Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Drug Investigation 8/2016

01.08.2016 | Current Opinion

Application of the Price–Volume Approach in Cases of Innovative Drugs Where Value-Based Pricing is Inadequate: Description of Real Experiences in Italy

verfasst von: Andrea Messori

Erschienen in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Several cases of expensive drugs designed for large patient populations (e.g. sofosbuvir) have raised a complex question in terms of drug pricing. Even assuming value-based pricing, the treatment with these drugs of all eligible patients would have an immense budgetary impact, which is unsustainable also for the richest countries. This raises the need to reduce the prices of these agents in comparison with those suggested by the value-based approach and to devise new pricing methods that can achieve this goal. The present study discusses in detail the following two methods: (i) The approach based on setting nation-wide budget thresholds for individual innovative agents in which a fixed proportion of the historical pharmaceutical expenditure represents the maximum budget attributable to an innovative treatment; (ii) The approach based on nation-wide price–volume agreements in which drug prices are progressively reduced as more patients receive the treatment. The first approach has been developed in the USA by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review and has been applied to PCSK9 inhibitors (alirocumab and evolocumab). The second approach has been designed for the Italian market and has found a systematic application to manage the price of ranibizumab, sofosbuvir, and PCSK9 inhibitors. While, in the past, price–volume agreements have been applied only on an empirical basis (i.e. in the absence of any quantitative theoretical rule), more recently some explicit mathematical models have been described. The performance of these models is now being evaluated on the basis of the real-world experiences conducted in some European countries, especially Italy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bach PB, Pearson SD. Payer and policy maker steps to support value-based pricing for drugs. JAMA. 2015;314(23):2503–4.CrossRefPubMed Bach PB, Pearson SD. Payer and policy maker steps to support value-based pricing for drugs. JAMA. 2015;314(23):2503–4.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Parkinson B, Sermet C, Clement F, Crausaz S, Godman B, Garner S, et al. Disinvestment and value-based purchasing strategies for pharmaceuticals: an international review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(9):905–24.CrossRefPubMed Parkinson B, Sermet C, Clement F, Crausaz S, Godman B, Garner S, et al. Disinvestment and value-based purchasing strategies for pharmaceuticals: an international review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(9):905–24.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Palozzo AC, Messori A. Disinvestment and Value-Based Purchasing Strategies for Pharmaceuticals: An International Review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(4):419–20.CrossRefPubMed Palozzo AC, Messori A. Disinvestment and Value-Based Purchasing Strategies for Pharmaceuticals: An International Review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(4):419–20.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Messori A. Newest treatments for hepatitis C: how can we manage sustainability?. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(12):1891–2.CrossRefPubMed Messori A. Newest treatments for hepatitis C: how can we manage sustainability?. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(12):1891–2.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tice JA, Kazi DS, Pearson SD. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors for treatment of high cholesterol levels: effectiveness and value. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;14:1–2. Tice JA, Kazi DS, Pearson SD. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors for treatment of high cholesterol levels: effectiveness and value. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;14:1–2.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy M. New cholesterol drugs are overpriced, independent analysis finds. BMJ. 2015;10(351):h4864.CrossRef McCarthy M. New cholesterol drugs are overpriced, independent analysis finds. BMJ. 2015;10(351):h4864.CrossRef
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Messori A, Fadda V, Trippoli S. Lowering the High Cost of Cancer Drugs-II. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(3):397–9.CrossRefPubMed Messori A, Fadda V, Trippoli S. Lowering the High Cost of Cancer Drugs-II. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(3):397–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Messori A. Evolocumab and alirocumab: exploring original procurement models to manage the reimbursement of these innovative treatments. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 [Epub ahead of print] Messori A. Evolocumab and alirocumab: exploring original procurement models to manage the reimbursement of these innovative treatments. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 [Epub ahead of print]
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee H, King D, Darzi A, Dolan P. Value-based pricing: time for a NICEr way of measuring health? Lancet. 2011;378(9804):1698.CrossRefPubMed Lee H, King D, Darzi A, Dolan P. Value-based pricing: time for a NICEr way of measuring health? Lancet. 2011;378(9804):1698.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Claxton K, Briggs A, Buxton MJ, Culyer AJ, McCabe C, Walker S, Sculpher MJ. Value based pricing for NHS drugs: an opportunity not to be missed? BMJ. 2008;336(7638):251–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Claxton K, Briggs A, Buxton MJ, Culyer AJ, McCabe C, Walker S, Sculpher MJ. Value based pricing for NHS drugs: an opportunity not to be missed? BMJ. 2008;336(7638):251–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat le Polain M, Franken M, Koopmanschap M, Cleemput I. Drug reimbursement systems: international comparison and policy recommendations. KCE Report 147C. https://kce.fgov.be/. Accessed 12 May 2016. le Polain M, Franken M, Koopmanschap M, Cleemput I. Drug reimbursement systems: international comparison and policy recommendations. KCE Report 147C. https://​kce.​fgov.​be/​. Accessed 12 May 2016.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cleemput I, Neyt M, Thiry N, De Laet Cs, Leys M. Threshold values for cost-effectiveness in health care. KCE Report 100C. https://kce.fgov.be/. Accessed 12 May 2016. Cleemput I, Neyt M, Thiry N, De Laet Cs, Leys M. Threshold values for cost-effectiveness in health care. KCE Report 100C. https://​kce.​fgov.​be/​. Accessed 12 May 2016.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Raftery J. Value based pricing: can it work? BMJ. 2013;11(347):f5941.CrossRef Raftery J. Value based pricing: can it work? BMJ. 2013;11(347):f5941.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Karlsberg Schaffer S, Sussex J, Hughes D, Devlin N. Opportunity costs and local health service spending decisions: a qualitative study from Wales. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Karlsberg Schaffer S, Sussex J, Hughes D, Devlin N. Opportunity costs and local health service spending decisions: a qualitative study from Wales. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Eckermann S, Pekarsky B. Can the real opportunity cost stand up: displaced services, the straw man outside the room. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(4):319–25.CrossRefPubMed Eckermann S, Pekarsky B. Can the real opportunity cost stand up: displaced services, the straw man outside the room. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(4):319–25.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawlins MD, Chalkidou K. The opportunity cost of cancer care: a statement from NICE. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(10):931–2.CrossRefPubMed Rawlins MD, Chalkidou K. The opportunity cost of cancer care: a statement from NICE. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(10):931–2.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen JP, Stolk E, Niezen M. Role of budget impact in drug reimbursement decisions. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2008;33(2):225–47.CrossRefPubMed Cohen JP, Stolk E, Niezen M. Role of budget impact in drug reimbursement decisions. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2008;33(2):225–47.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Mahony JF, Coughlan D. The Irish cost-effectiveness threshold: does it support rational rationing or might it lead to unintended harm to Ireland’s health system?. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(1):5–11.CrossRefPubMed O’Mahony JF, Coughlan D. The Irish cost-effectiveness threshold: does it support rational rationing or might it lead to unintended harm to Ireland’s health system?. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(1):5–11.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Application of the Price–Volume Approach in Cases of Innovative Drugs Where Value-Based Pricing is Inadequate: Description of Real Experiences in Italy
verfasst von
Andrea Messori
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-016-0408-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Clinical Drug Investigation 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe