Care practices and traditional beliefs related to neonatal jaundice in northern Vietnam: a population-based, cross-sectional descriptive study

Severe hyperbilirubinemia and kernicterus are rare in developed countries where bilirubin screening, blood typing, phototherapy equipment, and Rh immune globulin are available. In developing countries where these preventive therapeutic interventions are often unavailable, severe hyperbilirubinemia causes significant morbidity and mortality [1‐14]. In Vietnam, the lack of blood type testing, Rh immune globulin and accessible phototherapy may in part explain the frequent use of exchange transfusion for the treatment of severe hyperbilirubinemia [15, 16].

At the National Hospital of Pediatrics (NHP), the tertiary referral hospital for > 31 million people in northern Vietnam, 18% of neonatal admissions in 2002 were for hyperbilirubinemia, 22% of babies admitted for jaundice from 2003–05 underwent exchange transfusion, and an average of 207 exchange transfusions were performed yearly in 2006–08 [15].

A case series we conducted of infants undergoing exchange transfusion at the NHP suggested that delays in diagnosis and treatment contributed significantly to the use of exchange transfusion to treat severe hyperbilirubinemia [16]. That study, however, provided no quantitative data about the barriers causing delays in care-seeking among those not receiving exchange transfusion, and hence could not quantify their importance as risk factors for severe hyperbilirubinemia. We speculated that low parental knowledge of jaundice, traditional non-medical beliefs about causes and treatment, wrong medical advice, and inefficient transport procedures likely contributed to delayed care-seeking in some infants. In this study, we describe the prevalence of community care practices and traditional beliefs that may contribute to delayed presentation with severe hyperbilirubinemia and the frequency of phototherapy use.

We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional, descriptive population-based study at CHILILAB, a demographic and epidemiologic surveillance system established in 2003 by the Hanoi School of Public Health (HSPH) for public health and health policy research, from November 2008 through February 2010. CHILILAB is a member of the INDEPTH Network, an international network of field labs in 20 nations around the world that supports the development of longitudinal sites for health and social science research as well as intervention impact assessments. Located in Chi Linh District, Hai Duong Province (55 kilometers northeast of Hanoi), CHILILAB is comprised of 4 rural communes and 3 towns, with a study population of approximately 57,000 inhabitants from about 18,000 households. The entire district contains 17 communes and 3 towns, with a population of 142,278 (2010) [17].

The district public health care system consists of 1 district hospital, a regional health clinic, and 20 commune health stations. Commune health stations have nurse midwives who attend low risk vaginal deliveries while district hospitals have physicians who are able to perform C-sections. High risk deliveries are transferred to provincial or national hospitals. Sick neonates are usually transferred to the nearest neonatal intensive care unit at the provincial hospital 34 kilometers away or to the National Hospital of Pediatrics in Hanoi. Rapidly urbanizing and industrializing, Chi Linh District mirrors the socio-economic and demographic changes occurring throughout Vietnam [17].

We obtained research approval from both the HSPH Institutional Ethical Review Board (Approval #057/2008/YTCC-HD3) and University of California, San Francisco, Committee for Human Research (Approval #H63168-33205-01) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved locally by the Chi Linh District People’s Committee and district health officials.

We developed a questionnaire with input from Vietnamese physicians and public health faculty at the Hanoi School of Public Health to evaluate maternal knowledge of jaundice, to assess community newborn care practices that may affect jaundice detection and care-seeking behavior, and to determine the incidence of phototherapy. We then conducted a training session for the research assistants, reviewing the questionnaire and interview techniques before piloting the study for 2 weeks. Afterwards, we reconvened to address any problems and to revise the questionnaire with input from the research assistants, all of whom live in the community and have understanding of local care practices, before commencing the study.

We identified all expectant mothers through weekly telephone contact at commune health stations and the Chi Linh District Hospital where they were receiving prenatal care. All pregnant women are allowed a limited number of free prenatal care visits through the socialized government health care system which allows identification of pregnant mothers. Through prenatal and delivery records, we obtained their estimated delivery dates, and identified deliveries that occurred within the prior week. Mothers who were transferred to higher level hospitals due to complicated deliveries or electively delivered outside of the catchment area were captured during home visits conducted after their estimated date of delivery. The research assistants conducted home visits at 14–28 days after birth, and travelled on foot, bicycle, or motorcycle to reach the households. With these measures, we believe that we were able to identify nearly all and enroll most live births.

All consenting mothers of live-born infants in the CHILILAB surveillance area were included except those we could not contact or whose babies remained hospitalized at 28 days. After obtaining informed consent, the research assistants administered a 78-item questionnaire to the mother (Additional files 1 and 2). The questionnaire asked household demographic information, birth history, birth complications, presence of cephalohematoma, length of stay, newborn feeding, care practices, exposure or avoidance of sunlight, beliefs about effects of sunlight, use of traditional remedies, herbal medications, Chinese medicines, umbilical cord care, home environment, maternal knowledge of jaundice, maternal recognition and concern about jaundice, sibling history of jaundice, care seeking for jaundice, newborn follow-up care, symptoms of kernicterus, newborn re-hospitalization, phototherapy, and treatment history. We asked whether cost, distance, bad weather, poor perception of health providers, “baby was too young to take outside”, and lack of transportation were barriers to care. Mothers could choose more than one barrier and also could give an open response for other perceived barriers. Socio-economic data were extracted from the existing CHILILAB database, and class was categorized according to a standardized assessment of household wealth based upon possessions, home structure, and utilities.

We entered data into Microsoft Access, and then exported to STATA 11 (Statacorp, College Station, TX) for analysis. We used descriptive statistics, t-tests, chi-squared tests, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to measure various associations with receiving phototherapy.

This population-based, cross-sectional study of nearly 1,000 infants found a high rate of beliefs and practices that might put babies at risk for severe jaundice, but little evidence of severe hyperbilirubinemia or acute bilirubin encephalopathy in contrast to the high numbers of exchange transfusion performed at the NHP. Only 9 (0.9%) received phototherapy, 6 (0.6%) of which were during birth hospitalization, and 3 (0.3%) were readmissions. The readmission rate was lower than expected based on U.S. studies in which Asian newborns have higher risk [20‐22] and where readmission rates for phototherapy for all races combined ranged between 0.45-3% [20, 21, 23‐25]. Rates of readmission were further reduced in 2 studies to 0.43% and 0.18% after the implementation of routine bilirubin screening prior to discharge [24, 25]. Pre-discharge bilirubin screening and phototherapy, however, were not available in this community, and therefore, cannot explain the low rate of readmission for jaundice.

The absence of exchange transfusion or kernicterus was not surprising because our study was not designed nor powered to detect them. We conservatively estimated that there was 1 exchange transfusion per 2,545 births in northern Vietnam based upon an NHP catchment population of 31 million, crude national birth rate of 17.0 per 1,000 people (2007–09) [26], and average of 207 exchange transfusions performed yearly at the NHP (assuming exchange transfusions were performed exclusively at the NHP). However, we were expecting to find more cases of infants undergoing phototherapy and possibly detect cases of acute bilirubin encephalopathy but found none.

Selection and referral bias may have contributed to these unexpectedly low numbers. Our death rate was zero, and rate of birth complication was low, suggesting a relatively healthy newborn population compared to studies at the NHP. We excluded infants who remained hospitalized after 28 days, which meant premature infants <32 weeks gestation or other sick newborns with prolonged hospitalizations, who were at higher risk for hyperbilirubinemia, would have been excluded. A study of 615 newborns admitted for hyperbilirubinemia at the NHP (2003–05) found that 72% were low birth weight (<2500 g), 64% were premature (≤36 weeks), 10% had infection, 11% had birth asphyxia, and 17% had set-up for ABO-incompatibility [15]. Our case-series of 20 infants transferred to the NHP who underwent exchange transfusion (2008–2009) also showed that they were a high risk group. Seventy percent were transferred during birth hospitalization with most having co-morbidities of low birth weight, prematurity, infection, or Coombs + hemolysis. Half (n = 10) were delivered at tertiary centers (provincial or national hospitals) which selected for a higher risk population. Only 30% were readmissions from home [16]. Both selection and referral bias may explain the paradox of high numbers of exchange transfusion and acute bilirubin encephalopathy at the NHP but low rates of phototherapy and rarity of complications of hyperbilirubinemia in a population-based study.

Another explanation for low rates of phototherapy may be that hyperbilirubinemia went unnoticed, undetected, or untreated. Early discharge, lack of follow-up, and low parental knowledge of jaundice leading to decreased care-seeking may all contribute to lack of detection or treatment. Common cultural practices such as keeping infants in dark rooms during the first week after birth may also hinder jaundice detection at home, causing under-reporting. Because we used maternal reporting to estimate the incidence of jaundice without information from a medical assessment, clinical jaundice may have been under-estimated. Among mothers who reported their infant appeared jaundiced, many were not concerned, did not seek care, or used traditional therapies in lieu of care-seeking. It is possible that many infants became severely jaundiced but were not identified medically, and that we did not detect any bad outcomes because we did not have long-term follow-up which might have detected hearing loss or cerebral palsy, the long-term complications of untreated acute bilirubin encephalopathy. The lack of long-term follow-up is one of the main limitations of this study. Lastly, the common use of formula supplementation during the first week of life may have been protective [27, 28].

Concurrent, on-going efforts by the government and NGOs to implement phototherapy at provincial hospitals may have confounded our results by decreasing the incidence of hyperbilirubinemia and kernicterus during our study. The East Meets West Foundation started distributing LED phototherapy and supported courses on basic newborn care, including jaundice management, to 136 hospitals in Vietnam from 2007–09. Jaundice admissions to the NHP dropped yearly from 865 in 2008 to 509 in 2010. Kernicterus cases, however, remained unchanged between 2008 (n = 87) and 2010 (n = 81), and only dropped significantly in 2011 (n = 25, Jan-Sep) after the initiation of intensive jaundice workshops [29]. Although we cannot exclude this confounder, we believe it was unlikely that our low rates of phototherapy was an outcome of this intervention because the most dramatic changes in referrals for jaundice and kernicterus to the NHP occurred in 2011 after the conclusion of our data collection. Chi Linh District Hospital did not receive equipment or training during the study period. In addition, we would have expected increased utilization of phototherapy.

Although we were unable to determine the population incidence of hyperbilirubinemia, our study, nevertheless, contributes to understanding of perceptions of jaundice, care-seeking behavior for jaundice, and barriers to care. Our data could be used to develop educational interventions to dispel myths and improve care-seeking. Traditional, non-medical beliefs about the causes of jaundice and the use of traditional remedies in lieu of care-seeking were prevalent. Some mothers believed cranial suture diastases could cause jaundice and would treat the diastases and jaundice with an herb (typically burning the “ngai” herb and exposing the infant to the ashes or smoke). The association between jaundice and cranial suture diastasis may have arisen due to both being caused by intracranial hemorrhage which is frequent in Vietnam due to lack of vitamin K prophylaxis [30]. Others believed jaundice was caused by “lanh”. These lesions reportedly developed after the first few days of life and were believed to be associated with jaundice and poor feeding. Mothers said that jaundice would resolve and feeding improve after they scraped off the “lanh”. The perceived association between the improvement in jaundice with treatment of cranial suture diastasis or removal of “lanh” may just be a coincidental temporal relationship with the peaking of physiologic jaundice at 3–5 days before spontaneous resolution. However, for those cases that progress to pathologic hyperbilirubinemia, these traditional practices may have caused false reassurance, contribute to decreased or delayed care-seeking, and may contribute to increased risk for severe hyperbilirubinemia. The common and widespread use of traditional medicine, including herbal therapies for jaundice, has been previously reported in northern Vietnam and suggests that such therapies competed with evidence-based treatments [31]. Traditional medicine in the newborn also has been described across many cultures, sometimes causing harm, delaying care-seeking [32‐35], or increasing bilirubin admission levels [32].

We found that, overall, access to care was good, and there were few reported barriers except cost. Nearly all mothers delivered at a health facility, and <1% delivered at home indicating that access to attended deliveries was not a problem. Few reported that distance, weather, and lack of transportation were potential barriers even though the primary mode of transportation is by motorcycle, and winters in northern Vietnam can be cold and rainy. Cost (17%) was the most frequently cited barrier to seeking newborn care, a finding previously reported in Vietnam [36]. A government initiative to improve access to care and decrease cost for its most vulnerable populations led to the implementation of universal, free national health insurance for children <6 years in 2005 [37]. However, this insurance remains underutilized, especially among rural populations, and the burden of out-of-pocket expenses remains high due to incomplete coverage [37‐39]. Informal payments to caregivers, a prevalent practice, may add hidden costs and further deter care-seeking [40].

Maternal education may be a relatively simple and feasible approach to improve detection and increase care-seeking to prevent missed cases of hyperbilirubinemia in the community. High rates of maternal literacy and good availability of care may allow for the development of standardized education modules conducted either prenatally or post-partum. Health care providers can teach mothers about jaundice, dispel erroneous beliefs, instruct assessment of skin color under natural light, and encourage care-seeking in preference over traditional treatments. Educational campaigns should be coupled with building capacity at the district hospital for bilirubin screening and phototherapy to respond to increased demand for treatment. Investment in these interventions and equipment, however, should be done cautiously because their potential efficacy and cost-benefits are not yet known. We have no information on the actual incidence of jaundice meeting American Academy of Pediatrics criteria for phototherapy [41] or the outcome of untreated cases, and thus cannot determine if this approach will prevent many cases of kernicterus. These interventions may lead to unnecessary laboratory screening and phototherapy which may burden limited resources. Further studies to evaluate outcomes of untreated, jaundiced infants compared to those treated with phototherapy may provide the needed data to support such interventions and determine the cost-benefit of widespread implementation of phototherapy at district levels nationwide. In the interim, on-going efforts to build capacity at provincial hospitals, which care for higher risk infants, should be supported as they have been associated with decreased referrals to the NHP for both jaundice and kernicterus [29].

Low maternal knowledge of jaundice, traditional beliefs and newborn care practices, and short hospital stays after birth with absence of routine newborn follow-up may prevent or delay recognition of jaundice, care-seeking, or treatment, and may account for the lower than expected frequency of phototherapy in the community. Although an education campaign to modify community care practices and traditional beliefs may improve care-seeking and providing laboratory and phototherapy capabilities at district hospitals could improve detection and treatment of hyperbilirubinemia, it is unclear whether the exchange transfusions and kernicterus cases that could be prevented would be worth the added financial burden on the healthcare system. Therefore, it would be important to obtain the data on the long-term outcomes of jaundiced infants in the community who are untreated compared to those who are treated, to determine if such costly community interventions could be justified.