Correction to: Virol J (2021) 18:45 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-021-01516-0
Following publication of the original article [1], the author notified us that there is an error in Table 1, originated during typesetting. The correct Table 1 is given below.
Table 1
BioFire versus qPCR and rapid test versus qPCR outcomes
qPCR positive | qPCR negative | |
|---|---|---|
BioFire (n = 351) | ||
Positive | 98 | 14 |
Negative | 38 | 201 |
Rapid test (n = 299) | ||
Positive | 15 | 1 |
Negative | 161 | 122 |
Results for matched tests performed by BioFire and qPCR or rapid test and qPCR.
Anzeige
The publisher apologizes for any inconvenience.
The original article has been corrected.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.