Introduction
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory pruritic skin disease with complex pathophysiology and clinical presentation [
1‐
3]. AD causes dry skin, itchy rash, and has a great impact on quality of life (QoL) [
3,
4]. Social and financial costs caused by AD lead to the largest global burden of disability related to skin diseases [
3,
5]. Recent data suggest that the prevalence of AD is approximately 20% in children, and 7% in adults in the European Union (EU) [
6].
There is no cure for AD, but it can be effectively controlled [
2]. In recent years, a continuously expanding understanding of AD pathogenesis has led to rapidly evolving new therapeutic options [
7]. Treatment costs are one of the most troubling burdens of AD [
2]. In addition to prescribed medications, lifestyle modification is a pillar of AD therapy [
8]. Patients are encouraged to purchase specific clothing, soaps, detergents, and emollients [
8]. Financial costs and indirect expenses such as time spent on doctor’s appointments emphasize the need for optimal AD management [
2]. In the USA and Europe, treatment adherence was described as poor [
9,
10]. It was found in the USA that only 32% of patients followed their topical treatment in AD [
9]. In the UK nearly 50% of patients and caregivers could not correctly identify the potency of commonly prescribed topical corticosteroids [
10]. In Australia, poor understanding of the disease, lack of knowledge, and the complexity of treatment regimens were identified as factors responsible for poor treatment outcomes [
11]. Patient education was identified by worldwide recommendations to be crucial in improving treatment adherence and patients’ QoL in AD [
12,
13].
A recent study emphasized that English-speaking patients are utilizing the Internet to gain knowledge about their medical concerns and treatment options, underscored the accessibility, user-friendly interface, and low cost of online health information [
14]. In the English-speaking world, the Internet is widely recognized as a trustworthy source of health information [
14]. Individuals from these nations utilize online resources to enhance their own understanding and expand their expertise [
14]. The desire for self-education through online materials was strong among Anglophone patients [
15]. The most widely used web search engine, Google, allows patients to enter specific terms and receive a list of potential websites to address their inquiries [
15]. Online information found in Google is a mix of articles dedicated to the public, journalists, health professionals, and patients [
16]. Presented content is not regulated and significant quality variations were demonstrated on websites dedicated to various health conditions [
17]. Health-related articles aimed at the public and patients may use complex medical terminology, resulting in an overestimation of readers’ understanding and therefore potential confusion [
16,
18]. “Readability” is a term used to describe the level of ease with which written material can be read. This factor is of great importance when evaluating the comprehensibility of a patient-focused resource, as higher readability is typically linked to better understanding [
16,
18]. It could not be excluded that low readability of online materials related to AD contributes to its poor management. Lack of understanding of the AD pathogenesis such as the itch–scratch cycle, skin conditioning methods, and proper treatment application could lead to poor patient adherence and management outcomes.
A few studies have assessed readability of patient electronic materials dedicated to skin diseases [
1,
19,
20]. Only one study assessed patient electronic materials dedicated to AD [
1]. It involved only 30 articles, and all were written in English [
1], thus its results might not be reliable and generalizable to wider populations. No study was found that evaluated readability of patient electronic materials related to AD in multiple languages. No study has evaluated these materials’ readability by its source. The main aim of this study was to evaluate readability of Google-searched materials related to AD written in European languages with a validated measure. The secondary aim was to compare readability of those materials by their source. Prevalence of those materials in the included languages was also investigated. Finally, correlation between article readability and prevalence was examined.
Discussion
Although the Internet provides a great number of materials about AD, the comprehensibility of those information was revealed to be not optimal; no materials in any included languages were categorized as easy to comprehend, which highlighted this fact. Articles in 4 out of 23 included languages (English, Dutch, Swedish, and Danish) were classified as hard to comprehend. Articles in the majority of included languages (19 out of 23) were categorized as very hard. The presented results demonstrated also that articles released by non-profit organizations and pharmaceutical companies had the highest comprehensibility. The commercial background of AD-related materials was related to their lower readability. Articles issued by online shops and dermatology clinics had substantially lower comprehensibility levels. Quantity did not equate to readability in the context of online AD materials. The mean Lix scores did not correlate with number of hits.
Overall mean Lix score was 56 ± 8, which corresponds to college-grade level [
27]. In the EU, only 32% of the population had completed tertiary education [
28]. These facts mean that only one out of three potential patients can understand AD-related information found on the Internet. It was demonstrated that reliable patient self-education improves AD therapy outcomes both in paper-based and online form [
29,
30]. Booklets that contained information on important everyday patient-oriented aspects of AD significantly improved the emotional status of patients with AD [
2,
29]. Similarly, online educational materials proved to be helpful in the management of patients with AD [
2,
30]. Self-education with reliable online electronic materials led to significant improvement in AD symptoms and QoL [
30]. Online materials demonstrated greater effectiveness of education in patients with AD [
31].
In all included languages, low comprehensibility of online AD-related materials was revealed. Without sufficient understanding of the disease, its complexity, and treatment options, it is difficult for patients to maintain sufficient compliance. It seems reasonable to assume that introduction of comprehensible AD-related online educational materials would potentially improve AD treatment outcomes and reduce social and economic global burden of the disease. Although articles released by non-profit organizations and pharmaceutical companies were found to have the greatest readability, both had readability level classified as very hard. Similar results were revealed in other medical specialties such as gynecology and ophthalmology [
32‐
34]. These facts have implications, which are discussed below.
First, non-profit organizations and clinics, such as major associations focused on AD or academic hospitals, should improve comprehensibility of distributed information. Although associations often aim to educate health professionals, they could focus more on reliable patient education. Tertiary hospitals that teach students and medical professionals could also spread their expertise to the public in the form that layman can understand. In the age of disinformation, trusted sources should offer materials that meet the needs of the average Internet user.
Although articles released by pharmaceutical companies had higher levels of comprehensibility, there is scope for further improvement. Comprehensible online educational materials associated with certain manufacturers would benefit both company and patients. Patients with a good understanding of their therapy would have a better treatment adherence. It seems reasonable that with good compliance, satisfactory treatment outcomes could be associated with the company that released a certain article.
Secondly, reliable materials must be chosen by patients to fulfil their functions. Web promotion is possible through Google’s search engine [
18,
35]. Internet users were more likely to visit websites that were promoted and were positioned at the top of search results [
18,
35]. Encouraging the circulation of reliable and engaging online content could prove beneficial for the average Internet user. Top-searched materials written in European languages potentially would improve AD treatment outcomes. The economic and social burden of AD could be not only reduced in European countries but also in countries whose official languages are the same as in the EU (e.g., Portuguese in Brazil).
The present investigation revealed a correlation between readability and material abundance: greater prevalence of materials was associated with lower comprehensibility. This correlation was very weak (
R2 = 0.189). Although it is contrary to results within other specialties [
14,
18], it can reasonably be assumed that greater quantity is related to worse readability.
Articles in Italian, Polish, and Romanian were the most prevalent. Irish was the least popular language with only one included article. These observations could be explained by the following facts. Irish is a decaying language with only a few people speaking Irish [
36]. It seems reasonable that there was little or no interest in creating materials that were dedicated to a very limited group of patients. In Italy, Poland, and Romania, the public sector is limited and an ambulatory practice such as dermatology is run on a private ownership basis [
37‐
39]. Consequently, private practices could release more online materials, to grab the attention of potential patients and ensure an adequate volume of visits.
Several other readability investigations dedicated to other dermatoses demonstrated similar deficits and highlighted the need for the improvement of online health materials [
20,
40]. With the emerging pipeline of immunomodulators in AD treatment, it is increasingly important for online health information to reflect new therapeutic options [
40]. Online resources are becoming a standard in patient care and facilitate successful shared decision-making processes between physicians and patients [
41]. All of these suggest an overwhelming need for improved readability of online materials related to AD.
Although the present study evaluated the readability of online educational materials related to AD, the quality of the presented information remained unknown. DISCERN and JAMA instruments were designed to assess the quality of the data found on the Internet [
42,
43]. As a result of the number of languages evaluated, the authors focused only on readability. These instruments require fluency in the language of the assessed article, something that the authors could not ensure for all included languages. Low readability and quality of online materials have been the subject of debate since the Internet became popular. It was always difficult to encourage enhancement of the materials presented on the Internet. One initiative was Health On the Net (HON) certification [
44,
45]. Website administrators applied to the HON organization and sent source code of the website [
45]. When the certification was granted, the webpage could display the HON logo [
45]. If presented information did not adhere to the HON policy, the organization asked administrator to amend presented data [
45]. Patients could identify trustworthy website by the HON logo, which facilitated reliable information finding on the Internet [
45]. Unfortunately, this initiative was almost unknown and was permanently discontinued in December 2022 [
46]. Now, the problem of reliability of the online information is even more critical than at the beginning of the Internet era. With the introduction of artificial intelligence models such as ChatGPT, the Internet is being flooded with unreliable materials [
47]. These are often undistinguishable from human-written materials and often lead to patient disinformation [
47].
All included materials were evaluated with Lix score. Lix was originally designed to evaluate readability of newspapers articles written in Swedish [
25]. The accuracy of this readability measure was tested and approved in a variety of languages (Danish, English, Finnish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Swedish, Spanish) [
24‐
26,
48]. There were no studies that evaluated Lix for other included languages. This could potentially limit the presented investigation. However, Lix is considered by the scientific community as a reliable readability measure for all European languages [
24,
25]. Although levels of comprehensibility applied in this study were designed for Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, and Dutch [
24‐
26,
48], it could not be excluded that different cutoffs would be more suitable for other included languages. The Google search results are dynamic and could vary according to the geographic location of the search time and date. This study was conducted in Poland. Google search results were generated and evaluated between 26 December 2023 and 11 January 2024. It could not be excluded that data collection conducted in another country would bring different results. Similarly, the selection of Google as the search engine could bias the results. Quality evaluation of the analyzed articles with validated instruments was not performed, which is also important in the context of online health information. Nevertheless, this was beyond the designated scope of the study and may warrant further investigation in the future.