Concomitant familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia and single parathyroid adenoma: a case report

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a common endocrine disorder and is the most frequent benign cause of hypercalcemia. It is characterized by autonomous hypersecretion of parathyroid hormone (PTH), independently of serum calcium levels. Parathyroid adenoma(s) and parathyroid hyperplasia are the main causes of PHPT [1]. Familiar forms of PHPT (FPHPT) represent less than 5% of the total PHPT cases and include, among others, familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (FHH) and multiple endocrine neoplasia types 1 and 2A (MEN1 and MEN2A) [2].

FHH is a rare, benign syndrome only affecting the regulation of calcium metabolism, as first reported in 1972 by Foley et al. [3]. The familiar form FHH is an autosomal-dominant genetic disease with high penetrance, caused by an inactivating variant in the CASR gene encoding the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR), first reported by Pollack et al. in 1993 [4]. Since then, other pathogenic variants in GNA11 and AP2S1 have been introduced in clinical practice. The pathogenic variants lead to lifelong hypercalcemia, with no other organ involvement. Other FPHPTs are frequently associated with other endocrine, proliferative, and/or functional disorders, such as non-endocrine tumors associated with MEN1, MEN2A, MEN4, and hereditary hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome (HPT-JT) [5].

A small number of cases have reported parathyroid adenoma in patients with FHH [6‐13]. In this case report we present a 47-year-old man with severe hypercalcemia, genetic FHH, and a significant parathyroid adenoma at the lower left gland, without clinically actionable variants in MEN1.

In May 2017 the Caucasian patient was admitted to an endocrine clinic due to 6 months of nonspecific symptoms. The patient suffered from general malaise, nonspecific abdominal pain, and paresthesia in his fingers. He had a known history of FHH type 1 which was genetically confirmed in 2008, identifying the pathogenic (class 5) heterozygous CASR variant (NM_000388, c.644A>G, p.Asp215Gly in exon 4). The patient owned a medium-sized service company. He lived in the countryside with his wife and children. He had never smoked. At first admission, the patient had no signs of kidney stones and received no treatment. Biochemical evaluation showed elevated plasma ionized calcium (iCa) of 1.87 mmol/L and PTH 17.0 pmol/L with low 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) of 21 nmol/L and phosphate 0.60 mmol/L. The kidney function was normal, and the initial parathyroid scintigraphy revealed no focus (Table 1). The results of clinical evaluation were normal, with height of 182 cm, weight 83 kg, blood pressure 130/82, heart rate 48 beats per minute, and normal electrocardiography (ECG.) No signs of musculoskeletal symptoms and no neurological symptoms were observed.

After 5 months of treatment with 50 µg vitamin D daily, 25OHD had normalized to 88 nmol/L and PTH had decreased to 12.5 pmol/L. However, the symptoms of tiredness, abdominal pain, and hypercalcemia of iCa 1.88 mmol/L remained unchanged. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showed chronic pancreatitis but no renal calcification. The patient was observed (watchful waiting) until June 2018, with no change in clinical symptoms during this period.

In June 2018, reevaluation of the patient showed iCa 1.77 mmol/L, PTH 22.2 pmol/L with 25OHD of 46 nmol/L, and phosphate 0.64 mmol/L. The calcium–creatinine clearance ratio was low, 0.006. All other biochemical measures were normal, including the kidney function.

Three months later, cinacalcet treatment of 60 mg per day was initiated due to persisting high iCa and PTH levels. However, the iCa and PTH levels did not change, and cinacalcet was terminated. In January 2019, cinacalcet was reintroduced due to persistent high levels of iCa of 1.89 mmol/L and PTH of 18.5 pmol/L. A new parathyroid scintigraphy (subtractions-single-photon emission computed tomography/CT) revealed a single adenoma equivalent to the lower left gland corresponding to finding a 1.5-cm adenoma on CT evaluation (Fig. 1).

After a month, the cinacalcet dosage was increased to 60 mg twice daily, as the initial dosage of 60 mg once daily only resulted in a decrease in iCa to 1.71 mmol/L. A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan confirmed normal bone mineral density.

After the diagnosis of PHPT was confirmed, parathyroid surgery was completed in September 2019. A single 0.828-g parathyroid adenoma was removed in toto from beneath the left thyroid lobe. PTH decreased 52% perioperatively. The day after surgery, iCa was 1.45 mmol/L. Two weeks post-surgery, iCa was 1.51 mmol/L, and PTH normalized at 3.8 pmol/L. Since surgery, the patient has had no symptoms apart from his chronic pancreatitis. Clinically, the patient showed no hypercalcemic symptoms: blood pressure 121/69, heart rate 50 beats per minute. Respiratory findings were normal, with a rate of 12 breaths per minute and 99% saturation.

Genetic evaluation was redone, adding sequencing of other genes associated with hyperparathyroidism (AP2S1, CASR, CDC73, CDKN1B, GNA11, MEN1 and RET) including screening for mosaicism. Apart from a likely benign (class 2) MEN1 variant (c.762 G>A, p.Leu254Leu), no clinically actionable variants were added. The patient was clinically reevaluated 12 month postoperatively with no sign of hypercalcemic symptoms: weight stable at 83.9 kg; height 182 cm; BMI 24.7. Blood pressure was normal at 130/82. ECG was clinically normal with a heart rate of 48 beats per minute; no respiratory pathological findings; no sign of musculoskeletal symptoms; and no neurological symptoms.

In order to confirm that the remaining hypercalcemia was due to FHH, we found that his cousin carried the same CASR, c.644A>G, p.Asp215Gly (Fig. 2), and had iCa of 1.44 mmol/L and PTH of 2.1 pmol/L without any other symptoms of disease. The elevated iCa and corresponding normal PTH of this family member confirmed the pathogenicity of the CASR variant leading to elevated iCa without hyperparathyroidism.

The present case is an example of severe hypercalcemia in a middle-aged man with known FHH due to the development of a parathyroid adenoma. Treatment with high-dose cinacalcet was necessary to lower iCa and improve the patient’s well-being during the diagnostic period. Parathyroidectomy normalized PTH levels and reduced hypercalcemia, and the patient’s hypercalcemic symptoms resolved. PHPT is a common disease in adults. The high parathyroid state in PHPT causes increased renal absorption of calcium, increased bone turnover, and increased activated vitamin D, which in turn enhances calcium absorption from the intestine. PHPT is often asymptomatic and randomly discovered, and only in rare cases can lead to severe life-threatening hypercalcemia. In contrast to PHPT, FHH is a rare, genetic disorder which predominantly results in asymptomatic hypercalcemia with no significant clinical consequences. Our patient had a known pathogenic (class 5) heterozygous CASR variant (NM_000388, c.644A>G, p.Asp215Gly in exon 4). The variant had previously been identified in another family with FHH, and a functional study had confirmed that the variant leads to inactivation of the protein [14, 15]. The two diseases may share clinical manifestations and biochemical findings as presented in this and other cases. Previous cases of simultaneously diagnosed PHPT and FHH in patients presenting with hypercalcemic symptoms have been described [6‐9, 11, 12]. Distinguishing between the two entities can be complicated and must be carefully taken into consideration in the evaluation of hypercalcemia [16]. Reevaluation is necessary if the patient presents residual hypercalcemia after parathyroidectomy. In this case, as in a few others, PHPT develops in a patient with known FHH, which may lead to diagnostic delay, as the clinicians may be more likely to attribute the hypercalcemia to the known disease [10, 13]. Later presentation of hypercalcemic symptoms or organ manifestations, as in our patient developing general malaise and chronic pancreatitis with no obvious cause, should lead to diagnostic reevaluation. Pancreatitis secondary to both PHPT and FHH has been described [17, 18]. The mechanisms, however, are not fully understood. Our patient had persistent nonspecific abdominal symptoms even after parathyroid surgery had restored the calcium levels to FHH baseline levels, probably due to his chronic pancreatitis. These examples of coexisting hypercalcemic disease highlight the importance of following standard diagnostic measures for hypercalcemia as recommended in international guidelines, and reevaluating the patient if changes in clinical or biochemical presentation occur [2, 19]. The consensus of a standard biochemical measure to differentiate between FHH and PHPT is the calcium–creatinine clearance ratio. This measure is not useful for diagnosing concomitant FHH and PHPT, as in the present case. In addition, a recent study showed limitations of the calcium–creatinine clearance ratio in general in differentiating between FHH and PHPT [20]. Thus, a combination of clinical symptoms, family history, biochemical testing, parathyroid scintigraphy, and genetic testing is required to distinguish FHH from PHPT and also to exclude MEN1. In our case, there was a known variant of unknown significance in MEN1 at the first genetic analysis. As the patient developed PHPT years later, the MEN1 variant was reevaluated and classified as likely benign. The variant was classified in accordance with American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines [21]. In conclusion, correct diagnosis of the underlying cause of hypercalcemia is important to ensure the right treatment, as highlighted by the present case of a patient with known FHH developing PHPT. Patients with FHH should avoid operative treatment, and PHPT should be differentiated from MEN1 to determine whether parathyroidectomy should include the removal of one adenoma or 3.5 hyperplastic parathyroid glands.