skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557189acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Large-scale assessment of mobile notifications

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Notifications are a core feature of mobile phones. They inform users about a variety of events. Users may take immediate action or ignore them depending on the importance of a notification as well as their current context. The nature of notifications is manifold, applications use them both sparsely and frequently. In this paper we present the first large-scale analysis of mobile notifications with a focus on users' subjective perceptions. We derive a holistic picture of notifications on mobile phones by collecting close to 200 million notifications from more than 40,000 users. Using a data-driven approach, we break down what users like and dislike about notifications. Our results reveal differences in importance of notifications and how users value notifications from messaging apps as well as notifications that include information about people and events. Based on these results we derive a number of findings about the nature of notifications and guidelines to effectively use them.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p3055-sidebyside.mp4

mp4

168.1 MB

References

  1. Adamczyk, P. D., and Bailey, B. P. If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. In Proc. CHI (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Böhmer, M., Hecht, B., Schöning, J., Krüger, A., and Bauer, G. Falling asleep with angry birds, facebook and kindle: a large scale study on mobile application usage. In Proc. of MobileHCI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Church, K., and de Oliveira, R. What's up with whatsapp? comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional sms. In Proc. MobileHCI (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M., and Horvitz, E. Notification, disruption, and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. In Proc. Interact (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E., and Horvitz, E. Instant messaging and interruption: influence of task type on performance. In Proc. OZCHI (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., and Wilhite, S. A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In Proc. CHI (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Felt, A. P., Egelman, S., and Wagner, D. Ifive got 99 problems, but vibration ain't one: a survey of smartphone users' concerns. In Proc. SPSM (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fischer, J. E., Greenhalgh, C., and Benford, S. Investigating episodes of mobile phone activity as indicators of opportune moments to deliver notifications. In Proc. MobileHCI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fischer, J. E., Yee, N., Bellotti, V., Good, N., Benford, S., and Greenhalgh, C. Effects of content and time of delivery on receptivity to mobile interruptions. In Proc. MobileHCI (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Henze, N., and Pielot, M. App stores: external validity for mobile hci. interactions 20, 2 (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Henze, N., Pielot, M., Poppinga, B., Schinke, T., and Boll, S. My app is an experiment: Experience from user studies in mobile app stores. IJMHCI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ichikawa, F., Chipchase, J., and Grignani, R. Where's the phone? a study of mobile phone location in public spaces. In Proc. Mobility (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Iqbal, S. T., and Horvitz, E. Notifications and awareness: a field study of alert usage and preferences. In Proc. CSCW (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kim, H., Kim, G. J., Park, H. W., and Rice, R. E. Configurations of relationships in different media: Ftf, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and sms. Computer-Mediated Communication (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Leiva, L., Böhmer, M., Gehring, S., and Krüger, A. Back to the app: the costs of mobile application interruptions. In Proc. MobileHCI (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mark, G., Voida, S., and Cardello, A. "a pace not dictated by electrons": an empirical study of work without email. In Proc. CHI (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. McMillan, D., Morrison, A., Brown, O., Hall, M., and Chalmers, M. Further into the wild: Running worldwide trials of mobile systems. In Proc. Pervasive (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., and Raita, E. Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal Ubiquitous Computing (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pielot, M., de Oliveira, R., Kwak, H., and Oliver, N. Didn't you see my message? predicting attentiveness to mobile instant messages. In Proc. CHI (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Tukey, J. W. Exploratory data analysis. 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Wiese, J., Saponas, T. S., and Brush, A. Phoneprioception: enabling mobile phones to infer where they are kept. In Proc. CHI (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Large-scale assessment of mobile notifications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader