skip to main content
10.1145/1031607.1031638acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Controlling interruptions: awareness displays and social motivation for coordination

Published:06 November 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Spontaneous communication is common in the workplace but can be disruptive. Such communication usually benefits the initiator more than the target of the disruption. Previous research has indicated that awareness displays showing the workload of a target can reduce the harm interruptions inflict, but can increase the cognitive load on interrupters. This paper describes an experiment testing whether team membership influences interrupters' motivation to use awareness displays and whether the informational-intensity of a display influences its utility and cost. Results indicate interrupters use awareness displays to time communication only when they and their partners are rewarded as a team and that this timing improves the target's performance on a continuous attention task. Eye-tracking data shows that monitoring an information-rich display imposes a substantial attentional cost on the interrupters, and that an abstract display provides similar benefit with less distraction.

References

  1. Abel, M.J., Experiences in an exploratory distributed organization, in Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of group work, J. Galegher, R. Kraut, and C. Egido, Editors. 1990, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ. p. 489--510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Begole, J.B., Tang, J.C., and Hill, R. Rhythm modeling, visualizations and applications, in Proceedings of the 2003 Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST 2003). 2003. p. 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cadiz, J.J., Venolia, G.D., Jancke, G., and Gupta, A. Designing and deploying an information awareness interface, in Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2002). 2002. ACM Press. p. 314--323. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M., and Horvitz, E. Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance, in Proceedings of Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2001). 2001. Tokyo, Japan: IOS Press. p. 263--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dabbish, L.A. and Kraut, R.E. Coordinating communication: Awareness displays and interruption, in Extended Abstracts of the ACM conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2003). 2003. ACM Press. p. 786--787. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dourish, P. and Bly, S., Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group, in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1992), 1992, ACM Press. New York. p. 541--547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Erickson, T., Smith, D.N., Kellogg, W.A., Laff, M., Richards, J.T., and Bradner, E. Socially translucent systems: social proxies, persistent conversation, and the design of "babble", in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1999). 1999. p. 72--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fish, R.S., Kraut, R.E., Root, R.W., and Rice, R., Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication. Communications of the ACM, 1993. 36(1): p. 48--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fitts, P.M., Jones, R.E., and Milton, J.L., Eye movements of aircraft pilots during instrument-landing approaches. Aeronautical Engineering Review, 1950. 9(2): p. 24--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fogarty, J., Lai, J., and Christensen, J., Presence versus availability: The design and evaluation of a context-aware communication client. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2004. To appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gaertner, S.L., and Insko, C.A., Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2000. 79(1): p. 77--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldberg, J.H., and Kotval, X.P., Eye movement-based evaluation of the computer interface., in Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety, S.K. Kumar, Editor 1998, ISO Press. Amsterdam. p. 529--532.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Heath, C.G., Jirotka, M., Luff, P., and Hindmarsh, J., Unpacking collaboration: The interactional organisation of trading in a city dealing room. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1995. 3(2): p. 147--165. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Henry, K.B., Arrow, H., Carini, B., A tripartite model of group identification: Theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 1999. 30(5): p. 558--581.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Horvitz, E., Jacobs, A., and Hovel, D. Attention-sensitive alerting, in TY - CONF: Proceedings of Conference on Uncertainty and Articial Intelligence (UAI 1999). 1999. Stockholm, Sweden: Morgan Kaufmann. p. 305--313. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hudson, S. and Smith, I., Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support, in Proceedings of the 1997 SIGCHI Conference, 1996, ACM Press. New York. p. 248--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hudson, S.E., Fogarty, J., Atkeson, C.G., Avrahami, D., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Lee, J.C., and Yang, J. Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: A wizard of Oz feasibility study, in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2003). 2003. ACM Press. p. 257--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A., & Ranganathan, D. Hubbub: A sound-enhanced mobile instant messenger that supports awareness and opportunistic interactions, in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2002). 2002. ACM Press. p. 179--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jacob, R.J.K., and Karn, K.S., Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises (Section Commentary), in The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, J. Hyona, Radach, R., and Deubel, H., Editor 2003, Elsevier Science. Amsterdam. p. 573--605.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kraut, R.E. and Attewell, P., Media use in a global corporation: Electronic mail and organizational knowledge, in Culture of the Internet, S.K., Editor 1997, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mahwah, NJ. p. 323--342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kraut, R.E., Fish, R., Root, R., and Chalfonte, B., Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology., in Human reactions to technology: Claremont symposium on applied social psychology, S. Oskamp, Editor 1990, Sage Publications. Beverly Hills, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. McCarthy, J.C., and Monk, A.F., Measuring the quality of computer-mediated communication. Behavior & Information Technology, 1994. 13(5): p. 311--319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. McFarlane, D., Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 2002. 17(1): p. 63--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mintzberg, H., The manager's job: Folklore and fact, in Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations, R.P. Vecchio, Editor 1997, University of Notre Dame Press. Notre Dame, IN, US. p. 35--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. O'Conaill, B. and Frohlich, D., Timespace in the workplace: Dealing with interruptions, in Extended Abstracts of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1995), 1995, ACM Press. New York. p. 262--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Panko, R.R., Managerial communication patterns. Journal of Organizational Computing., 1992. 2: p. 95--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Perlow, L.A., The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999. 44(1): p. 57--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. RealVNC, RealVNC Ltd., http://www.realvnc.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Reder, S. and Schwab, R.G., The communicative economy of the workgroup: Multi-channel genres of communication, in Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 1988), 1988, ACM Press. New York. p. 354--368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Reder, S. and Schwab, R.G., The temporal structure of cooperative activity. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 1990), 1990. p. 303--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sproull, L., The nature of managerial attention, in Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, L. Sproull and J. Larkey, Editors. 1984, JAI Press. New York. p. 9--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Tang, J.C., Isaacs, E.A., and Rua, M., Supporting distributed groups with a montage of lightweight interactions, in Proceeding of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 1994), 1994, ACM Press. New York. p. 23--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Tang, J.C., Yankelovich, N., Begole, J.B., Van Kleek, M., Li, F., and Bhalodia, J. ConNexus to Awarenex: Extending awareness to mobile users, in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2001). 2001. p. 221--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Teasley, S., Covi, L., Krishnan, M.S., and Olson, J.S. How does radical collocation help a team succeed?, in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2000). 2000. ACM Press. p. 339--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Tetard, F., On fragmentation of working time: A study of causes and effects on work interruptions. Institute for Advanced Management Systems Research, IAMSR Research Report 99, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. van der Vegt, G., Emans, B., and van de Vliert, E., Motivating effects of task and outcome interdependence in work teams. Group & Organization Management, 1998. 23(2): p. 124--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Whittaker, S., Frohlich, D., and Daly-Jones, O., Informal workplace communication: What is it like and how might we support it?, in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1994), 1994, ACM Press. New York. p. 131--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Wickens, C.D.a.H., J.G., Engineering psychology and human performance. 3rd ed. 2000, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Controlling interruptions: awareness displays and social motivation for coordination

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CSCW '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
            November 2004
            644 pages
            ISBN:1581138105
            DOI:10.1145/1031607

            Copyright © 2004 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 6 November 2004

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            CSCW '04 Paper Acceptance Rate53of176submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

            Upcoming Conference

            CSCW '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader