nach oben

International Journal of Legal Medicine

Erschienen in:

09.12.2019 | Original Article

Maximum tensile stress and strain of skin of the domestic pig—differences concerning pigs from organic and non-organic farming

verfasst von: Sylvia Schick, Miriam Leiderer, Felicitas Lanzl, Matthias Graw, Steffen Peldschus

Erschienen in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this work has been to determine differences in biomechanical properties of porcine skin from organic and non-organic farming as porcine skin is widely used as a model for human skin. A test apparatus was used, using gravity to stretch and finally tear a dumbbell-shaped specimen of prepared abdominal skin with a testing surface area of 25 × 4 mm. A total of 32 specimens were taken from seven individual pigs, three from organic and four from non-organic farming, in different orientations with respect to the Langer’s lines. The tests were performed at a dynamic speed of around 1.66 m/s (corresponding to a nominal strain rate of 67 s⁻¹). Engineering strain at rupture was higher in pig skin from non-organic farming with values up to 321% as opposed to 90% in organic pig skin. The maximum tensile stress found in non-organic pig skin was lower than in pig skin from organic farming with maximum values of 34 MPa as opposed to 58 MPa. The reason for the difference in biomechanical properties is unclear; the effect of sunlight is discussed as well as other factors like age and exercise. It seems that the biomechanical properties of porcine skin from organic farming are more similar to those of human skin.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Cronin DS (2011) Explicit finite element method applied to impact biomechanics problems. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings: 240–254

Forman JL, Kent RW, Mroz K et al (2012) Predicting rib fracture risk with whole-body finite element models: development and preliminary evaluation of a probabilistic analytical framework. AAAM Ann Conf Proc 56:109–124

Kieser J, Taylor M, Carr D (2012) Forensic biomechanics. Developments in Forensic Science, WileyCrossRef

Whittle K, Kieser J, Ichim I et al (2008) The biomechanical modelling of non-ballistic skin wounding: blunt-force injury. Forensic Sci Med Pat 4(1):33–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-007-0029-y CrossRef

Wong B, Kieser JA, Ichim I et al (2008) Experimental simulation of non-ballistic wounding by sharp and blunt punches. Forensic Sci Med Pat 4(4):212–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-008-9042-z CrossRef

BGIA – Institut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung (2009) BG/BGIA-Empfehlungen für die Gefährdungsbeurteilung nach Maschinenrichtlinie: Gestaltung von Arbeitsplätzen mit kollaborierenden Robotern: Umfang: 37 Seiten

Wei JCJ, Edwards GA, Martin DJ et al (2017) Allometric scaling of skin thickness, elasticity, viscoelasticity to mass for micro-medical device translation: from mice, rats, rabbits, pigs to humans. Sci Rep 7(1):15885. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15830-7 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Monteiro-Riviere NA, Bristol DG, Manning TO et al (1990) Interspecies and interregional analysis of the comparative histologic thickness and laser Doppler blood flow measurements at five cutaneous sites in nine species. J Invest Dermatol 95(5):582–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12505567 PubMedCrossRef

Arumugam V, Naresh MD, Sanjeevi R (1994) Effect of strain rate on the fracture behaviour of skin. J Biosci 19(3):307–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716820 CrossRef

10.

Lee Y, Hwang K (2002) Skin thickness of Korean adults. Surg Radiol Anat 24(3-4):183–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-002-0034-5 PubMedCrossRef

11.

Weinig E, Zink P (1967) Über mechanische Eigenschaften der menschlichen Leichenhaut. Deut Z Ges Geric Med 60(3):61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00580195 CrossRef

12.

Barker DE (1951) Skin thickness in the human. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 7(2):115–116CrossRef

13.

Griffin MF, Leung BC, Premakumar Y et al (2017) Comparison of the mechanical properties of different skin sites for auricular and nasal reconstruction. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 46(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0210-6 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

14.

Fazekas IG, Kósa F, Basch A (1968) Uber die Reissfestigkeit der Haut verschiedener Körperregionen (On the tensile strength of skin in various body areas). Deut Z Ges Geric Med 64(2):62–92

15.

Falland-Cheung L, Scholze M, Lozano PF et al (2018) Mechanical properties of the human scalp in tension. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 84:188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.05.024 PubMedCrossRef

16.

Pittar N, Winter T, Falland-Cheung L et al (2018) Scalp simulation - a novel approach to site-specific biomechanical modeling of the skin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 77:308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.09.024 PubMedCrossRef

17.

Trotta A, Ní Annaidh A (2019) Mechanical characterisation of human and porcine scalp tissue at dynamic strain rates. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 100:103381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103381 PubMedCrossRef

18.

Thali MJ, Kneubuehl BP, Zollinger U et al (2002) The “skin-skull-brain model”: a new instrument for the study of gunshot effects. Forensic Sci Int 125(2-3):178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00637-5 PubMedCrossRef

19.

Thali MJ, Kneubuehl BP, Dirnhofer R (2002) A “skin-skull-brain model” for the biomechanical reconstruction of blunt forces to the human head. Forensic Sci Int 125(2-3):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00639-9 PubMedCrossRef

20.

Ankersen J, Birkbeck AE, Thomson RD et al (1999) Puncture resistance and tensile strength of skin simulants. P I Mech Eng H 213(6):493–501. https://doi.org/10.1243/0954411991535103 CrossRef

21.

Shergold OA, Fleck NA, Radford D (2006) The uniaxial stress versus strain response of pig skin and silicone rubber at low and high strain rates. Int J Impact Eng 32(9):1384–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.010 CrossRef

22.

Meyer W, Schwarz R, Neurand K (1978) The skin of domestic mammals as a model for the human skin, with special reference to the domestic pig. Curr Probl Dermatol 7:39–52PubMedCrossRef

23.

Meyer W (1996) Bemerkungen zur Eignung der Schweinehaut als biologisches Modell für die Haut des Menschen (Comments on the suitability of swine skin as a biological model for human skin). Hautarzt 47(3):178–182PubMedCrossRef

24.

Mawafy M, Cassens RG (1975) Microscopic structure of pig skin. J Anim Sci 41(5):1281–1290PubMedCrossRef

25.

Allam SS, Heidemann E (1974) Isolation, characterization and comparative studies of the N-terminal peptides from soluble pig skin collagen. FEBS Lett 39(2):187–189PubMedCrossRef

26.

Meyer W, Neurand K, Radke B (1982) Collagen fibre arrangement in the skin of the pig. J Anat 134(Pt 1):139–148PubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Ní Annaidh A, Bruyère K, Destrade M et al (2012) Characterization of the anisotropic mechanical properties of excised human skin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 5(1):139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.016 PubMedCrossRef

28.

Vardaxis NJ, Brans TA, Boon ME et al (1997) Confocal laser scanning microscopy of porcine skin: implications for human wound healing studies. J Anat 190(Pt 4):601–611. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.1997.19040601.x PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

29.

Langer K (ed) (1861) Zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Haut. Über die Spaltbarkeit der Cutis

30.

Rose EH, Ksander GA, Vistnes LM (1976) Skin tension lines in the domestic pig. Plast Reconstr Surg 57(6):729–732PubMedCrossRef

31.

Lim J, Hong J, Chen WW et al (2011) Mechanical response of pig skin under dynamic tensile loading. Int J Impact Eng 38(2-3):130–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.09.003 CrossRef

32.

Jansen LH, Rottier PB (1958) Comparison of the mechanical properties of strips of human abdominal skin excised from below and from above the umbilic. Dermatologica 117(4):252–258PubMedCrossRef

33.

Ridge MD, Wright V (1966b) Mechanical properties of skin: a bioengineering study of skin structure. J Appl Physiol 21(5):1602–1606. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1966.21.5.1602 PubMedCrossRef

34.

Yamada H (ed) (1970) Strength of biological materials. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

35.

Holzmann H, Korting GW, Kobelt D et al (1971) Prüfung der mechanischen Eigenschaften von menschlicher Haut in Abhängigkeit von Alter und Geschlecht (Studies on the mechanical properties of human skin in relation to age and sex). Arch Klin Exp Dermatol 239(4):355–367PubMedCrossRef

36.

Dunn MG, Silver FH, Swann DA (1985) Mechanical analysis of hypertrophic scar tissue: structural basis for apparent increased rigidity. J Invest Dermatol 84(1):9–13PubMedCrossRef

37.

Groves RB, Coulman SA, Birchall JC et al (2013) An anisotropic, hyperelastic model for skin: experimental measurements, finite element modelling and identification of parameters for human and murine skin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 18:167–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.021 PubMedCrossRef

38.

Jacquemoud C, Bruyere-Garnier K, Coret M (2007) Methodology to determine failure characteristics of planar soft tissues using a dynamic tensile test. J Biomech 40(2):468–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.12.010 PubMedCrossRef

39.

Gallagher AJ, Ní Anniadh A, Bruyere K et al. (eds) (2012) Dynamic tensile properties of human skin

40.

Doerfel S (2015) Generierung von Grundlagen für die Simulation von Weichgewebeverletzungen. Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

41.

Jussila J, Leppäniemi A, Paronen M et al (2005) Ballistic skin simulant. Forensic Sci Int 150(1):63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.06.039 PubMedCrossRef

42.

Falland-Cheung L, Waddell JN, Chun Li K et al (2017) Investigation of the elastic modulus, tensile and flexural strength of five skull simulant materials for impact testing of a forensic skin/skull/brain model. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 68:303–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.02.023 PubMedCrossRef

43.

Humphrey C, Kumaratilake J (2016) Ballistics and anatomical modelling - a review. Legal Med-Tokyo 23:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.09.002 CrossRef

44.

Jin Y, Haitao L, Cheng W et al (2019) The experimental and numerical investigation on the ballistic limit of BB-Gun pellet versus skin simulant. Forensic Sci Int 298:393–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.02.033 PubMedCrossRef

45.

Bir CA, Resslar M, Stewart S (2012) Skin penetration surrogate for the evaluation of less lethal kinetic energy munitions. Forensic Sci Int 220(1-3):126–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.02.008 PubMedCrossRef

46.

Wilkes GL, Brown IA, Wildnauer RH (1973) The biomechanical properties of skin. CRC Crit Rev Bioeng 1(4):453–495PubMed

47.

Daly CH, Odland GF (1979) Age-related changes in the mechanical properties of human skin. J Invest Dermatol 73(1):84–87PubMedCrossRef

48.

Biniek K, Levi K, Dauskardt RH (2012) Solar UV radiation reduces the barrier function of human skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(42):17111–17116. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206851109 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

49.

Levi K (2013) UV damage and sun care: Deciphering mechanics of skin to develop next generation therapies. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 28:471–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.02.008 PubMedCrossRef

50.

Piérard GE, Uhoda I, Piérard-Franchimont C (2003) From skin microrelief to wrinkles. An area ripe for investigation. J Cosmet Dermatol 2(1):21–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-2130.2003.00012.x PubMedCrossRef

51.

Vedrenne N, Coulomb B, Danigo A et al (2012) The complex dialogue between (myo)fibroblasts and the extracellular matrix during skin repair processes and ageing. Pathol Biol 60(1):20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patbio.2011.10.002 PubMedCrossRef

52.

Bernstein EF, Chen YQ, Kopp JB et al (1996) Long-term sun exposure alters the collagen of the papillary dermis. Comparison of sun-protected and photoaged skin by northern analysis, immunohistochemical staining, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 34(2 Pt 1):209–218PubMedCrossRef

53.

Cox HT (1941) The cleavage lines of the skin. Br J Surg 29(114):234–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.18002911408 CrossRef

54.

Oxlund H, Andreassen TT (1980) The roles of hyaluronic acid, collagen and elastin in the mechanical properties of connective tissues. J Anat 131(Pt 4):611–620PubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Carton RW, Dainuskas J, Clark JW (1962) Elastic properties of single elastic fibers. J Appl Physiol 17:547–551. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1962.17.3.547 PubMedCrossRef

56.

Deroy C, Destrade M, Mc Alinden A et al (2017) Non-invasive evaluation of skin tension lines with elastic waves. Skin Res Technol 23(3):326–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12339 PubMedCrossRef

57.

Borges AF (1984) Relaxed skin tension lines (RSTL) versus other skin lines. Plast Reconstr Surg 73(1):144–150PubMedCrossRef

58.

Holzapfel GA, Ogden RW (2009) On planar biaxial tests for anisotropic nonlinearly elastic solids. A continuum mechanical framework. Math Mech Solids 14(5):474–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286507084411 CrossRef

59.

Viidik A, Sandqvist L, Mägi M (1965) Influence of postmortal storage on tensile strength characteristics and histology of rabbit ligaments. Acta Orthop Scand 36(sup79):3–38. https://doi.org/10.3109/ort.1965.36.suppl-79.01 CrossRef

60.

Nishimura T, Liu A, Hattori A et al (1998) Changes in mechanical strength of intramuscular connective tissue during postmortem aging of beef. J Anim Sci 76(2):528–532PubMedCrossRef

61.

Viidik A, Lewin T (1966) Changes in tensile strength characteristics and histology of rabbit ligaments induced by different modes of postmortal storage. Acta Orthop Scand 37(2):141–155PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Maximum tensile stress and strain of skin of the domestic pig—differences concerning pigs from organic and non-organic farming
verfasst von: Sylvia Schick
Miriam Leiderer
Felicitas Lanzl
Matthias Graw
Steffen Peldschus
Publikationsdatum: 09.12.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Journal of Legal Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02207-w

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Maximum tensile stress and strain of skin of the domestic pig—differences concerning pigs from organic and non-organic farming

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin

Assistierter Suizid durch Infusion von Thiopental

Molekularpathologische Untersuchungen im Wandel der Zeit

Vergleichende Pathologie in der onkologischen Forschung

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Allelic frequencies of fifteen autosomal STRs in the northeastern Thai people

Protocol for evaluating women with female genital mutilation seeking asylum

Forensic parameters and allele frequency distributions of 16 STR in a Paraguayan population

Retrospective analysis of 172 cases of custodial deaths in China between 1999 and 2016: forensic experience in China

New methods for sex estimation using sternum and rib morphology

The four-minute approach revisited: accelerating MRI-based multi-factorial age estimation

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin

Assistierter Suizid durch Infusion von Thiopental

Molekularpathologische Untersuchungen im Wandel der Zeit

Vergleichende Pathologie in der onkologischen Forschung

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren