Background
Methods
Search strategy
Study selection and screening
Data extraction and quality assessment
Data analysis and synthesis
Results
Study characteristics
Reference | Country | Study aim | Parent characteristics | Child characteristics | Method | Data analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boman et al., 2013 [31] | Sweden | To explore and discuss how fathers involved in caring for a child with T1D experience support from paediatric diabetes teams in everyday life. | n = 11 (all fathers) Age: 37–51 years Cohabiting with mother: n = 7 Higher education: n = 5 | n = 11 (≤8yo n = 6) Age: 4–16 years Diabetes duration: 2–8 years | Online focus group discussion (n = 6 fathers); semi-structured interviews (n = 8 fathers) (mix of phone and face-to-face); both (n = 3 fathers) | Constructivist grounded theory analysis |
Elissa et al., 2017 [35] | Palestine | To explore the experiences of daily life in children with T1D and their parents living in the West Bank in Palestine | n = 10 (6 mothers) Age mothers: 28–49 years Age fathers: 32–42 years Cohabiting: all Higher education: n = 3 In employment: n = 4 (fathers) Rural or camp living: n = 4 | n = 10 Age: 8–16 years Diabetes duration: < 5 years (n = 3); 1–5 years (n = 4); > 5 years (n = 3) | Face-to-face interviews | Qualitative content analysis as per Graneheim & Lundman (2004) |
Iversen et al., 2018 [33] | Norway | To explore the lived experience of being mothers and fathers of a young child with T1D aged 1–7 who had had the diagnosis for at least 1 year. | n = 15 (8 mothers) Age mothers: 26–40 years (m = 30) Age fathers: 29–46 (m = 38) Cohabiting: 7 couples, 1 single mother In employment: all | n = 8 Age: 1–7 years Age at diagnosis: 1–5 years Diabetes duration: 1–6 years MDI (pen): n = 1 CSII: n = 7 | In-depth face-to-face interviews (one by telephone) | Interpretative phenomenological methodology as described by Van Manen |
Khandan et al., 2018 [34] | Iran | To explore the experiences of mothers with diabetic children after the transfer of caring role | n = 11 (all mothers) Age: 30–48 years Cohabiting: n = 9 Higher education: n = 8 In employment: n = 5 | n = 11 Age: 7–14 years (≤8yo n = 3) Diabetes duration: 12–96 months | Semi-structured and open-ended face-to-face interviews | Analysis as per Colaizzi |
Lawton et al., 2015 [28] | UK | To explore the difficulties parents encounter in trying to achieve clinically recommended blood glucose levels. | n = 54 (38 mothers) Age all parents: 25–51 years (m = 40.6 ± 6.1) Cohabiting: 70% Higher education: 27.8% In employment: 68.5% | n = 41 Age: 2–12 years (m = 8.4 ± 2.5) Age at diagnosis: 3–10 years (m = 5.2 ± 2.1) Diabetes duration: 1–11 years (m = 4.1 ± 2.9) CSII: 31.7% | In-depth face-to-face interviews | General theoretical and procedural direction taken from Grounded Theory research |
Lindström et al., 2017 [32] | Sweden | To experience how mothers experiencing burnout describe mothering a child with diabetes, with special focus on their need for control and self-esteem. | n = 21 (all mothers) Age: 31–50 years (m = 41) Cohabiting: 85.7% Higher education: 71.5% In employment: 90.4% | n = 22 Age: 3–17 years (m = 10.7) Diabetes duration: 1.5–15 years (m = 5.3) CSII: 77% | Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews | Inductive content analysis |
Marshall et al., 2009 [30] | UK | To explore and describe the experiences of children and their parents living with T1D from diagnosis onwards | n = 11 (10 mothers) Ethnicity: Asian, Eastern European, Jamaican, Irish, English backgrounds | n = 10 (≤8yo n = 4) Age: 4–17 years Diabetes duration: 10 months – 8 years | Conversational interviews | Van Manen’s phenomenological approach to thematic coding |
Patton et al., 2016 [26] | US | To describe parents’ perceptions of healthful eating for T1D in families of young children and identify factors related to parents’ dietary management in young children. | n = 23 (21 mothers) Age all parents: 27–49 years (m = 35.7 ± 5.1) Married: 83% Higher education: 87% | n = not specified Age: 2–6.9 years (m = 4.6 ± 1.3) Ethnicity: 78% non-hispanic white, 13% hispanic, 9% black Diabetes duration: m = 2.0 ± 1.5 years CSII: 87% | Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews | Guided by a grounded theory approach |
Perez et al., 2018 [27] | US | To explore how parents negotiate the uncertainty surrounding T1D | n = 29 (mother/father not specified) Age all parents: 33–50 (m = 44) Ethnicity: all Caucasian/white Married: n = 28 (97%) In full-time employment: n = 18 (stay-at-home: n = 11) Most identified household income as middle to upper-middle class | n = 30 Age: 2–17 years (m = 10.9) Age at diagnosis: 13 months - 13 years (m = 6.5 years) Diabetes duration: 4 months - 10 years (m = 4.39) | Interviews (by phone n = 26) | Thematic analysis as per Braun & Clarke (2006) |
Rankin et al., 2015 [29] | UK | To explore parents’ experiences of using an insulin pump to manage their child’s diabetes, including their views about the benefits and challenges for themselves and their child. | n = 19 (13 mothers) Age all parents: 34–44 years (m = 40.1 ± 3.7) Ethnicity: all white British Married or cohabiting: n = 18 Higher education: n = 9 In employment: n = 12 | n = 14 Age: 3–12 years (m = 8.4 ± 2.8) Age at diagnosis: 1–6 years (m = 3.8 ± 2.1) Length of time on pump: 1–4 years (m = 2.2 ± 1.2) | Face-to-face interviews | Thematic analysis using the method of constant comparison |
Sullivan-Bolyai et al., 2003 [23] | US | To provide a detailed description of day-to-day management experiences of mothers raising young children under 4 years with T1D. | n = 28 (all mothers) Age: m = 33 ± 5.24 years Ethnicity: 89% white Married: 86% Education: m = 15 ± 2.5 years Not working outside of home: n = 15 | n = 28 Age: m = 2.9 ± 0.6 years Diabetes duration: m = 1.25 ± 0.7 years | Face-to-face interviews | Naturalistic inquiry |
Sullivan-Bolyai et al., 2004 [24] | US | To describe the experiences of parents managing the T1D of their young children using an insulin pump. | n = 21 (14 mothers) Age all parents: m = 38 ± 3 years Ethnicity: all Caucasian Married: n = 20 Education: m = 16 ± 2 years | n = 16 Age: 2–11 years (m = 7 ± 2 years Length of time on pump: 3–36 months (m = 16 ± 11) | In-depth, face-to-face interviews | Qualitative content analysis as described by Sandelowski |
Sullivan-Bolyai et al., 2006 [25] | US | To describe fathers’ experiences in parenting and managing the care of their young children’s day-to-day diabetes regimen. | n = 14 (all fathers) Age: m = 36 ± 2 years Ethnicity: all white Married: all Education: m = 16 ± 2 years In employment: all | n = 15 Age: 2–8 years (m = 5 ± 2) Diabetes duration: 2 weeks – 3 years (m = 1.4 ± 0.8 months) | Face-to-face interviews | Qualitative content analysis |
Watt, 2017 [22] | Canada | To explore the emotion work of doing worry that parents engage in when caring for their children with diabetes. | n = 7 (5 mothers) Age all parents: 34–53 years (m = 44) All 2-parent, middle class families Education: all higher education | n = not specified Age: 18 years or younger Age at diagnosis: 9 months – 14 years | In-depth interviews in the context of institutional ethnography (not clear if face-to-face or phone) | Analysis guided by Smith’s (2005) conception of work and analytic questions suggested by IE scholars (McCoy, 2006) |
Quality assessment
Synthesis findings
1. Monopolisation of life | |
To help reduce the detrimental impact on parents’ psychological and emotional wellbeing, the primary authors recommended that healthcare professionals could: ascertain and address issues related to hypoglycaemia concerns, lapses in confidence and sleep [23]; and, provide encouragement and support by acknowledging the unpredictability of diabetes and treatment outcomes [22]. More general recommendations included professionals needing to familiarise themselves with the symptoms of burnout [32], and helping parents address any harmful emotions related to their caregiving situation [33]. This could involve: teaching parents strategies to manage negative feelings about the child being ‘different’ because of diabetes [26]; and, assessing and encouraging parental self-care, including helping to identify sources of respite [23]. Finally, to help reduce anxieties related to social stigma and gendered impacts, primary authors recommended that healthcare professionals seek to improve public awareness and understanding of type 1 diabetes [27, 34, 35]. To help relieve the care burden on mothers and encourage fathers’ involvement, primary authors recommended that professionals should, from the outset, set the expectation that (where possible) both parents attend clinic consultations [28] and that, for respite and emergency purposes, both should be involved in their child’s diabetes management [25]. This recommendation could be supported by working with parents to develop a ‘division of labour’ plan [23]. To alleviate parents’ concerns regarding potentially inappropriate diabetes management in daycare settings (e.g. nurseries, schools, playgroups), primary authors recommended that healthcare professionals should help educate staff on safe management practices [23] and, where possible, broaden their outreach work in these settings to increase the number of people available to support the child’s diabetes management [28]. To address potential financial pressures related to the child’s diabetes treatment, primary authors recommended that healthcare professionals should provide parents with financial guidance about all aspects of diabetes management [27] and offer referral to charitable organisations where appropriate [34]. | |
2. Parents’ experiences of professional and informal support | |
To address parents’ concerns regarding their diabetes management education and avoid mixed messages, primary authors recommended that healthcare professionals should develop and follow an agreed-upon teaching plan; this should include the option of booster sessions, which revisit information and techniques taught at the time of diagnosis [25] and take into consideration individuals’ differing speeds of learning and developing confidence [24]. To alleviate potential tensions between parents’ and professionals’ views regarding diabetes management, primary authors recommended that healthcare professionals should educate parents on their specific clinical perspective [28], while also using parents’ knowledge regarding their unique family situation and the child’s individual needs to inform treatment decisions [28, 31]. |
Impact on physical, psychological and emotional wellbeing
Furthermore, despite their child’s young age, many parents already worried about how diabetes would affect his/her life in the future [27, 30, 34, 35]:‘I am satisfied in one sense since NN is feeling fine. At the same time, I feel unhappy when I think about not sleeping, feeling anxious and feeling tired and moody all the time.’ [32]
These concerns could be influenced by sociocultural norms and expectations. Parents of young girls in the studies conducted in Iran [34] and Palestine [35] described worrying about their daughter’s diabetes harming her chances in marriage, lest she be viewed as less desirable and at risk of passing the condition on to her own children.‘I am always thinking about his future. I wonder what will happen to his body. Can he be successful in his life? I do not know; the future is unclear.’ [34]
Impact on relationships
Impact on personal choices and activities
These concerns could also affect mothers’ employment decisions, with some quitting work or reducing their working hours to allow them to care for their child at home [28]. However, others described how, despite wanting to be stay-at-home caregivers, they needed paid employment to afford their child’s diabetes treatment costs [34]. Importantly, this financial strain related to their child’s diabetes care was also reported by parents who self-identified as middle- to upper-middle class [27] and were in possession of medical insurance, as this did not always cover all necessary expenses [34, 35].‘I didn’t go to many places, because she couldn’t be with me and no one else can take care of her but me.’ [35]
Diabetes technologies: lessening the impact
Experiences of professional support
While diabetes teams were generally considered a helpful resource, some parents felt that professionals did not always appreciate the complex and dynamic nature of managing diabetes at home [31] and the considerable effort this required [23]. Furthermore, staff not making time to answer questions or calls, avoiding discussion of more holistic issues and offering inaccurate or inconsistent advice could undermine parents’ trust in their diabetes team [31]. Some parents described how they felt stressed and anxious in the run-up to clinic appointments for fear of being reprimanded for a (perceived) lack of effort and not meeting blood glucose targets [23, 28, 32]. This fear also led to some actively withholding information from the diabetes team [23] and was felt even in the absence of any critical comments from staff [32].‘It is like being handed a big city phone book and you have to learn all the names before you go home.’ [25]
Relatedly, some parents described how professionals tended to focus exclusively on the needs of the child and failed to acknowledge how some parents may be struggling to cope with the strains of diabetes management in the context of wider family life [32].‘I have a larger backpack than the professionals’ knowledge of HbA1c. Yes, it’s an individual who is affected, but in everyday life it [the diabetes] controls the whole family’s life, and then you have to have more in your backpack than just HbA1c.’ [31]
Experiences of informal support
Moreover, parents considered their peers a vital source of information when professional advice was deemed insufficient [34] or, as this mother explained, difficult to access [27]:‘I am in a diabetes support group with moms and I find I’ve learned a lot from what other moms do … I can say, oh my goodness, today is making me crazy and I can’t figure it out and diabetes is not fun right now.’ [22]
‘Facebook groups were also super helpful, because it was really nice to be able to post a question like, “How do you guys do this, or what should I do about this?” … because we did have the number to call, but getting hold of the doctor or educator was just a huge pain, and sometimes you don’t know if your question is big enough to call the doctor about.’ [27]