Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Virology Journal 1/2024

Open Access 01.12.2024 | Research

Deciphering the virome of Chunkung (Cnidium officinale) showing dwarfism-like symptoms via a high-throughput sequencing analysis

verfasst von: Mesele Tilahun Belete, Se Eun Kim, Workitu Firmosa Gudeta, Davaajargal Igori, Jeong A. Kwon, Su-Heon Lee, Jae Sun Moon

Erschienen in: Virology Journal | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Background

Viruses have notable effects on agroecosystems, wherein they can adversely affect plant health and cause problems (e.g., increased biosecurity risks and economic losses). However, our knowledge of their diversity and interactions with specific host plants in ecosystems remains limited. To enhance our understanding of the roles that viruses play in agroecosystems, comprehensive analyses of the viromes of a wide range of plants are essential. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) techniques are useful for conducting impartial and unbiased investigations of plant viromes, ultimately forming a basis for generating further biological and ecological insights. This study was conducted to thoroughly characterize the viral community dynamics in individual plants.

Results

An HTS-based virome analysis in conjunction with proximity sampling and a tripartite network analysis were performed to investigate the viral diversity in chunkung (Cnidium officinale) plants. We identified 61 distinct chunkung plant-associated viruses (27 DNA and 34 RNA viruses) from 21 known genera and 6 unclassified genera in 14 known viral families. Notably, 12 persistent viruses (7 DNA and 5 RNA viruses) were exclusive to dwarfed chunkung plants. The detection of viruses from the families Partitiviridae, Picobirnaviridae, and Spinareoviridae only in the dwarfed plants suggested that they may contribute to the observed dwarfism. The co-infection of chunkung by multiple viruses is indicative of a dynamic and interactive viral ecosystem with significant sequence variability and evidence of recombination.

Conclusions

We revealed the viral community involved in chunkung. Our findings suggest that chunkung serves as a significant reservoir for a variety of plant viruses. Moreover, the co-infection rate of individual plants was unexpectedly high. Future research will need to elucidate the mechanisms enabling several dozen viruses to co-exist in chunkung. Nevertheless, the important insights into the chunkung virome generated in this study may be relevant to developing effective plant viral disease management and control strategies.
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12985-024-02361-7.
Mesele Tilahun Belete and Se Eun Kim contributed equally to this work.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Background

Cnidium officinale (Korean name: chunkung), which is a flowering annual plant in the family Apiaceae [1, 2], has a long history of use in traditional medicine in Far East Asia, especially in Korea, China, and Japan. It has been used to treat various conditions, including pruritus, skin disorders, asthma, and erectile dysfunction [26]. Chunkung plants are cultivated through their rhizomes and are used to relieve pain and treat menstrual disturbances [7], vitamin deficiencies [8], hypertension, and inflammation [9]. Active compounds, such as osthol [5], volatile alkyl phthalide derivatives, and polysaccharides, have also been identified in chunkung rhizomes. To date, 350 compounds have been isolated from chunkung and identified [5]. There are ongoing studies on the medicinal properties of chunkung as well as on the phytopathogens (e.g., viruses) that can infect chunkung [10].
Viruses, which are ubiquitous in the biosphere, can infect a wide range of hosts, including plants, animals, and microbes [11]. They can invade their hosts through a process called cross-species transmission or spillover [1214], which can adversely affect plant health, thereby decreasing the market value of cultivated plants [1519]. Viral species in agricultural systems differ significantly from those in natural ecosystems [12]. In the latter case, including wild plants and native vegetation, have a distinct relationship with their host plants and often have neutral effects or provide their hosts with slight advantages [20]. In agricultural systems, they can significantly affect plant growth, resulting in substantial yield losses [2123]. Plant viruses are naturally transmitted through a variety of pathways (e.g., pollen, seeds, and vectors) [24, 25]. High-density cultivation of plants can promote viral spread [26]. The diversity of viruses in ecosystems can be influenced by various factors [27]. These include changes in the genetic traits and composition of host populations, shifts in the ecology of both the host plant and the virus, and for vectored viruses, modifications in the vector’s ecology and genetics. Additionally, human practices also affect viral diversity. For example, monocultures, irrigation systems, extended growing seasons, the transport of seedlings, changes in land use, and the application of artificial soil amendments can alter ecological dynamics and favor the emergence and spread of specific plant viruses [20, 27]. Several economically important viral diseases affect chunkung [28, 29], and the emergence of novel viruses is increasingly being detected because of advances in high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies.
Predicting crop damage is difficult [30] due to multiple factors, such as geographic region, virus strain, host plant cultivar/variety, and timing of infection [19, 31]. Technological advances, surveillance efforts, and improved diagnostic capabilities have increased interest in plant virus research [32, 33]. The development of massively parallel sequencing, which is also known as HTS, has contributed to significant breakthroughs in virome research [20, 25, 30, 34, 35]. The diagnosis of viral diseases typically relies on specific techniques (e.g., ELISA, microarray, and PCR) [34, 36] that are relatively cheap/economic and can rapidly detect known viruses [37]. However, these methods may be inappropriate for examining samples co-infected with multiple viral agents [38, 39]. Alternatively, HTS can efficiently detect and identify multiple viruses, even in the absence of prior knowledge about viral sequences [21, 26]. Advances in nucleic acid isolation protocols and the availability of HTS technologies have enabled researchers to comprehensively study the viruses associated with a specific host [39, 40]. Until recently, our understanding of plant virus diversity was limited. However, over the past decade, the mainstream use of HTS in biodiversity surveys, has helped fill our knowledge gaps. As a result, full viromes [16] obtained by HTS approach may lead to significant breakthroughs by enabling inclusive viral genome analyses, facilitating metagenomic investigations [41, 42], expanding analyses to non-model hosts [43], identifying viral variants [16], and advancing our understanding of viral transcriptomics [32].
The objective of this study was to elucidate the viral diversity in chunkung via HTS. We conducted a comprehensive survey to identify viruses that may be responsible for putative growth abnormalities and complex infections, or that adversely affect chunkung plant growth. The results of this study offer valuable insights into the diversity of viral communities and their potential ecological interactions. Furthermore, the virus genomes that were annotated and classified in this study are valuable resources for future research on virus–host interactions and the development of disease management strategies applicable to chunkung (SRA accessions: SAMN39861745 and SAMN39861546 of the BioProject PRJNA1074493). To the best of our knowledge, this survey represents the first study of the chunkung virome.

Methods

Sample collection and processing

We collected five duplicates of chunkung plants from three farms in Yeongyang, Gyeongsangbuk-do Province, South Korea (Table 1), which has conditions suitable for chunkung cultivation. All chunkung samples were cultivated in the field. In June 2021, five asymptomatic plants (designated as A) and five dwarfed plants (designated as D) were collected (Fig. 1A-E, Table 1). The strategy of collecting paired plant samples based on their proximity (closeness) was employed to minimize potential biases that could arise from variations in soil texture, fertility, and other environmental factors. More specifically, dwarfed and asymptomatic plants growing in close proximity were collected (Fig. 1A-E). Each sample was finely ground using a mortar and pestle precooled with liquid nitrogen. The powdered materials were stored at − 80 °C until further processing. For HTS, 4 g of each sample was pooled into two groups (i.e., asymptomatic and dwarfed), which were used to generate two libraries (i.e., A and D). Pooling samples can reduce sequencing costs and increase the chances of identifying multiple viruses simultaneously. However, it limits the detailed virome information from individual plants. Before RNA-Seq, we confirmed known virus infections using RT-PCR, allowing us to compare viromes from each sample.
Table 1
List of Cnidium officinale leaf samples: five dwarfed and five asymptomatic plants collected from Gyeongsangbuk-do province in Korea for RNA-seq
No
Sample name
Sample code
Collection date
Collection place
1
Cnidium officinale 1 (dwarfed)
1D
2021.06.12
236–4 Dogok-ri, Ilwol-myeon
Cnidium officinale cryptic (Asymptomatic) 1
1A
2021.06.12
236–4 Dogok-ri, Ilwol-myeon
2
Cnidium officinale 2 (dwarfed)
2D
2021.06.12
236–5 Dogok-ri, Ilwol-myeon
Cnidium officinale cryptic (Asymptomatic) 2
2A
2021.06.12
236–5 Dogok-ri, Ilwol-myeon
3
Cnidium officinale 3 (dwarfed)
3D
2021.06.12
480–9 Seomchon-ri, Ilwol-myeon
Cnidium officinale cryptic (Asymptomatic) 3
3A
2021.06.12
480–9 Seomchon-ri, Ilwol-myeon
4
Cnidium officinale 4 (dwarfed)
4D
2021.06.12
480–10 Seomchon-ri, Ilwol-myeon
Cnidium officinale cryptic (Asymptomatic) 4
4A
2021.06.12
480–10 Seomchon-ri, Ilwol-myeon
5
Cnidium officinale 5 (dwarfed)
5D
2021.06.12
Gokgangri San 2
Cnidium officinale cryptic (Asymptomatic) 5
5A
2021.06.12
Gokgangri San 2

Total RNA extraction, RNA-seq library preparation, and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from pooled asymptomatic and dwarfed samples as previously described [3, 4]. An easy-spin™ Total RNA Isolation Kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Sangdaewon-dong, South Korea) was used to extract RNA according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA quality, quantity, integrity were determined by gel electrophoresis and the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). The ribosomal RNA (rRNA) was eliminated using the Ribo-Zero™ rRNA Removal Kit (Plant Leaf) (Epicenter, Madison, WI, USA). Subsequently, libraries were generated using the TruSeq Stranded Total RNA low-throughput sample prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The final sequencing libraries were then prepared for paired-end sequencing (2 × 101-bp reads), which was performed using the Illumina HiSeq 4000 system (Illumina, CA, USA) at Macrogen Co. (Seoul, South Korea) (Fig. 2).

In silico analyses and assembly of viral genomes

The quality of the raw reads was assessed using FastQC (v0.11.7) [42]. Trimmomatic (v0.38) and the sliding window method [44] were used to remove including adapter sequences and low-quality reads (Phred < 30) [45]. The de novo assembly of the trimmed reads was performed using Trinity (vr20140717) [4]. The trimmed reads for each library were mapped to the assembled reference sequence (https://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​genomes/​GenomesGroup.​cgi?​taxid=​10239; retrieved in July 2021) using Bowtie 1.1.2 [44]. To determine viral gene abundance in each library, the read counts were estimated and their expression was measured using RSEM (v1.2.29) [46]. For this analysis, multiple public databases (e.g., NCBI nucleotide, NCBI non-redundant protein, and Pfam databases) were searched to gather all-inclusive information. Transdecoder (v3.0.1) [47] was used to predict virus-specific open reading frames. The assembled contigs associated with the chunkung virome were characterized using DIAMOND (v0.9.21) [48] and the NCBI BLASTn and BLASTx algorithms. The results were filtered using the default E-value cutoff of 1.0E-5. We carefully examined these contigs to identify viruses (Additional file 1 Table S1), excluded those that had nonviral CD-search hits, and selected only those with reliable and significant Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) hits.

BLAST search for identifying viruses in chunkung

The viruses detected in the chunkung were identified on the basis of a BLAST search [49] (Additional file 1 Table S1). To identify viral species affecting chunkung plants, the assembled contigs were used as queries for BLAST analyses (E-value cutoff of 1.0E-5). The BLAST hits with significant similarities to known viruses were considered as potential chunkung viruses. Further analyses (e.g., virus taxa) were performed using iTOL (https://​itol.​embl.​de/​itol.​cgi) [50]. Cytoscape (v3.10.0) [51], which is useful for visualizing and analyzing biological networks, was used to explore eventual virus–host interactions.

Detection of chunkung viruses via (RT-) PCR assays

Primers were designed for the PCR amplification of specific target regions of the viruses identified according to the annotated viral contigs obtained by HTS. The PCR assay was completed to confirm the presence of the viruses in individual plant hosts (Fig. 1A-E.). The Primer3Plus tool (https://​www.​bioinformatics.​nl/​cgi-bin/​primer3plus/​primer3plus.​cgi) [52] was used to design primers on the basis of the contigs corresponding to the identified species (Additional file 2 Table S8). To detect RNA viruses, total RNA was extracted from each chunkung sample using the WizPrep Plant Mini Kit (Wizbiosolutions, Seongnam, South Korea). Similarly, to detect DNA viruses, total DNA was extracted from each chunkung sample using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The RNA viruses were identified via a reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) performed using the one-step SuPrimeScript RT-PCR Premix (2 ×) (GeNet Bio, Daejeon, South Korea), whereas the DNA viruses were identified via a PCR performed using the Prime Taq Premix (GeNet Bio). The PCR products were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining. The PCR products were purified using the HiYield™ Gel/PCR DNA Mini Kit (RBC Bioscience, Taipei, Taiwan), and sent to Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea) for Sanger sequencing. The obtained sequences were analyzed and trimmed using DNAMAN (v5.2.10) (Lynnon BioSoft, CA, USA) [5].

Results

Sample collection and analysis of the symptoms of virus-infected chunkung plants

Clear differences were detected between the asymptomatic and dwarfed plants. The upper group represents asymptomatic plants, which are distinguished by larger morphology and higher yields. In contrast, the bottom group represents dwarfed plants that grew abnormally (i.e., overall poor health, stunted development, and unproductive features) (Fig. 1A-E).

Virome assembly and identification of viruses in chunkung

A total of 661,669,928 raw reads (66.8 Gbp) were obtained for the A library, whereas 655,644,488 raw reads (66.2 Gbp) were generated for the D library (Additional file 1 Table S2 2). For both libraries, the read length was 101 bp. Trimmomatic (v0.38) was used to remove barcode adapters and low-quality sequences. After trimming, 653,637,904 and 645,507,670 high-quality reads remained for the A and D libraries, respectively. The GC content was lower for the A library than for the D library (Additional file 1 Table S2). In addition, 529,312,518 and 344,279,682 trimmed reads (Additional file 1 Table S3) for the A and D libraries, respectively, were mapped to the assembled viral reference sequence using Bowtie. Moreover, 181,976 assembled transcripts with lengths ranging from 201 to 23,564 nucleotides were obtained for the A library, whereas 203,437 assembled transcripts with lengths ranging from 201 to 26,375 nucleotides were obtained for the D library (Additional file 1 Table S4). These transcripts were then compared with the sequences in various publicly available virus RefSeq databases.
A total of 350 contigs associated with 78 different viruses (Figs. 3 and 4) along with satellite RNAs were identified within the RNA-seq dataset. These viruses belong to 21 known genera and 6 unclassified genera (Fig. 5) from 14 known families (Fig. 6). Among the identified viruses, 9 were previously reported and are known pathogens of chunkung (Fig. 3). However, the remaining 69 viruses represented emerging viruses and known viruses that were not previously detected in chunkung. Additionally, some of these viruses were not previously identified in South Korea.
The selected viral contigs for the A library were 202–10,116 bp long, whereas those for the D library were 201–13,564 bp long. For both libraries, the sequence identities of the contigs varied from 21 to 100% (Additional file 1 Table S1). We examined the distribution of the detected plant viruses within each library by analyzing the relative abundance of virus-associated contigs (Additional file 1 Table S5). The most prevalent viruses in the A library were Glehnia littoralis virus 1 (GlLV1; 10.07%), followed by Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV; 9.35%), Angelica bushy stunt virus (AnBSV; 7.91%), Cnidium vein yellowing virus 2 (CnVYV-2; 6.47%), and Cnidium virus X (CnVX; 5.76%). The most common viruses in the D library were AnBSV (10.9%), followed by CMV (8.53%), GlLV1 (7.58%), Strawberry virus 2 (SV2; 6.64%), CnVX (5.69%), and Carrot Ch virus 1 (CChV-1; 5.69%) (Fig. 4, Additional file 1 Table S5). The most prevalent genera in both libraries were Rhabdovirus (22.57%), Caulimovirus (21.43%), and Cucumovirus (9.14%) (Fig. 5, Additional file 1 Table S6), but these contigs were more abundant in the D library than in the A library. Additionally, the genera Chordovirus, Oryzavirus, and Vaccinivirus were identified exclusively in the D library (Fig. 5). Furthermore, viruses in the families Partitiviridae, Picobirnaviridae, and Spinareoviridae were identified exclusively in the dwarfed plants (Fig. 6).
Among the 78 viruses identified on the basis of plant viral gene homology for the two HTS libraries, 25 distinct viruses were detected only in the dwarfed plants (Fig. 4). Intriguingly, a shared viral community comprising 41 viruses was identified in both libraries. We analyzed the viruses that were exclusive to the dwarfed or asymptomatic plants. In the A library, 51 viruses were identified, whereas 66 viruses were identified in the D library (Table 2).
Table 2
HTS-based virus detection—List of virus families, genome types, and relative percent abundance (> 201 nt), and their morphology
Genome
Family
Morphology
Genus
Asymptomatic plant
Dwarfed plant
Total
no. contigs
no. viruses
Abundance (%)
no. contigs
no. viruses
Abundance (%)
no. contigs
no. viruses
Abundance (%)
acircular dsDNA-RT (23virus, 103 contigs)
Caulimoviridae
Icosahedral/bacilliform
Badnavirus
6
5
4.32
11
6
5.21
17
8
4.86
Caulimovirus
27
8
19.42
48
10
22.75
75
11
21.43
Rosadnavirus
6
2
4.32
2
1
0.95
8
2
2.29
Solendovirus
1
1
0.72
1
1
0.47
2
1
0.57
Vaccinivirus
   
1
1
0.47
1
1
0.29
bcircular ssDNA (12 viruses, 16 contigs)
Geminiviridae
Icosahedral
Begomovirus
7
6
5.04
5
5
2.37
12
10
3.43
Citlodavirus
1
1
0.72
1
1
0.47
2
1
0.57
Unassigned
1
1
0.72
1
1
0.47
2
1
0.57
clinear dsRNA (9 viruses, 24 contigs)
Spinareoviridae
 
Fijivirus
5
3
3.6
5
4
2.37
10
4
2.86
Reoviridae
 
Unassigned
   
9
2
4.27
9
2
2.57
Partitiviridae
Icosahedral
Unassigned
   
1
1
0.47
1
1
0.29
Picobirnaviridae
Unassigned
   
1
1
0.47
1
1
0.29
Spinareoviridae
Oryzavirus
   
3
1
1.42
3
1
0.86
dssRNA (-) (13 viruses, 81 contigs)
Rhabdoviridae
Bullet-shaped, helical
Betanucleorhabdovirus
5
1
3.6
2
1
0.95
7
1
2
Cytorhabdovirus
10
2
7.19
29
8
13.74
39
8
11.14
Unassigned
16
3
11.51
17
2
8.06
33
3
9.43
Varicosavirus
1
1
0.72
1
1
0.47
2
1
0.57
essRNA( +) (21 viruses, 122 contigs)
Tombusviridae
Icosahedral
Betacarmovirus
2
1
1.44
2
1
0.95
4
1
1.14
Betaflexiviridae
Filamentous, flexible
Betaflexivirus
1
1
0.72
1
1
0.47
2
1
0.57
Capillovirus
4
1
2.88
6
1
2.84
10
1
2.86
Chordovirus
   
13
2
6.16
13
2
3.71
Bromoviridae
Icosahedral/bacilliform
Cucumovirus
14
2
10.07
18
1
8.53
32
2
9.14
Solemoviridae
Icosahedral
Enamovirus
3
1
2.16
3
1
1.42
6
1
1.71
Polerovirus
2
1
1.44
3
3
1.42
5
3
1.43
Alphaflexivirida
Filamentous, flexible
Potexvirus
9
2
6.47
13
2
6.16
22
2
6.29
Unclassified
 
Satellite RNAs
2
2
1.44
2
2
0.95
4
2
1.14
Secoviridae
Icosahedral
Stralarivirus
3
2
2.16
4
2
1.9
7
2
2
Unassigned
11
2
7.91
7
2
3.32
18
2
5.14
Virgaviridae
Filamentous, rigid/rod-shaped
Tobamovirus
2
2
1.44
1
1
0.47
3
2
0.86
Total
139
51
 
211
66
 
350
78
 
aReverse transcribing circular double stranded DNA
bcircular single stranded DNA
clinear double stranded RNA
dsingle-stranded RNA with a negative sense
esingle-stranded RNA with a positive sense. The table data describe the number of viruses detected in each library along with their respective contig counts

Genome composition and relative abundance of detected viruses in chunkung

During our analysis of the RNA-seq data, we determined the relative abundance of each virus according to its genome type and family (Fig. 7). The viromes included the circular double-stranded DNA with reverse transcriptase (dsDNA-RT) genome (n = 23; 29.43%) belonging to the family Caulimoviridae, the circular single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) genome (n = 12; 4.57%) belonging to the family Geminiviridae, the linear double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) genome (n = 9; 6.86%) belonging to the families Reoviridae, Partitiviridae, Picobirnaviridae, and Spinareoviridae, the positive-sense, single-stranded [ssRNA( +)] genome (n = 21; 36%) belonging to the families Tombusviridae, Betaflexiviridae, Alphaflexiviridae, Bromoviridae, Solemoviridae, Secoviridae, and Virgaviridae as well as satellite RNAs, and the negative-sense, single-stranded RNA [ssRNA( −)] genome (n = 13; 23.14%) from the family Rhabdoviridae. These findings provide valuable insights into the virome composition of this plant species. The RNA virus:DNA virus ratio (43:35) reflected the greater prevalence of RNA viruses in the chunkung virome.

Confirmation of the viruses identified by HTS via (RT-) PCR assay

The viruses identified following the analysis of the HTS data were verified via RT-PCR for RNA viruses and PCR for DNA viruses in chunkugn plants (Fig. 8) using 73 primer pairs (Additional file 2 Table S8) and a specific thermocycling program (Additional file 2 Table S9). Here, we employ three network metrics (tripartite network analysis) to illustrate the distribution of virome genome types within the chunkugn plant, revealing the intricate relationships among various viruses and their effects on the plant health. These distributions were categorized into asymptomatic (on the right side), putative dwarf plant-associated (on the left side), and shared viral communities (in the center). Subsequently, their presence was confirmed via reverse- transcriptase (RT-) PCR (Fig. 8). The result showed that although six viruses were inconsistently confirmed as present in the dwarfed samples, 12 viruses were detected in all dwarfed samples. In contrast, 5 viruses were detected only in the asymptomatic samples (Fig. 8). According to the HTS datasets, Lamium leaf distortion virus (LLDV) and Dahlia mosaic virus (DMV) were detected exclusively in the dwarfed plants. Interestingly, the PCR analysis indicated these two viruses were also present in the asymptomatic samples, indicative of the importance of employing complementary detection methods [19, 53, 54] for the comprehensive identification of viruses. All viral genomes were confirmed by (RT-) PCR, including dsDNA (19 viruses), ssDNA (8 viruses), dsRNA (8 viruses) and ssRNA (26 viruses) (Fig. 8).

Double-stranded reverse transcriptase DNA viruses

Of the 23 dsDNA-RT viruses identified by HTS, 19 were confirmed via PCR assays. These confirmed viruses belong to the genera Badnavirus (6 viruses), Caulimovirus (10 viruses), Rosadnavirus (1 virus), Solendovirus (1 virus), and Vaccinivirus (1 virus), in comparison to the total viruses detected by HTS (Table 3).
Table 3
A list of viruses identified based on RNA sequencing data and their PCR/RT-PCR validation in the chunkugn samples collected from production fields in south Korea in 2021; where Bold font: viruses not confirmed via PCR/RT-PCR assay and viruses indicated with (a): viruses known to infect chunkugn plant
Genome type
Family
Genus
Virus name
Abbreviation
Total reads
Abundance (%)
Identity (%)
Contig length
circular dsDNA,RT
Caulimoviridae
Badnavirus
Blackberry virus F
BVF
69
1.14
50–76
204–472
Cacao Bacilliform SriLanka Virus
CBSLV
12
0.29
46
327
Gulupa bacilliform virus A
GBVA
51
0.57
68–77
264–266
Jujube mosaic-associated virus
JuMaV
59
0.29
41
569
Pelargonium vein banding virus
PVBV
142
1.71
45–85
249–1051
Taro bacilliform virus
TaBV
40
0.29
57
492
Yacon necrotic mottle virus
YNMoV
17
0.29
79
341
Dioscorea bacilliform TR virus
DVB9
42
0.29
81
408
Caulimovirus
Angelica bushy stunt virusa
AnBSV
22,898
9.71
40–100
201–8323
Atractylodes mild mottle virus
AMMV
91
1.14
37–61
303–475
Carnation etched ring virus
CERV
48
0.86
53–80
242–645
Cauliflower mosaic virus
CaMV
1316
3.43
35–72
206–1518
Plantago latent caulimovirus
PlLV
129
0.57
47–82
242–798
Pueraria virus A
PVA
158
0.29
41
897
Soybean Putnam virus
SPuV
6949
3.71
37–88
222–4275
Strawberry vein banding virus
SVBV
436
0.86
41–66
445–1390
Dahlia mosaic virus
DMV
10
0.29
72
272
Horseradish latent virus
HRLV
7
0.29
42
209
Lamium leaf distortion virus
LLDV
220
0.29
50
975
Rosadnavirus
Rose yellow vein virus
RYVV
559
1.71
43–59
240–673
Viola yellow mottle virus
VYMoV
95
0.57
50–56
293–322
Solendovirus
Tobacco vein clearing virus
TVCV
11
0.57
37–47
203–439
Vaccinivirus
Blueberry fruit drop associated virus
BFDaV
19
0.29
64
341
circular ssDNA
Geminiviridae
Begomovirus
African cassava mosaic virus
ACMV
76
0.29
50
456
Cucurbit leaf crumple virus
CuLCrV
12
0.29
45
209
Merremia leaf curl virus
MerLCV
3
0.29
60
220
Squash leaf curl virus
SLCV
50
0.57
65–82
269–289
Tomato leaf curl Burkina Faso virus
TolCBFV
11
0.29
50
255
Tomato leaf curl Pakistan virus
ToLCPaKV
22
0.29
54
243
Tomato yellow leaf curl Thailand virus
TYLCTHV
82
0.29
48
852
Tomato yellow leaf curl virus
TYLCV
33
0.57
51–52
202–43
Yam yellow spot mosaic virus
YYSMV
61
0.29
49
338
Ageratum yellow vein virus
AYVV
1
0.29
54
219
Citlodavirus
Passion fruit chlorotic mottle virus
PCMoV
1515
0.57
44–45
2056–2978
Unassigned
Tomato curly top virus
ToCTV
527
0.57
57–59
659–1490
linear dsRNA
Reoviridae
Fijivirus
Fiji disease virus
FDV
205,206
0.86
22–32
3759–4564
Oat sterile dwarf virus
OSDV
104,808
0.57
22–23
1975–2018
Rice black streaked dwarf virus
RBSDV
95,274
0.29
32
4570
Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus
SRBSDV
323,936
1.14
21–23
3576–3610
Unassigned
Grapevine Cabernet Sauvignon reovirus
GCSV
414
0.86
22–36
794–1386
Raspberry latent virus
RpLV
479
1.71
27–53
401–1738
Partitiviridae
Unassigned
Panax cryptic virus 4
PCV4
6
0.29
52
262
Picobirnaviridae
Unassigned
Lysoka partiti-like virus
LPLV
9
0.29
54
222
Spinareoviridae
Oryzavirus
Rice ragged stunt virus
RRSV
34
0.86
39–46
317–386
ssRNA (-)
Rhabdoviridae
Betanucleorhabdovirus
Cnidium virus 1a
CnV1
67,823
2
77–100
779–8725
Cytorhabdovirus
Ivy vein banding virus
IVBV
15
0.29
90
285
Black currant cytorhabdovirus 1
BCaRV
45
0.57
58–60
239–492
Lettuce yellow mottle virus
LYMoV
30
0.29
60
426
Raspberry vein chlorosis virus
RVCV
21
0.57
58–64
225–237
Strawberry virus 2
SV2
406
4
51–89
204–998
Alfalfa dwarf virus
ADV
3
0.29
51
218
Sambucus virus1
SaV1
50,191
3.43
60–92
258–13,564
Trichosanthes associated rhabdovirus 1
TrARV1
3384
1.71
63–91
275–3010
Unassigned
Bacopa monnieri virus 3
BmV3
125
0.57
36–40
539–610
Cynara cardunculus rhabdovirus
CyRV
10
0.29
93
248
Glehnia littoralis virus 1
GlLV1
4697
8.57
48–98
205–2498
Varicosavirus
Aponogeton virus 1
ApoV1
3903
0.57
40–74
1789–1829
ssRNA( +)
Tombusviridae
Betacarmovirus
Japanese iris necrotic ring virus
JINRV
12
1.14
88–95
214–421
Betaflexiviridae
Betaflexivirus
Iris domestica betaflexivirus 1
IDBV
47,633
0.57
85–86
5023–5024
Capillovirus
Apple stem grooving virusa
ASGV
76,642
2.86
95–100
243–6507
Chordovirus
Carrot Ch virus 1
CChV1
760
3.43
60–95
232–1879
Hogweed virus 4
HV4
15
0.29
88
591
Bromoviridae
Cucumovirus
Cucumber mosaic virusa
CMV
17,428,208
8.86
87–100
205–3380
Hydrocharis dubia cucumovirus
HDCV
159
0.29
97
422
Solemoviridae
Enamovirus
Arracacha latent virus E associated RNA
ALVE
4,238,694
1.71
49–85
1078–2923
Polerovirus
Cnidium polerovirus 1a
CnPV1
578,766
0.57
96–98
343–6094
Pepper vein yellows virus
PeVYV
40
0.29
94
547
Pepper yellow leaf curl Thailand virus
PepYLCTHV
12
0.29
67
238
Alphaflexivirida
Potexvirus
Cnidium virus Xa
CnVX
120,246
5.71
79–100
204–5422
Potato virus X
PVX
43,104
0.57
33
2127–2155
Unclassified
Satellite RNAs
Cucumber mosaic virus satellite RNA
CMVsat
7553
0.57
93–97
363–711
Peony yellowing associated secovirus satellite RNA
PYSV
555,062
0.57
67
1016–1017
Secoviridae
Stralarivirus
Lychnis mottle virusa
LyMoV
289,682
0.57
96–97
3685–3710
Strawberry latent ringspot virus
SLRV
5289
1.43
82–98
394–517
Unassigned
Cnidium vein yellowing virus 1a
CnVYV1
350,522
0.86
91–100
1476–6914
Cnidium vein yellowing virus 2a
CnVYV2
143,789
4.29
94–100
216–2530
Virgaviridae
Tobamovirus
Opuntia virus 2
OpV2
97
0.29
85
672
Rubber tree latent virus 1
RTLV1
43,403
0.57
36
8256–8315

Single-stranded DNA viruses

Of the 12 ssDNA viruses identified by HTS, 8 were confirmed via PCR assays. These confirmed viruses belong to the genus Begomovirus (n = 6 viruses) as compared to the 10 viruses detected by HTS. Viruses belong to the genus Citlodavirus and the unclassified Geminiviridae were also confirmed by PCR (Table 3).

Double-stranded RNA viruses

Of the 9 dsRNA viruses identified by HTS, 8 were confirmed by RT-PCR. All HTS-identified viruses belong to the genus Fijivirus were confirmed by RT-PCR. Additionally, two unclassified viruses in the family Reoviridae, one unclassified virus in the family Partitiviridae, and 1 virus in the genus Oryzavirus were also confirmed by RT-PCR (Table 3).

Positive-sense, single-stranded viruses

Of the 21 ssRNA( +) viruses identified by HTS, 16 were confirmed by RT-PCR assays. RT-PCR analyses confirmed the presence of these viruses from 10 known genera namely, Betacarmovirus, Betaflexivirus, Capillovirus, Chordovirus, Cucumovirus, Enamovirus, Polerovirus, Potexvirus, Stralarivirus and Tobamovirus (Table 3).

Negative-sense, single-stranded viruses

Of the 13 ssRNA( −) viruses identified by HTS, 10 were confirmed by RT-PCR assays. RT-PCR analyses confirmed the presence of 10 viruses in the Rhabdoviridae family compared to the number of viruses detected by HTS (Table 3).

Common chunkugn viruses

Angelica bushy stunt virus (AnBSV), cnidium polerovirus 1 (CnPV1), cnidium vein yellowing virus 1 and 2 (CnVYV-1 and 2), cnidium virus 1 (CnV1), cnidium virus X (CnVX), apple stem grooving virus (ASGV), and cucumber mosaic virus (CMV). These viruses were detected in all the samples as described in Table 3.

Distribution of viruses in dwarfed chunkung plants

Our analysis indicated that compared with the asymptomatic plants, the dwarfed plants were infected with more viruses. 12 viruses (7 DNA viruses and 5 RNA viruses) were consistently detected in all dwarfed plants.
In terms of the total number of presumed viruses associated with dwarfed and asymptomatic plants based on genome type, and their relative abundance associated with dwarfed and asymptomatic plants, ssRNA( +) viruses were the predominant group in both asymptomatic and dwarfed plants, followed by circular dsDNA-RT viruses. We also examined the infection rates of each sample by performing (RT-) PCR analysis (Fig. 9). Except for the third sample (3D), all samples had uniform infection rates, with an equal number of viruses. The asymptomatic samples were infected with 41 viruses, which was fewer than the 49 viruses infecting the dwarfed samples. A total of 53 viruses were detected in sample 3D.

Discussion

The advancement of virome databases, powered by reliable and precise HTS techniques, has transformed virology and created new avenues for research opportunities. These include managing disease risks [54], tracking emerging diseases, and implementing new phytosanitary regulations [55]. Hence, HTS offers a significant advantage for virome characterization over conventional techniques such as ELISA, microarray, or (RT-) PCR detection because its efficacy is primarily dictated by the completeness of the reference databases [56], the depth of the data [57], and the accuracy of the base calls [58]. By analyzing viral genomes at a large scale [59], researchers can gain insights into factors such as transmission routes and epidemiology, host range, genetic diversity [6], and evolutionary dynamics [60].
In this study, we used HTS analyses to identify viral populations and their genome types in asymptomatic and dwarfed chunkugn plants (Fig. 1), which appear to be resistant and susceptible (Fig. 1) to the various viruses, respectively. Although chunkugn plants are susceptible to a wide range of RNA viruses, it was surprising that different DNA and RNA viruses could co-infect chunkugn plants. Here, we discuss the efficacy of HTS techniques in revealing a wide range of biologically significant breakthroughs. Due to its broad-spectrum approach, universality, and accurate pathogen profiling, HTS is capable of effectively detecting multiple viruses, both known and novel [61], in infected samples, even at minimal concentrations [56]. This holistic approach significantly reduces the risk of false negatives, enabling us to identify various co-infections (Fig. 10) and explore the untapped potential of viral diversity in chunkugn plants. In total, based on sequencing reads from 78 HTS-detected viruses, 61 viruses were collectively confirmed via (RT-) PCR in either of the collected samples (1D, 1A ~ 5D, 5A), as shown in Fig. 10. More specifically, the analysis confirmed the presence of 35 viruses in each sample, which is indicative of the multiple co-infections of individual plants. These viruses are broadly distributed and can infect and putatively persist in chunkung plants, regardless of the plant’s health status. According to our analysis, the viruses belong to no fewer than 21 genera (Fig. 5), representing 14 different families (Fig. 7). The strength of HTS techniques lies in their ability to identify potential chunkugn viruses (Fig. 10, Table 3), particularly in cases where disease symptoms are absent, ambiguous, or attributed to only a limited number of viruses, which may not be detectable using conventional methods. This capability is particularly crucial in the context of viral diseases, where early detection plays a pivotal role in implementing effective control strategies. In previous studies, researchers have investigated viruses infecting chunkugn plants [9, 28]. However, comprehensive studies on the chunkugn virome have been limited [3, 4, 9, 29], and there were no reports of DNA viruses. Our study filled this gap and identified the co-infection of chunkugn by four different virus genome types (i.e., ssRNA, dsRNA, ssDNA, and dsDNA) (Fig. 8). The interaction of different viruses can exacerbate disease symptoms in chunkugn plants and potentially spread them, indicating the possibility of further biodiversity and quasispecies development (different genome sequences within the same host) due to their rapid replication and mutation rates [38]. Therefore, chunkugn plant can serve as good model for investigating the co-infection caused by diverse viruses and their genetic variants.
According to this study, our analysis of the distribution of DNA and RNA viruses in chunkung plants indicated that RNA viruses were more abundant than DNA viruses (Additional file 2, Table S11). This prevalence can be explained by several factors [49]. First, compared with DNA viruses, RNA viruses have higher mutation rates [20], allowing them to rapidly adapt to changing conditions and infect plants. Second, RNA viruses have smaller genomes [37] that can be efficiently packaged and replicated within plant cells. Additionally, because of their relatively small genomes, RNA viruses are easily transmitted between plants and vectors [49]. Third, diverse genetic variants may be generated in RNA viruses via recombination [11, 62] and reassortment [11, 63]. Fourth, RNA viruses rely on the host plant cellular machinery for replication and protein synthesis [11], allowing them to establish infections more efficiently than DNA viruses. Finally, the mechanisms mediating the transmission of RNA viruses (e.g., insect vectors or pollen) enhance their dispersal among plant populations [24]. However, the occurrence and distribution of DNA viruses in plants can also be influenced by several factors. For instance, pararetroviruses (PRVs, family Caulimovirida) have wide geographical dissemination and invade a wide range of dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plant species [64]. PRV infections can be both asymptomatic and symptomatic, and they can remain dormant in their host for an indefinite period, becoming active when confronted with specific stress [64].
In general, viruses are obligate parasites that tend to build symbiotic relationships with their hosts [65], creating a suitable environment for the co-existence of multiple viruses within a single plant. This co-infection of different viruses within the host could cause harm [38]. For instance, studies have shown that mixed infections in plants can lead to synergistic interactions [11], resulting in increased disease symptoms. Although viruses are considered primary pathogens, some may serve beneficial roles as symbiotic partners within the host plant [65]. In contrast, certain co-infected viruses may not be associated with host disease symptoms.
Despite its advantages, the HTS has limitations. For instance, while HTS analysis exclusively detected two viruses, LLDV and DMV (Fig. 10), in dwarfed plants, PCR data revealed that both viruses were also present in the asymptomatic plants. This discrepancy suggests that HTS alone may be insufficient for a thorough and accurate investigation of the complete virome [16, 41]. Furthermore, distinguishing between true viral sequences and background noise or contaminants introduced during sample preparation or sequencing is challenging [16, 66]. Future advancements may focus on reducing the cost and complexity of HTS workflows, increasing the speed and throughput of sequencing platforms, and improving bioinformatics tools for data analysis and interpretation. The evidence presented in this work can offer valuable insights for researchers developing control and preventive strategies [53], including the implementation of biosecurity protocols to curb the spread of plant viruses in the field. The significant value of HTS and bioinformatics in plant health management will bolster their effectiveness in combating viral diseases, promoting sustainable agriculture, and ensuring reliable virus diagnosis for both known and unknown viruses.

Conclusions

The data presented herein provide evidence that chunkung serves as an important reservoir of diverse plant viruses, which may be related to its limited genetic diversity. Results revealed an unexpectedly high co-infection rate. This raises intriguing questions regarding the mechanisms underlying the co-existence of several dozen viruses within individual plants. Additional research is needed to clarify how several dozen viruses can co-exist and interact with each other in a single plant. This study generated essential data for predicting viral outbreaks and for managing the potential risks related to the spread of phytopathogenic viruses in agroecological systems.

Acknowledgements

We extend our heartfelt appreciation to the following individuals for their invaluable contributions to this study: M.T. for writing the manuscript, S.K. for helping to edit the manuscript, W.F. for conducting in vitro experiments, and J.S. for formulating, designing, and supervising the study. We also acknowledge the other authors for their assistance with processing samples. We thank Edanz (www.​edanz.​com/​ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Declarations

Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HE, Han JE, Lee H, Murthy HN, Kwon HJ, Lee GM, et al. Establishment of an Efficient In Vitro Propagation of Cnidium officinale Makino and Selection of Superior Clones through Flow Cytometric Assessment of DNA Content. Genes (Basel). 2022;13:1815.PubMedCrossRef Kim HE, Han JE, Lee H, Murthy HN, Kwon HJ, Lee GM, et al. Establishment of an Efficient In Vitro Propagation of Cnidium officinale Makino and Selection of Superior Clones through Flow Cytometric Assessment of DNA Content. Genes (Basel). 2022;13:1815.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi HS, Kim MSL, Sawamura M. Constituents of the essential oil of Cnidium officinale Makino, a Korean medicinal plant. Flavour Fragr J. 2002;17:49–53.CrossRef Choi HS, Kim MSL, Sawamura M. Constituents of the essential oil of Cnidium officinale Makino, a Korean medicinal plant. Flavour Fragr J. 2002;17:49–53.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gudeta WF, Belete MT, Igori D, Kim SE, Moon JS. Complete genome sequence of cnidium closterovirus 1, a novel member of the genus Closterovirus infecting Cnidium officinale. Arch Virol. 2022;167:1491–4.PubMedCrossRef Gudeta WF, Belete MT, Igori D, Kim SE, Moon JS. Complete genome sequence of cnidium closterovirus 1, a novel member of the genus Closterovirus infecting Cnidium officinale. Arch Virol. 2022;167:1491–4.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Belete MT, Igori D, Kim S eun, Lee SH, Moon JS. Complete genome sequence of cnidium virus 1, a novel betanucleorhabdovirus infecting Cnidium officinale. Arch Virol. 2022;167:973–7.PubMedCrossRef Belete MT, Igori D, Kim S eun, Lee SH, Moon JS. Complete genome sequence of cnidium virus 1, a novel betanucleorhabdovirus infecting Cnidium officinale. Arch Virol. 2022;167:973–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Li YM, Jia M, Li HQ, Zhang ND, Wen X, Rahman K, et al. Cnidium monnieri: A review of traditional uses, phytochemical and ethnopharmacological properties. Am J Chin Med. 2015;43:835–77.PubMedCrossRef Li YM, Jia M, Li HQ, Zhang ND, Wen X, Rahman K, et al. Cnidium monnieri: A review of traditional uses, phytochemical and ethnopharmacological properties. Am J Chin Med. 2015;43:835–77.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazuma Iwai, Tatsuya Kon, Haruki Abe, Hiroshi Honma, Naoki Kawasumi, Hiroko Kawakami, Midori Kawashimo, Miki Sakurai SF. Genetic diversity of viruses infecting cnidium plants ( Cnidium officinale ) in Japan : cnidium vein yellowing virus ( CnVYV ), cnidium virus X ( CnVX ) and cucumber mosaic virus ( CMV ). Res Sq. 2022; p.3–7. Kazuma Iwai, Tatsuya Kon, Haruki Abe, Hiroshi Honma, Naoki Kawasumi, Hiroko Kawakami, Midori Kawashimo, Miki Sakurai SF. Genetic diversity of viruses infecting cnidium plants ( Cnidium officinale ) in Japan : cnidium vein yellowing virus ( CnVYV ), cnidium virus X ( CnVX ) and cucumber mosaic virus ( CMV ). Res Sq. 2022; p.3–7.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran HNK, Cao TQ, Kim JA, Youn UJ, Kim S, Woo MH, et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of compounds from the rhizome of Cnidium officinale. Arch Pharm Res. 2018;41:977–85.PubMedCrossRef Tran HNK, Cao TQ, Kim JA, Youn UJ, Kim S, Woo MH, et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of compounds from the rhizome of Cnidium officinale. Arch Pharm Res. 2018;41:977–85.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Adil M, Ren X, Jeong BR. Light elicited growth, antioxidant enzymes activities and production of medicinal compounds in callus culture of Cnidium officinale Makino. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2019;196:111509.CrossRef Adil M, Ren X, Jeong BR. Light elicited growth, antioxidant enzymes activities and production of medicinal compounds in callus culture of Cnidium officinale Makino. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2019;196:111509.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Park YC, Kim KK, Jun HJ, Kang EH, Lee SR, Ahn JK, et al. Complete genome sequence of a novel member of the genus Polerovirus from Cnidium officinale in South Korea. Arch Virol. 2023;168:104.PubMedCrossRef Park YC, Kim KK, Jun HJ, Kang EH, Lee SR, Ahn JK, et al. Complete genome sequence of a novel member of the genus Polerovirus from Cnidium officinale in South Korea. Arch Virol. 2023;168:104.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nuzzo F, Moine A, Nerva L, Pagliarani C, Perrone I, Boccacci P, et al. Grapevine virome and production of healthy plants by somatic embryogenesis. Microb Biotechnol. 2022;15:1357–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Nuzzo F, Moine A, Nerva L, Pagliarani C, Perrone I, Boccacci P, et al. Grapevine virome and production of healthy plants by somatic embryogenesis. Microb Biotechnol. 2022;15:1357–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Singhal P, Nabi SU, Yadav MK, Dubey A. Mixed infection of plant viruses: diagnostics, interactions and impact on host. J Plant Dis Prot. 2021;128:353–68.CrossRef Singhal P, Nabi SU, Yadav MK, Dubey A. Mixed infection of plant viruses: diagnostics, interactions and impact on host. J Plant Dis Prot. 2021;128:353–68.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander HM, Mauck KE, Whitfield AE, Garrett KA, Malmstrom CM. Plant-virus interactions and the agro-ecological interface. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2014;138:529–47.CrossRef Alexander HM, Mauck KE, Whitfield AE, Garrett KA, Malmstrom CM. Plant-virus interactions and the agro-ecological interface. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2014;138:529–47.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietzgen RG, Bejerman NE, Goodin MM, Higgins CM, Huot OB, Kondo H, et al. Diversity and epidemiology of plant rhabdoviruses. Virus Res. 2020;281:197942.PubMedCrossRef Dietzgen RG, Bejerman NE, Goodin MM, Higgins CM, Huot OB, Kondo H, et al. Diversity and epidemiology of plant rhabdoviruses. Virus Res. 2020;281:197942.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Alcalá-Briseño RI, Casarrubias-Castillo K, López-Ley D, Garrett KA, Silva-Rosales L. Network Analysis of the Papaya Orchard Virome from Two Agroecological Regions of Chiapas. Mexico mSystems. 2020;5:e00423-e519.PubMed Alcalá-Briseño RI, Casarrubias-Castillo K, López-Ley D, Garrett KA, Silva-Rosales L. Network Analysis of the Papaya Orchard Virome from Two Agroecological Regions of Chiapas. Mexico mSystems. 2020;5:e00423-e519.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Maclot F, Candresse T, Filloux D, Malmstrom CM, Roumagnac P, van der Vlugt R, et al. Illuminating an Ecological Blackbox: Using High Throughput Sequencing to Characterize the Plant Virome Across Scales. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1–16.CrossRef Maclot F, Candresse T, Filloux D, Malmstrom CM, Roumagnac P, van der Vlugt R, et al. Illuminating an Ecological Blackbox: Using High Throughput Sequencing to Characterize the Plant Virome Across Scales. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1–16.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu Y, Li S, Na C, Yang L, Lu M. Analyses of virus/viroid communities in nectarine trees by next-generation sequencing and insight into viral synergisms implication in host disease symptoms. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–12. Xu Y, Li S, Na C, Yang L, Lu M. Analyses of virus/viroid communities in nectarine trees by next-generation sequencing and insight into viral synergisms implication in host disease symptoms. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–12.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Verbeek M, Dullemans AM, van Raaij HMG, Verhoeven JTJ, van der Vlugt RAA. Lettuce necrotic leaf curl virus, a new plant virus infecting lettuce and a proposed member of the genus Torradovirus. Arch Virol. 2014;159:801–5.PubMedCrossRef Verbeek M, Dullemans AM, van Raaij HMG, Verhoeven JTJ, van der Vlugt RAA. Lettuce necrotic leaf curl virus, a new plant virus infecting lettuce and a proposed member of the genus Torradovirus. Arch Virol. 2014;159:801–5.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehetre GT, Leo VV, Singh G, Sorokan A, Maksimov I, Yadav MK, et al. Current developments and challenges in plant viral diagnostics: A systematic review. Viruses. 2021;13:1–31.CrossRef Mehetre GT, Leo VV, Singh G, Sorokan A, Maksimov I, Yadav MK, et al. Current developments and challenges in plant viral diagnostics: A systematic review. Viruses. 2021;13:1–31.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat García-Arenal F, Fraile A, Malpica JM. Variation and evolution of plant virus populations. Int Microbiol. 2003;6:225–32.PubMedCrossRef García-Arenal F, Fraile A, Malpica JM. Variation and evolution of plant virus populations. Int Microbiol. 2003;6:225–32.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Olmedo-Velarde A, Loristo J, Kong A, Waisen P, Wang KH, Hu J, et al. Examination of the Virome of Taro Plants Affected by a Lethal Disease, the Alomae-Bobone Virus Complex, in Papua New Guinea. Viruses. 2022;14:1410.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Olmedo-Velarde A, Loristo J, Kong A, Waisen P, Wang KH, Hu J, et al. Examination of the Virome of Taro Plants Affected by a Lethal Disease, the Alomae-Bobone Virus Complex, in Papua New Guinea. Viruses. 2022;14:1410.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamitani M, Nagano AJ, Honjo MN, Kudoh H. RNA-Seq reveals virus-virus and virus-plant interactions in nature. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92:1–11.CrossRef Kamitani M, Nagano AJ, Honjo MN, Kudoh H. RNA-Seq reveals virus-virus and virus-plant interactions in nature. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92:1–11.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Escriu F, Fraile A, García-Arenal F. The evolution of virulence in a plant virus. Evolution. 2003;57:755–65.PubMed Escriu F, Fraile A, García-Arenal F. The evolution of virulence in a plant virus. Evolution. 2003;57:755–65.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamelin FM, Allen LJS, Prendeville HR, Hajimorad MR, Jeger MJ. The evolution of plant virus transmission pathways. J Theor Biol. 2016;396:75–89.PubMedCrossRef Hamelin FM, Allen LJS, Prendeville HR, Hajimorad MR, Jeger MJ. The evolution of plant virus transmission pathways. J Theor Biol. 2016;396:75–89.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mushegian AR, Elena SF. Evolution of plant virus movement proteins from the 30K superfamily and of their homologs integrated in plant genomes. Virology. 2015;476:304–15.PubMedCrossRef Mushegian AR, Elena SF. Evolution of plant virus movement proteins from the 30K superfamily and of their homologs integrated in plant genomes. Virology. 2015;476:304–15.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Quintanilha-Peixoto G, Fonseca PLC, Raya FT, Marone MP, Bortolini DE, Mieczkowski P, et al. The sisal virome: Uncovering the viral diversity of agave varieties reveals new and organ-specific viruses. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1–21.CrossRef Quintanilha-Peixoto G, Fonseca PLC, Raya FT, Marone MP, Bortolini DE, Mieczkowski P, et al. The sisal virome: Uncovering the viral diversity of agave varieties reveals new and organ-specific viruses. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1–21.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Elena SF, Fraile A, García-Arenal F. Evolution and emergence of plant viruses. 2014.CrossRef Elena SF, Fraile A, García-Arenal F. Evolution and emergence of plant viruses. 2014.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Honma H, Tsushima D, Kawakami H, Fujihara N, Tsusaka T, Kawashimo M, et al. Complete nucleotide sequence of a new potexvirus, ‘Cnidium virus X’, isolated from Cnidium officinale in Japan. Arch Virol. 2019;164:1931–5.PubMedCrossRef Honma H, Tsushima D, Kawakami H, Fujihara N, Tsusaka T, Kawashimo M, et al. Complete nucleotide sequence of a new potexvirus, ‘Cnidium virus X’, isolated from Cnidium officinale in Japan. Arch Virol. 2019;164:1931–5.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo RH, Zhao F, Lim S, Igori D, Kim SM, An TJ, et al. The complete genome sequences of two isolates of cnidium vein yellowing virus, a tentative new member of the family Secoviridae. Arch Virol. 2015;160:2911–4.PubMedCrossRef Yoo RH, Zhao F, Lim S, Igori D, Kim SM, An TJ, et al. The complete genome sequences of two isolates of cnidium vein yellowing virus, a tentative new member of the family Secoviridae. Arch Virol. 2015;160:2911–4.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraile A, García-Arenal F. Environment and evolution modulate plant virus pathogenesis. Curr Opin Virol. 2016;17:50–6.PubMedCrossRef Fraile A, García-Arenal F. Environment and evolution modulate plant virus pathogenesis. Curr Opin Virol. 2016;17:50–6.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong J-J, Ju H-J, Noh J. A Review of Detection Methods for the Plant Viruses. Res Plant Dis. 2014;20:173–81.CrossRef Jeong J-J, Ju H-J, Noh J. A Review of Detection Methods for the Plant Viruses. Res Plant Dis. 2014;20:173–81.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeger MJ. The epidemiology of plant virus disease: Towards a new synthesis. Plants. 2020;9:1–50.CrossRef Jeger MJ. The epidemiology of plant virus disease: Towards a new synthesis. Plants. 2020;9:1–50.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraile A, McLeish MJ, Pagán I, González-Jara P, Piñero D, García-Arenal F. Environmental heterogeneity and the evolution of plant-virus interactions: Viruses in wild pepper populations. Virus Res. 2017;241:68–76.PubMedCrossRef Fraile A, McLeish MJ, Pagán I, González-Jara P, Piñero D, García-Arenal F. Environmental heterogeneity and the evolution of plant-virus interactions: Viruses in wild pepper populations. Virus Res. 2017;241:68–76.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Prabha K, Baranwal VK, Jain RK. Applications of next generation high throughput sequencing technologies in characterization, discovery and molecular interaction of plant viruses. Indian J Virol. 2013;24:157–65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Prabha K, Baranwal VK, Jain RK. Applications of next generation high throughput sequencing technologies in characterization, discovery and molecular interaction of plant viruses. Indian J Virol. 2013;24:157–65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Polischuk V, Budzanivska I, Shevchenko T, Oliynik S. Evidence for plant viruses in the region of Argentina Islands. Antarctica FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007;59:409–17.PubMedCrossRef Polischuk V, Budzanivska I, Shevchenko T, Oliynik S. Evidence for plant viruses in the region of Argentina Islands. Antarctica FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007;59:409–17.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolja VV, Krupovic M, Koonin EV. Deep Roots and Splendid Boughs of the Global Plant Virome. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2020;58:23–53.PubMedCrossRef Dolja VV, Krupovic M, Koonin EV. Deep Roots and Splendid Boughs of the Global Plant Virome. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2020;58:23–53.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu Q, Ding SW, Zhang Y, Zhu S. Identification of Viruses and Viroids by Next-Generation Sequencing and Homology-Dependent and Homology-Independent Algorithms. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2015;53:425–44.PubMedCrossRef Wu Q, Ding SW, Zhang Y, Zhu S. Identification of Viruses and Viroids by Next-Generation Sequencing and Homology-Dependent and Homology-Independent Algorithms. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2015;53:425–44.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Jo Y, Choi H, Kim SM, Kim SL, Lee BC, Cho WK. The pepper virome: Natural co-infection of diverse viruses and their quasispecies. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:1–12.CrossRef Jo Y, Choi H, Kim SM, Kim SL, Lee BC, Cho WK. The pepper virome: Natural co-infection of diverse viruses and their quasispecies. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:1–12.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Rivarez MPS, Vučurović A, Mehle N, Ravnikar M, Kutnjak D. Global Advances in Tomato Virome Research: Current Status and the Impact of High-Throughput Sequencing. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:671925.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Rivarez MPS, Vučurović A, Mehle N, Ravnikar M, Kutnjak D. Global Advances in Tomato Virome Research: Current Status and the Impact of High-Throughput Sequencing. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:671925.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Bejerman N, Roumagnac P, Nemchinov LG. High-Throughput Sequencing for Deciphering the Virome of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1–17.CrossRef Bejerman N, Roumagnac P, Nemchinov LG. High-Throughput Sequencing for Deciphering the Virome of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1–17.CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Moubset O, François S, Maclot F, Palanga E, Julian C, Claude L, et al. Virion-Associated Nucleic Acid-Based Metagenomics: A Decade of Advances in Molecular Characterization of Plant Viruses. Phytopathology. 2022;112:2253–72.PubMedCrossRef Moubset O, François S, Maclot F, Palanga E, Julian C, Claude L, et al. Virion-Associated Nucleic Acid-Based Metagenomics: A Decade of Advances in Molecular Characterization of Plant Viruses. Phytopathology. 2022;112:2253–72.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Redila CD, Prakash V, Nouri S. Metagenomics analysis of the wheat virome identifies novel plant and fungal-associated viral sequences. Viruses. 2021;13:2457.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Redila CD, Prakash V, Nouri S. Metagenomics analysis of the wheat virome identifies novel plant and fungal-associated viral sequences. Viruses. 2021;13:2457.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen S, Yu F, Li Z, Zhang Y, Wang H, Zhai J, et al. Complete genome sequence of a novel virga-like virus infecting Hevea brasiliensis. Arch Virol. 2022;167:965–8.PubMedCrossRef Chen S, Yu F, Li Z, Zhang Y, Wang H, Zhai J, et al. Complete genome sequence of a novel virga-like virus infecting Hevea brasiliensis. Arch Virol. 2022;167:965–8.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Belete MT, Kim SE, Igori D, Ahn JK, Seo HK, Park YC, et al. Complete genome sequence of daphne virus 1, a novel cytorhabdovirus infecting Daphne odora. Arch Virol. 2023;168:141.PubMedCrossRef Belete MT, Kim SE, Igori D, Ahn JK, Seo HK, Park YC, et al. Complete genome sequence of daphne virus 1, a novel cytorhabdovirus infecting Daphne odora. Arch Virol. 2023;168:141.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams IP, Skelton A, Macarthur R, Hodges T, Hinds H, Flint L, et al. Carrot yellow leaf virus is associated with carrot internal necrosis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e109125.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Adams IP, Skelton A, Macarthur R, Hodges T, Hinds H, Flint L, et al. Carrot yellow leaf virus is associated with carrot internal necrosis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e109125.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu X, Shi X, Chen C, Zhang L. Improving RNA-Seq expression estimation by modeling isoform- and exon-specific read sequencing rate. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:1–13.CrossRef Liu X, Shi X, Chen C, Zhang L. Improving RNA-Seq expression estimation by modeling isoform- and exon-specific read sequencing rate. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:1–13.CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Wainaina JM, Ateka E, Makori T, Kehoe MA, Boykin LM. A metagenomic study of DNA viruses from samples of local varieties of common bean in Kenya. PeerJ. 2019;2019:1–18. Wainaina JM, Ateka E, Makori T, Kehoe MA, Boykin LM. A metagenomic study of DNA viruses from samples of local varieties of common bean in Kenya. PeerJ. 2019;2019:1–18.
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Z, Neupane A, Feng J, Pedersen C, Marzano SYL. Direct metatranscriptomic survey of the sunflower microbiome and virome. Viruses. 2021;13:1–14.CrossRef Wang Z, Neupane A, Feng J, Pedersen C, Marzano SYL. Direct metatranscriptomic survey of the sunflower microbiome and virome. Viruses. 2021;13:1–14.CrossRef
49.
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng R, Li X, Jiang L, Gong L, Geslin C, Shao Z. Virus diversity and interactions with hosts in deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Microbiome. 2022;10:1–17.CrossRef Cheng R, Li X, Jiang L, Gong L, Geslin C, Shao Z. Virus diversity and interactions with hosts in deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Microbiome. 2022;10:1–17.CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Kieft K, Zhou Z, Anantharaman K. VIBRANT: Automated recovery, annotation and curation of microbial viruses, and evaluation of viral community function from genomic sequences. Microbiome. 2020;8:1–23.CrossRef Kieft K, Zhou Z, Anantharaman K. VIBRANT: Automated recovery, annotation and curation of microbial viruses, and evaluation of viral community function from genomic sequences. Microbiome. 2020;8:1–23.CrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Rivarez MPS, Pecman A, Bačnik K, Ferreira OMC, Vučurović A, Seljak G, et al. In-depth study of tomato and weed viromes reveals undiscovered plant virus diversity in an agroecosystem. bioRxiv. 2022; 498278. Rivarez MPS, Pecman A, Bačnik K, Ferreira OMC, Vučurović A, Seljak G, et al. In-depth study of tomato and weed viromes reveals undiscovered plant virus diversity in an agroecosystem. bioRxiv. 2022; 498278.
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacroix C, Renner K, Cole E, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Malmstrom CM. Methodological guidelines for accurate detection of viruses in wild plant species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:1966–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lacroix C, Renner K, Cole E, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Malmstrom CM. Methodological guidelines for accurate detection of viruses in wild plant species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:1966–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubio L, Galipienso L, Ferriol I. Detection of Plant Viruses and Disease Management: Relevance of Genetic Diversity and Evolution. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1–23.CrossRef Rubio L, Galipienso L, Ferriol I. Detection of Plant Viruses and Disease Management: Relevance of Genetic Diversity and Evolution. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1–23.CrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Sepúlveda M, Cardona D, García YG, Higuita M, Gutiérrez PA, Marín M. Virome analysis for identification of viruses associated with asymptomatic infection of purple passion fruit (Passiflora edulis f. edulis) in Colombia. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2022;97:187–200.CrossRef Sepúlveda M, Cardona D, García YG, Higuita M, Gutiérrez PA, Marín M. Virome analysis for identification of viruses associated with asymptomatic infection of purple passion fruit (Passiflora edulis f. edulis) in Colombia. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2022;97:187–200.CrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Valenzuela SL, Norambuena T, Morgante V, García F, Jiménez JC, Núñez C, et al. Viroscope: Plant viral diagnosis from high-throughput sequencing data using biologically-informed genome assembly coverage. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:967021.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Valenzuela SL, Norambuena T, Morgante V, García F, Jiménez JC, Núñez C, et al. Viroscope: Plant viral diagnosis from high-throughput sequencing data using biologically-informed genome assembly coverage. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:967021.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Maree HJ, Fox A, Al Rwahnih M, Boonham N, Candresse T. Application of hts for routine plant virus diagnostics: state of the art and challenges. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1–4.CrossRef Maree HJ, Fox A, Al Rwahnih M, Boonham N, Candresse T. Application of hts for routine plant virus diagnostics: state of the art and challenges. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1–4.CrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Massingham T, Goldman N. All your base: A fast and accurate probabilistic approach to base calling. Genome Biol. 2012;13:1–15.CrossRef Massingham T, Goldman N. All your base: A fast and accurate probabilistic approach to base calling. Genome Biol. 2012;13:1–15.CrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang S, Mao Q, Wang Y, He J, Yang J, Chen X, et al. Expanding known viral diversity in plants: virome of 161 species alongside an ancient canal. Environ Microbiomes. 2022;17:1–15. Yang S, Mao Q, Wang Y, He J, Yang J, Chen X, et al. Expanding known viral diversity in plants: virome of 161 species alongside an ancient canal. Environ Microbiomes. 2022;17:1–15.
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruark-Seward CL, Bonville B, Kennedy G, Rasmussen DA. Evolutionary dynamics of Tomato spotted wilt virus within and between alternate plant hosts and thrips. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–16.CrossRef Ruark-Seward CL, Bonville B, Kennedy G, Rasmussen DA. Evolutionary dynamics of Tomato spotted wilt virus within and between alternate plant hosts and thrips. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–16.CrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng SH, Braxton C, Eloit M, Feng SF, Fragnoud R, Mallet L, et al. Current perspectives on high-throughput sequencing (HTS) for adventitious virus detection: Upstream sample processing and library preparation. Viruses. 2018;10:566.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ng SH, Braxton C, Eloit M, Feng SF, Fragnoud R, Mallet L, et al. Current perspectives on high-throughput sequencing (HTS) for adventitious virus detection: Upstream sample processing and library preparation. Viruses. 2018;10:566.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin M, Xu W. Special Issue: “Evolution, Ecology and Diversity of Plant Virus.” Viruses. 2023;15:1–2.CrossRef Yin M, Xu W. Special Issue: “Evolution, Ecology and Diversity of Plant Virus.” Viruses. 2023;15:1–2.CrossRef
63.
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Nasim N, Dey N. Pararetroviruses: Plant Infecting dsDNA Viruses. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2022;40:106–18.CrossRef Nasim N, Dey N. Pararetroviruses: Plant Infecting dsDNA Viruses. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2022;40:106–18.CrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Deakin G, Dobbs E, Bennett JM, Jones IM, Grogan HM, Burton KS. Multiple viral infections in Agaricus bisporus - Characterization of 18 unique RNA viruses and 8 ORFans identified by deep sequencing. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–13.CrossRef Deakin G, Dobbs E, Bennett JM, Jones IM, Grogan HM, Burton KS. Multiple viral infections in Agaricus bisporus - Characterization of 18 unique RNA viruses and 8 ORFans identified by deep sequencing. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–13.CrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Nemchinov LG, Irish BM, Grinstead S, Postnikova OA. Characterization of the seed virome of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L). Virol J. 2023;20:1–7.CrossRef Nemchinov LG, Irish BM, Grinstead S, Postnikova OA. Characterization of the seed virome of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L). Virol J. 2023;20:1–7.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Deciphering the virome of Chunkung (Cnidium officinale) showing dwarfism-like symptoms via a high-throughput sequencing analysis
verfasst von
Mesele Tilahun Belete
Se Eun Kim
Workitu Firmosa Gudeta
Davaajargal Igori
Jeong A. Kwon
Su-Heon Lee
Jae Sun Moon
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Virology Journal / Ausgabe 1/2024
Elektronische ISSN: 1743-422X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-024-02361-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Virology Journal 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Alphablocker schützt vor Miktionsproblemen nach der Biopsie

16.05.2024 alpha-1-Rezeptorantagonisten Nachrichten

Nach einer Prostatabiopsie treten häufig Probleme beim Wasserlassen auf. Ob sich das durch den periinterventionellen Einsatz von Alphablockern verhindern lässt, haben australische Mediziner im Zuge einer Metaanalyse untersucht.

Eingreifen von Umstehenden rettet vor Erstickungstod!

15.05.2024 Fremdkörperaspiration Nachrichten

Wer sich an einem Essensrest verschluckt und um Luft ringt, benötigt vor allem rasche Hilfe. Dass Umstehende nur in jedem zweiten Erstickungsnotfall bereit waren, diese zu leisten, ist das ernüchternde Ergebnis einer Beobachtungsstudie aus Japan. Doch es gibt auch eine gute Nachricht.

Neue S3-Leitlinie zur unkomplizierten Zystitis: Auf Antibiotika verzichten?

15.05.2024 Harnwegsinfektionen Nachrichten

Welche Antibiotika darf man bei unkomplizierter Zystitis verwenden und wovon sollte man die Finger lassen? Welche pflanzlichen Präparate können helfen? Was taugt der zugelassene Impfstoff? Antworten vom Koordinator der frisch überarbeiteten S3-Leitlinie, Prof. Florian Wagenlehner.

Schadet Ärger den Gefäßen?

14.05.2024 Arteriosklerose Nachrichten

In einer Studie aus New York wirkte sich Ärger kurzfristig deutlich negativ auf die Endothelfunktion gesunder Probanden aus. Möglicherweise hat dies Einfluss auf die kardiovaskuläre Gesundheit.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.