skip to main content
10.1145/2037373.2037401acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Field study of a waiting-time filler delivery system

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

As the variety of mobile services increases, the uses of mobile communications become more diverse and the control of service quality from a user experience perspective becomes increasingly important in mobile service design. The quality of the network is one of the critical factors determining mobile service quality. However, quality has mainly been evaluated in objective physical terms, such as delay reduction and increased bandwidth. It is less common to use a human-centered design viewpoint to improve network performance. In this paper, we discuss a waiting-time filler delivery system that actively addresses the human factor to improve the subjective quality of a mobile network. The main contribution of this paper is to quantitatively show the effect of time fillers on waiting. Field experiments show that time fillers can significantly decrease user dissatisfaction with waiting, but that this effect is strongly influenced by user preferences concerning content.

References

  1. Antonides, G., Verhoef, P. C., and van Aalst, M. Consumer perception and evaluation of waiting time: A field experiment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12 (2002), 193--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bouch, A., Kuchinsky, A., and Bhatti, N. Quality is in the eye of the beholder: Meeting users' requirements for internet quality of service. Proc. CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 297--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Harrison, C., Yeo, Z., and Hudson, S. E. Faster Progress Bars: Manipulating Perceived Duration with Visual Augmentations. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1545--1548. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ibarrola, E., Liberal, F., Taboada, I., and Ortega, R. Web QoE Evaluation in Multi-Agent Networks: Validation of ITU-T G.1030. Proc. ICAS 2009, IEEE (2009), 289--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. ITU. Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality. ITU-T Recommendation P.800, ITU (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ITU. Estimating end-to-end performance in IP networks for data applications, ITU-T Recommendation G.1030, ITU (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ITU. World mobile telecommunication market forecast. Report ITU-R M.2072, ITU (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. ITU. Framework for services supported by IMT. Recommendation ITU-R M.1822, ITU (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ITU. Definition of QoE. ITU-T Appendix I to P.10/G.100, ITU (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Munichor, N. and Rafaeli, A. Numbers or apologies? Customer reactions to telephone waiting time fillers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (2007), 511--518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Niida, S., Uemura, S., and Nakamura, H. Mobile services -User tolerance for waiting time-. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 5(2010), 61--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Uemura, S., Niida, S., and Nakamura, H. A Web script-based method to evaluate user satisfaction of mobile services in the field. Proc. CENTRIC 2010, IEEE (2010), 34--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Field study of a waiting-time filler delivery system

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        MobileHCI '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
        August 2011
        781 pages
        ISBN:9781450305419
        DOI:10.1145/2037373

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 August 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader