Introduction
Aims and hypothesis
Patient population
Randomization
Study procedures
Trial objectives and outcomes
Objectives | Outcome |
---|---|
Primary | |
Improve functional outcome in participants with wake-up ischemic stroke | Functional outcome defined as shift across the ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (0–6) at 3 months follow-up |
Secondary | |
Increase the proportion of patients with excellent functional outcome | Proportion of participants free from disability defined as functional outcome mRS score of 0–1 at 3 months follow-up |
Increase the proportion of patients with good functional outcome | Proportion of participants functionally independent defined as an mRS score 0–2 at 3 months follow-up |
Increase the proportion of patients with response to treatment stratified by baseline stroke severity | Proportion of patients with response to treatment; mRS 0 for patients with a mild deficit at study entry (NIHSS <=7), mRS 0-1 for patients with a moderate deficit (NIHSS 8-14), and mRS 0–2 for patients with a severe deficit (NIHSS >14) |
Reduce mortality rate | Proportion of participant mortality over the 3 months study period |
Determine safety based on the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) | Proportion of patients with SICH as defined by the SITS-MOST criteria [8] Proportion of patients with SICH as defined by the IST-3 criteria [9] |
Determine safety based on the rate of parenchymal hemorrhage type 2 (PH-2) [10]a | Proportion of patients with parenchymal hemorrhage type 2 on follow-up imaging at 24 (± 6) h |
Determine safety based on the rate of any intracranial hemorrhage | Proportion of patients with any intracranial hemorrhage detected on follow-up imaging at 24 (± 6) h |
Reduce poor functional outcome or death | Proportion of patients with mRS score of 4–6 at 3 months |
Sample size considerations
Statistical analysis plan
Analysis principles and general considerations
Treatment of missing values
Trial profile
Patient characteristics and baseline comparisons
Primary outcome: Differences in 3 months functional outcome across the full mRS scale between treatment groups
Secondary efficacy and safety outcomes: Differences in proportions of patients with clinical outcomes between treatment groups
-
Excellent functional outcome (mRS 0–1) at 3 months poststroke:
-
Good functional outcome (mRS 0–2) at 3 months poststroke:
-
The proportion of patients with response to treatment on day 7 (or discharge):
-
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage as defined by Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST)8
-
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage as defined by defined by International Stroke Trial-3 (IST-3)9
-
Parenchymal hemorrhage type 210 on follow-up imaging at 24±6 h
-
Any intracranial hemorrhage detected on follow-up imaging at 24±6 h
-
Poor outcome defined as mRS score dichotomized by poor outcome (mRS 4-6) versus mRS 0–3 at 3 months