Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01.12.2024 | Research

Diet and lifestyle behaviours simultaneously act on frailty: it is time to move the threshold of frailty prevention and control forward

verfasst von: Shan-lan Yang, Lei Wu, He-lang Huang, Lang-lang Zhang, Yi-xin Chen, Sheng Zhou, Xiu-xiu Chen, Jiao-feng Wang, Chao-bao Zhang, Zhi-jun Bao

Erschienen in: BMC Public Health | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Background

To analyse the association among the simultaneous effects of dietary intake, daily life behavioural factors, and frailty outcomes in older Chinese women, we predicted the probability of maintaining physical robustness under a combination of different variables.

Methods

The Fried frailty criterion was used to determine the three groups of “frailty”, “pre-frailty”, and “robust”, and a national epidemiological survey was performed. The three-classification decision tree model was fitted, and the comprehensive performance of the model was evaluated to predict the probability of occurrence of different outcomes.

Results

Among the 1,044 participants, 15.9% were frailty and 50.29% were pre-frailty; the overall prevalence first increased and then decreased with age, reaching a peak at 70–74 years of age. Through univariate analysis, filtering, and embedded screening, eight significant variables were identified: staple food, spices, exercise (frequency, intensity, and time), work frequency, self-feeling, and family emotions. In the three-classification decision tree, the values of each evaluation index of Model 3 were relatively average; the accuracy, recall, specificity, precision, and F1 score range were between 75% and 84%, and the AUC was also greater than 0.800, indicating excellent performance and the best interpretability of the results. Model 3 takes exercise time as the root node and contains 6 variables and 10 types, suggesting the impact of the comprehensive effect of these variables on robust and non-robust populations (the predicted probability range is 6.67–93.33%).

Conclusion

The combined effect of these factors (no exercise or less than 0.5 h of exercise per day, occasional exercise, exercise at low intensity, feeling more tired at work, and eating too many staple foods (> 450 g per day) are more detrimental to maintaining robustness.
Begleitmaterial
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12889-024-18639-y.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Frailty is a gradual age-related non-specific decline of the physiological system, which is primarily characterised by increased vulnerability, reduced anti-stress ability, and decreased ability to maintain balance, resulting in a series of adverse events, such as hospitalisation, falls, disability, and death, which seriously reduces the quality of life of older individuals and increases the burden of family care and the pressure on social, medical, and health resources [13]. Population aging and longevity are objective trends in human social development. With the continuous acceleration of the global aging process, the change in population structure increases the proportion of the frail population, and the frailty of the older individuals is becoming increasingly obvious.
Frailty is an unavoidable phenomenon in older adults and an intermediate state between health and death [4]. According to one survey, the prevalence of frailty in the older population in China is 12.8%, and the prevalence of frailty in hospitals and nursing institutions is even higher at 22.6% and 44.3%, respectively, which is consistent with the results of foreign studies [57]. Frailty in the older adults is sex-specific, with a higher prevalence in female than in male in both pre-frailty and frailty [8], which is related to changes in the endocrine system; in particular, the sharp decline in hormone levels in female after menopause plays an important role in sarcopenia [9].
There is a lot of research on frailty influences and interventions, especially at the level of dietary nutrition and exercise; for example, anti-inflammatory diets can counteract the effects of unfavourable factors on frail [10], and resistance training performs well in frail interventions [11]. However, there are still some issues that need to be solved: first, the current exploration of frailty in the Chinese older population has been explored at the provincial, municipal, and district levels, but has not formed a national vision; second, previous studies have mostly explored the relationship between a single-dimensional factor and frailty, but have not explored at multiple levels; third, most of the existing studies focus on the intervention after the diagnosis of frailty, assuming that if the diet and living behaviours can be standardised before the occurrence of frailty, the incidence of frailty can be reduced, the treatment of frailty can be moved forward to prevention, and the economic burden of patients and the medical burden of hospitals can be reduced. Hence, based on the above realities and limitations, this study focused on the simultaneous effects of dietary intake and lifestyle behaviours on frailty in older Chinese female population.

Materials and methods

Study participants and sample size

The study participants were female residents of five provinces, Fujian, Jiangxi, Shaanxi, Henan, and Hebei, which are divided into northern and southern China by the Qinling-Huaihe River line. Multistage stratified cluster sampling was carried out according to the proportion of the resident female population, gross domestic product level, and age distribution ratio in the five provinces.

Inclusion criteria

Women (≥ 60-year-old) who actively participated in this research activity and provided all information necessary for the research.

Exclusion criteria

Severe diseases, such as tumours, autoimmune diseases, vital organ failure, disability, psychiatric abnormality, noncompliance, and inability to participate in the study.

Sample size

Based on the prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older adults in China (12.8%), it is proposed that the number is the positive probability π, the test level (α) = 0.05 (bilateral), the allowable error (δ) = 0.2π, and on the basis of the calculated sample increased by 20%, according to the formula \(n=\left(\frac{{Z}_{\alpha /2}}{\delta }\right)\times \pi \times \left(1-\pi \right)\), the final sample size is approximately 785 people, with a minimum sample number of each province being 157 people. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Research method

Information collection

We designed a questionnaire for the participants, which mainly included the following three points: basic information (education level, marital status, current or pre-retirement occupation), dietary intake (staple food, vegetarian dishes, meat dishes, fruits, seasonings, and water intake), and life behaviours (dressing, sleep, exercise, and family emotion).

Frailty judgment

The frailty of study participants was assessed based on the Fried frailty phenotype, which describes frailty as a decline in body function associated with aging, by assessing weight, exercise, fatigue, walking, and grip strength, and meeting three or more of the criteria to be considered frailty, 1–2 for pre-frailty and 0 for robustness.

Machine learning model fitting

“Frail”, “Pre-frail,” and “Robust” were set as the output variables (Y), and the variables after univariate analysis were further filtered and embedded screened, and the final variables were used as input variables (Xn) to fit the decision tree model. The evaluation of the three-classification model was carried out by the macroscopic method, that is, after the Y mute variable, the performance evaluation of each level and the comprehensive level were carried out, respectively.

Statistical analyses and quality control

The formulation of the dietary intake questionnaire was based on the General Plan for the Survey of Nutrition and Health Status of Chinese Residents [12] and was determined after evaluation and revision by relevant experts. Nutrient intake was calculated based on the 6th edition of the China Food Composition Standard Edition [13].
R software (R Project for Statistical Computing, version 4.1.3, http://​www.​r-project.​org/​) was used for the statistical analysis, decision tree model construction, and performance evaluation, and the performance of the model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), sensitivity, and specificity. The two-sided test level (α) was 0.05.

Results

Demographic characteristics

A total of 1,126 participants were surveyed, and 1,044 valid questionnaires were collected, with an effective response rate of 92.72%. The average age of the participants was 69.85 ± 6.83 years, and the oldest was 97 years old. The education level of participants was mostly at the primary school level (65.52%), occupational distribution was the highest proportion of workers and farmers (76.25%), 76.44% of participants were married, and the ratio between north and south China was 1.41:1. There were 166 (15.9%) participants with frailty, 525 (50.29%) with pre-frailty, and 353 (33.81%) who were robust (Fig. 1). The proportion of frail individuals was the largest in the 65–74-year age group (53.01%), while the proportion of pre-frail and robust individuals in the 60–69-year age group was the largest (56.76% vs. 56.66%) (Table 1).
Table 1
Basic demographic characteristics of 1044 research subjects
Variable
Frail
 
Prefrail
 
Robust
 
Statistics
P-value
N
%
N
%
N
%
Ageyears
 60~
24
14.46
65
12.38
93
26.35
46.632
<0.001
 65~
30
18.07
93
17.71
107
30.31
 70~
41
24.70
140
26.67
68
19.26
 75~
38
22.89
131
24.95
46
13.03
 80~
33
19.88
96
18.29
39
11.05
Education
 Elementary school and below
137
82.53
361
68.76
185
52.41
58.734
<0.001
 Junior middle school
23
13.86
102
19.43
88
24.93
 Senior middle school
6
3.61
45
8.57
56
15.86
 College and above
0
0.00
17
3.24
24
6.80
Occupation
 Worker
29
17.47
102
19.43
106
30.03
86.761
<0.001
 Farmer
108
65.06
326
62.10
125
35.41
 Cadre
4
2.41
37
7.05
63
17.85
 Self-employed
11
6.63
23
4.38
26
7.37
 Others
14
8.43
37
7.05
33
9.35
Marital status
 Married
119
71.69
403
76.76
276
78.19
5.698
0.223
 Unmarried
2
1.20
3
0.57
6
1.70
 Widowhood and divorce
45
27.11
119
22.67
71
20.11
Region
 South China
87
52.41
277
52.76
249
70.54
30.755
<0.001
 North China
79
47.59
248
47.24
104
29.46
Total
166
100.00
525
100.00
353
100.00
  
Senior middle school include Secondary Special School

Screening of factors in dietary intake and life behaviour

In this study, the factors related to frailty were investigated and analysed from the dimensions of dietary intake and individual lifestyle. We not only quantified the food intake but also converted it into nutrient intake based on the total weekly intake in the dietary dimension; 21 meaningful variables were obtained after univariate analysis (P < 0.05), indicating that there were significant differences in these factors among the frailty, pre frailty, and robust groups (Table 2). The lifestyle dimension covered personal lifestyle, family emotions, work, and exercise, and 12 meaningful variables were obtained after univariate screening (P < 0.05, Table 3). To solve the problem of collinearity between the factors of each dimension, the filter method was adopted, and nine variables (fat, dietary fibre, VA, VC, VE, CA, K, Fe, and food water content) with a correlation of more than 0.7 between the variables were preliminarily eliminated.
To explore the influence of independent variable X on dependent variable Y more accurately, the continuous variables in the remaining variables were standardised, and the categorical explanatory variables were converted into dummy variables and then screened using LASSO classification regularisation in the embedded method. The 10-fold cross-validation fitting model was used to obtain a minimum mean square error of 1.515 for the simplest model at lambda.1se (Fig. 2). Finally, eight variables closely related to frailty were identified: diet, exercise, work, and family emotions (ST1).
Table 2
Dietary and Weekly nutrient intake in “Frail”, “Pre-frail” and “Robust” groups
Variable
Frail Groups
Prefrail Groups
Robust Groups
Overall comparison
Statistics
P
Staple food(g/d)
419.88±90.40
446.85±91.59
378.74±93.50
6.069
0.002
Vegetarian dishes(g/w)
 Leafy vegetables
607.22±61.65
666.51±69.38
763.78±66.03
8.422
<0.001
 Root and stem vegetables
389.76±80.69
374.43±81.30
427.00±81.46
2.721
0.066
 Solanaceous fruit vegetables
360.13±70.46
370.02±76.23
411.68±79.59
2.494
0.083
 Melon vegetables
325.41±62.31
314.81±56.05
396.75±69.21
12.428
0.002
 Legume vegetables
328.70±62.14
284.51±62.45
356.45±66.95
5.472
0.004
Meat dishes(g/w)
 Livestock
324.12±58.18
333.53±40.04
404.68±44.43
13.511
0.001
 Poultry
153.27±41.68
136.08±40.88
155.57±58.55
2.131
0.119
 Fish and shrimp
140.59±41.19
144.04±48.86
186.96±44.81
6.991
0.001
 Eggs
220.38±58.50
223.34±55.82
255.78±56.66
4.526
0.011
Between-meal nibbles(g/w)
 Fruits
121.09±416.67
425.50±162.01
645.49±114.01
39.051
<0.001
 Milk
382.28±57.56
447.93±53.14
566.53±46.12
9.162
0.010
 Nuts
90.53±43.22
111.16±43.67
121.43±43.20
2.667
0.263
Daily water intake(ml/d)
1199.75±244.49
1332.59±240.71
1351.78±293.12
3.485
0.031
 Energy(Kcal)
13503.25±3388.5
14307.55±3933.78
13392.04±3296.52
1.723
0.423
 Protein(g)
386.38±96.99
398.37±82.51
407.20±91.56
3.149
0.207
 Fat(g)
239.45±97.02
257.48±95.80
289.93±95.67
4.464
0.012
 Carbohydrate(g)
2522.79±500.14
2676.27±513.35
2364.07±588.46
2.62
0.270
 Dietary fiber(g)
76.77±25.45
76.33±24.27
86.83±27.67
6.07
0.002
Vitamins
 VA(ug)
191.46±60.59
213.68±86.44
264.39±80.37
21.958
<0.001
 VB(mg)
72.11±26.40
72.29±25.02
77.77±25.09
2.859
0.058
 VC(mg)
573.01±147.09
601.88±150.76
702.60±176.31
10.911
<0.001
 VE(mg)
45.23±18.45
46.22±21.77
54.26±17.91
4.279
0.014
Macroelements
 Ca(mg)
1533.11±378.35
1590.67±332.18
1882.12±396.75
12.389
<0.001
 P(mg)
4462.63±951.69
4673.39±922.61
4846.94±958.38
4.857
0.088
 K(mg)
8273.10±1246.13
8461.19±1212.12
9151.05±1289.69
5.203
0.006
 Na(mg)
1831.90±520.97
2057.07±636.63
2318.20±588.43
3.145
0.043
 Mg(mg)
1421.78±479.25
1488.83±523.92
1500.84±473.54
2.697
0.260
Microelements
 Fe(mg)
30.61±17.28
32.00±19.03
35.51±21.20
4.839
0.008
 Zn(mg)
73.63±30.44
78.69±33.86
74.34±37.52
2.064
0.356
 Se(ug)
222.93±104.51
231.06±109.43
231.19±93.03
1.071
0.585
 Cu(mg)
8.83±5.32
9.53±5.91
8.74±5.36
3.076
0.215
 Mn(mg)
45.24±31.21
49.80±35.23
45.74±36.49
2.449
0.294
Food water content(g)
3489.11±1571.61
3588.13±1584.71
4240.09±1762.38
19.943
<0.001
Oil(g)
 ≤25
39(23.49)
131(24.95)
101(28.61)
5.618
0.467
 25~50
88(53.01)
242(46.10)
152(43.06)
 >50
27(16.27)
111(21.14)
71(20.11)
 Unclear
12(7.23)
41(7.81)
29(8.22)
Salt(g)
 <6
78(46.99)
231(44.00)
164(46.46)
3.951
0.683
 6~10
64(38.55)
210(40.00)
145(41.08)
 >10
18(10.84)
71(13.52)
38(10.76)
 Unclear
6(3.61)
13(2.48)
6(1.70)
Sugar(g)
 ≤25
111(66.87)
344(65.52)
249(70.54)
7.423
0.284
 25~50
42(25.30)
121(23.05)
66(18.70)
 >50
8(4.82)
45(8.57)
24(6.80)
 Unclear
5(3.01)
14(2.67)
14(3.97)
Spices
 Not eat
22(13.25)
62(11.81)
32(9.07)
12.975
0.043
 Eat less
50(30.12)
148(28.19)
92(26.06)
 Eat an average
60(36.14)
214(40.76)
128(36.26)
 Eat more
34(20.48)
101(19.24)
101(28.61)
Spices refer to the intake of ginger, garlic, vinegar, peppercorns, etc.; Continuous variables are expressed in the form of (x ̅±SD), statistics are F-values, and categorical variables are expressed in the form of n (%), Statistics are χ2-values
Table 3
Personal life behaviors and comparison in “Frail”, “Pre-frail” and “Robust” groups
Variable
Frail Groups
Prefrail Groups
Robust Groups
Overall comparison
χ2
P
Dressing style
 Pursuing fashion
3(1.81)
13(2.48)
18(5.10)
25.218
<0.001
 Follow fashion
7(4.22)
26(4.95)
35(9.92)
 Adhere to personal style
54(32.53)
113(21.52)
81(22.95)
 Not to care
102(61.45)
373(71.05)
219(62.04)
Duration of hobbies(h)
0.5
94(56.63)
258(49.14)
59(16.71)
124.929
<0.001
 0.5~1
27(16.27)
125(23.81)
132(37.39)
 1~2
29(17.47)
64(12.19)
70(19.83)
2
16(9.64)
78(14.86)
92(26.06)
Emotion in life
 Truly satisfied
59(35.54)
152(28.95)
131(37.11)
29.964
<0.001
 Satisfied
75(45.18)
274(52.19)
171(48.44)
 Not so satisfied
18(10.84)
77(14.67)
50(14.16)
 Dissatisfied
14(8.43)
22(4.19)
1(0.28)
Satiety level
 ≥90%
60(36.14)
224(42.67)
107(30.31)
14.971
0.005
 70~80%
99(59.64)
271(51.62)
224(63.46)
 ≤60%
7(4.22)
30(5.71)
22(6.23)
Sleep time point
 Before 21:00
31(18.67)
107(20.38)
52(14.73)
26.97
0.001
 21-22 o'clock
40(24.10)
198(37.71)
151(42.78)
 22-23 o'clock
54(32.53)
114(21.71)
95(26.91)
 After 23:00
27(16.27)
69(13.14)
40(11.33)
 Uncertain
14(8.43)
37(7.05)
15(4.25)
Night sleep duration
 <4
13(7.83)
52(9.90)
32(9.07)
12.311
0.055
 4~6
61(36.75)
154(29.33)
90(25.50)
 6~8
73(43.98)
272(51.81)
181(51.27)
 >8
19(11.45)
47(8.95)
50(14.16)
Nap duration
 No
27(16.27)
106(20.19)
61(17.28)
16.519
0.036
 <0.5
23(13.86)
74(14.10)
49(13.88)
 0.5~
73(43.98)
185(35.24)
117(33.14)
 1~
35(21.08)
123(23.43)
112(31.73)
Exercise frequency
 Occasionally
39(23.49)
239(45.52)
40(11.33)
133.569
<0.001
 Every week
17(10.24)
73(13.90)
48(13.60)
 Everyday
110(66.27)
213(40.57)
265(75.07)
Exercise intensity
 Low-intensity
118(71.08)
409(77.9)
218(61.76)
35.983
<0.001
 Middle-intensity
33(19.88)
52(9.90)
81(22.95)
 High-strength
15(9.04)
64(12.19)
54(15.30)
Exercise duration
 No
15(9.04)
164(31.24)
25(7.08)
199.809
<0.001
 <0.5
43(25.90)
174(33.14)
45(12.75)
 0.5~1
72(43.37)
142(27.05)
181(51.27)
 1~2
24(14.46)
38(7.24)
82(23.23)
Work frequency
 Occasionally
28(16.87)
114(21.71)
44(12.46)
18.109
0.001
 Every week
18(10.84)
73(13.90)
36(10.20)
 Everyday
120(72.29)
338(64.38)
273(77.34)
Work intensity
 Low-intensity
88(53.01)
235(44.76)
180(50.99)
36.639
<0.001
 Middle-intensity
44(26.51)
135(25.71)
127(35.98)
 High-strength
34(20.48)
155(29.52)
46(13.03)
Work self-feeling
 Relaxed
62(37.35)
114(21.71)
143(40.51)
122.75
<0.001
 Not so relaxed
67(40.36)
247(47.05)
199(56.37)
 A little tired
23(13.86)
130(24.76)
10(2.83)
 Tired
14(8.43)
34(6.48)
1(0.28)
Duration of hobbies refers to the time devoted to healthy hobbies everyday such as calligraphy, painting, music, fishing, dancing, raising flowers, traveling, dating, etc.; "70~80% satiety level" means that each meal eats subjectively feels hungry and full, and there is still a desire to continue eating; "≥90% satiety level" means that each meal eats subjectively feels saturated, and there is no desire to continue eating; Emotion in life refers to the comprehensive perception of the subject's emotional experiences such as husband and wife life, family member relationships, relatives and friends; Both the duration of sleep, nap, and exercise are units of hours; Low-intensity refers to walking, middle-intensity refers to brisk walking, cycling, etc., and high-intensity refers to long-distance running, swimming, fitness, etc

Decision tree model fitting and performance evaluation

The training and validation sets were randomly divided in a ratio of 7:3, and fitting and tuning were performed on the training set, followed by validation on the test set. The participants’ frailty status (Y) was converted into dummy variables (Y1 = frail or not, Y2 = pre-frail or not, and Y3 = robust or not), and decision tree models were fitted according to different Yn values. Tree pruning was based on the Complexity Parameter (CP), and the CP value that minimised the prediction error of the model was selected (Fig. 3).
The performance of the three models was comprehensively evaluated in the training and validation sets, and the performance of the decision tree tri-classification model was judged to be excellent from a macro perspective. Although Model 1 had high accuracy in the two sets, the recall, F1 score, and AUC were low (24.17% vs. 17.39%, 38.84% vs. 29.53%, 0.627 vs. 0.564, respectively; Table 4; Fig. 4). Based on the NPV values, the model may focus excessively on the occurrence of negative events. Importantly, the division of the dependent variable (Y) in Model 1 was extremely unbalanced, with only 15.9% assigned a value of 1(frail). The indicators of Models 2 and 3 were relatively close, but those of Model 2 were higher, but Model 2 could not distinguish the events with a value of 0 when the results were elaborated, indicating that the robust and frail people were combined, resulting in the inability to judge and distinguish the extreme effects of a certain factor on these two types of people; therefore, we used Model 3 to sort out the final results (Table 4).
Table 4
Performance of three classification decision tree model in training set and test set
Data Set
Indicators
Model One
Model Two
Model Three
Train Set
Accuracy (%)
84.95
82.63
80.16
Recall (%)
24.17
86.78
83.47
Specificity (%)
95.09
78.53
76.40
Youden index
0.193
0.653
0.599
Kappa index
0.192
0.653
0.575
PPV (%)
49.13
79.97
64.46
NPV (%)
86.47
85.74
90.01
Precision (%)
98.85
78.53
80.75
F1 score (%)
38.84
82.45
82.09
AUC (95%CI)
0.627 (0.591,0.662)
0.834 (0.805,0.861)
0.832 (0.803,0.859)
Test Set
Accuracy (%)
84.35
82.75
78.59
Recall (%)
17.39
87.04
83.81
Specificity (%)
93.63
78.15
75.48
Youden index
0.110
0.652
0.593
Kappa index
0.064
0.654
0.530
PPV (%)
31.99
81.06
63.26
NPV (%)
86.80
84.87
90.25
Precision (%)
97.75
78.15
81.73
F1 score (%)
29.53
82.36
82.76
AUC (95%CI)
0.564 (0.507,0.619)
0.824 (0.777,0.864)
0.814 (0.766,0.855)
PPV Positive predictive value, NPV Negative predictive value

Combined effects of dietary intake and life behaviour on frailty, pre-frailty, and robustness

Combined with the professional knowledge and the visualization results of decision tree model 3 (Fig. 5), we comprehensively sorted out the influence judgment of 6 variables and 10 types on robust and non-robust (Table 5, impact range 6.67–93.33%), suggesting that the combined effect of these factors is not conducive to maintaining personal robustness: not exercising or spending less than 0.5 h per day on exercise, occasional exercise with low exercise intensity, self-feeling a little tried or more at work, and excessive consumption of staple foods (> 450 g per day).
Table 5
Comprehensive impact of dietary intake and lifestyle behavior on “Robust” and “Unrobust” Groups
Type
Exercise duration
Exercise intensity
Work self-feeling
Exercise frequency
Staple food
Contribution rate
Not Robust
Robust
1
<0.5 h
Low-intensity
   
93.33
6.67
2
No
Middle or
high-strength
   
84.85
15.15
3
<0.5 h
Middle-intensity
   
68.75
31.25
4
<0.5 h
High-strength
   
30.77
69.23
5
≥ 0.5 h
 
A little tired or tired
  
89.16
10.84
6
≥ 0.5 h
Low-intensity
Relaxed or not so relaxed
Occasionally
 
90.48
9.52
7
≥ 0.5 h
Middle or
high-strength
Relaxed or not so relaxed
Occasionally
 
25.00
75.00
8
≥ 0.5 h
 
Relaxed or not so relaxed
Every week or day
<450 g
33.33
66.67
9
0.5 ~ 1/>2 h
 
Relaxed or not so relaxed
Every week or day
≥ 451 g
34.38
65.62
10
1 ~ 2 h
 
Relaxed or not so relaxed
Every week or day
≥ 451 g
87.50
12.50

Discussion

Frailty research is a challenging topic in the life sciences. In recent years, many scholars have conducted a large number of prospective cohort studies for the treatment of frailty, and our scientific hypothesis is that by regulating the diet and lifestyle characteristics of the population before the onset of frailty, the threshold of frailty treatment can be moved forward, and the focus of medical work can be shifted to prevention and health care. After the field investigation in China, our hypothesis was confirmed: older Chinese women who do not exercise or spend less than 0.5 h a day at the same time, occasionally exercise and exercise at a low intensity, feel more tired at work, and eat too many staple foods (> 450 g per day) are not conducive to staying robust.
Prevalence of frailty in Chinese older female population.
Our study found that frailty prevalence in older Chinese women was 15.9%, which is higher than that in 2019 in China’s community of the older population [12.8%, (10.5%, 15.2%)] [5]. The increase in the value and COVID-19 has a certain relationship; most COVID − 19 poor prognosis and death occurs in older people. Clinical samples test results showed that C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, lactate dehydrogenase, calcitonin, transferrin of older samples, elevated cortisol levels were different degree of meaningful, and vitamin D levels were significantly lower (generally accepted biomarkers of frail) [14]. During the pandemic, social isolation has become a part of the daily lives of the older population in China. Family conflict, depression, anxiety, and other emotions caused by isolation reduce collective disease tolerance and further exacerbate frailty [15].
After age stratification with a span of 5 years, the overall prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty increased first and then decreased with age, showing an inverted “U” shape change. The peak of the inverted “U” appeared in the 70–74 age group, indicating that the physical injury and disease manifestation of the study participants increased in the young-older age group (60–74-year-old). Awareness and behaviour of self-care in women over 75 years of age began to increase, while the prevalence of frailty decreased.
Fitting and performance evaluation of a three-classification decision tree model.
To draw intuitive and in-depth conclusions, we focused on the detailed quantification of dietary intake and lifestyle behavioural factors that influence frailty. The constructed three-classification decision tree model focused on the systematic screening of influencing variables; that is, on the basis of single factors, filters, and embedded variable screening methods were adopted, and the variable assignment was analysed in combination with professional knowledge. The decision tree model was adopted as the auxiliary model for this analysis because its result is an intuitive and easy-to-understand tree. It can not only screen the main factors affecting frailty again, but also clearly show the interaction between factors and the contribution degree of each type of effect, avoiding the classification problem that complex parameter estimation cannot be expressed by functions [16].
In the training and test sets, Model 3 exhibited excellent performance, and the values of each index were relatively average. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity ranges of Model 3 were between 75% and 84%, and the AUC was greater than 0.800. The intake of fruit, milk, eggs, sedentary behaviour, and sleep time were not reflected in the final results, but this does not mean that the older adults did not need to pay attention; in fact, the final results were refined in layers of screening, the importance of variables was relatively high, and more attention needed to be paid.
Effects of dietary intake and lifestyle behaviour on population.
The dietary and lifestyle questionnaire used in this study, combined with authoritative research and surveys, retrospectively summarises the work experience of our group, which is in line with the actual situation of women. Before the survey, each investigator received uniform training and learned a clear definition of each indicator to ensure the authenticity and reliability of the results as much as possible.
Eating too many staple foods (> 450 g per day) is detrimental to robustness. Women in southern China mainly consume rice as their staple food, while women in northern China mainly consume pasta; however, both rice and pasta are the main sources of carbohydrate intake, and excessive intake of carbohydrates can lead to obesity and overweight [17]. Sarcopenic obesity is a clinically functional disorder in which obesity and sarcopenia coexist. It is characterised by a decrease in lean body mass accompanied by excessive accumulation of adipose tissue, particularly visceral fat, and is highly prevalent in older women [18]. Previous studies on frailty have focused on supplementing protein diets in diagnosed populations to regulate metabolism and improve muscle mass [19]; however, our study suggests, for the first time, that carbohydrate restriction appears to be more important than protein supplementation in healthy people (who have not progressed to frailty). Restricting carbohydrate intake has performed well in women for weight loss, insulin resistance, and blood glucose and lipids [20]; however, proper carbohydrate intake (not low-carbohydrate and high-carbohydrate diets) can increase muscle glycogen stores, muscle mass, and bone mass [21] and prevent osteoporosis. Notably, a combination of exercise and reduced carbohydrates in the diet appears to reduce the loss of muscle mass caused by ketosis [22].
Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of life behaviours, in which exercise time, intensity, and frequency were identified in the model. Further quantitative results showed that not exercising or exercising for less than 0.5 h a day, while occasionally exercising and exercising at a low intensity, does not contribute to maintaining physical robustness. Randomised clinical trials have demonstrated that exercise can significantly improve the quality of life in older adults, reduce age-related oxidative damage and chronic inflammation, and improve mitochondrial function, actin profile, the IGF-1 signalling pathway, and insulin sensitivity [23, 24]. A combination of exercise and dietary nutrition is recommended for the prevention and treatment of frailty [25].
We propose that, after maintaining good diet and exercise habits, work fatigue in older women should be reduced. Self-perception of work is a comprehensive measure of women’s psychological and social health; we define “work” as social work and family work in this study. In society, Chinese women work until the age of 55 before they can retire, and the working hours of the freelance self-employed depend on their economic pressure. In the family, women are expected to take care of their older parents, children, and grandchildren, as well as provide emotional support and household chores. Owing to the intensification of aging and the extension of women’s life expectancy, women have been in this stage for a longer period of time, increasing their energy, emotional, and economic investment. If they feel tired, it means that an increase in age and changes in social roles have increased their psychological pressure, which is also the root cause of mental illness. Frailty is a biopsychosocial syndrome [26], and epidemiological evidence suggests that more than one-third of older patients with depression [27] are frail; therefore, we do not recommend that older women remain stressed at work, as this can easily lead to psychologically related disorders and thus frailty.
Although our study is based on a cross-sectional survey, it has the following three advantages: First, our research perspective is based on the representative provinces and cities of China, and the geographical and age distribution of the research objects is uniform, which can reflect the objective reality of frailty in older Chinese women; second, based on the two dimensions of dietary intake and life behaviour, we comprehensively evaluated the comprehensive effect of the factors in two dimensions on the population simultaneously. Finally, we explain and predict the comprehensive effect of frailty in two dimensions, and the results prove the simplicity and feasibility of the medical focus from frailty treatment to frailty prevention.
This study has some limitations. The intensity of cross-sectional investigations in epidemiological studies is still low in causal judgments, and we cannot tell whether a negative combination of factors causes frailty or frailty results in a negative combination of these factors. Follow-up studies should obtain information on a larger sample. Despite these limitations, our work innovatively suggests the feasibility of shifting the focus of frailty efforts and providing positive information for day-to-day prevention of frailty.

Acknowledgements

N/A.

Declarations

According to the Declaration of Helsinki, the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University and informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Anhänge

Supplementary Information

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, et al. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet (London England). 2013;381(9868):752–62.CrossRefPubMed Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, et al. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet (London England). 2013;381(9868):752–62.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, et al. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet (London England). 2019;394(10206):1365–75.CrossRefPubMed Hoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, et al. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet (London England). 2019;394(10206):1365–75.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kojima G, Iliffe S, Jivraj S, et al. Association between frailty and quality of life among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2016;70(7):716–21.CrossRef Kojima G, Iliffe S, Jivraj S, et al. Association between frailty and quality of life among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2016;70(7):716–21.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ji XY, Chen J, Bao ZJ. Focusing on the prevention and treatment of frailty among the elderly population in China. Lao Nian Yi Xue Yu bao jian. 2019;25(04):430–2. Ji XY, Chen J, Bao ZJ. Focusing on the prevention and treatment of frailty among the elderly population in China. Lao Nian Yi Xue Yu bao jian. 2019;25(04):430–2.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tian P, Yang N, Hao QK, et al. Systematic evaluation of the prevalence of elderly frailty in China. Zhong Guo Xun Zheng Yi xue. 2019;19(06):656–64. Tian P, Yang N, Hao QK, et al. Systematic evaluation of the prevalence of elderly frailty in China. Zhong Guo Xun Zheng Yi xue. 2019;19(06):656–64.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Doody P, Asamane EA, Aunger JA, et al. The prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty among geriatric hospital inpatients and its association with economic prosperity and healthcare expenditure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 467,779 geriatric hospital inpatients. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;80:101666.CrossRefPubMed Doody P, Asamane EA, Aunger JA, et al. The prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty among geriatric hospital inpatients and its association with economic prosperity and healthcare expenditure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 467,779 geriatric hospital inpatients. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;80:101666.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Almohaisen N, Gittins M, Todd C, et al. Prevalence of Undernutrition, Frailty and Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling people aged 50 years and above: systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2022;14(8):1537.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Almohaisen N, Gittins M, Todd C, et al. Prevalence of Undernutrition, Frailty and Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling people aged 50 years and above: systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2022;14(8):1537.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Marconcin P, Barak S, Ferrari G, et al. Prevalence of Frailty and its Association with depressive symptoms among European older adults from 17 countries: a 5-Year longitudinal Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(21):14055.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marconcin P, Barak S, Ferrari G, et al. Prevalence of Frailty and its Association with depressive symptoms among European older adults from 17 countries: a 5-Year longitudinal Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(21):14055.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Province MA, Hadley EC, Hornbrook MC, et al. The effects of exercise on falls in elderly patients. A preplanned meta-analysis of the FICSIT trials. Frailty and injuries: Cooperative studies of intervention Techniques. JAMA. 1995;273(17):1341–7.CrossRefPubMed Province MA, Hadley EC, Hornbrook MC, et al. The effects of exercise on falls in elderly patients. A preplanned meta-analysis of the FICSIT trials. Frailty and injuries: Cooperative studies of intervention Techniques. JAMA. 1995;273(17):1341–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiao Y, Li W, Jiang H, et al. Association of egg intake with risks of cardiometabolic factors among adults in China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1010539.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jiao Y, Li W, Jiang H, et al. Association of egg intake with risks of cardiometabolic factors among adults in China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1010539.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat YX Yang. Chinese food ingredient list standard version 6th Edition. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press; 2018. YX Yang. Chinese food ingredient list standard version 6th Edition. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press; 2018.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiao LP, Guo JJ, Yang YY, et al. Application of decision tree model and logistic regression model in the analysis of influencing factors of domestic drinking water quality. Zhong Guo Wei Sheng Tong Ji. 2020;37(06):874–7. Jiao LP, Guo JJ, Yang YY, et al. Application of decision tree model and logistic regression model in the analysis of influencing factors of domestic drinking water quality. Zhong Guo Wei Sheng Tong Ji. 2020;37(06):874–7.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Naude CE, Brand A, Schoonees A, et al. Low-carbohydrate versus balanced-carbohydrate diets for reducing weight and cardiovascular risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;1(1):Cd013334.PubMed Naude CE, Brand A, Schoonees A, et al. Low-carbohydrate versus balanced-carbohydrate diets for reducing weight and cardiovascular risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;1(1):Cd013334.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmer M, Lindqvist C, Petersson S, et al. Treatment of NAFLD with intermittent calorie restriction or low-carb high-fat diet - a randomised controlled trial. JHEP Reports: Innov Hepatol. 2021;3(3):100256.CrossRef Holmer M, Lindqvist C, Petersson S, et al. Treatment of NAFLD with intermittent calorie restriction or low-carb high-fat diet - a randomised controlled trial. JHEP Reports: Innov Hepatol. 2021;3(3):100256.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wachsmuth NB, Aberer F, Haupt S, Schierbauer JR, Zimmer RT, Eckstein ML, Zunner B, Schmidt W, Niedrist T, Sourij H, Moser O. The impact of a High-Carbohydrate/Low Fat vs. Low-Carbohydrate Diet on performance and body composition in physically active adults: a cross-over controlled trial. Nutrients. 2022;14(3):423. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030423.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wachsmuth NB, Aberer F, Haupt S, Schierbauer JR, Zimmer RT, Eckstein ML, Zunner B, Schmidt W, Niedrist T, Sourij H, Moser O. The impact of a High-Carbohydrate/Low Fat vs. Low-Carbohydrate Diet on performance and body composition in physically active adults: a cross-over controlled trial. Nutrients. 2022;14(3):423. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​nu14030423.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarazona-Santabalbina FJ, Gómez-Cabrera MC, Pérez-Ros P, et al. A Multicomponent Exercise intervention that reverses Frailty and improves cognition, emotion, and Social Networking in the Community-Dwelling Frail Elderly: a randomized clinical Trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(5):426–33.CrossRefPubMed Tarazona-Santabalbina FJ, Gómez-Cabrera MC, Pérez-Ros P, et al. A Multicomponent Exercise intervention that reverses Frailty and improves cognition, emotion, and Social Networking in the Community-Dwelling Frail Elderly: a randomized clinical Trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(5):426–33.CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nascimento CM, Ingles M, Salvador-Pascual A, et al. Sarcopenia, frailty and their prevention by exercise. Free Rad Biol Med. 2019;132:42–9.CrossRefPubMed Nascimento CM, Ingles M, Salvador-Pascual A, et al. Sarcopenia, frailty and their prevention by exercise. Free Rad Biol Med. 2019;132:42–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Metadaten
Titel
Diet and lifestyle behaviours simultaneously act on frailty: it is time to move the threshold of frailty prevention and control forward
verfasst von
Shan-lan Yang
Lei Wu
He-lang Huang
Lang-lang Zhang
Yi-xin Chen
Sheng Zhou
Xiu-xiu Chen
Jiao-feng Wang
Chao-bao Zhang
Zhi-jun Bao
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Public Health / Ausgabe 1/2024
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18639-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe