Background
Despite significant efforts to control and eradicate malaria, this deadly parasitic disease remains the most prevalent in the world. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 World Malaria Report, a total of 241 million malaria cases were recorded in 2020, representing a 12 million increase compared to 2019 (229 million cases) [
1]. Approximately 627,000 malaria deaths were estimated to occur in 2020, 12% increase compared to 2019 (558,000 deaths) [
1], due to the disruption of health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sub-Saharan Africa alone accounts for nearly 96% of all cases. Children under 5 years old, and pregnant women, remain the population groups with the highest risk of contracting malaria [
2,
3].
In Gabon, a Central African country, the malaria transmission is stable throughout the year with mean prevalence of 22.3% (data of the National Malaria Control Programme). In the country, three plasmodial species:
P. falciparum, P. malariae and
P. ovale have been reported [
4]. Among them,
P. falciparum is the most widespread, (responsible for all cases of infection in some areas), followed by
P. malariae (0.5-5%) and
P. ovale (0.5-2%) [
5‐
8]. In 2002, a new national malaria control policy was implemented to control malaria. It included artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), the use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs),the use of intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP), which has a protective effect in the mother and fetus, and finally, early diagnosis of all suspect cases in order to initiate care [
1]. These measures led to a decrease in the burden of malaria infection in the urban and rural areas.In Libreville and Franceville (urban areas), prevalence of malaria infection decreased from 31.2 to 18.3% [
9] and from 69 to 19.5% [
10], respectively. The decreased in malaria prevalence has led to the age of the populations at risk of malaria shifted in Libreville and Franceville [
9,
10]. The intensification of malaria control measures in children under 5 years of age has resulted in low exposure to
Anoheles bites. As a result, a delay in the development of immunity to malaria has been observed, putting children over 5 years of age at risk of malaria [
9,
10]. In Makokou and Dienga (rural areas of Gabon), the malaria prevalence were 54.4% and 43.5% respectively [
11,
12]. In general, the prevalence of malaria in rural Gabon is poorly documented. In Gabon, the COVID-19 pandemic was declared in March 2020. This led to the implementation of restrictive measures from 6pm to 5am and a disruption of health services. This dysfunction of the health services has led to an increase in cases and deaths due to malaria. However, in Franceville, south-east Gabon, no data on malaria cases recorded before, during and after the COVID-19 epidemic has been published. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the epidemiological characteristics of malaria in Franceville from 2019 to 2021.
Methods
Study site and patients
This study was conducted at the HASG in Franceville (in Haut-Ogooué Province, Gabon), an urban area in southeastern of Gabon, with a population of 129,694 people. This retrospective study involved all patients who came at the hospital for fever or a history of fever in the last 48 h (base axillary temperature or rectal temperature > 37.5 °C).
Data collection
Socio-demographic information such as age and gender, biomedical information such as blood cell count and malaria diagnostic result of all patients were collected from laboratory registries from 1 to 2019 to 31 December 2021.
The consultation of the laboratory registers was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki 2000. This study was approved by the National Research Ethics Committee of Gabon (N°0021/2022/CNER/P/SG) which exempts the patient’s informed consent in the context of a retrospective study and by the hospital management, which is the guarantor of hospital data (1845/MS/SG/DRSSE/HASG). The data were collected anonymously as part of the routine analyses performed at the laboratory of the HASG, this health structure is supervised by a Director.
At the HASG, light microscopy (LM) is used in clinical practice to detect malaria infection in all patients presenting to health facilities with symptoms. Thick blood smears were defined as positive if any asexual forms of
Plasmodium sp were observed by at least two microscopists and parasitaemia are calculated based on WHO guidelines [
12]: low (+) 1–10/100 fields, mild (++) 11–100/100 fields, moderate (+++) 1–10/one field, and high parasitaemia (++++) > 10/one field. Unfortunately, information on the
Plasmodium species diagnosed is not available in the registers. Nevertheless,
P. falciparum accounts for more than 94% of the malaria infection [
5,
10]. Severe anemia was defined as a hemoglobin value < 5 g/dL in children and < 7 g/dL in adults [
13].
Data analysis
Data of all patients were recorded in Excel 2013 spreadsheets. Statistical analyses were carried out with Epi-info version 3.3.2 (2005, CDC, Atlanta, USA) and the R software version 4.0.5 (2021-03-31). Patients with missing data were excluded for the analysis. Qualitative variables have been described by proportion and quantitative variables by mean, standard deviation (SD), median with inter-quartile range (IQR). Proportions were compared using the Chi2 test. For all analyses, the significance level was set at α = 5%.
Discussion
During the 2000s, published data on malaria epidemiology across sub-Saharan Africa showed a decline in malaria prevalence [
14‐
16]. Several studies conducted in Gabon also describe a decline in malaria cases between 2005 and 2010 in urban and semi-urban areas [
9,
17]. This decrease in malaria prevalence is the result of the implementation of a malaria control policy in Gabon starting in 2002, including intermittent preventive treatment of pregnant women, distribution of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), and increased availability of effective antimalarial drugs [
9,
18]. After 2010, studies describe a resurgence in the number of malaria cases in both rural and urban areas of Gabon [
18‐
20]. In this study, the malaria burden in Franceville was 33.5% for the 2019–2021 period. This high prevalence of malaria could be explained by the lack of awareness campaigns and the absence of vector control methods during that time [
11]. This prevalence of malaria infection is higher than those described in 2010 (17.9%) by Lekana-Douki et al., and in 2013 (21.2%) by Maghendji-Nzondo et al. [
5,
10]. This study showed that the malaria prevalence is higher in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to 2019 and 2021, before and after COVID-19 pandemic respectively. These results are in accordance with global data that showed an increase in malaria cases during the COVID-19 pandemic [1]. The implementation of pandemic’s restrictive measures has led to the disruption of healthcare infrastructure, to a decrease in the finance of households (lack of financial resources to buy antimalaria in drugstores) and consequently to a decrease in the malaria control.
In sub-Saharan Africa, children under 5 years of age have often been the age group who is most at risk of developing malaria [
21]. In this study, the age group [
6‐
9] years had the highest malaria prevalence (44.3%) in 2019 while the age group [
10‐
14] years had the highest malaria prevalence in 2020 and 2021 (53.8% and 48.9% respectively). These results may indicate a shift in the age group of patients at risk for malaria infection in accordance with study carried-out in Cameroon [
22] or may reflect broader trends in higher prevalence among older children [
23,
24]. Also, this result could be explained by the fact that during the COVID-19 pandemic, adolescents in this age group spent more time outside the home due to the idleness created by the COVID-19 restrictive and were therefore more exposed to mosquito bites. It has been recognized for more than a decade that measures which reduce the level of exposure may interfere with the natural acquisition of immunity to malaria[
25]. This shift could show a delay in the acquisition of malaria immunity among adolescents and the factors associated with this delayed immunity acquisition remain to be elucidated [
26,
27]. For each age group, the prevalence of malaria was higher in 2020. This result could be explained by the negative impact of COVID-19 on the epidemiology of malaria causing disruptions in health services, affecting the implementation of prevention and treatment policies, which are reflected in an increase in the number of malaria cases during the 2020 year [
28]. This study shown low prevalence (0.39%) for severe anemia. This prevalence seems to be lower than that found by Maghendji-Nzondo in Franceville, at the Centre Hospitalier Régional Amissa Bongo (CHRAB) and Dzeing-Ella in Libreville [
5,
29]. This result could be explained by the fact that in the HASG of Franceville, all critical clinical cases are systematically transferred to the CHRAB which is the reference health structure in the Haut-Ogooué province, for better management.
The annual prevalence of malaria for the years 2019, 2020 and 2021 were 30.2%, 37.4% and 31.5%, respectively. The variation in malaria infection during the long rainy season, long dry season, and short dry season was significantly different between 2019, 2020 and2021 (
p < 0.01). For all three years of the study, malaria was most prevalent during the short dry season. This result could be explained by the abundance of Anopheles mosquito breeding sites during this period of the year, since abundant rainfall makes it the wettest season. This result is also consistent with those of Maghendji-Nzondo which showed a higher prevalence of malaria cases during the short rainy season, with prevalence of 26.4% in 2011 and 29.8% in 2012 [
5,
30]. Similarly, other studies conducted in Gabon and other areas have shown that malaria infection prevalence are higher during the short rainy season [
31,
32]. This study provides necessary data for the epidemiological surveillance of malaria and its use by policy-makers.
This study has a few limitations. Data gathered on malaria infection were based on hospital laboratory registries and there were missing data. There could be selection bias (hospital-based), no species diagnosis has been performed for Plasmodium infection and the absence of data on severe malaria. Also, data of several patients were missing and could not be included in analyses. In addition, this study did not include data from rural areas due to difficulties in accessing these data (remoteness, absence or low conservation of hospital registers, lack of malaria diagnostic equipment) and limited funding.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. DIBO Mireille, Director of the Chinese-Gabonese Friendship Hospital in Franceville, for granting permission to conduct this study. Mr. NZAMBA Ulrich, head of the hospital’s analysis laboratory, and Mr. ROPONAT TCHOUA Parfait Aimé, senior medical biology technician, for making the various registers available to us. Our thanks also go to Dr MOUNIOKO Franck for his help. Finally, we are deeply grateful to the patients who participated in the study.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.