Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2024

Open Access 01.12.2024 | Research

Development of regional pharmacy intravenous admixture services data reporting and analysis platform for enhanced quality control ability

verfasst von: Shaowu Tian, Genyu Xie, Fan Xu, Jun Zhang

Erschienen in: BMC Health Services Research | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Background

Pharmacy intravenous admixture service (PIVAS) center has emerged as an important department of hospitals as it can improve occupational protection and ensure the safety and effectiveness of intravenous infusions. However, there is little research on the standardized capability and risk evaluation of PIVAS by using modern information technology. In this research, we established Regional Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Services Data Reporting and Analysis Platform (RPDRAP) to improve quality control ability for PIVAS management. RPDRAP including evaluation matrix for quality control monitoring. The construction of platform is based on guidelines for the Construction and Management of PIVAS and management specifications of PIVAS in China.

Methods

RPDRAP was established in 2018. This platform comprises a data collection system and a data analysis system. The data collection system consists of 67 data items. Data collection relied on online platforms through data acquisition module. The collected data were analyzed using a model with 20 indicators within the data analysis system. Fifteen hospitals, public comprehensive healthcare facilities with more than 500 beds, participated in the platform’s application evaluation.

Results

The study revealed significant differences in PIVAS total score, supervisors, and workload between 2020 and 2022. The platform’s application results demonstrated improvements in personnel management, work efficiency, and infection control within these PIVAS. Although statistical significance was observed in only 8 out of the 25 items, most of the scores showed an increase, with a small portion remaining unchanged and no decline in scores.

Conclusions

This platform can be recommended for PIVAS homogeneous and regional efficient management. The use of this platform not only improves the quality control ability of PIVAS but also enables the management department to quickly grasp the current situation and characteristics of each PIVAS through standardized data collection and analysis.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Background

Intravenous drug therapy is widely used in clinical treatment in China. The percentage of inpatients receiving intravenous infusion exceeds 80% [1]. However, intravenous administration is considered the most risky method of drug therapy, as it can lead to severe adverse reactions and pose a threat to human life and health. According to the 2021 National Annual Monitoring Report on adverse reactions, 55.3% of adverse reactions are attributed to injection administration, with 90.5% of these adverse reactions specifically related to intravenous administration [2].
Pharmacy intravenous admixture services (PIVAS) is a department within medical institutions that provides specialized technical services for the centralized compounding of intravenous medications for patients. In PIVAS, trained pharmacists offer pharmaceutical services such as intervention and review of intravenous medication prescriptions, compounding and mixing of medications, and participation in the assessment of intravenous infusion usage [3, 4]. Studies have indicated that the implementation of PIVAS can significantly improve the level of rational drug use, enhance infusion safety, and reduce occupational exposure among healthcare workers [5, 6]. Additionally, it has been shown to decrease medication preparation errors and result in cost savings [7]. PIVAS has been widely adopted in developed countries such as the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom [810]. In China, over 2,000 PIVAS have been implemented. However, it is important to emphasize that PIVAS is a high-risk institution. Inadequate hardware, unreasonable dispensing processes, and chaotic personnel management can lead to large-scale and unforeseen drug accidents. Abdulwahid and Al-Ani. (2020) collected 99 cases from five hospitals. Among these cases, 52 were drug accidents caused by improper use of intravenous injection include drug-drug interaction, drug-disease interaction, and not indicated medication [11]. Curran. (2011) found that infusate contamination can cause infusate-related bloodstream infection and even death [12]. Moyen. et al. (2008) discovered drug errors rank seventh in terms of causes of death [13].
At present, many studies have shown the importance of information management in pharmacy administration. A study by Mazrouei. et al. (2021) showed that standardized data collection is conducive to reduce over-the-counter drug abuse [14]. Meslamani. et al. (2021) showed that pharmacists’ remote intervention through telephone and Internet impact on the medication and clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 in rural areas [15]. Abdel-Qader. et al. (2022) showd that online collaborative consultation between pharmacists and doctors significantly reduce people’s resistance to the COVID-19 vaccine [16]. Although various intelligent machines and systems have been implemented in PIVAS, including labeling systems, infusion sequence annotation systems, review prescription databases, and so on [1719], the utilization of this equipment only addresses workload challenges and helps mitigate human errors in specific aspects of the workflow. At present, there is little research on the standardized capability and risk evaluation of PIVAS by using modern information technology. In this research, we established the Regional Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Services Data Reporting and Analysis Platform (RPDRAP), based on guidelines for the Construction and Management of PIVAS and management specifications of PIVAS in China, to improve quality control ability for PIVAS management.

Methods

Platform structure

RPDRAP consists of two systems: the data collection system and the data analysis system. The data collection system comprises a data acquisition module and a data audit module. The data collection module is displayed in the form of an online questionnaire for users to fill in the relevant information including basic information, hardware management, personnel management, work efficiency, information management, and infection control management aspects of 67 data collection items of PIVAS (Table 1). When the data reporter of PIVAS submits the form online every quarter, the system will verify the integrity and validity of the information. Once approved by the experts using the data audit module, the data will be stored in the SQL server database.
Table 1
Data collection items of data collection system
Aspect
Item
Unit
Data type
Data item number
Item
Unit
Data type
Data item number
Basic Information
Name of medical institution
 
String
A01
Position
 
String
A07
Address
 
Varchar
A02
Hospital grade
 
[character]
A08
Legal representative
 
String
A03
Postal code
 
Integer
A09
Director of Pharmacy Department
 
String
A04
Director of medical institution
 
String
A10
Fix telephone number
 
Integer
A05
Phone number
 
Integer
A11
Reporter
 
string
A06
Start operating time
 
Time
A12
Hardware management
working area
Float
B01
Number of fans
Unit
Integer
B07
Total number of beds
Bed
Integer
B02
Number of horizontal laminar flow console
Unit
Integer
B08
Number of hospital wards
Unit
Integer
B03
Rest area
Float
B09
The number of beds provided (temporary prescription)
Unit
Integer
B04
The number of beds provided by PIVAS
Bed
Integer
B10
Number of clean bench
Unit
Integer
B05
The number of beds provided (long-term prescription)
Bed
Integer
B11
Number of air conditioners
Unit
Integer
B06
Number of biosafety cabinets
Unit
Integer
B12
Personnel management
Number of assistant staff
People
Integer
C01
Number of nurses
People
Integer
C06
Number of training at above the municipal level
Times
Integer
C02
Number of training in hospital
Times
Integer
C07
Number of people trained at or above the municipal level
People
Integer
C03
Number of people trained in hospital
People
Integer
C08
Number of beds provided by PIVAS
Bed
Integer
C04
Title of director
 
String
C09
Degree of director
 
String
C05
Number of pharmacists
People
Integer
C10
Work efficiency management
Total amount of infusion prepared
Bag
Integer
D01
General drug dispensing amount
Bag
Integer
D11
Quantity of antibiotics dispensed
Bag
Integer
D02
Parenteral nutrition dispensing amount
Bag
Integer
D12
Quantity of anticancer drug dispensed
Bag
Integer
D03
Average number of infusion preparations per person
Bag
Integer
D13
Daily number of prescriptions reviewed per person
Piece
Integer
D04
Total amount of prescription
Piece
Integer
D14
Daily average dispensing quantity for long-term prescription
Bag
Integer
D05
Daily average dispensing quantity for temporary prescription
Bag
Integer
D15
Number of unreasonable prescription
Piece
Integer
D06
Proportion of unreasonable prescription
%
Float
D16
Disposal of unreasonable prescription (packing or returning)
 
[Character]
D07
Number of unreasonable prescription that physician agree to modify
Piece
Integer
D17
Number of errors in displaying
Bag
Integer
D08
Number of prescription review errors
Piece
Integer
D18
Number of disposable syringes used
Unit
Integer
D09
Number of wrong dispensing
Bag
Integer
D19
Total number of infusion distribution
Bag
Integer
D10
    
Infection control management
Comprehensive cleaning frequency
Times
Integer
E01
Temperature qualification rate
%
Float
E07
Humidity qualification rate
%
Float
E02
Rate of qualified pressure
%
Float
E08
Microorganisms qualification rate
%
Float
E03
Number of cleanliness detection
Times
Integer
E09
Times of primary air filter maintenance
Times
Integer
E04
Frequency of replacement  of disinfectant
 
Integer
E10
Times of medium efficiency air filter maintenance
Times
Integer
E05
Disinfection method (ethanol, ultraviolet or other)
 
String
E11
Times of high efficiency air filter maintenance
Times
Integer
E06
    
Information management
Automatic equipment
 
[Character]
F01
Configuration of clinical records management information system
 
Boolean
F03
Configuration of information systems
 
Boolean
F02
    
The data analysis system comprises a directed acyclic graph(DAG)execute editor, data query model, data analysis module, and data display module. DAG execute editor is used to implement system operations through visualization. The data analysis module consists of functions of computational formula, Table association settings, pivot, group statistics, and data mining analysis method. We had created an evaluation matrix which is composed of 20 scoring indicators and developed by an expert group from the Yunnan Pharmaceutical Association and the Yunnan Pharmaceutical Administration Quality Control Center are shown in Table 2. The evaluation results of each PIVAS are obtained through this model and presented in the form of radar charts and score Tables through data display module. The framework of RPDRAP is shown in Fig. 1.
Table 2
evaluation matrix
Indicators
Scoring requirements
Score calculation method
Data source
Hardware management
11
 
Rationality of working area
Average daily deployment is less than 1000 bags, the working area shall not be less than 300 m2. The Average is 1001 ~ 2000 bags, working area should be 300 ~ 500m2. The number of dispensing infusions per day is 2001 ~ 3000 bags, working area should be 500 ~ 650m2. The Average is more than 3000 bags, the working area will be increased by 50m2 for every 500 bags added.
Score: 5 points.
Scoring criteria: when meeting scoring requirements, 5 points will be given.
B01, D05 + D15
(D05 + D15: average daily deployment)
Auxiliary functional area
PIVAS has a Secondary drug warehouse, material storage area, drug outsourcing area, transfer box/transfer vehicle storage area, and meeting and teaching lounge.
Score: 1 point.
Scoring criteria: when meeting the scoring requirements, 1 point will be given.
B09
Rationality of workbench quantity for service bed
One double operator console should be equipped for every 100 beds at least.
Score: 5 points.
Scoring criteria: when meeting the scoring requirements, 5 points will be given.
B05 + B08 + B12 > B02 > B10,
(B05 + B08 + B12: double operator console)
Personnel management
14
 
Staff training
Personnel of PIVAS is relatively fixed, pass training and examination of professional knowledge and technical operation specifications, and receive regular continuing medical education.
Score: 5 points.
Scoring criteria: when number of training sessions per person is greater than 1, 5 points will be given. When the number is between 1 and 0.2, 2 points will be given. When the number is less than 0.2, 0 points will be given.
(C02 + C07)/(C03 + C08)
(C02 + C07: training times, C03 + C08: number of trainers)
Personnel types
Pharmacists.
Score: 5 points.
Scoring criteria: when all staff are pharmacists, 5 points will be given. When proportion of pharmacists is between 80% and 50%, 4 points will be given. When proportion of nurser is more than 50%, 2 points will be given. All staff are nurses, 0 score will be given.
C06, C10
Director
The person in charge of PIVAS shall be qualified for professional and technical posts above the intermediate level.
Score: 4 points.
Scoring criteria: when title and degree of director are above of supervising pharmacist and bachelor’s degree, 4 points will be given. When title and educational level are supervising pharmacist and bachelor’s degree below, 2 points will be given.
C09, C05
Work efficiency management
49
 
Type of infusion
PIVAS should provide intravenous drug dispensing services, including parenteral nutrition, anticancer drugs, antibiotics drugs, and general drugs
Score: 10 points.
Scoring criteria: when 4 types of drugs are dispensed, 4 points will be given. When parenteral nutrition or anticancer drugs are dispensed, 3 points will be given. When antibiotics drugs or general drugs are dispensed, 2 points will be given.
D02, D03, D11, D12
Average daily deployment
According to an average number of prepared infusions daily of PIVAS in Yunnan Province in the past few years.
Score: 5 points.
Scoring criteria: when average daily deployment more than the average, 5 points will be get. Average daily deployment is between two-thirds and one of average,4 points will be given. Average daily deployment is between two-thirds and one-thirds of average,3 points will be given. Average daily deployment is less than one-thirds of average, 2 points will be given.
D05 + D15
(D05 + D15: average daily deployment)
Daily bed infusion quantity
Based on the average number of daily infusions per sickbed of PIVAS in Yunnan Province in the past few years.
Score: 3 points.
Scoring criteria: daily bed infusion quantity is less than average,3 points will be given. The quantity is more than average, 1 point will be given.
D10/B10
(D10/B10: daily bed infusion quantity)
Usage of syringe
According to the average number of dispensing infusion groups for each syringe of PIVAS in Yunnan Province in the past few years.
Score: 5 points.
Scoring criteria: the average number of dispensing infusion groups for each syringe is less than average,5 points will be given. The average number is more than average, 4 points will be given.
D01/D09
(D01/D09: the average number of dispensing infusion groups for each syringe)
Daily infusion allocation quantity per person
80–100 bags.
Score: 5 points.
Scoring criteria: daily infusion allocation quantity per person is less than 100,5 points will be given.
D13
Temporary order deployment rate
The number of temporary medical orders allocated is proportional to the PIVAS service capacity.
5 points.
Scoring criteria: temporary order deployment rate is higher than 5%, 5 points will be given. The rate is between 5% and 3%, 3 points will be given. The rate is lower than 3%, no point.
D15/D05
(D15/D05: temporary order deployment rate)
Daily number of prescriptions reviewed per person
To ensure the quality and efficiency of the audition, reviewed prescriptions per person per day are less than 500 medical orders in PIVAS.
Score: 6 points.
Scoring criteria: daily number of prescriptions reviewed per person is less than 500, 6 points will be given. The number is between 800 and 500, 3 points will be given. The number is greater than 800,0 points will be given.
D04
Unreasonable prescription and disposition
Based on the average rate of unreasonable prescription and disposition of PIVAS in Yunnan Province in the past few years.
Score: 5 points.
Scoring criteria: the rate of unreasonable prescription is lower than the average and disposition rate is higher than the average, 5 points will be given. The rate and disposition rate are more than the average, 3 points will be given. The rate is lower than the average and disposition rate is higher than average, 1 point will be given.
D17/D06,D16
(D17/D06: disposition rate of unreasonable prescription)
Error control rate
The error rate of dispensed infusion of PIVAS in Yunnan Province in the past few years.
Score: 5 points.
Scoring criteria: error control rate is less than the average, 5 points will be given. Error control rate exceeds 30% of the average, 2 points will be given.
D08 + D18 + D19/D01
(D08 + D18 + D19:error qualities of infusion preparation)
Infection control management
13
 
Comprehensive cleaning frequency
We shall clean and disinfect the workbench and floor at least every day. Fully clean PIVAS at least once a week.
Score: 5 points.
Scoring criteria: comprehensive cleaning frequency is at least once a week, 5 points will be given. The frequency is once between a week and two weeks, 3 points will be given. The frequency is once a month, 1 point will be given.
E01
Air filter cleaning and maintenance
Clean and maintain air filters at least annually.
Score: 5 points.
Scoring criteria: completing cleaning and maintenance of all air filters within one year, 5 points will be given. Completing the cleaning and maintenance of one to two types of air filters within one year, 3 points will be given. Completing the cleaning and maintenance of no air filters within one year,0 points will be given.
E04, E05, E06
Disinfection method
At least two disinfectants are selected for disinfection in PIVAS.
Score: 3 points.
Scoring criteria: two or more disinfection methods are used in PIVAS, 3 points will be given. Only one disinfection method is used in PIVAS,0 points will be given.
E11
Information management
13
 
Degree of informatics
The more intelligent systems and instruments, the higher the degree of informatization.
Score: 8 points.
Scoring criteria: when PIVAS has configuration of information systems, 3 points will be given. When PIVAS has clinical records management information system, 2 points will be given. PIVAS has two types of automatic equipment, 2 points will be given.
F01, F02, F03
Tracing control
Determine based on whether PIVAS has corresponding intelligent instruments, such as drug dispensing scanner, vertical flow clean bench, etc.
Score: 5 points.
Scoring criteria: tracing control is higher 2, 5 points will be given. Tracing control is between 1 and 2, 3 points will be given. Tracing control is between 1 and 0.5, 2 points will be given. Tracing control is between 0.5 and 0.1, 1 point will be given.
F02/B05 + B08 + B12
(B05 + B08 + B12:double operator console)
Total scores
 
100
 
Note: The data source is from Table 1, and only data item number is referenced in this Table
The evaluation matrix was verified by an expert group from the Yunnan Pharmaceutical Association and the Yunnan Pharmaceutical Administration Quality Control Center.

Platform application

We had carried out the research and application of this platform in Yunnan Province, China. Since its launch in 2020, an increasing number of PIVAS had participated in the platform’s application. In 2020, there were 28 participating PIVAS, followed by 55 in 2021 and 71 in 2022.
Through this platform, PIVAS regularly reports information related to its operations. Additionally, PIVAS could easily access their own PIVAS scores for the 20 indicators, as well as the average, maximum, and minimum scores of PIVAS in the region.

Study subjects

To evaluate whether the application of the platform promoted the standardized construction and development of PIVAS, the following inclusion criteria for study subjects were formulated: (1) The subjects under investigation were second-level and above public hospitals (hospitals of county-level and above) in Yunnan Province. (2) The medical institutions in Yunnan Province had implemented PIVAS and had reported data in RPDRAP. (3) Complete data for the years 2020, 2021, and 2022 were submitted in RPDRAP. Fifteen PIVAS met the inclusion criteria, and their three-year operational data were selected as the research objects.

Statistical analyses

Due to the non-normal distribution of the data tested by the normality checking tested Shapiro-Wilk test, we analyzed the data of 20 indicators in five aspects of 15 PIVAS in the past three years with the generalized estimation equation and pairwise comparison. SPSS statistical software (SPSS 24) was used to analyze the data.

Result

The analysis results of 20 indicators across five aspects over three years for the 15 PIVAS are presented in Tables 3 and 4. The scores for the total and each aspect of the 15 PIVAS are displayed in Fig. 2. Over three years, significant improvements were observed in 8 indicators of five aspects (see Table 4).
Table 3
Mean and standard deviation of 20 indicators of 15 PIVAS in three years
Indicator
M + SD(2020)
M + SD(2021)
M + SD(2022)
Hardware management
9.60 ± 2.22
9.60 ± 2.22
9.60 ± 2.22
Rationality of working area
4.00 ± 1.46
4.00 ± 1.46
4.00 ± 1.46
Auxiliary functional area
1.00 ± 0.00
1.00 ± 0.00
1.00 ± 0.00
Rationality of workbench quantity for service bed
4.60 ± 1.06
4.60 ± 1.06
4.60 ± 1.03
Personnel management
9.20 ± 3.57
10.40 ± 2.16
10.67 ± 2.77
Director
2.13 ± 2.07
2.13 ± 2.07
2.13 ± 2.07
Personnel types
2.80 ± 2.01
3.27 ± 1.75
3.60 ± 1.55
Staff training
2.13 ± 2.00
3.53 ± 1.96
4.33 ± 1.76
Work efficiency management
25.73 ± 12.79
32.53 ± 10.18
37.93 ± 4.15
Type of infusion
7.20 ± 3.95
8.33 ± 2.72
9.20 ± 1.73
Average daily deployment
3.87 ± 1.30
3.87 ± 1.30
3.87 ± 1.30
Daily bed infusion quantity
2.33 ± 1.23
2.47 ± 0.83
2.60 ± 0.63
Usage of syringe
0.93 ± 1.94
1.20 ± 2.08
2.87 ± 2.13
Daily infusion allocation quantity per person
1.80 ± 1.21
3.07 ± 1.71
3.80 ± 1.52
Temporary order deployment rate
1.67 ± 2.44
1.67 ± 2.44
1.67 ± 2.44
Daily number of prescriptions reviewed per person
3.40 ± 2.50
4.60 ± 2.23
5.80 ± 0.77
Unreasonable medical order and disposition
2.07 ± 2.49
3.67 ± 2.89
4.13 ± 1.64
Error control rate
2.47 ± 2.20
3.67 ± 1.99
4.00 ± 1.73
Infection control management
10.00 ± 3.53
10.67 ± 2.64
11.00 ± 1.96
Comprehensive cleaning frequency
4.00 ± 2.07
4.67 ± 1.29
5.00 ± 0.00
Air filter cleaning and maintenance
3.40 ± 2.03
3.40 ± 2.03
3.40 ± 2.03
Disinfection method
2.60 ± 1.06
2.60 ± 1.06
2.60 ± 1.06
Information management
0.93 ± 1.53
3.60 ± 1.50
5.05 ± 1.51
Degree of informatics
0.00 ± 0.00
2.67 ± 0.82
4.12 ± 1.06
Tracing control
0.93 ± 1.53
0.93 ± 1.53
0.93 ± 1.53
Total scores
55.47 ± 17.19
66.8 ± 11.62
74.25 ± 5.32
Note: “M” and “SD” respectively represents mean and standard deviation
Table 4
Pairwise comparisons analysis of 20 indicators of 15 PIVAS in three years
Indicator
 
Standard Error
P
Hardware management
20vs21
0.00
1.00
20vs22
0.00
1.00
21vs22
0.00
1.00
Rationality of working area
20vs21
0.00
1.00
20vs22
0.00
1.00
21vs22
0.00
1.00
Auxiliary functional area
20vs21
0.00
1.00
20vs22
0.00
1.00
21vs22
0.00
1.00
Rationality of workbench quantity for service bed
20vs21
0.00
1.00
20vs22
0.00
1.00
21vs22
0.00
1.00
Personnel management
20vs21
0.56
0.03 *
20vs22
0.60
0.01*
21vs22
0.31
0.38
Director
20vs21
0.00
1.00
20vs22
0.00
1.00
21vs22
0.00
1.00
Personnel types
20vs21
0.33
0.16
20vs22
0.33
0.16
21vs22
0.00
1.00
Staff training
20vs21
0.45
0.08
20vs22
0.58
< 0.001**
21vs22
0.53
0.008**
Work efficiency management
20vs21
2.13
0.01*
20vs22
2.49
< 0.001**
21vs22
2.17
0.01*
Type of infusion
20vs21
0.66
0.19
20vs22
0.93
0.03*
21vs22
0.76
0.14
Average daily deployment
20vs21
0.00
1.00
20vs22
0.00
1.00
21vs22
0.00
1.00
Daily bed infusion quantity
20vs21
0.26
0.46
20vs22
0.32
0.22
21vs22
0.21
0.35
Usage of syringe
20vs21
0.00
1.00
20vs22
0.56
< 0.001**
21vs22
0.56
< 0.001**
Daily infusion allocation quantity per person
20vs21
0.47
0.03*
20vs22
0.46
< 0.001*
21vs22
0.48
0.10
Temporary order deployment rate
20vs21
0.00
1.00
20vs22
0.00
1.00
21vs22
0.00
1.00
Daily number of prescriptions reviewed per person
20vs21
0.68
0.08
20vs22
0.60
< 0.001*
21vs22
0.46
0.03*
Unreasonable prescriptions and disposition
20vs21
0.54
0.02*
20vs22
0.56
< 0.001*
21vs22
0.49
0.35
Error control rate
20vs21
0.36
0.01*
20vs22
0.58
0.01*
21vs22
0.52
0.20
Infection control management
20vs21
0.44
0.13
20vs22
0.52
0.05
21vs22
0.32
0.30
Comprehensive cleaning frequency
20vs21
0.44
0.13
20vs22
0.52
0.05
21vs22
0.32
0.30
Air filter cleaning and maintenance
20vs21
0.00
1.00
20vs22
0.00
1.00
21vs22
0.00
1.00
Disinfection method
20vs21
0.00
1.00
20vs22
0.00
1.00
21vs22
0.00
1.00
Information management
20vs21
0.26
< 0.001*
20vs22
0.35
< 0.001*
21vs22
0.22
< 0.001*
Degree of informatics
20vs21
0.20
< 0.001**
20vs22
0.33
< 0.001**
21vs22
0.22
< 0.001**
Tracing control
20vs21
0.00
1.00
20vs22
0.00
1.00
21vs22
0.00
1.00
Total scores
20vs21
3.11
< 0.001**
20vs22
3.40
< 0.001**
21vs22
2.39
< 0.001**
Note: “* ”means P < 0.05; “* * ”means P < 0.01
The indicators of “type of infusion”, “the number of comprehensive cleaning times”, and “the number of prescriptions per person per day” improved significantly, and the final score was close to the highest score.
The indicators of “usage of syringe (P < 0.001)”, “daily infusion allocation quantity per person (P < 0.05)”, “unreasonable medical order and disposition (P < 0.001)”, “work efficiency management (P < 0.01)” and “information management (P < 0.01)” were significantly improved, but further improvements are needed to meet the standard requirements.
The indicators of “staff training (P < 0.01)”, “daily number of prescriptions reviewed per person (P < 0.05)”, “error control rate (P = 0.01)”, “degree of informatics (P < 0.001)” and “unreasonable medical order disposition (P < 0.05)” were significantly improved, and have been more than 80% of the total score.
Although the scores of “air filtration”, “daily bed infusion quantity”, “average daily deployment”, “personnel management”, and “infection control management” showed an upward trend but there was no significant difference in scores.
The indicators of “rating of work area”, “average daily deployment”, “all air filter cleaning and maintenance” and “disinfection method” haven’t changed for three years and the average score rate exceeded 60% of standard requirements.
The indicators of “director”, “temporary order deployment rate”, and “tracking control” have no change and the average score rate was less than 60% of standard requirements.

Discussion

At present, quality control has attracted much attention by PIVAS managers. There have been many studies on this research area, but majority of studies more focused on improvement of quality control using a particular innovative technology or equipment. Deng. et al. (2022) explored the development of automatic auxiliary dispensing equipment in PIVAS to improve the work efficiency, and reduce the drug risk caused by dispensing errors [20]. Gao. et al. (2020) found that implementation of lean had positive results, which improved the efficiency of the operation, reduced the work start time and the amount of staff, and improved clinical satisfaction [21]. Yang. et al. (2023) investigated the emotional disorders including depression and anxiety among staff of PIVAS [3]. The result show depression and anxiety are common among PIVAS leaders and staff working in hospitals in China. Hospitals should implement measures to improve the mental health of PIVAS leaders and staff. Chen. et al. (2021) analyzed the current situation of personnel training and scientific research regarding PIVAS [22]. The findings indicated that the training content for PIVAS personnel in China was relatively comprehensive, but the areas of management tools, career development, and scientific research training were comparatively deficient, resulting in very low scientific research output. However little research focused on how to evaluate the capability of quality control of existing PIVAS and research in this area is considered to be of great importance for the management of PIVAS.
In this research, we established RPDRAP. Through the platform application, PIVAS managers can not only better understand the requirements of each indicator, but also obtain the highest, lowest, average, and own scores of each indicator within the region. In this way, PIVAS managers can more accurately manage and control the problems that exist in PIVAS. The effect of system application was shown in the results. Due to the high cost of hardware management including the work area, biosafety cabinets, and air conditioning equipment, it is difficult and time-consuming to update. This result can be interpreted as the score for hardware management of the 15 PIVAS has remained unchanged over the past three years. Once the hardware management of PIVAS are completed, there is no margin for changes. PIVAS included in the statistical analysis was the first batch to use the platform, the hardware construction standards were not uniform at that time. In terms of the hardware score of PIVAS added to the platform application in the later stage, it has made significant progress.
Furthermore, over the past three years, the item scores for 5 indicators such as directorship, temporary order deployment quantity, and so on have consistently remained relatively low. The average score of director was 2.13 points, only achieving 53% of the score for this item. County-level hospitals generally have lower scores and remaining unchange in this item. This indicates that the professional and technical level of PIVAS professionals at the county level needs to be improved, and this improvement will take a long time. The average score of temporary order deployment quantity was 1.67 points, only achieving 33.4% of the score for this item. The temporary order deployment quantity requires more professional technical personnel for PIVAS, which is also the reason for the limited improvement and remaining unchanged. The average score of usage of syringe was 2.87 points, only achieving 57.4% of the score for this item. The reuse of syringes in the formulation of similar drugs can save costs.

Conclusion

The safety of intravenous infusion is very important to the treatment outcome, and the safety of PIVAS depends on many aspects. Such as clean workbench, high-quality disinfection equipment, and high-quality staff. RPDRAP is the first PIVAS unified data management platform in China. The use of this platform enables different PIVAS in the region to compare their management measures with each other, which not only enhances the quality control ability of PIVAS but also enables the management department to understand the current situation and characteristics of each PIVAS timely and comprehensively through standardized data, which provides strong evidence for evaluating the service capability of PIVAS.

Strengths and limitations

RPDRAP is the first PIVAS unified data management platform in China. Using this platform PIVAS can systematically and quickly find its own shortcomings by comparing the management and capacity building of PIVAS in the region.
Now the platform is only used within Yunnan Province. We hope it can be promoted and applied to a wider range of regions. Furthermore, the evaluation matrix of the analysis system should be further expanded and improved based on the progress of research on quality control.

Acknowledgements

We thank the expert group of Yunnan Pharmaceutical Association and Yunnan Pharmaceutical Administration Quality Control Center for their support.

Declarations

Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mermel L. Short- term peripheral venous catheter- related blood-stream infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:1757–62.CrossRefPubMed Mermel L. Short- term peripheral venous catheter- related blood-stream infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:1757–62.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu JH. 2021 Annual ADR report on national ADR monitoring. China Qual News 2022-04-08: 002. Xu JH. 2021 Annual ADR report on national ADR monitoring. China Qual News 2022-04-08: 002.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang C, Li D, Yang Y, Hu Y, Zhang L. Investigation of the status of depression and anxiety among leaders and staff in pharmacy intravenous admixture services in China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 A;102(34). Yang C, Li D, Yang Y, Hu Y, Zhang L. Investigation of the status of depression and anxiety among leaders and staff in pharmacy intravenous admixture services in China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 A;102(34).
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang C, Kang BY, Zhang L, Yu D. Construction situation, costs and charges associated with pharmacy intravenous admixture services: multi-center cross-sectional survey based on 137 medical institutions in China’s mainland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):577.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang C, Kang BY, Zhang L, Yu D. Construction situation, costs and charges associated with pharmacy intravenous admixture services: multi-center cross-sectional survey based on 137 medical institutions in China’s mainland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):577.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Zheng Q, Lv Y, et al. Evaluation of adverse health risks associated with antineoplastic drug exposure in nurses at two Chinese hospitals: the effects of implementing a pharmacy intravenous admixture service. Am J Ind Med. 2016;59:264–73.CrossRefPubMed Zhang X, Zheng Q, Lv Y, et al. Evaluation of adverse health risks associated with antineoplastic drug exposure in nurses at two Chinese hospitals: the effects of implementing a pharmacy intravenous admixture service. Am J Ind Med. 2016;59:264–73.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Bao J, Wang R, et al. A multicenter study of biological effects assessment of pharmacy workers occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs in Pharmacy Intravenous admixture services. J Hazard Mater. 2016;315:86–92.CrossRefPubMed Zhang J, Bao J, Wang R, et al. A multicenter study of biological effects assessment of pharmacy workers occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs in Pharmacy Intravenous admixture services. J Hazard Mater. 2016;315:86–92.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen H, Guo Y, Wei H, et al. The impact of pharmacist oriented mode on risk control in a Chinese centralized intravenous admixture service centre. Sci Rep. 2021;11:5445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralADS Chen H, Guo Y, Wei H, et al. The impact of pharmacist oriented mode on risk control in a Chinese centralized intravenous admixture service centre. Sci Rep. 2021;11:5445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralADS
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hitt CM, Nightingale CH, Quintiliani R, et al. Cost comparison of single daily i.v. doses of ceftriaxone versus continuous infusion of cefotaxime. Am J Health-System Pharm. 1997;54:1614–8.CrossRef Hitt CM, Nightingale CH, Quintiliani R, et al. Cost comparison of single daily i.v. doses of ceftriaxone versus continuous infusion of cefotaxime. Am J Health-System Pharm. 1997;54:1614–8.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Paoletti RD, Casey EW. Reducing costs through centralization and standardization of an i.v. admixture program. Am J Health-System Pharm. 2000;57:1147–9.CrossRef Paoletti RD, Casey EW. Reducing costs through centralization and standardization of an i.v. admixture program. Am J Health-System Pharm. 2000;57:1147–9.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tallett ER. Centralized intravenous admixture program for nine British hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1978;35:163–5.PubMed Tallett ER. Centralized intravenous admixture program for nine British hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1978;35:163–5.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-ani Oas. Intravenous medication administration errors and this can endanger the lives of patients. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2020;13(7):169–73. Al-ani Oas. Intravenous medication administration errors and this can endanger the lives of patients. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2020;13(7):169–73.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Curran E. Intravenous drug preparation: the infection risks. Br J Nurs. 2011;20(S4):6–8. Curran E. Intravenous drug preparation: the infection risks. Br J Nurs. 2011;20(S4):6–8.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Al Mazrouei N, Ibrahim RM, Al Meslamani AZ, Abdel-Qader DH, Mohamed Ibrahim O. Virtual pharmacist interventions on abuse of over-the-counter medications during COVID-19 versus traditional pharmacist interventions. J Am Pharmacists Association. 2021;61(3):331–9.CrossRef Al Mazrouei N, Ibrahim RM, Al Meslamani AZ, Abdel-Qader DH, Mohamed Ibrahim O. Virtual pharmacist interventions on abuse of over-the-counter medications during COVID-19 versus traditional pharmacist interventions. J Am Pharmacists Association. 2021;61(3):331–9.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Al Meslamani AZ, Kassem AB, El-Bassiouny NA, Ibrahim OM. An emergency plan for management of COVID-19 patients in rural areas. Int J Clin Pract Oct. 2021;75(10):e14563. Al Meslamani AZ, Kassem AB, El-Bassiouny NA, Ibrahim OM. An emergency plan for management of COVID-19 patients in rural areas. Int J Clin Pract Oct. 2021;75(10):e14563.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdel-Qader DH, Hayajneh W, Albassam A, et al. Pharmacists-physicians collaborative intervention to reduce vaccine hesitancy and resistance: a randomized controlled trial. Vaccine X Apr. 2022;10:100135.CrossRef Abdel-Qader DH, Hayajneh W, Albassam A, et al. Pharmacists-physicians collaborative intervention to reduce vaccine hesitancy and resistance: a randomized controlled trial. Vaccine X Apr. 2022;10:100135.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Li G, Xu, et al. The effect of auxiliary admixture equipment on the hygiene conditions and quality of Pharmacy Intravenous admixture services. Appl Nanosci. 2022;11:2997–3006. Li G, Xu, et al. The effect of auxiliary admixture equipment on the hygiene conditions and quality of Pharmacy Intravenous admixture services. Appl Nanosci. 2022;11:2997–3006.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu W, Ming G, Xueqin G et al. Application of information-intelligence technologies in pharmacy intravenous admixture services in a Chinese third-class a hospital. BMC Health Serv Res 2022;22. Xu W, Ming G, Xueqin G et al. Application of information-intelligence technologies in pharmacy intravenous admixture services in a Chinese third-class a hospital. BMC Health Serv Res 2022;22.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Qiu J, Deng T, Wang Z, et al. Development and evaluation of an intravenous infusion sequence annotation system. Appl Clin Inf. 2021;12:65–72.CrossRef Qiu J, Deng T, Wang Z, et al. Development and evaluation of an intravenous infusion sequence annotation system. Appl Clin Inf. 2021;12:65–72.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Deng GL, Huang YL, Xu H et al. Development and clinical verification of automatic auxiliary dosing and dispensing equipment. Appl Nanosci 2022,13(4):1–8. Deng GL, Huang YL, Xu H et al. Development and clinical verification of automatic auxiliary dosing and dispensing equipment. Appl Nanosci 2022,13(4):1–8.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao T, Zhang X, Gurd B, Liu Z. From self-management to a systemized process: the implementation of lean management in a Chinese hospital’s pharmacy intravenous admixture services center. Leadersh Health Serv. 2020;ahead–of–print(ahead–of–print):325–37.CrossRef Gao T, Zhang X, Gurd B, Liu Z. From self-management to a systemized process: the implementation of lean management in a Chinese hospital’s pharmacy intravenous admixture services center. Leadersh Health Serv. 2020;ahead–of–print(ahead–of–print):325–37.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen J, Ni XF, Yang CS, Zhang LL. Multi-center investigation on personnel training and scientific research status of pharmacy intravenous admixture services (PIVAS) in mainland China based on the perspectives of PIVAS leaders. Med (Baltim). 2021;100(10):e24881.CrossRef Chen J, Ni XF, Yang CS, Zhang LL. Multi-center investigation on personnel training and scientific research status of pharmacy intravenous admixture services (PIVAS) in mainland China based on the perspectives of PIVAS leaders. Med (Baltim). 2021;100(10):e24881.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Development of regional pharmacy intravenous admixture services data reporting and analysis platform for enhanced quality control ability
verfasst von
Shaowu Tian
Genyu Xie
Fan Xu
Jun Zhang
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Health Services Research / Ausgabe 1/2024
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10696-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

BMC Health Services Research 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe