skip to main content
10.1145/2971648.2971732acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

In-situ investigation of notifications in multi-device environments

Published:12 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smart devices have arrived in our everyday lives. Being able to notify the user about events is a core feature of these devices. Related work investigated interruptions caused by notifications on single devices. In this paper, we investigate notifications in multi-device environments by analyzing the results of a week-long in-situ study with 16 participants. We used the Experience Sampling Method (ESM) and recorded the participants' interaction with smartphones, smartwatches, tablets and PCs. Disregarding the type or content of notifications, we found that the smartphone is the preferred device on which to be notified. Further, we found that the proximity to the device, whether it is currently being used and the user's current location can be used to predict if the user wants to receive notifications on a device. The findings can be used to design future multi-device aware smart notification systems.

References

  1. Jacob Cohen. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edn. Hillsdale, New Jersey: L. (1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sunny Consolvo and Miriam Walker. 2003. Using the Experience Sampling Method to Evaluate Ubicomp Applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2, 2 (2003), 24--31. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2003.1203750 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Reed Larson. 2014. Validity and Reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method. In Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. Springer, 35--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mary Czerwinski, Eric Horvitz, and Susan Wilhite. 2004. A Diary Study of Task Switching and Interruptions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 175--182. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/985692.985715 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Joel E. Fischer, Chris Greenhalgh, and Steve Benford. 2011. Investigating Episodes of Mobile Phone Activity As Indicators of Opportune Moments to Deliver Notifications. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 181--190. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037402 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Joel M Hektner, Jennifer A Schmidt, and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2007. Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Joyce Ho and Stephen S. Intille. 2005. Using Context-aware Computing to Reduce the Perceived Burden of Interruptions from Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 909--918. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055100 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Shamsi T. Iqbal and Brian P. Bailey. 2008. Effects of Intelligent Notification Management on Users and Their Tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 93--102. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357070 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Shamsi T. Iqbal and Eric Horvitz. 2010. Notifications and Awareness: A Field Study of Alert Usage and Preferences. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27--30. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718926 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Luis Leiva, Matthias Böhmer, Sven Gehring, and Antonio Krüger. 2012. Back to the App: The Costs of Mobile Application Interruptions. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 291--294. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2371574.2371617 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tadashi Okoshi, Julian Ramos, Hiroki Nozaki, Jin Nakazawa, Anind K. Dey, and Hideyuki Tokuda. 2015. Reducing Users' Perceived Mental Effort Due to Interruptive Notifications in Multi-device Mobile Environments. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 475--486. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2807517 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Martin Pielot, Karen Church, and Rodrigo de Oliveira. 2014a. An In-Situ Study of Mobile Phone Notifications. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services (MobileHCI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 233--242. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628364 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Martin Pielot, Rodrigo de Oliveira, Haewoon Kwak, and Nuria Oliver. 2014b. Didn't You See My Message?: Predicting Attentiveness to Mobile Instant Messages. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3319--3328. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556973 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Niels Henze, Tilman Dingler, Martin Pielot, Dominik Weber, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2014. Large-scale Assessment of Mobile Notifications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3055--3064. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557189 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Alireza Sahami Shirazi and Niels Henze. 2015. Assessment of Notifications on Smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1111--1116. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2786567.2794338 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dominik Weber, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, and Niels Henze. 2015. Towards Smart Notifications Using Research in the Large. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1117--1122. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2786567.2794334 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jason Wiese, T. Scott Saponas, and A.J. Bernheim Brush. 2013. Phoneprioception: Enabling Mobile Phones to Infer Where They Are Kept. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2157--2166. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481296 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. In-situ investigation of notifications in multi-device environments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
      September 2016
      1288 pages
      ISBN:9781450344616
      DOI:10.1145/2971648

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 September 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UbiComp '16 Paper Acceptance Rate101of389submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader