Background
Materials and methods
Aim of the study
Study design and setting
-
What are the behavioral intentions of graduating pharmacy students toward interprofessional collaboration?
-
What are and what factors influence their attitudes in this regard?
-
What are their subjective norms and the sources of social pressure that could influence their behavior?
-
What impacts their perceived behavioral control in this aspect in terms of controllability dimensions and self-efficacy?
1. Opening questions: - participants’ understanding of the term interprofessional collaboration (IPC) and their previous experiences |
2. Attitudes about IPC: - advantages and positive feelings - disadvantages and negative feelings |
3. Subjective Norms about IPC: - approval in the environment and positive social pressure sources - disapproval in the environment and negative social pressure sources |
4. Perceived Behavioral Control of IPC: - factors enabling or facilitating the behavior - factors preventing or hindering the behavior |
5. Participants’ opinions about IPC in Poland – the situation now, possibilities, and improvements that could be introduced |
6. Participants’ readiness for IPC |
7. Closing question: - additional topics that participants wanted to raise on the subject |
Study participants
Data analysis
Results
Attitudes | Subjective norms | Perceived behavioral control |
---|---|---|
Possibility to acquire new knowledge, skills, and competencies | Pharmacists and pharmacy students | Respondents’ knowledge, skills, and experience |
Increased prestige and appreciation of the profession | Physicians | Limited knowledge of representatives of other professions and collaboration |
Better quality of patient care | Patients | The atmosphere at the future place of work and co-workers’ potential reluctance |
Support and relief offered to other team members | Relatives and friends | Finding time for collaboration |
Worries about potential errors and knowledge gaps | Decision and policymakers | Incentives and gratification system |
Legal regulations |
Attitudes
Possibility to acquire new knowledge, skills, and competencies
P1: “I think that for me, expanding knowledge also about things that I, for example, was not taught during studies. I think that I can also teach someone, and someone can teach me something, and it is also cool because then a person develops.”
P12: “Firstly, it is definitely exciting. Secondly, certainly personal development because at the moment I have a limited need for further education after the studies because I assume that there is no point in further learning on such serious topics - let’s say some pharmacological ones because I will not use it anyway, so I prefer to focus on what new cream came out to give the patient a hint. So really, I flatten, so to speak, my competence, and here, for sure, I would see more sense in personal development.”
Increased prestige and appreciation of the profession
P3: “We, as pharmacists, can also show what knowledge we have at this moment, and we do not limit ourselves to being [the respondent uses the word szufladziarze – an untranslatable pejorative plural noun originating from Polish szuflada (drawer), referring to pharmacists as mere sellers of medicaments], as people often see us […] it is certainly an opportunity to prove ourselves.”
Better quality of patient care
P12: “Certainly, increasing the quality of care for the patient because one specialist cannot handle everything. Instead, it would be divided into several people, so the quality would be higher because these people could specialize more, and so higher the probability of catching some error.”
Support and relief offered to other team members
P7: “I believe that teamwork is crucial nowadays, that one person is not able to do much alone, that it is pointless to assume that one person should be responsible for everything, […] And thanks to this collaboration, we can function better, and people are relieved, too. Then one person is not so mentally burdened.”
Worries about potential errors and knowledge gaps
P5: “We would also take responsibility for this patient, for our opinion, which would be put into practice, well, [patient’s] health and life would depend on us. […] And in such a situation that, for example, I analyzed something wrong, and on this basis, a wrong decision was made, which potentially caused the patient to suffer, it could be hard.”
P6: “When someone treats you as a specialist, and you feel like a specialist at least a little bit, there is also this fear that you do not know something, that you will say something wrong, that they will ask you a question about something you realize that you should know, but at the moment you do not know. […] I guess the fact that the team’s expectations will be disappointed is my biggest fear in such teams, where we have several different professions.”
Subjective norms
Pharmacists and pharmacy students
P8: “I think pharmacists would be happy about that. […] [pharmacists and why?] Well, I think that many pharmacists have such a sense of inferiority because of this hierarchy. And they could praise it as it could be a beginning of something in a better direction - abolishing this hierarchy.”
P14: “I think pharmacists as a professional group [could disapprove]. I think that some people, because I do not want to make generalizations, might feel jealous that I, as a pharmacist after studies, suddenly go to some interprofessional team - Why cannot they go because they are also good pharmacists and could be there too? So, I think such jealousy could appear somewhere.”
Physicians
P9: “I think that some doctors would be pleased because our knowledge in the field of, for example, pharmacokinetics, pharmacology, pharmacotherapy is a bit different and often more detailed than that of doctors. […] doctors have the basis in pharmacology, more in the direction of dosing or treatment, while drug interactions at some cellular or metabolism level are more of our area, so surely this would make doctors happy that they do not have to worry so much about combining different drugs, because we would be on guard of this.”
P2: “It seems to me that, at least at first, physicians would probably be dissatisfied that their competencies are taken away from them, that someone meddles in their work.”
P1: “Some doctors, especially the older ones, could have a problem with the fact that someone interferes with their work, what they prescribe, takes away a part of their competence.”
P9: “The perception of the world of pharmacists is changing, and, for example, in the era of the pandemic, the profession was very much approved by the environment where we were often simply on the front line and had to lead such a patient by the hand in various diseases.”
Patients
P1: “I believe that, first of all, such a statistical patient would probably be the most satisfied with such a solution […] such cooperation would definitely relieve the queues, because let’s face it, how many people are registered for a doctor’s appointment only to extend the prescription, for example, for medicines they take permanently. Why cannot it be done, for example, that the doctor knows the patient and introduces them to the pharmacist? The pharmacist continues the therapy, and, for example, once in a while, [diagnostic] tests are ordered so that the patient can see if everything is fine with them. If they are okay, we are moving on with it, and the doctor can admit other people who, for example, have not been diagnosed yet.”
P5: “There is still mistrust among patients in a sense what they [pharmacists] can bring or know if they are not a doctor.”
Relatives and friends
P2: “Probably my grandfather, who has a rather stereotypical view of the work of a pharmacist and sees the pharmacist behind the counter only as a seller, so he would probably be happy if I was in such a team because it would go hand in hand with greater prestige, money and that I am near doctors, so it is as if I were a doctor myself.”
Decision and policymakers
P3: “In a society, I do not see who would be bothered by it. Unless who would have to finance it? Because, let’s face it, such cooperation would not be pro bono in the long run. Let’s say the NFZ [National Health Fund – governmental insurer agency] could frown upon it a bit until it would see the benefit, which taking some measures can work for the benefit of the patient.”
P9: “Maybe it would also be prestige for the hospital management because, for now, in Poland, such a team is still something exclusive, unusual that would distinguish a given medical unit.”
P3: “I think the pandemic will oblige the NFZ to make better use of our professional group. Well, the fact that vaccinations have started, in addition to COVID, also the flu.”
Perceived behavioral control
Respondents’ knowledge, skills, and experience
P1: “To be honest, I feel prepared. I feel that I gained a lot of knowledge during my studies.”
P2: “I do not feel I have the experience needed to work in a team like this. However, after a few years of work, if I gained this experience, I think it could be a very interesting escape from working in a pharmacy.”
Limited knowledge of representatives of other professions and collaboration
P3: “First of all, cooperation, learning to cooperate with various professionals already at the stage of studies because this is where you have students of medicine, nursing, physiotherapy in one place. Why not use it?”
P2: “First of all, I think that at the level of studies, some classes, which would primarily present in practice how such a team works, or just a conversation with members of such teams would blow up this fog of mystery covering the work of the interprofessional team. I try to make decisions, as much as possible, aware of what I’m getting myself into […] If I knew better what such cooperation looks like, I could imagine whether something like this is for me.”
P7: “I was also volunteering at the beginning of the pandemic. It was a student consultation point […] I was in the group, another pharmacy student and a medical student, and we had the opportunity to cooperate and solve various [patient] cases or problems with patients assigned to us. And you could also see a different point of view, and I also know that the girl from medicine was also impressed by how much we were able to help her select drugs.”
The atmosphere at the future place of work and co-workers’ potential reluctance
P2: “If I were to cooperate in such a team, it seems to me that if the relations between the members of the team were warm and friendly, it would be easier to cooperate because it would mean that other team members would not take it personally if one would point out a mistake or suggest some change.”
Finding time for collaboration
P5: “I am not sure if something like this would give me satisfaction. It seems to me it requires a lot of commitment, and I do not know if at the moment I can say whether I am ready for such a sacrifice.”
Incentives and gratification system
P7: “Also, probably some salary, depending on how much it would be […] I think that money would also matter. There is no point in hiding that.”
P12: “I think some prestige to it as well, if it was some nice hospital, or I knew that it would be such a prestigious job. That would also motivate me additionally.”
Legal regulations
P7: “All activities a given profession is supposed to perform in such collaboration should be clearly defined. So, who can what and who should say what because there may be some friction, and the pharmacist can step too much in front of the doctor, the doctor can wash their hands, and so on. So, I think the most important thing would be to develop a good system.”