skip to main content
10.1145/1124772.1124881acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Responsiveness in instant messaging: predictive models supporting inter-personal communication

Published:22 April 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

For the majority of us, inter-personal communication is an essential part of our daily lives. Instant Messaging, or IM, has been growing in popularity for personal and work-related communication. The low cost of sending a message, combined with the limited awareness provided by current IM systems result in messages often arriving at inconvenient or disruptive times. In a step towards solving this problem, we created statistical models that successfully predict responsiveness to incoming instant messages -- simply put: whether the receiver is likely to respond to a message within a certain time period. These models were constructed using a large corpus of real IM interaction collected from 16 participants, including over 90,000 messages. The models we present can predict, with accuracy as high as 90.1%, whether a message sent to begin a new session of communication would get a response within 30 seconds, 1, 2, 5, and 10 minutes. This type of prediction can be used, for example, to drive online-status indicators, or in services aimed at finding potential communicators.

References

  1. Avrahami, D., Gergle, D., Hudson, S.E. and Kiesler, S. Improving the match between callers and receivers: A study on the effect of contextual information on cell phone interruptions. Behavior & Information Technology (in press). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Avrahami D. & Hudson S. E. QnA: Augmenting an instant messaging client to balance user responsiveness and performance. In Proc. CSCW'04, ACM Press (2004), 515--518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barabási, A.L. The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature, 435, Nature Publishing (2005), 207--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Begole J., Matsakis N. E. & Tang J. C. Lilsys: Sensing unavailability. In Proc. CSCW'04, ACM Press (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Begole, J., Tang, J.C., Smith, R.E., and Yankelovich, N. Work rhythms: Analyzing visualizations of awareness histories of distributed groups. In Proc. CSCW'02, ACM Press (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cerulean Studios - Trillian Pro http://www.trillian.ccGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M. and Horvitz, E. Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance. In Proc. INTERACT'01, IOS Press (2001), 263--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dabbish L. and Kraut R. Controlling interruptions: Awareness displays and social motivation for coordination. In Proc. CSCW'04, ACM Press (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fogarty J., Hudson S. E. & Lai J. Examining the robustness of sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility. In Proc. CHI'04, ACM Press (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fogarty J., Ko A. J., Aung H. H., Golden E., Tang K. P. & Hudson S. E. Examining task engagement in sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility. In Proc. CHI'05, ACM Press (2005), 331--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fogarty J., Lai J. & Christensen J. Presence versus availability: The design and evaluation of a context-aware communication client. IJHCS, 61, 3, (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Freund, Y., and Schapire, R.E. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In Proc. ICML'96, Morgan Kaufmann (1996), 148--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gillie, T., and Broadbent, D. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity and complexity. Psychological Research, 50, 1 (1989), 243--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Grinter, R. and Palen, L. Instant Messaging in Teen Live, In Proc. CSCW'02, ACM Press (2002), 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Horvitz E. & Apacible J. Learning and reasoning about interruption. In Proc. ICMI'03, ACM Press (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Horvitz E., Koch P., Kadie C. M. & Jacobs A. Coordinate: Probabilistic forecasting of presence and availability. In Proc. UAI'02, Morgan Kaufmann (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Horvitz E., Koch P. & Apacible J. BusyBody: Creating and fielding personalized models of the cost of interruption. In Proc. CSCW'04, ACM Press (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hudson, J.M., Christensen, J., Kellogg, W.A., and Erickson, T. "I'd be overwhelmed, but it's just one more thing to do": Availability and interruption in research management. In Proc. CHI'02, ACM Press (2002), 97--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hudson S., Fogarty J., Atkeson C., Avrahami D., Forlizzi J., Kiesler S., Lee J. & Yang J. Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: A Wizard of Oz feasibility study. In Proc. CHI'03, ACM Press (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A., Whittaker, S., Schiano, D.J. and Kamm, C. The Character, Functions, and Styles of Instant Messaging in the Workplace. In Proc. CSCW'02, ACM Press (2002), 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kohavi, R. and John, G.H. Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection. Artificial Intelligence, 97, 1-2, ACM Press (1997), 273--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lotus Sametime http://www.lotus.com/sametimeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Milewski, A.E. and Smith, T.M. Providing Presence Cues to Telephone Users. In Proc. CSCW'00, ACM Press (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Nagel K. S., Hudson J. M. & Abowd G. D. Predictors of availability in home life context-mediated communication. In Proc. CSCW'04, ACM Press (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Nardi, B., Whittaker, S. and Bradner, E. Interaction and Outeraction: Instant Messaging in Action. In Proc. CSCW'00. ACM Press (2000), 79--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. O'Conaill, B., and Frohlich, D. Timespace in the workplace: dealing with interruptions. In Conference companion CHI'95, ACM Press (1995), 262--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Voida, A., Newstetter, W. C., and Mynatt, E. D. When conventions collide: the tensions of instant messaging attributed. In Proc. CHI'02, ACM Press (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Witten, I.H. and Frank, E. Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques, 2nd Edition, Morgan Kaufmann (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Responsiveness in instant messaging: predictive models supporting inter-personal communication

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2006
      1353 pages
      ISBN:1595933727
      DOI:10.1145/1124772

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 April 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader