Introduction
Large increases in mental health problems including depression and anxiety symptoms, and psychological stress, have been highlighted from the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic and during periods of restrictions. In response, many developed countries established dedicated telephone support lines or online mental health advice information for people in need of support, and some governments increased mental health funding and access to mental health services [1]. Mental health support organisations have also promoted actions that individuals could take to support their mental health such as staying active and socially connected, and discouraged potentially harmful actions such as consuming alcohol or illicit drugs. Whilst information on formal mental health service use is routinely captured by healthcare administrative systems (e.g. for billing purposes) and reported by Government health departments, other behavioural approaches to promote resilience and wellbeing, or informal mental health supports like talking to friends or family, are typically unreported.
Self-care is the ability of people to promote and maintain health, and cope with illness, either with or without the support of a health care provider [2]. Several approaches to mental health self-care pivoted during the COVID-19 pandemic to align with periods of public health restrictions. For example, telehealth services acted as a substitute for in-person health consultations [3], and in-person group social activities pivoted to virtual forms in some circumstances. During periods of restrictions and lockdowns there was increased focus on forms of self-care such as practicing meditation and mindfulness at home [4], limiting news and social media exposure [5, 6], involvement in distracting activities (such as exercise, music or online yoga) and communicating with family, friends and colleagues about personal mental health concerns [7]. Whilst the pandemic has led to new mental health promotion information recommending actions to manage mental health concerns, it is less clear to what extent particular forms of mental health self-care were adopted.
Anzeige
The mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic were not shared equally. Some people were more at-risk of ill mental health than others, in part, due to the disruption of several social determinants of health such as pandemic-related loss of work or income [8]. Individuals with pre-existing mental health conditions have also been shown to be more at risk of poor mental health during the pandemic [9], and those experiencing periods of community lockdown [10], particularly women and young adults [11]. As a result, engagement with mental health services, or other forms of self-care may be more relevant, and common, for people experiencing psychological distress, particularly for people with ongoing counselling or prescribed with medications for pre-existing mental health conditions. Barriers to mental health help-seeking behaviour are known to differ by gender, with men less commonly utilising health services, reportedly due to personal stigma and increased stoicism [12], and older adults are known to be especially unlikely to seek mental health services despite a positive attitude to such services [13]. By understanding which forms of mental health self-care were less commonly undertaken during the COVID-19 pandemic by specific subgroups, it is possible to identify specific populations who may benefit from helpful forms of mental health self-care, whilst discouraging potentially harmful actions.
Using a prospective cohort of working-age Australians enrolled in a study of changes in health and work during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, we sought to answer two research questions on actions taken to manage mental health concerns during the pandemic.
1.
How prevalent were actions to manage mental health concerns?
2.
What demographic, health and employment characteristics were associated with actions taken to manage mental health concerns?
Methods
Study design and setting
The COVID-19 Work and Health Study is a national prospective longitudinal cohort study of working-age Australians during 2020 and 2021 [9]. Respondents were all engaged in paid work prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, aged 18 years or older and resided in Australia. Upon study enrolment, respondents completed a 20-minute baseline survey including changes in work, health, pre-existing health conditions and demographics. Respondents were then asked to provide consent to be contacted for follow-up surveys, the first being one month after the baseline survey. Approval to conduct the study was provided by Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (#24,003). Informed consent was obtained from all participants for being included in the study. Participation was voluntary.
Anzeige
Outcomes
Actions to manage mental health concerns
Outcomes were derived from 13 response items to the following question:
“Thinking about the past month, which of the following actions have you taken to help manage stress, anxiety or other mental health problems?”. Response items were developed by the study investigator team to reflect both actions promoted by mental health and wellbeing support organisations during the pandemic such as BeyondBlue [14] as a primary reference, as well as the use of dedicated COVID-19 telephone support lines [15], and response items also reflected issues being raised in public discussions of mental health including potentially harmful actions such as reported increases in alcohol consumption [16].
Responses were collected as binary yes/no variables from 13 response items. These individual response items were allocated to one of five categories: (1) Lifestyle changes, (2) Diet and exercise, (3) Alcohol or drug use, (4) Medications, (5) Helplines and online resources. Outcomes describe whether individuals reported at least one action within any given category, or not.
Talking to others about mental health concerns
Respondents were asked the following question: “In the past month, have you spoken with any of the following people specifically about your mental health?”. Response options included talking to a friend, family member, general practitioner (GP), psychologist, psychiatrist, another health professional, or someone else (specified). For each respondent, three binary variables were defined as having spoken to at least one type of (1) health professional, or (2) non-health professional about mental health, or (3) having spoken to no one.
Predictors
Factors known to be associated with mental health were included as predictors for analyses including gender, age group, employment, recent engagement in work, pre-existing health conditions (anxiety and/or depression), current level of psychological distress, and survey mode (online or telephone) [9]. Covariate reference groups were selected to align with groups of lower psychological distress levels.
Data on pre-existing mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression were collected at baseline. During a 1-month follow-up survey, the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress (K-6) scale [17] evaluated the current level of distress. Participants were categorised into two groups (1) moderate to high distress: scores in the interval 11 to 30, and (2) low to no distress: scores in the interval 6 to 10 [18].
Current details of work described employment status (either currently employed or unemployed), and engagement in work defined as whether people had worked any hours during the prior week or not.
Data analysis
Cohort counts and percentages describe the prevalence of mental health actions across each of five categories, in addition to whether people had either spoken about their mental health to a non-health professional, a health professional, or no one during the prior month.
Eight binary logistic regression models were evaluated across: (1) each of the five outcomes describing categories of actions to manage mental health concerns, and (2) three outcomes on talking about personal mental health concerns with others. Model estimates are described as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and a significance level of 0.05.
Results
Amongst 1646 respondents, 1429 (87%) had taken at least one action to manage their mental health concerns during the prior month (Table 1). A total of 914 (56%) had spoken to someone specifically about their mental health during the prior month such as a health professional (19%), or a family member or friend (52%). Lifestyle changes were the most common way that people were managing their mental health and was reported by 1276 people (78%). Implementing changes to diet and exercise to manage mental health was the second most common category to mental health concerns (47%), followed by increased alcohol or drug use (27%), medication (22%), and use of helplines or other online resources (20%).
Table 1
Prevalence of actions taken to manage personal mental health concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic
Action reported N (%) | |
---|---|
Actions to manage personal mental health concerns | |
Lifestyle changes | 1276 (77.5) |
1. Watched or read something uplifting | 849 (51.6) |
2. Distracted yourself by keeping active or learning a new skill | 826 (50.2) |
3. Reduced your exposure to news and social media | 572 (34.8) |
4. Practiced meditation or mindfulness | 466 (28.3) |
Diet and exercise | 772 (46.9) |
5. Made changes to your exercise | 667 (40.5) |
6. Made changes to your diet | 435 (26.4) |
Alcohol of drug use | 445 (27.0) |
7. Drunk more alcohol than normal | 355 (21.6) |
8. Taken non-prescribed drugs | 134 (8.1) |
Medications | 358 (21.7) |
9. Taken your prescribed medication | 302 (18.3) |
10. Made changes to your medications | 132 (8.0) |
Helplines and online resources | 331 (20.1) |
11. Searched for information on managing mental health problems (e.g. on the internet) | 225 (13.7) |
12. Participated in an online forum / chat group | 141 (8.6) |
13. Called a telephone support line | 42 (2.6) |
Speaking to others specifically about your mental health | |
1. Health professional (e.g. general practitioner, psychologist, psychiatrist) | 306 (18.6) |
2. Non-health professional (e.g. friend, family member) | 853 (51.8) |
3. Spoken to no one | 732 (44.5) |
Total sample of working-age Australians | 1646 (100.0) |
The response rate for the K-6 questionnaire on psychological distress was 1631 out of 1646 respondents (99.1%). A total of 776 (47%) respondents scored moderate to high levels of psychological distress of which 718 (93%) reported at least one action to manage their mental health concerns, and 571 (74%) had spoken to someone about their mental health. In comparison, of the 855 (53%) respondents with no to low levels of psychological distress, 700 (82%) reported at least one action to manage their mental health concerns, and 337 (39%) had spoken to someone about their mental health. Among respondents, women and younger people more commonly reported helpful actions to manage mental health concerns compared to reference groups, as well as those experiencing loss of work, psychological distress and those with pre-existing anxiety or depression (Figures 1 and2, Supplementary Tables 1 and2).
Anzeige
×
×
Women were more likely to report making changes to their lifestyle, exercise or diet, as well as using online resources or helplines, or talking about their mental health to others such as a family member or friend. Whilst recognising that people over 65 years were relatively uncommon in our cohort (Supplementary Table 3), people aged over 55 years were less likely to report making changes to manage their mental health through exercise, diet, alcohol or drug use, or talking to a friend or family member about their mental health. Increased alcohol consumption or drug use was less prevalent for people aged 18 to 24 years compared to people aged 35 to 44 years. Those aged 55 to 64 years more commonly reported making changes to, or taking, prescribed medications for their mental health concerns compared to the reference group, and people aged 65 or older less commonly reported using online mental health resources or telephone helplines. People who had not worked during the prior week made changes to their lifestyle and used online resources more often than people who had worked during the prior week.
People experiencing psychological distress, or with pre-existing anxiety or depression, more commonly reported talking to a health professional, using medication to manage their mental health, or searching for help online.
Anzeige
Discussion
Our findings demonstrate that informal forms of mental health self-care during the COVID-19 pandemic were much more common than the use of formal mental health services such as psychologist or psychiatrist consultations and calls to COVID-19 telephone support lines. Most people reported at least one form of mental health self-care such as meditation or mindfulness, activities to distract themselves, or speaking to a family member or friend about their mental health concerns during the prior month. Despite the heightened use of telephone helplines during the early stages of the pandemic [19], this was the least common action reported to manage mental health concerns within our sample of working-age Australians. Our findings broadly align with the WHO framework for organisation of services for mental health, describing a higher prevalence of informal service use compared to formal service use [20], and our analyses add further value by quantifying more specific informal actions taken to manage mental health. Furthermore, our findings clearly demonstrate the extent to which strategies to manage mental health concerns differ by individuals’ pre-existing and current mental health status, employment, age and gender. The prevalence of actions taken by people in distress suggests that those in most need of help made changes to their lives to support their mental health, and were more likely to seek help. However, people experiencing moderate to high levels of distress also more commonly increased their consumption of alcohol or drug use, which can lead to poorer health or may contribute towards harmful forms of substance abuse in some circumstances [21].
Physical health and mental health are closely interrelated, and exercise was commonly reported as an approach to manage mental health concerns during the pandemic. For some people physical activity during the pandemic acted as a motivator for anxiety relief, whereas those with mental health deteriorations have reported increased sedentary behaviour overall [22]. Physical health interventions, that result in long duration physical activity, may offer the most mental health benefits to men [23], who were identified as having potential barriers to mental health self-care in terms of making changes to their exercise or diet. Furthermore, men may also benefit from employer-based education on mental health supports to reduce negative attitudes of psychological openness to tackle the under-utilisation of mental health services [24], and to benefit from the mental health support of family and friends [25].
The strength of this national cohort study lies within the diverse forms of mental health self-care evaluated, which were investigated by pre-existing health factors, in addition to employment status, age and gender. Findings uncover personal characteristics associated with potential barriers to engagement with mental health supports, and self-care, during an economic crisis. One limitation is that the study findings fall exclusively within the COVID-19 pandemic context, without reference to the degree of mental health self-care prior to the pandemic. However, given the declined mental health observed in this group compared to pre-pandemic reference levels [8, 9], mental health self-care would be anticipated to be less common before the pandemic when taking into context the study findings. Whilst our dataset consists of working-age Australians that are an overrepresented sample of people that experienced pandemic-related work loss, findings are valid within the context of the early stages of the pandemic in Australia, during a heightened period of work loss [26], although they may differ based on changes in public health orders over time, and their relevance for the workforce. Within the category of formal forms of mental healthcare, the heightened use of mental health services in Australia has been ongoing since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic [27], demonstrating the longer-term need for such services. Analogous information on mental health self-care over longer time periods since the start of the pandemic remains a challenge to quantify. Longitudinal research studies, over several years, will uncover changes in informal forms of mental health self-care following periods of crisis. In many nations, stringent pandemic measures have since lifted, and unenforced recommendations remain in community settings which may promote good mental health as observed following the release of lockdown measures [10]. However, some workplaces remain high infection risk settings such as in the health and care industry, and mental health consequences of pandemic-related changes in work may differ from industries with fewer ongoing pandemic-related measures or changes in workload. Employers are uniquely placed to develop relevant mental health supports and policies during changes to the workplace and the nature of work resulting from the pandemic.
The elevated use of online mental health resources and lifestyle changes among furloughed or newly unemployed individuals suggests that these individuals may be more receptive to self-directed mental health interventions. This highlights the potential for online resources and lifestyle modifications to serve as valuable tools for promoting mental well-being during periods of unemployment or furlough. Further research is warranted to understand the long-term effects of these interventions and to identify strategies for promoting their uptake among this vulnerable population, whilst overcoming known barriers to mental health self-care [28].
Anzeige
Conclusion
Behavioural actions to manage mental health concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic were common, as were conversations with friends or family members. Interventions to encourage the use of formal mental health supports are encouraged such as promoting accessible mental health supports in the workplace, and increasing mental health education for all workers. While online resources can be a valuable tool for managing mental health concerns among individuals experiencing unemployment or furlough, it is essential to ensure that the information provided is evidence-based and tailored to the specific needs of this population. Mental health supports and services should focus on reducing barriers to health care, particularly for people associated with commonly taking less help-seeking behaviour in general, and importantly for people experiencing high levels of distress. This should be coupled with programs for mental health promotion and preventive strategies.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the Social Research Centre for undertaking telephone interviews. We thank the participants for taking the time to complete the surveys.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Approval to conduct the study was provided by Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (#24003). All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all participants for being included in the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.