Background
Method and material
Population | 1. Fetus or newborn or infant or baby or babies |
2. Parent* or mother* or father* or pregnan* | |
3. 1 or 2 | |
Concept | 4. MH sleep hygiene |
5. Infant sleep or sleep location or sleep habit or sleep hygiene | |
6. 4. AND 5. | |
7. 3. AND 6. | |
Context | 8. Parent* guidance or parent* information or parent* psychoeducation or parent* support or parent* intervention or parent* involvement or parent* communication |
9. 7. AND 8. | |
10. 9 AND sleep included in abstract or title |
Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria | |
---|---|---|
Study design | Systematic review, literature review, metasynthesis, prospective study, clinical trial, qualitative research | Professional articles, research protocol, comments, conference abstract, book, web page |
Time of publication | 2010 until August 2021 | |
Publication language | Peer-reviewed article in English, Danish, Swedish or Norwegian | Articles published in ofter languages |
Place published | Indexed in PubMed, PsykINFO or CINAHL or detected in references from selected papers | |
Population | Families with healthy term-born infants aged 0–6 months living together. | Prematurity, children diagnosed with diseases or specific medical problems, disabilities or institutionalized because of caregiving needs |
Delimitation | The words sleep* and newborn or infant* or baby or babies were included in abstract/title | Abstract or title did not include words focusing on sleep or target population |
Results
Study | Aims & participants | Methods | Results | Comments and clinical implications | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Baddock et al. (2019) [46] New Zealand | Investigation of infant physiology and risks and benefits of parent-infant bedsharing. The review included 40 papers reporting on infants aged six month or younger. Studies were published between 1994 and 2017. | A systematic review. Some type of objective data was assessed in 27 papers and subjective data in 32 papers. | Sleep duration was reported in 19 studies. Compared to solitary sleeping, bed-sharing was associated with significantly shorter sleep among infants in six studies, no difference in four and longer sleep duration in two studies. Bed-sharing was associated with slightly higher axillary and skin-temperature and more frequent breastfeeding. Bed-sharing was associated with lower cortisol response to a mild stressor (bath) at five weeks but not later in infancy. | Bedsharing or not Different sleep-arrangements influence infants sensory and physical micro-environment in different ways. Differences related to sleep architecture, infant arousals, infant overnight temperature control, cardiorespiratory responses, breastfeeding duration, sleep position, mother-infant interactions and physiological responses to mild stress. |
2. | Canter et al. (2015) [32] USA | Assess the usefulness of an educational video about infant safe sleep that was tested by 43 new mothers, while 49 new mothers received standard care N = 92 | Prospective, pre- post intervention study. Maternal observations of infant sleep were collected on surveys. | Compared to the standard care-group, video-mothers reported more frequently that they had observed appropriate infant sleep positions in the nursery (67.4% vs. 46.9%,(p < .05). The study did not control for changes in sleep knowledge among health workers in the unit. | Safe infant sleep educational tools The 6 minutes long video focused on (a) avoiding smoke, alcohol, and drugs, (b) the importance of a comfortable sleeping temperature, (c) appropriate dressing and sleep position for babies and d) the ABCs of safe sleeping: alone, on the back and in a crib. |
3. | Cullen et al. (2016) [47] USA | Identify teaching strategies that nurses can use to increase families safe sleep practices. Among 100 studies, 24 papers were selected for intensively review and 14 studies included. | A systematic review and meta synthesis. | Analysis resulted in 14 findings that formed 4 themes. Meta-aggregation resulted in two synthesized outcomes: First, parents practice co-bedding with their infant despite knowledge about the risks and having received teaching. Next, families should receive co-bedding messages tailored to their specific circumstances and risks. | Personalization of safe infant sleep guidance For the first outcome the categories were” Keeping their babies close” and “My grandma says - family traditions”. The second outcome was obtained from two categories that covered seven findings. The categories were “Nurses influencing parenting behavior” and “Modeling ways to reduce risk”. Thus, healthcare workers should be context sensitive and personalize their information. |
4 | Hauck et al. (2015) [48] USA | Description of parental knowledge and practice before and after implementation of an educational program and free crib distribution. N = 3303 (antenatally), 1483 (postnatally) and 1729 at 3 months follow-up. | Prospective cohort study evaluating a program in a high-risk US area. Data collection by surveys developed for this study | Parental knowledge about safe infant sleep increased after receiving a crib (p < 0.001). Intended use of supine position for infant sleep increased from 80% (postnatally) to 87% after receiving a crib (p < 0.001). Unintended bedsharing decreased after participation in the program and 90% reported that the infant slept in the crib after the program compared to 51% before. | Safe infant sleep educational tools The authors state that programs like the BBB should be evaluated on a periodic basis to assure that they positively influence parental knowledge and practices about safe infant sleep. The program focused on sleep position, use of pacifier, bedsharing and feeding practices. |
5. | Kellams et al. (2017) [49] USA | A multisite quality improvement intervention was implemented in 8 US-maternity wards, aiming to improve health professionals’ knowledge and role modeling about infant safe sleep. | A knowledge-campaign lasting for a median of 160 days (range, 101–273) across the 8 units. New mothers answered a survey before discharge from hospital | Mothers who reported receiving information on 4 primary safe sleep topics raised from 72 to 95% of the time (a 24–57% increase over the baseline). Additionally, 93% of infants were observed in a supine sleep position, and 88% of infants were observed in a safe sleep environment (a 24 and 33% increase over baselines). These rates sustained until 12 months later. | Safe infant sleep educational tools The intervention included information on safe sleep positions, absence of objects in sleep environment, introduction of pacifier for sleep once breastfeeding is established and room-sharing without bed-sharing. Tool kit for hospitals: PP, Posters, pocket-sized cards for nurses to use when counseling parents and sample letters to inform hospital leaders. |
6. | Mathews et al. 2016) [50] USA | Can enhanced information reduce the use of soft bedding? Comparison of two groups of African American mothers receiving either standard or enhanced information N = 1194. | A randomized controlled study (RCT). All data are based on self-reports | Across 3 follow-ups (2–3 weeks, 2–3 months and 5–6 months) mothers in the enhanced information group used less soft bedding last night (adj OR = 0.74 (0.58–0.94), p = 0.013, used less soft bedding in the last week (adj OR = 0.70 (0.54–0.90), p = 0.006. More maternal self-efficacy was associated with more frequent inappropriate arrangements. | Soft bedding, personalization of safe infant sleep guidance The study focuses on a group of US-mothers that mostly were unmarried (80%) and in the lower range regarding socio-economic resources (SES). The results may be affected by high attrition rates, only 46% participated at 6 months. Mothers that left the study were younger and with lower SES. |
7. | Mileva-Seitz et al. (2017) [21] The Netherlands | The prevalence of parent-child bed sharing (P-CBS) is investigated across 659 research articles (peer-reviewed, editorial pieces and comments). | A systematic review. | P-CBS was reported in 98 studies. Prevalence ranged from 2.5% in an Australian study to 100% in many African countries. The relation between P-CBS and risks of sudden infant death is investigated and nuanced. The reviewers call for collaboration across different disciplines introducing a new term “psychoanthropediatrics”. | Intentional or reactive bedsharing Some studies focus on the difference between intentional and reactive bed-sharing. Results indicate that intentional bed-sharing parents were more likely to bed-share all night, to endorse and be more satisfied with bed-sharing, while parents of reactive bed-sharers had more often tried a ‘cry-it-out-method’ of sleep training and reported more night-time difficulties. |
8. | Patton et al. (2015) [30] USA | Investigation of whether nurses provide safe sleep environments for infants in a hospital setting Sample sizes ranged from 94 to 5911 nurses and/or other healthcare workers across included studies. Samples of parents ranged from 100 to 671. | An integrative review based on search in multiple databases (1999–2013) 16 studies included. | Four papers discussed nursing knowledge and compliance with safe sleep recommendations. In 12 of the 16 studies incorrect recommendations from nurses were detected. Most nurses are aware of the AAP recommendations but may choose not to follow them consequently due to fear of aspiration. Parental observations mirror these inconsistencies in health workers’ practice: 50% used the side-lying position, 37% the supine position, and 10% a combination of positions. | Safe infant sleep education and role modeling The choices nurses make regarding safe infant sleep practices can influence parental behavior at home. In the included studies some mothers were not even aware of sleep related risk factors. When nurses lack knowledge and their practice is inconsistent, parents may find themselves confused. If parents observe inconsistencies between nurses’ practice and teaching, they may use the positions they observed professionals performed. |
9. | Raines (2018) [31] USA | Investigates which factors that influence on parental behaviors related to newborn safe sleep positions and environments in the home. | Descriptive qualitative study. - qualitative interview conducted by telephone | Participants described three consistent factors that influenced how newborn sleep at home. The most frequently mentioned influence was Other People followed by Nobody/No One and Images from sources such as books, pictures, television, and the Internet. | Safe infant sleep and parental believes Parents need education about the rationale for the AAP safe sleep guidelines and nurses are important in helping them understand AAP recommendations for safe sleep. The images to which parents are exposed send mixed messages. Health care professionals should portray safe sleep for infants in media, marketing materials, and other graphic representations. |
10. | Salm-Ward et al. (2018) [51] USA | A comparison of parental knowledge and use of safe sleep practices after distribution of an educational program and baby cribs. Mothers that either were pregnant in the last trimester or mother of a child less than 3 months old were eligible, N = 132. | A prospective, matched pre- and post-test cohort study with follow-up. Surveys were answered by use of telephone interviews ten weeks after post-test survey. | Participants reported increased knowledge after the program: recommended back position (58.8% at pre-test vs. 96.2% at post-test, p < 0.001); recommended separate surface in parents’ room (53.4 vs. 74.8%, p < 0.001); no soft items (85.9% vs. 96.9%, p = 0.001); smoke exposure increases risk (57.1 vs. 93.7%, p < 0.001); breastfeeding reduces risk (55.8 vs. 82.2%, p < 0.001); back sleep does not increase risk of choking (48.8 vs. 85.6%, p < 0.001); pacifier use decreases risk (9.6 vs. 62.4%, p < .001); always back sleep (76.4% vs. 92.9%, p < 0.001); and infants should sleep on a flat, firm surface (89.1 vs. 98.4%, p = 0.003). | Safe infant sleep education At pre-test, 58.4% of participants reported receiving a health workers advice on sleep position and 40.2% on sleep location. The only informational item that were significantly less known the responders at follow-up compared to the post-test survey was that use of a pacifier decreases the risk of SUID. |
11. | Vilvens et al. (2020) [52] USA | Focus on why parents/ caregivers might fail to practice safe infant sleep arrangements. (N = 124) Parents of infants less than one year were interviewed. | A descriptive, qualitative study based on interviews. Use of ‘pulse interviewing’ -talking with parents at community events in a high-risk US area. | Six themes of underlying reasons why caregivers might not practice safe sleep behaviors were identified and included: (a) culture and family tradition; (b) knowledge about safe sleep practices; (c) resource access; (d) stressed out parents; (e) lack of support; and (f) fear for safety of baby. | Safe infant sleep and parental resources Based on the study information the authors formed five narratives (personas). These learning examples are introduced as resources that may strengthen health workers ability to be context sensitive and personalize their information in communication with new parents about infant sleep safety. |
Study | Aims & participants | Methods | Main results | Comments and clinical implications | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
12. | Douglas et al. (2013) [53] Australia | Investigates if behavioral sleep interventions in families with infants less than 6 months may improve child and maternal outcomes. | Systematic review. 638 studies were detected, and 43 studies selected for review. | The authors argue that behavioral sleep interventions are inefficient for infants younger than 6 months. Main critiques are presented as 3 methodical limitations related to:1) lack of focus on associations with feeding difficulties, 2) to little differentiation between the first and second part of infants first year and 3) that some studies interpret associations as causal relations. | Focus on the high variability in neurodevelopmental stages and sleep maturation the first six months. Unsettled infant behavior in this period is a complex phenomenon. They argue for a holistic approach in attempts to support and empower parents including individualized approaches, cue-based care, and healthy daytime biopsychological rhythms. |
13. | Kempler et al. (2016) [54] Australia | May a psychosocial sleep-focused interventions improve infant sleep or maternal mood in the first year? | Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT’s. 7 of 9 included studies reports on children less than six months (N = 2023 mother-infant dyads). | The designed interventions had a small positive effect on total night-time sleep for infants (TNTS), p < 0.001, Hedge’s g = 0.204, but only a weak, non-significant effect on infant night waking. | It is a great heterogeneity between the programs included in this study. Thus, they can’t conclude what types of interventions that is best. Efficacy depends on infants’ maturation and age. |
14. | Cricton & Symon (2016) [55] Australia | Exam the effects of behavioral sleep techniques on infant aged six month or less. | Non-systematic review. 11 studies, covering 2663 infants included | The studies provide evidence that active preventive intervention improves infant sleep in the earliest month of life (no statistics). No results indicating harmful effects of delayed responses were found. | Key information given to parents included: infant sleep physiology, patterns and cycles, sleep onset associations, routines, use of diaries: focal feed, self-settling, settling techniques, minimized interactions on night, differentiate night and day. Provision of parental education differed between individual and group settings. |
15. | Paul et al. (2016) [56] USA | Investigates if a responsive parenting intervention (RPI) might improve sleep outcomes in a sample of families with newborn infants compared to a control group. N = 279 infants. | RCT that recruited families right after childbirth and conducted follow-up assessments at 2, 8, 52 weeks after birth with parental reports. | Compared with controls the RPI- group were less likely to have prolonged bedtime routines at one year of age, earlier bedtimes at 16 weeks, they were more seldom fed to sleep and had longer nocturnal sleep duration at 8, 16 and 40 weeks. | RPI is a multicomponent program including advice about bedtime routines, sleep location and parental soothing behavior and behavior in relation to night waking. |
16. | Mihelic et al. (2017) [29] Australia | Evaluation of the efficacy of parental interventions. Only results on infants sleeping problems are included here (13 studies). | A meta-analytic review of publications from 5 databases, all published before February 2016. | Participation in the intervention groups were associated with significantly better sleep outcomes among children, Cohen’s d = 0.24, p < 0.001 compared to control groups. Interventions assessing infant crying did not show significant intervention effects. | The findings concur with Cochrane review in 2013 [57]. Parental competence or confidence was only assessed in five studies and the authors mention this as these factors are known to have impact on sleep outcomes. |
17. | Galland et al. (2017) [58] New Zealand | Evaluates the preventive effects of a sleep intervention given antenatally and three weeks post-partum. N = 802 families | RCT with four groups: 1) usual care, 2) sleep intervention, 3) activity and feeding intervention and 4) combination of 2) and 3). Data based on parental self-report and actigraphy. | Analysis with linear mixed models did not detect any significant benefits of the sleep education at 6 months. The frequency of problematic sleep reported by all mothers were 16.1% at 4 months and 19.9% at 6 months. Parental practices related to infant safe sleep were not affected by the intervention. | The authors questions if antenatal education to parents may be to early. They acknowledge that infant awaking and disrupted sleep the first 6 month should be viewed as normal, due to the ongoing neurodevelopmental maturation and infants’ adaptation to the extrauterine world. |
18. | Middlemiss et al. (2017) [59] USA | Investigating changes in infants total sleep time (TST) in a prospective, clinical study. Families were enrolled in a sleep intervention program. N = 34 mother-infant dyads. | A response-based sleep intervention with four timepoints when children were from 4 to 11 months old. Data was collected from sleep logs, questionnaires and salvia-samples. | Analyses of infant sleep, from before admission to the program until finish detected a significant increase in childrens total sleep time (TST) (t(59) = 8.96, p < 0.001). The mean increase in TST was 5.8-hour pr 24 hours. | Teaching parents to understand and respond to infant cues, through the day and at the transition to sleep was associated with an increase in mothers’ ability to overview their infants sleep schedules. These effects were possible without engaging in behavioral extinction strategies. Interestingly, maternal registrations of infant sleep were associated with higher degrees of maternal anxiety or depression, possibly associated with changes in response patterns. |
19. | Martins et al. (2018) [27] Portugal | An evaluation of a postnatal education program distributed to 159 new mothers (IG) before discharge from the maternity ward in comparison with a control group (CG). Total N = 314. | An experimental, longitudinal study with implementation of a 15- minutes educational session. Data was collected from self-report on questionnaires at childrens age of 1,2,4 and six months. | Infants in the IG group slept more often in their own bed at their age of one month (OR adj = 4.51; 95% CI,1.69–12) and were more often able to fall asleep alone (OR adj = 4.11; 95% CI, 2.3–7.4). IG-infants were less often feed to sleep than controls (OR adj = 1.49; 95% CI, 0.9–2.4). At 6 months IG-infants still were reported as more able to fall in sleep alone and needed less feeding to sleep. | The intervention consisted of one individual session with a specially trained sleep-consultant (pediatrician), supplemented with a leaflet. The information included knowledge about normal sleep cycles, the importance of sleep for healthy development, sleep hygiene including routines, infant solitary sleeping, sleep promotive environments and how to support infants self-soothing capacities. |
20. | Ball et al. (2020) [28] United Kingdom | A description of the development of a new approach to support parental wellbeing and responsive infant caregiving in UK. Responses were given by 164 health practitioners and 535 new parents. | An action research study that adapts an existing Australian program to a new UK-intervention “Sleep, Baby & You” (SBY). Data were collected on stakeholder meetings. Field-testing of the SBY were done among health practitioners and new parents. | Practitioners were positive about the concepts and suggestions contained within the SBY-materiel. SBY is described as a non-prescriptive approach that search to normalize the life with a newborn infant and the challenges it brings. 12 parents gave anonymous response on the program. They emphasize the importance of getting knowledge about normal sleep development and that spoken and written materiel support each other. | Feedback given across this developmental process confirms that parents want knowledge about normal infant sleep both antenatally and in infancy, adapted to the needs of each family. This paper does not mention the importance of infant safe sleep; thus, we don’t know if it’s incorporated in the program. |
21. | Sweeney et al. (2020) [26] New Zealand | A pilot testing of a perinatally delivered behavioral-educational sleep intervention (PIPIS). 20 mothers formed a control-group (CG) and 20 a sleep intervention-group (SIG). N = 40. | A pilot of a controlled trial. Data collection used self-reported sleep quality and actigraphic measures from mothers and infants. | Total sleep time per 24 hours (TST) among mothers were similar in the groups, but total nocturnal TST became significantly different. SIG-mothers had an increase of 47 minutes in nocturnal sleep, but not for CG-mothers from 6 to 12 weeks postpartum [t(36.55) = − 4.30, P < 0.001. Infants sleep outcomes were similar across groups. By 12 weeks, compared with 6-week reports, maternal perception of infant sleep problems was improved for SIG-mothers but not for CG-mothers. | SIG-mothers reported greater confidence in managing their infants sleep even the relation was not tested. Infant sleep development follows individual tracks the first six month of life. Results from this study may indicate that the intervention strengthened mothers’ capacity to handle these challenges. |
Aims & partisipants | Methods | Main results | Key words and comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
22. | Adams et al. (2020) [60] USA | Investigation of how early or later bedtimes may influence night-time sleep duration in 2–24 weeks old infants. N = 24 newborns | Study with microburst longitudinal design, assessing infant sleep with actigraphy and maternal reports at infants ages 6, 15 and 24 weeks. | For every 1 hour earlier in infants’ usual sleep night-time onset (SNTO) total night-time sleep (TNTS) was 34.4 min longer that night (p < 0.01). Infants with earlier than usual sleep onset had slightly earlier sleep offset the next morning (8.4 min for every 1 h earlier in onset; p = 0.02). | Bedtime routines; sleep duration. This study demonstrate that earlier bedtimes may benefit sleep among the youngest infants in addition to early consistent bedtime routines. |
23. | Bennett et al. (2013) [61] United Kingdom | Review of how massage may promote sleep habits among healthy term-born infants aging 6 month or less. | Cochrane review of studies published before June 2011. Inclusion of 34 RCTs. | Heterogeneity between included studies were substantial and massage was only modestly associated with positive effects on 24-hour sleep duration. | Parent behavior (babymassage); sleep quality No studies documented negative effects of massage for this population |
24 | Bilgin & Wolke (2020) [62] United Kingdom | Observation of associations between parental use of “cry it out” and childrens attachment quality and crying behavior at 18 months. N = 178 parent-infant dyads. | Prospective, longitudinal study recruiting families across 3 maternity wards. Parents reported use of “cry it out” at term and when infants were 3, 6 and 18 months. | No adverse impacts of leaving infants to “cry it out” was detected in the first 6 months of life. Tested in relation to infants’ attachment quality and cry-frequency at 18 months. Often use of “cry it out” was reported by 8–13% at term-age, 3 and 6 months. Never use of this strategy were reported by 63% at term-age and from about 40% of families at 3 and 6 months. | Parent behavior and infant crying. Leaving infants to “cry it out” at term, both a few times and often, was negatively associated with frequency of crying at 3 months. The authors neither recommend leaving infant to cry out nor responding immediately. The findings are thought to be consistent with an approach to parenting that is intuitive and adapts to infants demands and regulatory behaviors. |
25. | Bruni et al. (2014) [63] Italy | A longitudinal examination of sleep patterns, habits and parent-reported sleep problems among infant aging 1 to 12 months. N = 704 infants assessed by 81 different Italian pediatricians. | Prospective, longitudinal cohort study collecting data on sleep outcomes from parents answering surveys by telephone interviews. 3520 surveys were collected. | Both night-time, daytime and total sleep duration showed high inter-individual variability from one to 12 months associated with changes the first six months and stability after that | Sleep quality; sleep duration Investigates sleep arrangements and sleep challenges. Provides a context for clinicians to discuss sleep issues with parents and suggest that prevention efforts should focus to the first 3–6 months, since sleep patterns show stability from that time point to 12 months. |
26. | Chen et al. (2019) [64] Singapore & Germany | An investigation of associations between screen viewing (SV) and sleep duration among children less than 2 years old. N = 714 infants. | Cross-sectional study using parental reports of SV and sleep. | For the whole sample was 1 hour SV associated with 16 minutes shorter TST (p < 0.001). The prevalence of daily SV among infants 0 to 6 month was 28.3% and their mean screen time was 60 minutes (IQ range 0.44 to 120) Compared to the no-screen group a dose-response relation was detected for young screen-viewers. | Screen viewing; sleep duration The negative association between SV and sleep duration was strongest among the youngest infants. |
27. | Field et al. (2016) [65] USA | An investigation of differences between baby massage with lotion (LM-group) or without lotion (non-LM group) or no massage at all (control group) and whether this influences infant sleep quality. N = 76 mother-infant dyads. | RCT, program started in the post-delivery ward and was evaluated at a 1-month follow-up. Use of maternal self-report. | Compared to the other groups, shorter sleep latency was found in the LM-group (p = 0.002), and decreased number of nightwakings (p = 0.008). LM-mothers reported higher confidence in managing their infants sleep (p = 0.03). There was a positive correlation between the number of massages and longer infant night-time sleep (p < 0.005). | Parent behavior (babymassage) Infant and maternal sleep was highly correlated. Massage without lotion might be uncomfortable for newborns and new parents need to get knowledge about this factor and the dose-dependent association between baby massage and night-time sleep. Maternal ratings of infant sleep difficulties tended to decrease in the LM-group compared to the non-LM group. |
28. | Fiese et al. (2021) [14] USA | An investigation of associations between bedtime routines and infant sleep quality in infancy. N = Parent of 468 infants. | Part of a large prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Bedtime routines and sleep measures were reported by mothers on questionnaires at infants ages of 3,12,18 and 24 months. | More bedtime routine consistency predicted less night-time waking and sleep problems across infancy. More adaptive activities at 3 months of age predicted longer sleep duration at 12 months (r = 0.12, p < 0.05). | Bedtime routines; sleep quality Bedtime routines and sleep outcomes had moderate stability over time, especially from one to two years. |
29. | Kahn et al. (2021) [66] USA | An examination of the moderating role of infant age on the relation between infants’ use of different screens and sleep outcomes. N = 1074 infants aged 0–18 months. | Cross-sectional study. Data collection by parental reports and autovideosomnography. | Age moderated the relation between daytime touchscreen exposure and sleep. For 3- months old infants were a 5-minute daytime touchscreen exposure associated with an average decrease of 13 minutes daytime sleep (b = − 2.62, SE = 0.62, p < 0.001. More daytime touchscreen exposure was associated with fewer awaking’s (b = − 0.03, SE = 0.01, p = 0.03) | Screen viewing; sleep duration The author suggests that displacement of daytime sleep by screens may lead for a greater accumulation of sleep homeostatic pressure, possibly facilitating more consolidated night-time sleep among the youngest infants. |
30. | Lennartsson et al. (2016) [67] Sweden | An evaluation of a child health nurses educational program aiming to improve their ability to talk with new parents about risks of cranial asymmetry in newborns and how to prevent this the first 4 month after birth. N = 272 parents | A cross-sectional survey nested in a larger intervention study. Data collection by parental report on questionnaires at children’s age of 4 month. | Parent in the education-group reported more often that they were aware of the importance of alternating the direction of their infant’s head when initiating sleeping compared to control-group parents (82% versus 64%, p = 0.001). Significant group differences were also found in relation to which kind of pillows that could be used and when they should be removed. | Parent behavior; Infant physical health The paper gives detailed information about the advice nurses should give and it seems relevant to integrate this in talks about infant sleep issues. |
31. | Meyer et al. (2011) [68] Germany | A comparison of sleep among healthy infants. A swaddling group (SG = 40) and a control group using sleeping bags (CG = 45) were compared. N = 85 infants. | Prospective, observational study with use of polysomnography to assess differences in sleep stages and awaking’s in 7.5 weeks old infants. | Compared to use of sleeping bags swaddling reduced the rate of spontaneous waking (p = 0.020), reduced the number of changes in sleep state (p = 0.015), promoted more quiet sleep (p = 0.032), and reduced time spent awake (p = 0.001). Sleep efficiency was increased (p = 0.001). | Parent behavior (swaddling); sleep quality The authors conclude that swaddling may reduce the risk of infant injuries or death as sleep becomes more consolidated even when children sleep in the recommended supine position. |
32. | Mindell et al. (2015) [69] USA | Investigates if there are dose-dependent associations between use of bedtime routines and healthy sleep habits. N = 10,085 mothers from 14 countries. | Multinational cross-sectional study using the Brief Infant /Child Sleep Questionnaire (BICQ) in all countries. | Consistent bedtime routines (CBR = 3–7 times per week) among preschoolers were associated with more routines in infancy. A dose-dependent association between CBR and better sleep outcomes were documented for infants, toddlers and preschoolers. | Bedtime routines Routines that are instituted in early infancy are associated with better sleep outcomes later in childhood. |
33. | Mindell et al. (2018) [70] USA | A study examining the impact of a consistent bedtime routine involving massage on infants and mothers sleep and mood. N = 123 | Prospective study randomizing families with 3–18 old infants to an intervention (IG, n = 64) or a control group (CG, n = 59). Data collected by maternal self-report. | After one and two weeks no changes were detected among CG-infants while night-waking decreased among IG-infants at both times (F = 5.36, p = 0.006). Fewer IG-mother reported their infant with a sleep problem at these times (p = 0.013) and they were more confident with their ability to manage infant sleep compared to CG-mothers (F = 8.42, p < 0.001). | Bedtime routines Participating families were not identified with any sleep problems before study inclusion. Mean age of the children were almost 9 months. The intervention did not affect any other maternal outcome than fewer night-waking. |
34 | Oden et al. (2012) [71] USA | Investigates the associations between parent’s use of swaddling and infant sleep positions. N = 103 parents | Cross-sectional descriptive study recruiting parents to answer a survey at well child visits with infants aged 0–3 months. | All parents had sometimes swaddled their infant and parents who used swaddling routinely were more likely to but their infant in supine position when swaddled (p < 0.01). | Parent behavior (swaddling) Most parents found swaddling as a safe practice. Parents who not swaddled routinely were more likely to use inappropriate sleeping positions. Parents need to learn how to swaddle in a safe manner to avoid increased risks of injuries or sudden death. |
35. | Paul et al. (2017) [72] USA | This study investigates associations between parent-infant room sharing and sleep outcomes. N = 230 mother/infant dyads with healthy, term born infants at a US maternity ward. | A randomized controlled trial collecting data by maternal self-report. Mothers reported on Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire, BISQ) at children’s age of 4 and 8 months | By 4 months: children sleeping in separate rooms had more regular bedtime routines adjusted OR 1.93 (95% CI:1.05–3.53,), p = 0.03, they were put to bed earlier adjusted OR 1.93 (95% CI: 1.06–3.53), p = 0.03. They were also reported with longer sleep laps (29 min.) than room sharers (p = 0.02), fewer feedings at night (p = 0.02), safer sleep environment (p = 0.02) and less frequent moved over to parents’ bed at night adjusted OR = 0.24 (95% CI: 0.09–0.61), p = 0.003 | Sleep location; sleep quality This research is one part of a large comprehensive study that primarily focuses on obesity prevention. |
36. | Philbrook & Teti (2016) [73] USA | Investigates associations between night-time parenting behavior and infants’ cortisol patterns at 3,6 and 9 months. N = 82 mother-infant dyads. | Prospective, observational study collecting data by use of video equipment in family homes, salvia sampling and maternal self-report. | Multilevel modeling revealed that infant cortisol levels were lower at timepoints when mothers were scored as emotionally available (b = −.25, p < 0.01). This association was driven by lower infant cortisol levels at bedtime (b = −.35, p < 0.01). | Bedtime routines; parental emotional availability Findings shed light on factors involved in transactional relationships between infants and parents, relevant in relation to stress regulation and the importance of biobehavioral synchrony. Cortisol decreased with age for infants of less emotional available mothers but remained at low levels for infants of more emotionally available mothers. |
37. | Voltaire & Teti (2018) [74] USA | An investigation of associations between different sleep arrangements (cosleepers or not) and two different night-time behaviors among parents (using distress-initiated or non-distress-initiated strategies). N = 107 families | Prospective observational study (part of the large SIESTA-study). Families were recruited in the maternity ward and data collected at children’s age of 1,3,6 and 9 month using observations and questionnaires | The number of distress-initiated parent-infant episodes at night in the first 3 months affected the decline in nightwakings. More of these episodes were associated with a steeper decline in night waking. For infants that mostly were solitary sleepers more non-distressed episodes were associated with slower decrease in number of night-waking with age and low levels of non-distressed episodes were associated with faster reduction of night waking. | Parenting behavior; physical health; sleep quality It is suggested that infant sleep regulation may benefit from appropriate night-time interventions in the 3 first month of life, while similar association not were detected at six months. Maternal responsiveness during the first few months of life is associated with lower levels of infant distress toward the end of the first year. |
38. | Östürk & Temel (2019) [75] Turkey | A 90-minute training program focusing on appropriate soothing techniques for newborns were introduced to an intervention group (IG = 21) at a home visit 4 weeks after given birth and compared with families forming a control group (CG = 21). N = 42 mother-infant dyads. | A single-blind randomized experimental study comparing IG and CG parents reports of infant’s self-regulation when infants were 3,7,11 and 23 weeks old. | No group differences were found before the program was introduced to the IG group. At 7 weeks IG-infants slept more than CG-infant (on average 78 min per 24 h, p = 0.004), woke up more seldom (p = 0.001) and cried less (p = 0.001) and fed more seldom per 24 h (p = 0.001). Similar group differences were detected at infants age of 11 weeks, and for most variables, but not for sleep duration at 23 weeks. | Parent behavior (soothing techniques); sleep quality Helping new parents to understand how they can support infants to establish best possible regulative behavior across the first weeks and month of life seem. The techniques used in this study were swaddling, holding an unsettled infant in side- or prone position, use sushing with white noise and swing the infant vertically. |