skip to main content
10.1145/2037373.2037402acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigating episodes of mobile phone activity as indicators of opportune moments to deliver notifications

Published:30 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We investigate whether opportune moments to deliver notifications surface at the endings of episodes of mobile interaction (making voice calls or receiving SMS) based on the assumption that the endings collocate with naturally occurring breakpoint in the user's primary task. Testing this with a naturalistic experiment we find that interruptions (notifications) are attended to and dealt with significantly more quickly after a user has finished an episode of mobile interaction compared to a random baseline condition, supporting the potential utility of this notification strategy. We also find that the workload and situational appropriateness of the secondary interruption task significantly affect subsequent delay and completion rate of the tasks. In situ self-reports and interviews reveal complexities in the subjective experience of the interruption, which suggest that a more nuanced classification of the particular call or SMS and its relationship to the primary task(s) would be desirable.

References

  1. Adamczyk, P. D. and B. P. Bailey. If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. Proc. CHI 2004. ACM Press (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Avrahmi, D., Forgarty, J., Hudson, S. E. Biases in human estimation of interruptibility: effects and implications for practice. Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Coragio, L. Deleterious effects of intermittent interruptions on the task performance of knowledge workers: a laboratory investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona (1990).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cutrell, E. B., Czerwinski, M., Horvitz E. Effects of instant messaging interruptions on computing tasks. Ext. abstracts CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cutrell, E. B., Czerwinski, M., Horvitz E. Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance. Proc. INTERACT 2001, IOS Press (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., Prescott, S. The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6, 3 (1977), 281--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E., Horvitz, E. Instant messaging: Effects of relevance and timing. People and computers XIV: Proc. HCI 2000, British Computer Society (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dabbish, L. A. Coordinating Initiation and Response in Computer-Mediated Communication. PhD thesis. Pittsburgh, PA, Carnegie Mellon University, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dourish, P. Where the action is. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fischer, J. E., Yee, N., Bellotti, V., Good, N., Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C. Effects of content and time of delivery on receptivity to mobile interruptions. Proc. MobileHCI 2010, ACM Press (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Garson, G. D. Linear Mixed Models. Available at: http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/multilevel.ht m. Last accessed on 18.09.2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gillie, T., Broadbent, D. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psych. Research 50 (1989), 243--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ho, J., Intille, S. S. Using context-aware computing to reduce the burden of interruptions from mobile devices. Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Horvitz, E. J., Apacible J. Learning and reasoning about interruption. Proc. ICMI 2003, ACM Press (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Horvitz, E. J., Apacible, J., Subramani, M. Balancing awareness and interruption: investigation of notification deferral policies. Proc. UM 2005, Springer (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hudson, J. M., Christensen, J., Kellogg, W. A., Erickson, T. "I'd be overwhelmed, but it's just one more thing to do": availability and interruption in research management. Proc. CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Iqbal, S. T., Adamczyk, P. D., Zheng, X. S., Bailey, B. P. Towards an Index of Opportunity: Understanding changes in mental workload during task execution. Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Iqbal, S. T., Bailey, B. P. Understanding and developing models for detecting and differentiating breakpoints during interactive tasks. Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Latorella, K. M. Effects of modality on interrupted flight deck performance: Implications for data link. NASA Langley Technical Report Server (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. McFarlane, D. C., Latorella, K. A. The Scope and Importance of Human Interruption in Human-Computer Interaction Design. HCI 17, 1 (2002), 1--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Miyata, Y., Norman, D. A. Psychological issues in support of multiple activites. In Norman. D. A. (ed.) User-Centered System Design. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1986), 265--284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Monk, C. A., Boehm-Davis, D. A., Tafton, J. G. The attentional cost of interrupting task performance at various stages. Proc. HFES 2002, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2002).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. O'Conaill, B., Frohlich, D. Timespace in the workplace: dealing with interruptions. Proc. CHI 1995, ACM Press (1995). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Oulasvirta, A., Tamminen, S., Roto, V., Kuorelahti, J. Interaction in 4--second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. Proc. CHI 2005, ACM (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Tolmie, P., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Benford, S. "Are you watching this film or what?" Interruptions and the juggling of cohorts. Proc. CSCW 2008, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Wang, H.-C., Fussell, S. R., Setlock, L. D. Cultural Difference and Adaptation of Communication Styles in Computer-Mediated Group Brainstorming. Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Zacks, J. M., Braver, T. S., Sheridan, M. A., Donaldson, D. I., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., Buckner, R. L., Raichie, M. E. Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience 4, 6 (2001), 651--655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Investigating episodes of mobile phone activity as indicators of opportune moments to deliver notifications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MobileHCI '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
      August 2011
      781 pages
      ISBN:9781450305419
      DOI:10.1145/2037373

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 August 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader