Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 5/2021

05.01.2021 | Original Article

Asymptomatic macrocephaly: to scan or not to scan

verfasst von: Claire N. Thomas, Amy B. Kolbe, Larry A. Binkovitz, Jennifer S. McDonald, Kristen B. Thomas

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Macrocephaly is a common finding in infants and is often idiopathic or familial. In the absence of clinical signs and symptoms, it can be difficult to determine when concern for underlying pathology is justified.

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to determine the utility of screening head ultrasound (US) in asymptomatic infants with macrocephaly and to identify clinical factors associated with significant US findings.

Materials and methods

A 20-year retrospective review was performed of infants undergoing head US for macrocephaly or rapidly increasing head circumference. Data collected included age, gender, head circumference at birth and at the time of US, specialty of the ordering physician, US findings, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and clinical course including interventions.

Results

Four hundred and forty infants met inclusion criteria. Two hundred and eighty studies (64%) were found to be normal, 137 (31%) had incidental findings, 17 (3.8%) had indeterminate but potentially significant findings, and 6 (1.4%) had significant findings. Twenty of the 23 infants with indeterminate or significant findings had subsequent CT or MRI. This confirmed significant findings in eight infants (1.8%): three subdural hematomas, two intracranial tumors, two aqueductal stenoses, and one middle fossa cyst. Five of the eight infants required surgical procedures. The only statistically significant association found with having a significant finding on head US was head circumference at birth.

Conclusion

Ultrasound is a useful initial study to evaluate infantile macrocephaly, identifying several treatable causes in our study and, when negative, effectively excluding significant pathology.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Orrù E, Calloni SF, Tekes A et al (2018) The child with macrocephaly: differential diagnosis and neuroimaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210:848–859CrossRef Orrù E, Calloni SF, Tekes A et al (2018) The child with macrocephaly: differential diagnosis and neuroimaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210:848–859CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan AP, Mankad K, Gonçalves FG et al (2018) Macrocephaly: solving the diagnostic dilemma. Top Magn Reson Imaging 27:197–217CrossRef Tan AP, Mankad K, Gonçalves FG et al (2018) Macrocephaly: solving the diagnostic dilemma. Top Magn Reson Imaging 27:197–217CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Medina LS, Frawley K, Zurakowski D et al (2001) Children with macrocrania: clinical and imaging predictors of disorders requiring surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:564–570PubMed Medina LS, Frawley K, Zurakowski D et al (2001) Children with macrocrania: clinical and imaging predictors of disorders requiring surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:564–570PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Babcock DS, Han BK, Dine MS (1988) Sonographic findings in infants with macrocrania. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150:1359–1365CrossRef Babcock DS, Han BK, Dine MS (1988) Sonographic findings in infants with macrocrania. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150:1359–1365CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Carolan PL, McLaurin RL, Towbin RB et al (1985) Benign extra-axial collections of infancy. Pediatr Neurosci 12:140–144CrossRef Carolan PL, McLaurin RL, Towbin RB et al (1985) Benign extra-axial collections of infancy. Pediatr Neurosci 12:140–144CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuruvilla LC (2014) Benign enlargement of sub-arachnoid spaces in infancy. J Pediatr Neurosci 9:129–131CrossRef Kuruvilla LC (2014) Benign enlargement of sub-arachnoid spaces in infancy. J Pediatr Neurosci 9:129–131CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Marino MA, Morabito R, Vinci S et al (2014) Benign external hydrocephalus in infants: a single Centre experience and literature review. Neuroradiol J 27:245–250CrossRef Marino MA, Morabito R, Vinci S et al (2014) Benign external hydrocephalus in infants: a single Centre experience and literature review. Neuroradiol J 27:245–250CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith R, Leonidas JC, Maytal J (1998) The value of head ultrasound in infants with macrocephaly. Pediatr Radiol 28:143–146CrossRef Smith R, Leonidas JC, Maytal J (1998) The value of head ultrasound in infants with macrocephaly. Pediatr Radiol 28:143–146CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Haws ME, Linscott L, Thomas C et al (2017) A retrospective analysis of the utility of head computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging in the management of benign macrocrania. J Pediatr 182:283–289. e281 Haws ME, Linscott L, Thomas C et al (2017) A retrospective analysis of the utility of head computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging in the management of benign macrocrania. J Pediatr 182:283–289. e281
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Naffaa L, Rubin M, Stamler AC et al (2017) The diagnostic yield of ultrasound of the head in healthy infants presenting with the clinical diagnosis of benign macrocrania. Clin Radiol 72:94.e7–94.e11 Naffaa L, Rubin M, Stamler AC et al (2017) The diagnostic yield of ultrasound of the head in healthy infants presenting with the clinical diagnosis of benign macrocrania. Clin Radiol 72:94.e7–94.e11
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sampson MA, Berg AD, Huber JN, Olgun G (2019) Necessity of intracranial imaging in infants and children with macrocephaly. Pediatr Neurol 93:21–26CrossRef Sampson MA, Berg AD, Huber JN, Olgun G (2019) Necessity of intracranial imaging in infants and children with macrocephaly. Pediatr Neurol 93:21–26CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Asymptomatic macrocephaly: to scan or not to scan
verfasst von
Claire N. Thomas
Amy B. Kolbe
Larry A. Binkovitz
Jennifer S. McDonald
Kristen B. Thomas
Publikationsdatum
05.01.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04907-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Pediatric Radiology 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Minisymposium: Pediatric MRI quality and safety

Magnetic resonance imaging in children with implants

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.