. Health Aff., 28, 2, 357--360. DOI= 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R. and Kawasumi, Y. 2005. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 12, 5, 505--516. DOI= 10.1197/jamia.M1700.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Rouf, E., Whittle, J., Lu, N. and Schwartz, M.D. 2007. Computers in the exam room: differences in physician-patient interaction may be due to physician experience. J. Gen. Intern. Med., 22, 1, 43--48. DOI= 10.1007/s11606-007-0112-9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Russell, S. and Williams, R. Social shaping of technology: Frameworks, findings and implications for policy with glossary of social shaping concepts. in Sorensen, K. and Williams, R. eds. Shaping technology, guiding policy: concepts, spaces, and tools, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2002, 37--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Shachak, A. and Reis, S. 2009. The impact of electronic medical records on patient-doctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review. J. Eval. Clin. Pract., 15, 4, 641--649. DOI= 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01065.x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Sicotte, C. and Lehoux, P. 2003. Teleconsultation: rejected and emerging uses. Methods Inf. Med., 42, 4, 451--457. DOI= 10.1267/METH03040451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Sittig, D.F., Ash, J.S., Zhang, J., Osheroff, J.A. and Shabot, M.M. 2005. Lessons from "Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system". Pediatrics, 118, 2,s 797--801. DOI= 10.1542/peds.2005-3132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Tierney, W.M., Overhage, J.M., Murray, M.D., Harris, L.E., Zhou, X.-H., Eckert, G.J., Smith, F.E., Nienaber, N., McDonald, C.J. and Wolinsky, F.D. 2003. Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care. J Gen. Intern. Med., 18, 12, 1060--1061.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Timmons, S. 2003. Resistance to computerized care planning systems by qualified nurses working in the UK NHS. Methods Inf. Med., 42, 4, 471--476. DOI= 10.1267/METH03040471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Ventres, W., Kooienga, S., Vuckovic, N., Marlin, R., Nygren, P. and Stewart, V. 2006. Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis. Ann. Fam. Med., 4, 2, 124--131. DOI= 10.1370/afm.425.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Welch, W.P., Bazarko, D., Ritten, K., Burgess, Y., Harmon, R. and Sandy, L.G. 2007. Electronic health records in four community physician practices: Impact on quality and cost of care. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 14, 3, 320--328. DOI= 10.1197/jamia.M2125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Zheng, K., Haftel, H., Hirschl, R., O'Reilly, M. and Hanauer, D. 2010. Quantifying the impact of health IT implementations on clinical workflow: a new methodological perspective. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 17, 4, 454--461. DOI= 10.1136/jamia.2010.004440.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Using electronic health record systems in diabetes care: emerging practices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHI '10: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium
      November 2010
      886 pages
      ISBN:9781450300308
      DOI:10.1145/1882992

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 November 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader