Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 3/2024

17.01.2024 | Original Article

No difference in prevalence of postoperative iliopsoas tendinitis in patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery when using absorbable versus non-absorbable suture for capsular closure

verfasst von: Michael Moore, Ian Savage-Elliott, Kevin Lehane, Zachary I. Li, Steven Magister, Thomas Hoffmeister, Thomas Youm

Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Ausgabe 3/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The volume of arthroscopic hip surgery has increased dramatically in recent years with iliopsoas tendinitis (IPT) being one of the most common complications of this procedure. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of post-operative IPT in patients who undergo arthroscopic hip surgery with capsular closure using absorbable versus non-absorbable suture.

Methods

This is a single center, single surgeon, retrospective analysis performed between August 2007 and May 2023 comparing two cohorts who underwent hip arthroscopy. Patients were divided into those who underwent surgery with capsular closure using absorbable (Vicryl®, Johnson and Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ) suture and those who underwent capsular closure with non-absorbable suture (Suturetape, Arthrex, Naples FL). All patients who underwent primary or revision hip arthroscopy and were at least 2 months post-operation were initially included in the study.

Results

Between August 2007 and May 2023 a total of 1513 hip arthroscopy surgeries were performed. Within this cohort, 1421 hips underwent hip arthroscopy with non-absorbable suture and 64 hips underwent surgery with absorbable suture. There was no significant difference between the proportion of IPT in the non-absorbable cohort (2.3%) versus the absorbable cohort (1.6%) (P = 0.669).

Conclusion

Capsular closure with Absorbable sutures was non-inferior to capsular closure with non-absorbable sutures with respect to the proportion of post-operative IPT following hip arthroscopy for FAI. Additionally, the proportion of post-operative IPT was found to be significantly higher in patients undergoing revision versus primary hip arthroscopy, regardless of capsular closure suture type.

Level of evidence

IV.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Zusmanovich M, Haselman W, Serrano B, Banffy M (2022) The incidence of hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral pathology increased by 85% between 2011 and 2018 in the United States. Arthroscopy 38:82–87CrossRefPubMed Zusmanovich M, Haselman W, Serrano B, Banffy M (2022) The incidence of hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral pathology increased by 85% between 2011 and 2018 in the United States. Arthroscopy 38:82–87CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Malik AT, Jain N, Scharschmidt TJ, Glassman AH, Khan SN (2022) Primary hip arthroscopy and conversion to total hip arthroplasty: trends and survival analysis in the medicare population. Hip Int 32:239–245CrossRefPubMed Malik AT, Jain N, Scharschmidt TJ, Glassman AH, Khan SN (2022) Primary hip arthroscopy and conversion to total hip arthroplasty: trends and survival analysis in the medicare population. Hip Int 32:239–245CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cvetanovich GL, Chalmers PN, Levy DM et al (2016) Hip arthroscopy surgical volume trends and 30-day postoperative complications. Arthroscopy 32:1286–1292CrossRefPubMed Cvetanovich GL, Chalmers PN, Levy DM et al (2016) Hip arthroscopy surgical volume trends and 30-day postoperative complications. Arthroscopy 32:1286–1292CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat MaraditKremers H, Schilz SR, Van Houten HK et al (2017) Trends in utilization and outcomes of hip arthroscopy in the United States between 2005 and 2013. J Arthroplast 32:750–755CrossRef MaraditKremers H, Schilz SR, Van Houten HK et al (2017) Trends in utilization and outcomes of hip arthroscopy in the United States between 2005 and 2013. J Arthroplast 32:750–755CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakano N, Lisenda L, Jones TL, Loveday DT, Khanduja V (2017) Complications following arthroscopic surgery of the hip: a systematic review of 36,761 cases. Bone Jt J 99-B:1577–1583CrossRef Nakano N, Lisenda L, Jones TL, Loveday DT, Khanduja V (2017) Complications following arthroscopic surgery of the hip: a systematic review of 36,761 cases. Bone Jt J 99-B:1577–1583CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Papavasiliou AV, Bardakos NV (2012) Complications of arthroscopic surgery of the hip. Bone Jt Res 1:131–144CrossRef Papavasiliou AV, Bardakos NV (2012) Complications of arthroscopic surgery of the hip. Bone Jt Res 1:131–144CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston CA, Wiley JP, Lindsay DM, Wiseman DA (1998) Iliopsoas bursitis and tendinitis a review. Sports Med 25:271–283CrossRefPubMed Johnston CA, Wiley JP, Lindsay DM, Wiseman DA (1998) Iliopsoas bursitis and tendinitis a review. Sports Med 25:271–283CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tibor LM, Sekiya JK (2008) Differential diagnosis of pain around the hip joint. Arthroscopy 24:1407–1421CrossRefPubMed Tibor LM, Sekiya JK (2008) Differential diagnosis of pain around the hip joint. Arthroscopy 24:1407–1421CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Philippon MJ, Decker MJ, Giphart JE, Torry MR, Wahoff MS, LaPrade RF (2011) Rehabilitation exercise progression for the gluteus medius muscle with consideration for iliopsoas tendinitis: an in vivo electromyography study. Am J Sports Med 39:1777–1785CrossRefPubMed Philippon MJ, Decker MJ, Giphart JE, Torry MR, Wahoff MS, LaPrade RF (2011) Rehabilitation exercise progression for the gluteus medius muscle with consideration for iliopsoas tendinitis: an in vivo electromyography study. Am J Sports Med 39:1777–1785CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell A, Thompson K, Pham H et al (2021) The incidence and pattern of iliopsoas tendinitis following hip arthroscopy. Hip Int 31:542–547CrossRefPubMed Campbell A, Thompson K, Pham H et al (2021) The incidence and pattern of iliopsoas tendinitis following hip arthroscopy. Hip Int 31:542–547CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Matalia J, Panmand P, Ghalla P (2018) Comparative analysis of non-absorbable 10–0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10–0 vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 66:661–664CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Matalia J, Panmand P, Ghalla P (2018) Comparative analysis of non-absorbable 10–0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10–0 vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 66:661–664CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Alawode AO, Adeyemi MO, James O, Ogunlewe MO, Butali A, Adeyemo WL (2018) A comparative study of immediate wound healing complications following cleft lip repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable skin sutures. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:159–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alawode AO, Adeyemi MO, James O, Ogunlewe MO, Butali A, Adeyemo WL (2018) A comparative study of immediate wound healing complications following cleft lip repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable skin sutures. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:159–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW (1992) A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 18:785–795CrossRefPubMed Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW (1992) A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 18:785–795CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Debus ES, Geiger D, Sailer M, Ederer J, Thiede A (1997) Physical, biological and handling characteristics of surgical suture material: a comparison of four different multifilament absorbable sutures. Eur Surg Res 29:52–61CrossRefPubMed Debus ES, Geiger D, Sailer M, Ederer J, Thiede A (1997) Physical, biological and handling characteristics of surgical suture material: a comparison of four different multifilament absorbable sutures. Eur Surg Res 29:52–61CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tajirian AL, Goldberg DJ (2010) A review of sutures and other skin closure materials. J Cosmet Laser Ther 12:296–302CrossRefPubMed Tajirian AL, Goldberg DJ (2010) A review of sutures and other skin closure materials. J Cosmet Laser Ther 12:296–302CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dijkstra HP, Mc Auliffe S, Ardern CL et al (2022) Oxford consensus on primary cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: part 1-definitions, terminology, taxonomy and imaging outcomes. Br J Sports Med 57:325–341CrossRefPubMed Dijkstra HP, Mc Auliffe S, Ardern CL et al (2022) Oxford consensus on primary cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: part 1-definitions, terminology, taxonomy and imaging outcomes. Br J Sports Med 57:325–341CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Althunian TA, de Boer A, Groenwold RHH, Klungel OH (2017) Defining the noninferiority margin and analysing noninferiority: an overview. Br J Clin Pharmacol 83:1636–1642CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Althunian TA, de Boer A, Groenwold RHH, Klungel OH (2017) Defining the noninferiority margin and analysing noninferiority: an overview. Br J Clin Pharmacol 83:1636–1642CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Adib F, Johnson AJ, Hennrikus WL, Nasreddine A, Kocher M, Yen YM (2018) Iliopsoas tendonitis after hip arthroscopy: prevalence, risk factors and treatment algorithm. J Hip Preserv Surg 5:362–369CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Adib F, Johnson AJ, Hennrikus WL, Nasreddine A, Kocher M, Yen YM (2018) Iliopsoas tendonitis after hip arthroscopy: prevalence, risk factors and treatment algorithm. J Hip Preserv Surg 5:362–369CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cvetanovich GL, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, Bach BR Jr, Bush-Joseph CA, Nho SJ (2015) Revision hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of diagnoses, operative findings, and outcomes. Arthroscopy 31:1382–1390CrossRefPubMed Cvetanovich GL, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, Bach BR Jr, Bush-Joseph CA, Nho SJ (2015) Revision hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of diagnoses, operative findings, and outcomes. Arthroscopy 31:1382–1390CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bar-Sela SM, Spierer O, Spierer A (2007) Suture-related complications after congenital cataract surgery: vicryl versus mersilene sutures. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:301–304CrossRefPubMed Bar-Sela SM, Spierer O, Spierer A (2007) Suture-related complications after congenital cataract surgery: vicryl versus mersilene sutures. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:301–304CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Li ZY, Hu GF, Jin ZG et al (2021) Capsular healing in interportal and periportal capsulotomy methods of hip arthroscopy. Orthop Surg 13:1863–1869CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li ZY, Hu GF, Jin ZG et al (2021) Capsular healing in interportal and periportal capsulotomy methods of hip arthroscopy. Orthop Surg 13:1863–1869CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassinger SM, Wongworawat MD, Hechanova JW (2006) Biomechanical characteristics of 10 arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy 22:827–832CrossRefPubMed Hassinger SM, Wongworawat MD, Hechanova JW (2006) Biomechanical characteristics of 10 arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy 22:827–832CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer DC, Bachmann E, Ladermann A, Lajtai G, Jentzsch T (2018) The best knot and suture configurations for high-strength suture material. An in vitro biomechanical study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:1277–1282CrossRefPubMed Meyer DC, Bachmann E, Ladermann A, Lajtai G, Jentzsch T (2018) The best knot and suture configurations for high-strength suture material. An in vitro biomechanical study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:1277–1282CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Haynes DF, Kreithen JC (2014) Vicryl mesh in expander/implant breast reconstruction: long-term follow-up in 38 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:892–899CrossRefPubMed Haynes DF, Kreithen JC (2014) Vicryl mesh in expander/implant breast reconstruction: long-term follow-up in 38 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:892–899CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
No difference in prevalence of postoperative iliopsoas tendinitis in patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery when using absorbable versus non-absorbable suture for capsular closure
verfasst von
Michael Moore
Ian Savage-Elliott
Kevin Lehane
Zachary I. Li
Steven Magister
Thomas Hoffmeister
Thomas Youm
Publikationsdatum
17.01.2024
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Ausgabe 3/2024
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03818-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2024

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 3/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.