nach oben

18.04.2024 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Reliability and concurrent validity of 30-s and 5-time sit-to-stand tests in older adults with knee osteoarthritis

verfasst von: Lalita Khuna, Tussaneeporn Soison, Theardkhwan Plukwongchuen, Napaporn Tangadulrat

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Sit-to-stand (STS) movement is fundamental in daily life. STS tasks have been used to assess lower limb muscle strength, balance control, and functional abilities in various populations, but limited information is available on their use in older individuals with knee osteoarthritis.

Objective

We here examined the intra-rater, inter-rater, and test–retest reliability of the 30-s and 5-time STS tests, and calculated the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Moreover, we explored the concurrent validity of these tests by analysing their correlation with knee muscle strength, pain, stiffness, and physical function in older adults with knee osteoarthritis.

Method

This cross-sectional study included 60 older participants diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis. Baseline demographic information and data on pain, stiffness, and physical function using the modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) were obtained. Participants performed the 30-s and 5-time STS tests as well as knee muscle strength assessment using a hand-held dynamometer. After 1 week, 30 participants were reassessed to evaluate test–retest reliability.

Results

The 30-s and 5-time STS tests had excellent intra-, inter-, and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.990–1.000, 0.996–0.999, and 0.841–0.853, respectively) with a large SEM and MDC. Both STS tests significantly correlated with knee extensor and flexor strength and all modified WOMAC domains (Pearson’s correlation coefficients: 0.28–0.61, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The 30-s and 5-time STS tests are reliable assessment tools and correlate with knee muscle strength, pain, stiffness, and physical function in older adults with knee osteoarthritis.

Key Points

• The 30-s and 5-time STS test can serve as surrogate measures in various aspects of knee health, including muscle strength, pain levels, stiffness, and overall physical function, in older adults with knee osteoarthritis.

• Both these STS tests are dependable tools, accessible for both experienced and inexperienced assessors to administer effectively.

Loeser RF, Goldring SR, Scanzello CR, Goldring MB (2013) Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis Rheum 64:1697–1707. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34453CrossRef

van Dijk GM, Veenhof C, Spreeuwenberg P, Coene N, Burger BJ, van Schaardenburg D, van den Ende CH, Lankhorst GJ, Dekker J, CARPA Study Group (2010) Prognosis of limitations in activities in osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a 3-year cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.08.147CrossRefPubMed

Ng CT, Tan MP (2013) Osteoarthritis and falls in the older person. Age Ageing 42:561–566. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/aft070CrossRefPubMed

Manlapaz DG, Sole G, Jayakaran P, Chapple CM (2019) Risk factors for falls in adults with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. PM&R 11:745–757. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.12066CrossRef

Etnyre B, Thomas DO (2007) Event Standardization of Sit-to-Stand Movements. Phys Ther 87:1651–1666. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060378CrossRefPubMed

Yoshioka S, Nagano A, Hay DC, Fukashiro S (2012) The minimum required muscle force for a sit-to-stand task. J Biomech 45:699–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.11.054CrossRefPubMed

Yoshioka S, Nagano A, Hay DC, Fukashiro S (2009) Biomechanical analysis of the relation between movement time and joint moment development during a sit-to-stand task. BioMed Eng Online 27:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-8-27CrossRef

Seven YB, Akalan NE, Yucesoy NA (2007) Effects of back loading on the biomechanics of sit-to-stand motion in health children. Hum Mov Sci 27:65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2007.11.001CrossRef

Lord SR, Murray SM, Chapman K, Munro B, Tiedemann A (2002) Sit-to-stand performance depends on sensation, speed, balance, and psychological status in addition to strength in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 57:M539–M543. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/57.8.m539CrossRefPubMed

10.

Tiedemann A, Shimada H, Sherrington C, Murray S, Lord S (2008) The comparative ability of eight functional mobility tests for predicting falls in community-dwelling older people. Ageing 37:430–435. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afn100CrossRef

11.

Lomaglio MJ, Eng JJ (2005) Muscle strength and weight-bearing symmetry relate to sit-to-stand performance in individuals with stroke. Gait Posture 22(2):126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.08.002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Mong Y, Teo TW, Ng SS (2010) 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in subjects with chronic stroke: Reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.030CrossRefPubMed

13.

Wang TH, Liao HF, Peng YC (2012) Reliability and validity of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test for children with cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil 26:664–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511426889CrossRefPubMed

14.

Møller AB, Bibby BM, Skjerbæk AG, Jensen E, Sørensen H, Stenager E, Dalgas U (2012) Validity and variability of the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in patients with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 34:2251–2258. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.683479CrossRefPubMed

15.

Petersen C, Steffen T, Paly E, Dvorak L, Nelson R (2017) Reliability and minimal detectable change for sit-to-stand tests and the functional gait assessment for individuals with Parkinson disease. Geriatr Phys Ther 40:223–226. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000102CrossRef

16.

Khuna L, Thaweewannakij T, Wattanapan P, Amatachaya P, Amatachaya S (2020) Five times sit-to-stand test for ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: A psychometric study on the effects of arm placements. Spinal Cord 58:356–364. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-019-0372-3CrossRefPubMed

17.

Meretta BM, Whitney SL, Marchetti GF, Sparto PJ, Muirhead RJ (2006) The five times sit to stand test: responsiveness to change and concurrent validity in adults undergoing vestibular rehabilitation. J Vestib Res 16:233–243CrossRefPubMed

18.

Bohannon RW (1995) Sit-to-stand test for measuring performance of lower extremity muscles. Percept Mot Skills 80:163–166. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1995.80.1.163CrossRefPubMed

19.

Bohannon RW (2012) Measurement of sit-to-stand among older adults. Top Geriatr Rehabil 28:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/TGR.0b013e31823415faCrossRef

20.

Dobson F, Hinman RS, Hall M, Terwee CB, Roos EM, Bennell KL (2012) Measurement properties of performance-based measures to assess physical function in hip and knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 20:1548–1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.015CrossRefPubMed

21.

Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012CrossRefPubMed

22.

de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL (2011) Measurement in medicine: A practical guide, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef

23.

Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, Greenwald R, Hochberg M et al (1986) Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum 29:1039–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780290816CrossRefPubMed

24.

Altman R, Alarcón G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Brown C, Cooke TD, Daniel W, Feldman D et al (1991) The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum 34:505–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780340502CrossRefPubMed

25.

Morrow JR Jr, Jackson AW (1993) How “significant” is your reliability? Res Q Exerc Sport 64:352–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1993.10608821CrossRefPubMed

26.

Bohannon RW (2011) Test-retest reliability of the five-repetition sit-to stand test: a systematic review of the literature involving adults. J Strength Cond Res 25:3205–3207. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234e59fCrossRefPubMed

27.

Jones CJ, Rikli RE, Beam WC (1999) A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport 70:113–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1999.10608028CrossRefPubMed

28.

Charoencholvanich K, Pongcharoen B (2005) Oxford Knee Score and SF-36: Translation & reliability for use with total knee arthroscopy patients in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 88:1194–1202PubMed

29.

Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7859CrossRefPubMed

30.

Bohannon RW, Andrews AW (1987) Interrater reliability of hand-held dynamometry. Phys Ther 67:931–933. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.6.931CrossRefPubMed

31.

Bohannon RW (1986) Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry during a single session of strength assessment. Phys Ther 66:206–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/66.2.206CrossRefPubMed

32.

Wadsworth CT, Krishnan R, Sear M, Harrold J, Nielsen DH (1987) Intrarater reliability of manual muscle testing and hand-held dynametric muscle testing. Phys Ther 67:1342–1347. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.9.1342CrossRefPubMed

33.

Bellamy N (2002) WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index User Guide, 5th edn. Brisbane, Australia

34.

Kuptniratsaikul V, Rattanachaiyanont M (2007) Validation of a modified Thai version of the Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index for knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 26:1641–1645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-007-0560-yCrossRefPubMed

35.

Andresen EM (2000) Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:S15–S20. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.20619CrossRefPubMed

36.

Bruton A, Conway JH, Holgate ST (2000) Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy 86:94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61211-4CrossRef

37.

Beaton DE (2000) Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine 25:3192–3199. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00015CrossRefPubMed

38.

Andresen EM, Fonts BS, Romeis JC, Brownson CA (1999) Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:877–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90077-1CrossRefPubMed

39.

Gill S, McBurney H (2008) Reliability of performance-based measures in people awaiting joint replacement surgery of the hip or knee. Physiother Res Int 13:141–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.411CrossRefPubMed

40.

Wright AA, Cook CE, Baxter GD, Dockerty JD, Abbott JH (2011) A comparison of 3 methodological approaches to defining major clinically important improvement of 4 performance measures in patients with hip osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 41:319–327. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2011.3515CrossRefPubMed

41.

Blankevoort CG, van Heuvelen MJ, Scherder EJ (2013) Reliability of six physical performance tests in older people with dementia. Phys Ther 93:69–78. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20110164CrossRefPubMed

42.

McCarthy EK, Horvat MA, Holtsberg PA, Wisenbaker JM (2004) Repeated chair stands as a measure of lower limb strength in sexagenarian women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59:1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/59.11.1207CrossRefPubMed

43.

Khuna L, Phadungkit S, Thaweewannakij T, Amatachaya P, Amatachaya S (2022) Outcomes of the five times sit-to-stand test could determine lower limb functions of ambulatory people with spinal cord injury only when assessed without hands. J Spinal Cord Med 45:402–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2020.1803658CrossRefPubMed

44.

Sharma L, Cahue S, Song J, Hayes K, Pai YC, Dunlop D (2003) Physical functioning over three years in knee osteoarthritis: role of psychosocial, local mechanical, and neuromuscular factors. Arthritis Rheum 48:3359–3370. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.11420CrossRefPubMed

45.

Lin YC, Davey RC, Cochrane T (2001) Tests for physical function of the elderly with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:280–286. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0838.2001.110505.xCrossRefPubMed

Titel: Reliability and concurrent validity of 30-s and 5-time sit-to-stand tests in older adults with knee osteoarthritis
verfasst von: Lalita Khuna
Tussaneeporn Soison
Theardkhwan Plukwongchuen
Napaporn Tangadulrat
Publikationsdatum: 18.04.2024
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Clinical Rheumatology
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-06969-6

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Reliability and concurrent validity of 30-s and 5-time sit-to-stand tests in older adults with knee osteoarthritis

Abstract

Introduction

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusion

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

Wie managen Sie die schmerzhafte diabetische Polyneuropathie?

Update Innere Medizin

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

Wie managen Sie die schmerzhafte diabetische Polyneuropathie?

Update Innere Medizin