Skip to main content
Erschienen in: international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine 4/2012

01.12.2012 | original article

Evaluation of flexural strength and shear bond strength of repaired microhybrid composite with varied surface treatments

An in vitro study

verfasst von: Sunit K. Jurel, MDS, Raghuwar Dayal Singh, MDS, Durga Shanker Gupta, MDS, Pooran Chand, MDS, Ramashanker Siddhartha, MDS

Erschienen in: international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine | Ausgabe 4/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different surface treatments on the flexural strength (FS) and shear bond strength (SBS) of repaired microhybrid composite.

Materials and methods

For the FS test composite specimens (n  = 36: 2 mm ´ 2 mm ´ 12.5 mm) used for repair were shaped in a silicone mould. For the SBS test composite specimens (n = 36: diameter =  8 mm, thickness = 3 mm) used for repair were shaped in a metal mould, cured in visible light, and embedded in dental stone. Three different methods of surface preparation were evaluated: group A (control) specimens were treated by etching with 35 % phosphoric acid, group B specimens were air abraded with 50 μm aluminium oxide at 100 psi and group C specimens received two parallel 1 mm deep grooves using a 1/4 round burr before being treated by etching with 35 % phosphoric acid. After surface treatment a bonding agent was placed on each specimen and light-cured. Repairs were accomplished by adding more composite to the FS or SBS specimens. Specimens were thermocycled 500 times between 5 °C and 55 °C with 30 s dwell times. All specimens were tested by loading to failure at a rate of 0.5 mm/min using an Instron universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA test to compare the means of each group within the SBS or FS tests and Tukey post hoc tests (p < 0.05) were used to detect any differences.

Results

Mean FS values (MPa) were: group A = 60.5 ± 9.9, group B = 73.9 ± 13.2 and group C = 81.3± 14.3. Mean SBS values (MPa) were: group A = 24.5 ± 4.4, group B = 28.5 ± 4.3 and group C = 27.0 ± 2.8. The FSs of groups B and C were significantly greater than in group A but there was no significant difference between group C and group B. For the SBS test group B was significantly greater than in group A but with no significant differences between groups C and B.

Conclusions

Acid etching alone was not very effective in producing well-bonded composite repairs. Mechanical retention was more effective than acid etching and as effective as or more effective than air-abrasion (p < 0.05) for repaired composite specimens.

Clinical significance

Either mechanical retention or air abrasion is recommended prior to repairing an existing composite restoration to achieve the highest bond strength.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J. Effects of surface properties on bond strength between layers of newly cured dental composites. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:358–60.PubMedCrossRef Li J. Effects of surface properties on bond strength between layers of newly cured dental composites. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:358–60.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis G, Johnson W, Martin W, Canerdy A, Claburn C, Collier M. Shear bond strength of immediately repaired light-cured composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1998;23:121–7.PubMed Lewis G, Johnson W, Martin W, Canerdy A, Claburn C, Collier M. Shear bond strength of immediately repaired light-cured composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1998;23:121–7.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyer DB, Chan KC, Reinhardt JW. Build-up and repair of light cured composites: bond strength. J Dent Res. 1984;63:1241–4.PubMedCrossRef Boyer DB, Chan KC, Reinhardt JW. Build-up and repair of light cured composites: bond strength. J Dent Res. 1984;63:1241–4.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Söderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res. 1991;99:173–80.PubMed Söderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res. 1991;99:173–80.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent. 1998;26:685–94.PubMedCrossRef Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent. 1998;26:685–94.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Swift EJ Jr, Cloe BC, Boyer DB. Effect of a silane coupling agent on composite repair strengths. Am J Dent. 1994;7:200–2.PubMed Swift EJ Jr, Cloe BC, Boyer DB. Effect of a silane coupling agent on composite repair strengths. Am J Dent. 1994;7:200–2.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sau CW, Oh GS, Koh H, Chee CS, Lim CC. Shear bond strength of repaired composite resins using a hybrid composite resin. Oper Dent. 1999;24:156–61.PubMed Sau CW, Oh GS, Koh H, Chee CS, Lim CC. Shear bond strength of repaired composite resins using a hybrid composite resin. Oper Dent. 1999;24:156–61.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Guzman A, Moore BK. Influence of surface treatment on bond strength between a heat-activated and a light-activated resin composite. Inter J Prosthodont. 1995;8:179–86. Guzman A, Moore BK. Influence of surface treatment on bond strength between a heat-activated and a light-activated resin composite. Inter J Prosthodont. 1995;8:179–86.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner CW, Meiers JC. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent. 1993;18(5):187–94.PubMed Turner CW, Meiers JC. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent. 1993;18(5):187–94.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Puckett AD, Holder R, O’Hara JW. Strength of posterior composite repairs using different composite/bonding agent combinations. Oper Dent. 1991;16:136–40.PubMed Puckett AD, Holder R, O’Hara JW. Strength of posterior composite repairs using different composite/bonding agent combinations. Oper Dent. 1991;16:136–40.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Saunders WP. Effect of fatigue upon the interfacial bond strength of repaired composite resins. J Dent. 1990;18(3):158–62.PubMedCrossRef Saunders WP. Effect of fatigue upon the interfacial bond strength of repaired composite resins. J Dent. 1990;18(3):158–62.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouschlicher MR, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA. Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. Am J Dent. 1997;10:279–83.PubMed Bouschlicher MR, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA. Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. Am J Dent. 1997;10:279–83.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen C, Mondragon E, Gordan VV, Mjör IA. The effect of mechanical undercuts on the strength of composite repair. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:1406–12.PubMed Shen C, Mondragon E, Gordan VV, Mjör IA. The effect of mechanical undercuts on the strength of composite repair. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:1406–12.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Rest. 1997;76:1298–307.CrossRef Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Rest. 1997;76:1298–307.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Wang Z. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test. Dent Mater. 1995;11:126–31.PubMedCrossRef DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Wang Z. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test. Dent Mater. 1995;11:126–31.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res. 1995;74:1591–6. Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res. 1995;74:1591–6.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tjandrawinata R, Irie M, Suzuki K. Flexural properties of eight flowable light cured restorative materials, in immediate vs 24-hour water storage. Oper Dent. 2005;30:239–49.PubMed Tjandrawinata R, Irie M, Suzuki K. Flexural properties of eight flowable light cured restorative materials, in immediate vs 24-hour water storage. Oper Dent. 2005;30:239–49.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 10th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2003. pp. 52–4, 62–3, 82–3, 665–6. Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 10th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2003. pp. 52–4, 62–3, 82–3, 665–6.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouschlicher MR, Cobb DS, Boyer DB. Radiopacity of compomers, flowable and conventional resin composites for posterior restorations. Oper Dent. 1999;24(1):20–5.PubMed Bouschlicher MR, Cobb DS, Boyer DB. Radiopacity of compomers, flowable and conventional resin composites for posterior restorations. Oper Dent. 1999;24(1):20–5.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77(2):122–6.PubMedCrossRef Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77(2):122–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of flexural strength and shear bond strength of repaired microhybrid composite with varied surface treatments
An in vitro study
verfasst von
Sunit K. Jurel, MDS
Raghuwar Dayal Singh, MDS
Durga Shanker Gupta, MDS
Pooran Chand, MDS
Ramashanker Siddhartha, MDS
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2012
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine / Ausgabe 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1867-2221
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-223X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12548-012-0058-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2012

international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine 4/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.