In the original publication, authors would like to make corrections in the abstract section and in discussion text.
In the abstract, in the results section, it states: “Pair comparisons of groups 2 and 3 also showed significant differences in the percentage of B lymphocytes (p = 0.03) and NK-lymphocytes (p = 0.02).”. This is an error, since the analyses for NK-lymphocytes (group 2 vs. 3) were non-significant (p = 0.26). The correct sentence would be: “Pair comparisons of groups 2 and 3 also showed significant differences in the percentage of B-lymphocytes (p = 0.03) and T-lymphocytes (p = 0.02).”
In the discussion (page 5), it states: “In our study, no differences were found in the TCD8+ lymphocyte subpopulations, but we did find a significantly higher percentage of NK-lymphocytes in CAA patients compared with NCAA ones.”. This sentence is not correct, since although we did find a higher percentage of NK-lymphocytes in patients with CAA, this analysis did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.26). The correct sentence would be: “In our study, no differences were found in the TCD8+ lymphocyte subpopulations. We did find a higher percentage of NK-lymphocytes in CAA patients compared with NCAA ones, although this analysis did not reach statistical significance.”
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.