nach oben

European Journal of Applied Physiology

Erschienen in:

Open Access 15.10.2022 | Original Article

High-intensity interval training: optimizing oxygen consumption and time to exhaustion taking advantage of the exponential reconstitution behaviour of D’

verfasst von: Filippo Vaccari, Jacopo Stafuzza, Nicola Giovanelli, Stefano Lazzer

Erschienen in: European Journal of Applied Physiology | Ausgabe 1/2023

Abstract

Purpose

Accumulating the time near maximum aerobic power $\left( {{\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}} } \right)$ is considered to be the most effective way to improve aerobic capacity. The aims of this study were: (1) to verify whether postponing the first recovery interval improves time to exhaustion during a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) test, and (2) to verify whether a HIIT protocol with decreasing interval duration (HIDIT) is more effective in accumulating time near ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ compared with two classical protocols with short intervals (SI_HIIT) and long intervals (LI_HIIT).

Methods

Nine active males (35 ± 11 years, ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ 52 ± 5 mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹) performed a graded exercise test on an athletic track. Critical velocity and D’ were estimated from three to five high-intensity trials to exhaustion. Then, the subjects performed three trials with a single recovery interval after 30 s (Rec_30s), after 3 min (Rec_3min) and after exhaustion (Rec_Tlim) to verify whether postponing the first recovery interval enhances the time to exhaustion. Finally, the subjects performed the three HIIT protocols mentioned above.

Results

The time to exhaustion was significantly greater in Rec_Tlim (464 ± 67 s) than in Rec_3min (388 ± 48 s) (p < 0.0078) and Rec_30s (308 ± 44 s) (p > 0.0001). Additionally, it was significantly greater in Rec_3min than in Rec_30s (p = 0.0247). Furthermore, the time accumulated near ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ was significantly longer in HIDIT (998 ± 129 s) than in SI_HIIT (678 ± 116 s) (p = 0.003) and LI_HIIT (673 ± 115 s) (p < 0.031).

Conclusions

During the trials, postponing the first recovery interval was effective in improving the time to exhaustion. Moreover, HIDIT was effective in prolonging the time near ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$.

Communicated by Philip D. Chilibeck.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

BLC

Blood lactate concentration

Critical power

CR-10

Validated scale of perceived exertion

Critical velocity

CV₆

Velocity leading to exhaustion in 6 min

D’

The maximum distance that may be covered beyond CV

Effect size

HIDIT

Decreasing intervals HIIT (combining high intensity from 3 min to 30 s and low intensity from 2 min to 20 s)

HIIT

High-intensity interval training

Heart rate

LI_HIIT

Long intervals HIIT (3 min high–2 s low intensity)

SI_HIIT

Short intervals HIIT (30 s high–20 s low intensity)

Rec_30s

Test consisting in a bout of exercise of 30 s followed by a recovery phase and a subsequent bout to exhaustion

Rec_3min

Test consisting in a bout of exercise of 3 min followed by a recovery phase and a subsequent bout to exhaustion

Rec_Tlim

Test consisting in a bout of exercise to exhaustion followed by a recovery phase and another bout to exhaustion

RPE

Rate of perceived exertion

T_lim

Time to exhaustion

T90% ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$

Time elapsed above 90% of V̇O_2max

${\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{{2}}$

CO₂ output

${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{2}}$

Pulmonary O₂ uptake

${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$

Maximal aerobic power

${\text{v}}{\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$

Running speed occurred at the maximal aerobic power

W’

Amount of work that can be done during exercise above the CP

Introduction

Maximum aerobic power (${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$) is one of the most important parameters for evaluating the efficiency of the cardiorespiratory system, and it is also one of the most important determinants of endurance performance. Therefore, the purpose of many training protocols is to improve maximum aerobic power by working at intensities close to or equal to ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ (Wenger and Bell 1986; Midgley and Mc Naughton 2006). Researchers have proposed different protocols that were able to solicit and maintain the exercise intensity close to ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ as long as possible. One of the training methods that allows athletes to extend the duration of exercise at a very high intensity is called high-intensity interval training (HIIT) (Midgley and Mc Naughton 2006; Buchheit and Laursen 2013). HIIT can be set with the help of critical velocity (CV) and D’ (maximum distance that may be covered beyond CV (Jones et al. 2019)). CV is the intensity below which a metabolic steady state is still possible (for a more detailed definition see Jones and Vanhatalo (2017)). CV and D′ are phenomenologically equivalent to critical power (the critical threshold used in performances where the intensity is measured in Watts such as cycling) and W′ (the finite amount of work that can be done beyond CP), respectively (Ettema 1966; Broxterman et al. 2015; Jones and Vanhatalo 2017; Jones et al. 2019). During HIIT, D' is consumed when the intensity is above CV. On the other hand, during recovery periods below CV, D’ is reconstituted (Billat et al. 2001; Skiba et al. 2014; Jones and Vanhatalo 2017). When D' is fully depleted, only an adequate recovery period allows to perform another high-intensity interval. Nevertheless, while the depletion of D’ above CV occurs at a constant rate, its reconstitution takes place with exponential behaviour. In other words, whether D' is close to exhaustion, its recovery is quicker than when it is about to be fully reconstituted. In fact, the rate of recovery decreases as a function of recovery time (Ferguson et al. 2010; Skiba et al. 2014; Caen et al. 2019; Sreedhara et al. 2020; do Nascimento Salvador et al. 2021; Lievens et al. 2021).

In a previous work (Vaccari et al. 2020) we showed that this feature can be exploited to extend the time elapsed above 90% of ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ (T90%${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$) during HIIT. HIIT protocols with initially longer and then shorter intervals above CV would allow prolongation of T90%${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ for two reasons: 1—an initial "priming effect" of oxygen consumption (Jones et al. 2008): indeed, long intervals increase oxygen consumption faster than short intervals (Millet et al. 2003); 2—at the beginning of the exercise, when D' is not widely depleted, its recovery is relatively slow (Skiba et al. 2012). In contrast, the reconstitution of D' will be relatively faster starting with a long interval and thus recovering when D’ is already nearly depleted (Skiba et al. 2012). After the first long interval, more frequent recovery periods could be introduced by decreasing the duration of the intervals. In fact, at this stage, even a few seconds of recovery will be more effective than at the beginning. This should allow for the extension of high-intensity exercises for longer and maintain the rate of oxygen consumption high for longer time.

The current study aims to expand our previous work (Vaccari et al. 2020) and tests the hypothesis that: (1) comparing three trials with a single recovery period, postponing the first recovery interval recovery allows to prolong the time to exhaustion at the end of the trial; (2) decreasing the intervals duration during a HIIT session can be more effective in running performance in comparison with HIIT protocol with long or short intervals.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Nine active, non-smoking men were recruited (34 ± 11 years; 79 ± 8 kg; ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ 52 ± 5 mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹). All of them concluded the entire protocol except one who got injured in the last test. Then, all of his completed tests were taken into account for the analysis. The inclusion criteria were: (1) recreational runner; (2) training volume in the latest 6 months was greater than 3 session per week (or was greater than 40 km per week … vedi tu); (3) none of the athletes had a history of neuromuscular or musculoskeletal impairments at the time of the study that could affect the results.

Study design

The Ethics Committee of the Friuli-Venezia Giulia approved the study (protocol number 30/2021). Participants performed from 9 to 11 test days, separated by at least 48 h in the spring of 2021. During the first visit to the laboratory, an operator explained the purposes and the objectives of the study to each subject and obtained written informed consent. Then, participants underwent medical examinations and performed a maximal running step-incremental test to measure ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ and maximal aerobic speed (${\text{v}}{\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$). Although the objectives were explained to all subjects, the study hypothesis was not revealed to not influence the results. After the first visit, participants were examined three to five times on different days to determine their velocity–duration relationship (CV and D’). CV parameters were used to set up the HIIT tests. Then, they randomly performed three tests to exhaustion to determine the reconstitution of D’ after a period of 2 min of recovery, which was set after high-intensity bouts of 30 s, 3 min or after Tlim (time to exhaustion). Finally, the subjects performed three HIIT tests in a randomized order: long interval HIIT (LI_HIIT), high-intensity decreasing interval training (HIDIT), and short interval HIIT (SI_HIIT) (Fig. 1). During the three HIIT tests, oxygen consumption and heart rate (HR) were measured along with Tlim, and the time above 90% of ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ and blood lactate concentration (BLC), HR and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) using the Borg CR-10 scale (Borg et al. 2010) were measured at the end of the tests. Each test was performed at the same time of the day, on an athletic track and separated from the previous one by a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 6 days. Subjects were instructed to avoid the consumption of drinks containing caffeine for at least 8 h before each test and to avoid vigorous physical activity in the 24 h preceding each testing session. Furthermore, they were asked to maintain the same drinking and feeding habits before each test. The nine subjects concluded the entire protocol within 12 weeks from the first visit.

On-track testing session

Incremental tests, velocity–duration relationship trials, D’ reconstitution trials, and HIIT tests were performed at the athletic track of Gemona del Friuli, Italy. Every test session was preceded by the same warm-up routine: 10 min running at 10 or 12 km/h (depending on the fitness level), followed by 1-min passive recovery. The running speed was set considering a series of markers that were placed every 20 m on the first lane of the track. Every participant was paced by an operator on a bike that set the right speed passing every mark when an acoustic signal (a beep) was emitted from a device. In other words, each "beep" corresponded to the time in which 20 m should have been covered if one went at the predetermined speed (e.g., at 2.7 m/s a beep every 7.4 s). The test ended when the subject was not able to follow the bike for two consecutive markers, despite strong encouragement of the operator.

Incremental test

The incremental test was performed on the athletic track under medical supervision, and standard safety procedures were followed. During the first visit, an operator instructed the subjects to correctly report the rate of perceived exertion on the CR-10 scale (Borg et al. 2010). The incremental step test started at 10 or 12 km/h depending on the fitness level of the subject and increased by 0.5 km/h per minute throughout the test until voluntary exhaustion. Ventilation, ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{2}}$ and carbon dioxide (${\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{{2}}$) were measured breath-by-breath using a portable metabolic unit (K5, Cosmed, Italy). The ventilation was measured by a turbine calibrated before each test with a 3-L syringe. Calibration of O₂ and CO₂ analysers was performed before each test by utilizing calibration gas mixtures of known composition (16.00% O₂; 4.00% CO₂). The V̇O₂ plateau during the last 30 s was used to verify the achievement of ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$, while ${\text{v}}{\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ was considered the minimum velocity at which the ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ plateau appeared (Taylor et al. 1955; Poole and Jones 2017).

Velocity–duration relationship

CV and D’ were estimated from three to five high-intensity trials to exhaustion performed in different days at 90 to 110% of the ${\text{v}}{\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$. All the tests had to last a minimum of ~ 2 and a maximum of ~ 15 min to be considered valid (Jones and Vanhatalo 2017).

To find CV and D’, two methods were used (Clarke and Skiba 2013): (1) Distance–time method: the distance covered (D) in each of the separate exercise bouts was plotted against T_lim. In this case, the slope of the linear regression represents CV, and the intercept represents D’; (2) 1/time method: velocity was plotted against 1/time. In this case, the slope of the line represents D’, and the intercept represents CV. For each subject, the determination coefficient (R²) resulting from both methods had to be higher than 0.95. If not, more trials were performed to increase the precision of linear regression. A minimum of three and a maximum of five trials have been made for each subject. Eventually, the method with higher R² was used to determine CV and D’.

D’ reconstitution tests

To investigate the reconstruction characteristics of D’, the participants performed three trials in a randomized order and preceded by the same warm-up as in the incremental test. The three trials comprised one high-intensity bout (B1) followed by a 2-min active recovery interval and a second high-intensity bout to exhaustion (B2). The first bout of the trial was meant to simulate three different interval durations in which D’ was consumed: long bout (Rec_3min, Fig. 1C), short bout (Rec_30sec, Fig. 1D) and exhaustion bout (Rec_Tlim, Fig. 1E). The intensity of the high-intensity bouts was the same as the HIIT test and corresponded to the velocity that was supposed to lead to exhaustion in 6 min (360 s) according to the following equation (Jones et al. 2010):

$${\text{CV}}_{{6}} = \frac{{D^{\prime}}}{360s} + CV.$$

(1)

The velocity used for the low-intensity bout was 66% of the CV and was the same as that used in the HIIT test.

The recovery interval of 2 min served to the reconstitution of D’ (Caen et al. 2019), and the last bout to exhaustion was performed to measure how much the timing of the first recovery bout (after 30 s, 3 min or Tlim) influenced the reconstitution rate of D’. Because it can be theoretically assumed that D′ = 0 at exhaustion, this calculation yielded the D′ reconstitution after the recovery interval.

The amount of D′ expended in the first bout (B1) and in the second bout (B2) (Fig. 1C–E) was calculated by numerical integration of the power values above CV. The difference between D’ was calculated from the intensity–duration relationship, and the sum of the expenditure of D’ during B1 and B2 allowed us to calculate the amount of D' reconstituted during the recovery interval. Subsequently, it was expressed as a percentage of total D’.

HIIT tests

After the incremental tests, the critical velocity tests, and the recovery trials, subjects performed three HIIT training sessions in a randomized order. The velocity of the work/recovery bouts and the work/recovery duration ratio were the same in each trial, although the duration of the intervals was changed. The work and recovery intensity were the same as the D’ reconstitution tests (see previous paragraph), while the ratio work/recovery time was set at 3/2 for all the tests. The three-interval test was structured as follows:

Long intervals (LI_HIIT, Fig. 1F): 3 min at high intensity and 2 min at low intensity repeated until volitional exhaustion of the subject;
High-intensity decremental interval training (HIDIT, Fig. 1G): 3 min at high intensity and 2 min at low intensity; 2 min at high intensity and 1 min and 20 s at low intensity; 1 min at high intensity and 40 s at low intensity; 45 s at high intensity and 30 s at low intensity; and finally, 30 s at high intensity and 20 s at low intensity repeated until volitional exhaustion of the subject;
Short intervals (SI_HIIT, Fig. 1H): 30 s at high intensity and 20 s at low intensity until volitional exhaustion of the subject.

Throughout the HIIT protocols, ventilatory parameters were measured using a breath-by-breath metabolic unit (K5, Cosmed, Italy), and then data were averaged every 5 s. ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{2}}$ and HR were measured during the entire test, while BLC and RPE were measured at the end of each test. An operator collected a capillary blood sample from the fingertip to measure BLC after 3 min of the end of the exercise (Lactate Scout 4, EKF Diagnostics, UK), while the subjects reported RPE consulting the CR-10 scale shown by another operator. At the end, the total time spent above 90% of ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ was determined as the sum of each averaged 5 s when ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{2}}$ was equal to or higher than 90% of ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software (IBM, Chicago, USA) with significance set at P < 0.05. Descriptive data are presented as the mean ± SD. HIIT tests and the three sessions to test D’ reconstitution were compared by a mixed-effect analysis. Where the analysis found a significant difference, Tukey’s multiple comparison test between the three protocols was performed. Effect size (ES) was calculated using Cohen’s d (0 < d < 0.20, small; 0.20 < d < 0.50, medium; d > 0.50, large). For our purposes, a sample size of 6 subjects was calculated to have a statistical power of 0.8 to refute the null hypothesis and to obtain an ES of 0.80 with an alpha error of 0.05 and a beta error of 0.20. To have a safe margin 9 subject have been recruited.

Results

Age and weights along with values attained during the incremental test and the velocity–duration relationship trials are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Anthropometrics and physiological characteristic of the participants; data were obtained from incremental test and velocity–duration relationship trials

Subject	Age (yr)	Weight (kg)	${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ (mLO₂ × min⁻¹)	${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ (mLO₂ × kg⁻¹ × min⁻¹)	${\rm{v}} \dot {{\rm V}}{{\rm{O}}}_{2{\rm max}}$ (km × min⁻¹)	HR_max (bpm)	CV (m × s⁻¹)	D' (m)
1	29	86	4125	48.0	15.0	186	3.48	250
2	21	69	3801	55.1	18.0	181	4.39	248
3	44	86	4660	54.2	15.0	175	3.47	204
4	44	85	3807	44.8	14.0	191	3.34	246
5	21	88	4356	49.5	14.0	194	3.37	230
6	42	77	3510	45.6	13.5	165	3.33	121
7	51	78	3990	51.2	14.5	164	3.40	163
8	36	71	4310	60.7	17.5	149	4.48	124
9	28	68	3866	56.9	15.5	183	3.78	258
Mean	35	79	4047	52	15.2	176	3.67	205
SD	11	8	352	5	1.6	15	0.45	55

${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$: maximal aerobic power; ${\mathrm{v\dot V}}{{\mathrm{O}}_{{\mathrm{2max}}}}$: velocity at ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$; ${\text{HR}}_{{{\text{max}}}}$: maximal heart rate; CV: critical velocity; D’: amount of work which is possible to do beyond CV expressed as a distance in metres

For trials investigating D’ and for HIIT protocols, the high intensity was set at CV₆ (mean value 15.2 ± 1.6 km/h), while low intensity corresponded to 66% CV (mean value 8.8 ± 1.6 km/h). The total time spent at high intensity during the reconstitution D' trials was on average 308 ± 44 s, 388 ± 48 s, and 464 ± 67 s for Rec_30sec, Rec_3min, and Rec_Tlim, respectively, which was significantly different between each trial (Fig. 2). In particular, Rec_3min was greater than Rec_30sec (+ 80 s; 95% C.I from + 150 to + 12 s; p = 0.0247; ES = 1.00, large); Rec_Tlim was greater than Rec_30sec (+ 156 s; 95% C.I from + 213 to + 100 s; p > 0.0001; ES = 2.64, large); and Rec_Tlim was greater than Rec_3min (+ 75 s; 95% C.I from + 128 to + 24 s; p = 0.0078; ES = 1.39, large).

Furthermore, D' of Rec_30sec was on average 13 ± 12% less than D' calculated from the velocity–duration relationship, while following Rec_3min, D' was + 10 ± 15%, and following Rec_Tlim, D' was + 28 ± 18% (Fig. 2).

The physiological and perceptual responses during the three HIIT protocols are shown in Table 2. There were no significant differences between the three protocols other than T_lim and T90%${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$. In particular, the T_lim of HIDIT was significantly higher than those of SI_HIIT (+ 48%; 95% C.I from + 488 to + 154 s; p = 0.001; ES = 1.85, large) and LI_HIIT (+ 47%; 95% C.I from + 519 to + 133 s; p = 0.004; ES = 1.60, large), while there were no differences between the T_lim of SI_HIIT and LI_HIIT (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, T90%${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ of HIDIT was significantly higher than SI_HIIT (+ 116%; 95% C.I from + 440 to + 20 s; p = 0.003; ES = 1.04, large) and LI_HIIT (+ 66%; 95% C.I from + 535 to + 115 s, p = 0.031; ES = 1.50; large), while there were no differences between T90%${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ of SI_HIIT and LI_HIIT (Fig. 3A).

Table 2

Data from HIIT protocol with short intervals (SI_HIIT), with decreasing duration of intervals (HIDIT) and with long intervals (LI_HIIT)

	SI_HIIT	HIDIT	LI_HIIT
Tlim (s)	678 ± 116*	998 ± 129	673 ± 115*
${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2peak}}}}$(mL O₂ × min⁻¹)	3890 ± 442	4032 ± 393	4277 ± 388
% ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2peak}}}}$/${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$	96 ± 9	101 ± 6	106 ± 9
${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2mean}}}}$(mL O₂ × min⁻¹)	3590 ± 397	3580 ± 292	3637 ± 306
% V̇O_2mean/V̇O_2max	89 ± 6	89 ± 5	90 ± 8
T90%${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$(s)	167 ± 188*	579 ± 219	349 ± 111*
HR_peak (bpm)	175 ± 15	176 ± 13	176 ± 11
HR_mean (bpm)	166 ± 16	164 ± 15	164 ± 16
BLC post (mM)	7.5 ± 4.7	9.9 ± 4.5	8.6 ± 3.0
RPE	8.2 ± 0.7	8.5 ± 0.4	8.3 ± 0.4

For all the protocols the same mean speed for high intensity and low intensity were used, and the ratio of the durations of high/low intensities were identical

Values are presented as mean ± SD

Tlim: time to exhaustion; ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2peak}}}}$: peak oxygen consumption during the HIIT protocols; ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2mean}}}}$: mean oxygen consumption during the HIIT protocols; ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$: maximal oxygen consumption from the incremental test; T90%${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$: Time elapsed above 90% of ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$; ${\text{HR}}_{{{\text{peak}}}}$: peak heart rate; ${\text{HR}}_{{{\text{mean}}}}$: mean heart rate during the work intervals; BLC post: blood lactate concentration 3 min after the end of the protocol; RPE: rate of perceived exertion. *different from HIDIT (p < 0.05)

Discussion

The main findings of the present study showed that (i) postponing the first recovery interval allows increasing T_lim. In fact, Rec_tlim was more effective than Rec_3min and Rec_30sec, and Rec_3min was more effective than Rec_30sec in prolonging time to exhaustion; (ii) time above 90% of ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ and T_lim were higher during HIDIT than HIIT protocols with long (LI_HIIT) and short (SI_HIIT) intervals, despite having identical mean velocity, duration and ratio high/low intensity of the intervals. These results confirm that the reconstitution of D’, when falling below the intensity corresponding to the CV, has an exponential behaviour that can be exploited in HIIT protocols to prolong T_lim and T90%${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$.

The intensities used for the HIIT protocols were chosen to optimize the time near to maximum oxygen consumption. The velocity used for the high-intensity intervals (CV₆), corresponds approximately to the speed at ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ (Billat et al. 1999). The velocity used for the low intensity intervals (66%CV), is slow enough to allow recovery, but fast enough to maintain high the oxygen consumption. The choice of protocols for HIIT with long and short intervals was also made to optimize the time near to maximum oxygen consumption, as emerged from the indications of the review of Buchheit and Laursen (2013). The HIDIT protocol, on the other hand, was designed to progressively arrive from long to short intervals over a not excessively long time.

Several studies performed on cycle ergometers have verified that the reconstitution of W' (used in place of D’ when cycling) was exponential (Ferguson et al. 2010; Skiba et al. 2014; Caen et al. 2019; Sreedhara et al. 2020; do Nascimento Salvador et al. 2021; Lievens et al. 2021), while the present study is the first to verify it on running performance.

Furthermore, our study used a different experimental design from previous studies. For example, the studies by Ferguson et al. (2010) and Caen et al. (2019) demonstrated that the reconstitution of W' during recovery was exponential by performing a series of tests with recovery intervals with progressively longer durations. Thus, they verified that after reaching exhaustion, at the beginning, the reconstitution of W’ was very fast and then gradually slowed down. In recent years, this topic has been of interest to several studies that have tried to better explain the behaviour of W', both during bouts above critical power (CP, used in place of CV when cycling) and below CP. The studies by Skiba and colleagues (Skiba et al. 2012, 2014, 2015; Chidnok et al. 2013; Broxterman et al. 2015) led to the creation of a model that allows us to predict the behaviour of W' (i.e., the Model W' bal). Recent studies have tried to question it. For example, the study by Chorley et al. (2018) showed that repeated exhaustion exercises slow down the reconstruction of W’. The study by Caen et al. (2019) showed that the speed of reconstitution of W' depends on how quickly it was depleted by the previous bout: the faster it is consumed, the faster it rebuilds. Furthermore, the study by Lievens et al. (2021) showed how the reconstitution of W' was slower than expected in the heavy domain. Finally, the study by Sreedhara et al. (2020) showed that the intensity of recovery was even more important than the duration of recovery. In agreement with previous studies on cycling, our study confirmed the exponential trend of the reconstitution of D’ during running performance. Moreover, it showed that this feature can be exploited to increase exercise tolerance by postponing the first recovery interval.

Unexpectedly, in the Rec_30sec test, the total time over CV was even less than that estimated by the velocity–duration relationship tests (Fig. 2). This means that the 2 min under CV did not allow for recovery but probably even consumed a portion of D'. Unfortunately, we cannot explain this result through our data, and there are no other studies that have verified the behaviour of W' (cycling) or D' (running) after such a short interval above CV. A possible explanation is that the first 30 s were not sufficient to activate the aerobic system adequately. Therefore, the recovery carried out in the following 2 min (i.e., at 66% of the CV) was not sufficiently low to allow D’ reconstitution. Indeed, the study by Sreedhara et al. (2020) showed that at an intensity close to CP, the reconstitution of W' is much slower than one might expect, even at approximately 90% CP intensity. In some cases, a depletion of W’ occurs instead of a reconstitution.

We previously observed that a HIDIT protocol can increase the T90%${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ in cyclists compared to HIIT protocols with short or long intervals (Vaccari et al. 2020). However, the results of this study were slightly different from the results of the present study. Indeed, on cyclists, HIDIT did not significantly increase T_lim, but the average ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{2}}$ during the HIIT with long intervals was higher than HIIT with short intervals. In the present study, we wanted to verify that HIDIT was advantageous also in running performance, since the kinetics of ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{2}}$ are not the same in running and cycling (Hill et al. 2003). Although in recent years several studies have tried to propose strategies to increase the time close to ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ during HIIT, researchers have focused mainly on the fast start strategy to exploit the priming effect (Billat et al. 2013; De Aguiar et al. 2013; Lisbôa et al. 2015; Bossi et al. 2019; Rønnestad et al. 2019, 2021; Beltrami et al. 2021). Additionally, most of the studies were performed on cycle ergometers. On the other hand, the studies by Rønnestad et al. were conducted on cross-country skiers and confirmed that a fast-starting strategy can increase the average ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{2}}$ (Rønnestad et al. 2019, 2021) and the time above 90% of the ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ (Rønnestad et al. 2021) compared to a traditional HIIT session. Moreover, the study by (Beltrami et al. 2021) is particularly interesting because the authors compared a fast start protocol and a traditional HIIT protocol in runners and cyclists. The authors showed that only in cycling performance the average V̇O₂ and the time above 90% of the ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ were greater. Conversely, when subjects were asked to perform the same protocol by running, the ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{2}}$ kinetics were not different between the two HIIT protocols. Although the tests by Beltrami and colleagues did not lead to exhaustion, there seem to be some similarities between the fast start strategy and HIDIT during running. In fact, our data show that there is no difference in the average ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{2}}$ between HIDIT and traditional protocols. Therefore, for the same duration, the two protocols would not have shown differences over time above 90% of ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$.

Practical applications

In adult active males, training protocols starting with long intervals followed by short intervals could be useful to accumulate time close to ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ and consequently improve it. HIDIT would not seem physiologically more fatiguing than other classical protocols. Thus, it could be used in a general preparation phase in the same way as traditional HIIT protocols. Women were not included among the participants, this precluded us from verifying whether HIDIT can also be successfully applied to women's training.

Conclusions

In conclusion, during the HIIT trials performed for this study, postponing the first recovery interval below CV contributed to increasing T_lim. Furthermore, active males achieved longer time above 90% of ${\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}$ and longer T_lim by performing a HIDIT running protocol than HIIT protocols with long and short intervals, despite having similar values of BLC and RPE at the end of the trial.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the participants in the study for their time and effort to ensure the success of the project.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interests.

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt testen ¹

e.Med Allgemeinmedizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Allgemeinmedizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Premium-Inhalten der allgemeinmedizinischen Zeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Allgemeinmedizin-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Jetzt testen ²

Beltrami FG, Roos E, von Ow M, Spengler CM (2021) Cardiorespiratory responses to constant and varied-load interval training sessions. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 16:1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0104CrossRef

Billat VL, Blondel N, Berthoin S (1999) Determination of the velocity associated with the longest time to exhaustion at maximal oxygen uptake. Eur J Appl Physiol 80:159–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050573CrossRef

Billat VL, Slawinksi J, Bocquet V et al (2001) Very short (15s–15s) interval-training around the critical velocity allows middle-aged runners to maintain max for 14 minutes. Int J Sports Med 22:201–208CrossRef

Billat V, Petot H, Karp JR et al (2013) The sustainability of VO2max: Effect of decreasing the workload. Eur J Appl Physiol 113:385–394CrossRef

Borg E, Borg G, Larsson K et al (2010) An index for breathlessness and leg fatigue. Scand J Med Sci Sports 20:644–650CrossRef

Bossi AH, Mesquida C, Passfield L et al (2019) Optimizing interval training through power-output variation within the work intervals. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2019-0260CrossRef

Broxterman RM, Ade CJ, Craig JC et al (2015) The relationship between critical speed and the respiratory compensation point: Coincidence or equivalence. Eur J Sport Sci 15:631–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.966764CrossRef

Buchheit M, Laursen PB (2013) High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: Cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports Med 43:313–338CrossRef

Caen K, Bourgois JG, Bourgois G, Boone J (2019) The reconstitution of W′ depends on both work and recovery characteristics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 51:1745–1751. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001968CrossRef

Chidnok W, DiMenna FJ, Fulford J et al (2013) Muscle metabolic responses during high-intensity intermittent exercise measured by 31P-MRS: relationship to the critical power concept. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 305:R1085–R1092CrossRef

Chorley A, Bott RP, Marwood S, Lamb KL (2018) Reconstitution of W’ in recovery slows with repeated bouts of maximal exercise. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, pp 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0256

Clarke DC, Skiba PF (2013) Rationale and resources for teaching the mathematical modeling of athletic training and performance. Adv Physiol Educ 37:134–152. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00078.2011CrossRef

De Aguiar RA, Turnes T, De Oliveira Cruz RS, Caputo F (2013) Fast-start strategy increases the time spent above 95 %VO2max during severe-intensity intermittent running exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 113:941–949CrossRef

do Nascimento Salvador PC, Schäfer L, Antonacci Guglielmo LG et al (2021) Modeling the depletion and reconstitution of W ′: Effects of prior exercise on cycling tolerance. Respir Physiol 285:7

Ettema JH (1966) Limits of human performance and energy-production. Int Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Physiol Einschließlich Arbeitsphysiol 22:45–54

Ferguson C, Rossiter HB, Whipp BJ et al (2010) Effect of recovery duration from prior exhaustive exercise on the parameters of the power-duration relationship. J Appl Physiol 108:866–874CrossRef

Hill DW, Halcomb JN, Stevens EC (2003) Oxygen uptake kinetics during severe intensity running and cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-002-0779-xCrossRef

Jones AM, Vanhatalo A (2017) The “critical power” concept: applications to sports performance with a focus on intermittent high-intensity exercise. Sports Med 47(Suppl 1):65–78CrossRef

Jones AM, Wilkerson DP, Vanhatalo A, Burnley M (2008) Influence of pacing strategy on O2 uptake and exercise tolerance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 18:615–626CrossRef

Jones AM, Vanhatalo A, Burnley M et al (2010) Critical power: Implications for determination of V’O2max and exercise tolerance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42:1876–1890CrossRef

Jones AM, Burnley M, Black MI, et al (2019) The maximal metabolic steady state: redefining the ‘gold standard.’ Physiol Rep 7:e14098. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14098

Lievens M, Caen K, Bourgois JG et al (2021) W′ Reconstitution accelerates more with decreasing intensity in the heavy- versus the moderate-intensity domain. Med Sci Sports Exerc 53:1276–1284. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002574CrossRef

Lisbôa FD, Salvador AF, Raimundo JAG et al (2015) Decreasing power output increases aerobic controbution during low-volume severe-intensity intermittent exercise. J Strength Cond Res 29:2434–2440CrossRef

Midgley A, Mc Naughton L (2006) Time at or near VO2max during continuous and intermittent running. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 46:1–14

Millet GP, Candau R, Fattori P et al (2003) Responses to different intermittent runs at velocity associated with. Can J Appl Physiol 28:410–423CrossRef

Poole DC, Jones AM (2017) Measurement of the maximum oxygen uptake V̇o 2max : V̇o 2peak is no longer acceptable. J Appl Physiol 122:997–1002CrossRef

Rønnestad BR, Rømer T, Hansen J (2019) Increasing oxygen uptake in well-trained cross-country skiers during work intervals with a fast start. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 15:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0360CrossRef

Rønnestad BR, Bakken TA, Thyli V et al (2021) Increasing oxygen uptake in cross-country skiers by speed variation in work intervals. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 1:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2021-0226CrossRef

Skiba PF, Chidnok W, Vanhatalo A, Jones AM (2012) Modeling the expenditure and reconstitution of work capacity above critical power. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44:1526–1532CrossRef

Skiba PF, Jackman S, Clarke D et al (2014) Effect of work and recovery durations on W′ reconstitution during intermittent exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 46:1433–1440. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000226CrossRef

Skiba PF, Fulford J, Clarke DC et al (2015) Intramuscular determinants of the ability to recover work capacity above critical power. Eur J Appl Physiol 115:703–713CrossRef

Sreedhara VSM, Ashtiani F, Mocko GM et al (2020) Modeling the recovery of w′ in the moderate to heavy exercise intensity domain. Med Sci Sports Exerc 52:2646–2654. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002425CrossRef

Taylor HL, Buskirk E, Henschel A (1955) Maximal oxygen intake as an objective measure of cardio-respiratory performance. J Appl Physiol 8:73–80CrossRef

Vaccari F, Giovanelli N, Lazzer S (2020) High-intensity decreasing interval training (HIDIT) increases time above 90% V’O2peak. Eur J Appl Physiol 120:2397–2405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04463-wCrossRef

Wenger HA, Bell GJ (1986) The interactions of intensity, frequency and duration. Sports Med 3:346–356CrossRef

Titel: High-intensity interval training: optimizing oxygen consumption and time to exhaustion taking advantage of the exponential reconstitution behaviour of D’
verfasst von: Filippo Vaccari
Jacopo Stafuzza
Nicola Giovanelli
Stefano Lazzer
Publikationsdatum: 15.10.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Journal of Applied Physiology / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1439-6319
Elektronische ISSN: 1439-6327
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-05059-2

Neu im Fachgebiet Arbeitsmedizin

Das Geschlechterparadoxon in der gesundheitlich beeinträchtigten Lebenszeit – Ende eines Mythos?

Open Access Hüftgelenksbewegungseinschränkung Leitthema

Beginnend mit den 1920er-Jahren hat sich eine Vorstellung über die Geschlechterdifferenzen in Gesundheit und Mortalität etabliert, die von Lorber und Moore in dem einprägsamen Satz: „Women get sicker, but men die quicker“, zusammengefasst wurde [ 1 …, S. 13]. Tatsächlich erscheinen vor dem Hintergrund der höheren Lebenserwartung der Frauen die Studienergebnisse zu den Geschlechterdifferenzen in der Morbidität überraschend, wonach Frauen im Durchschnitt einen schlechteren Gesundheitszustand aufweisen als Männer [

Gesunde Lebenserwartung: Ein kritischer Blick auf Nutzen und Potenziale des demographischen Gesundheitsindikators

Open Access Leitthema

Die demographische Alterung hat vielfältige gesellschaftliche Konsequenzen, deren Ausmaß wesentlich vom Gesundheitszustand der Bevölkerung abhängt. Um diesen analysieren und bewerten zu können, wurden spezielle Kennziffern entwickelt, die in …

Wie hat sich die Lebenserwartung ohne funktionelle Einschränkungen in Deutschland entwickelt? Eine Analyse mit Daten des Deutschen Alterssurveys (DEAS)

Open Access Hüftgelenksbewegungseinschränkung Leitthema

Deutschland erfährt, wie andere Hocheinkommensstaaten, aufgrund kontinuierlich rückläufiger Mortalität und niedriger Geburtenraten tiefgreifende demografische Veränderungen. Der demografische Wandel führt in Deutschland zu einem zunehmend höheren …

Hitzeschutz im Fokus der hessischen Betreuungs- und Pflegeaufsicht

Open Access Klimawandel Übersichtsartikel

Im Sommer 2023 kündigte das Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (BMG) einen nationalen Hitzeschutzplan an und forderte die Länder auf, zu prüfen, „ob die Warnstufen des [Deutschen Wetterdienstes] DWD mit der Durchführung von Akutmaßnahmen …

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publisher's Note

Introduction

Materials and methods

Subjects

Study design

On-track testing session

Incremental test

Velocity–duration relationship

D’ reconstitution tests

HIIT tests

Statistics

Results

Discussion

Practical applications

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Declarations

Conflict of interest

Publisher's Note

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

e.Med Allgemeinmedizin

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Physiological adaptations following vigorous exercise and moderate exercise with superimposed electrical stimulation

Flawed analysis and erroneous interpretations of the critical power concept: response to Mr. Dotan

Active warm-up and time-of-day effects on repeated-sprint performance and post-exercise recovery

Individual physiological responses to changes in shoe bending stiffness: a cluster analysis study on 96 runners

Dietary nitrate supplementation enhances heavy load carriage performance in military cadets

Interrater reliability of a customized submaximal cycle ergometer test

Neu im Fachgebiet Arbeitsmedizin

Das Geschlechterparadoxon in der gesundheitlich beeinträchtigten Lebenszeit – Ende eines Mythos?

Gesunde Lebenserwartung: Ein kritischer Blick auf Nutzen und Potenziale des demographischen Gesundheitsindikators

Wie hat sich die Lebenserwartung ohne funktionelle Einschränkungen in Deutschland entwickelt? Eine Analyse mit Daten des Deutschen Alterssurveys (DEAS)

Hitzeschutz im Fokus der hessischen Betreuungs- und Pflegeaufsicht