High-power short-duration catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: is it really a new era? Comparison between new and old radiofrequency contact force–sensing catheters
verfasst von:
Antonio Dello Russo, Leonardo D’Angelo, Paolo Compagnucci, Laura Cipolletta, Quintino Parisi, Yari Valeri, Francesca Campanelli, Giovanni Volpato, Laura Carboni, Giuseppe Ciliberti, Giulia Emily Stronati, Alessandro Barbarossa, Valentina La Piscopia, Barbara Bondavalli, Federico Guerra, Andrea Natale, Michela Casella
The clinical performance of high-power, short-duration (HPSD) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the novel flexible tip TactiFlex™ (TFSE) catheter, as compared to standard-power, long-duration (SPLD) PVI using the TactiCath™ (TCSE) catheter among patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently unknown.
Methods
We conducted a prospective, observational, single-centre study including 40 consecutive patients undergoing PVI for paroxysmal/persistent AF, using HPSD ablation with the novel TFSE catheter (HPSD/TFSE group). Based on propensity score-matching, forty patients undergoing SPLD PVI with the TCSE catheter were identified (SPLD/TCSE group). In the HPSD/TFSE group, RF lesions were performed by delivering 40–50 W for 10–20 s, while in the SPLD/TCSE group, RF power was 30–35 W, targeting a lesion size index (LSI) of 4.0–5.5. The co-primary study outcomes were time required to complete PVI and first pass isolation (FPI).
Results
PVI was achieved in 100% of patients in both groups, and no major adverse events were observed. Remarkably, PVI time was shorter in the HPSD/TFSE, compared to the SPLD/TCSE group(9 [7–9] min vs. 50 [37–54] min; p < 0.001), while FPI rate was non-significantly higher in the former group(91% [146/160] vs 83% [134/160]; p = 0.063). Shorter procedural (108 [91–120] min vs. 173 [139–187] min, p < 0.001), total RF (9 [7–11] min vs. 43 [32–53] min, p < 0.001), fluoroscopy times(15 [10–19] min vs. 18 [13–26] min, p = 0.014), and lower DAP (1461 [860–2181] vs. 7200 [3400–20,800], p < 0.001) were recorded in the HPSD/TFSE group. A higher average impedance drop was obtained with HPSD/TFSE CA(17[17–18]Ω vs. 16 [15–17] Ω, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
In our initial clinical experience, HPSD PVI with the TFSE catheter proved faster than SPLD PVI with the TCSE catheter, at least equally effective in terms of FPI, and it was associated with greater impedance drop.
Graphical abstract
Main study findings. Abbreviations: DAP, dose area product; HPSD–TFSE, high-power short-duration with the TactiFlex™, Sensor Enabled™ catheter; PVI, pulmonary vein isolation; RF, radiofrequency energy; SPLD–TCSE, standard-power long-duration ablation with the TactiCath, Sensor Enabled™ catheter
×
Anzeige
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
High-power short-duration catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: is it really a new era? Comparison between new and old radiofrequency contact force–sensing catheters
verfasst von
Antonio Dello Russo Leonardo D’Angelo Paolo Compagnucci Laura Cipolletta Quintino Parisi Yari Valeri Francesca Campanelli Giovanni Volpato Laura Carboni Giuseppe Ciliberti Giulia Emily Stronati Alessandro Barbarossa Valentina La Piscopia Barbara Bondavalli Federico Guerra Andrea Natale Michela Casella
Wenn Eingriffe wie eine Koronarangiografie oder eine Koronarangioplastie anstehen, wird häufig empfohlen, in den Stunden zuvor nüchtern zu bleiben. Ein französisches Forscherteam hat diese Maßnahme hinterfragt.
Der Nachweis aktiver Plaques mittels 18F-Natriumfluorid-PET hilft nicht nur, infarktgefährdete Patienten, sondern auch infarktgefährdete Koronararterien zu erkennen. Von einer gezielten Behandlung vulnerabler Plaques ist man trotzdem weit entfernt.
Der GLP-1-Agonist Semaglutid hat in der FLOW-Studie bewiesen, dass sich damit die Progression chronischer Nierenerkrankungen bei Patienten mit Typ-2-Diabetes bremsen lässt. Auch in kardiovaskulärer Hinsicht war die Therapie erfolgreich.
Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.
Update Kardiologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.