nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2023 | Research

Risk indicators for oral ulcers among people living with HIV during the first wave of the pandemic: a cross sectional study

verfasst von: Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan, Roberto Ariel Abeldaño Zuñiga, Jorma I. Virtanen, Nourhan M. Aly, Oliver C Ezechi, Joanne Lusher, Maha El Tantawi, Annie L Nguyen

Erschienen in: BMC Oral Health | Ausgabe 1/2023

Abstract

Background

Little is currently known about HIV-related parameters that may increase the risk for oral ulcers during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to overcome this gap in research by assessing the associations between HIV viral load, antiretroviral adherence profile, co-morbidity status, SARS-CoV-2 infection and oral ulcers among people living with HIV (PLHIV).

Methods

This was a secondary analysis of data generated from 21,206 to 18 years and above, recruited from 152 countries through an online survey between July and December 2020. Data were extracted for 874 people who reported living with HIV. The dependent variable was reporting having oral ulcer. The independent variables were the viral load, adherence to antiretroviral treatment and a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The confounding variables were age at last birthday and sex at birth. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the associations between the dependent and independent variables after adjusting for the confounding variables.

Results

Of the 874 participants, 99 (11.3%) reported having oral ulcers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The odds of PLHIV having oral ulcers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly higher for people who did not know their viral load than those who had undetectable viral load (AOR: 2.036; 95% CI: 1.204–3.443; p = 0.008); and people who did not adhere to the use of antiretroviral treatment than those who adhered (AOR: 4.113; 95% CI: 2.567–6.589; p < 0.001). Also, PLHIV who had SARS-CoV-2 infection had significantly higher odds of having oral ulcers than those who did not have the infection (AOR: 14.556; 95% CI: 4.500-47.078; p < 0.001). PLHIV who had co-morbidities had non-significantly higher odds of having oral ulcers than those without co-morbidities (AOR: 1.170; 95% CI: 0.656–2.085; p = 0.595).

Conclusion

Oral ulcers may be an indicator of poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy and unsuppressed viral load among PLHIV. It may also be an indicator of SARS-CoV-2 infection and a signal to take prompt and critical care of affected individuals because of the risk for severe COVID-19 for these individuals.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03330-2.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Oral ulcers are a pathognomonic feature of COVID-19 [1]. The causative pathway between COVID-19 infection and oral ulcers are both direct and indirect. Directly, it is suggested that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) affects the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), its main host cell receptor, expressed on the epithelial cells of the tongue and of the salivary glands thereby causing oral ulcerations and superficial necrosis [2]. Indirectly, oral ulcers may result from pandemic-related stress. Stress increases the level of salivary cortisol or reactive oxygen species [3], increases the quantity and activity of leukocytes [4] and increases the risk for oral tissue biting or chewing to relieve stress [5]. Emotional distress also increases the risk for oral ulcers [6].

The risk for people living with HIV (PLHIV) to COVID-19 induced pathologies is of major concern. This is because PLHIV, especially those with advanced HIV and those who are not on antiretroviral treatment, have higher rates of co-morbidities and behaviours that are associated with severe COVID-19. These include higher rates of inhalational drug use [7], greater tobacco use [8], and hazardous alcohol use [9, 10] which are factors that increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection [11]. PLHIV also have high rates of cancer [12], cardiovascular disease [13], pulmonary disease [14, 15], obesity, diabetes [16] which are all associated with higher risk for severe COVID-19. Also, PLHIV may have low CD4 + T-cell count, and unsuppressed viral load with higher risk for severe COVID-19 [17]. They have higher frequency of autoimmunity and immune dysregulation [16] as well more medical comorbidities that may increase their risk for oral ulcers [18‐23].

Oral ulcers may be an early risk indicator for COVID-19 infection in PLHIV. They appear between 0 and 10 days after the start of COVID-19 symptoms with the most common sites being the tongue [2]. Oral ulcers appear as aphthous-like ulcers in young patients with mild cases of COVID-19 and resembling herpes simplex virus-1 necrotic ulcers in the more severe and immunosuppressed older individuals [24]. There are currently no studies identifying key features of HIV infection that may increase the risk of oral ulcers among PLHIV during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLHIV may be at high risk for COVID-19 pandemic induced-stress oral ulcers due to the elevated C-reactive protein, ferritin, and interleukin-6 [25] that are also associated with oral ulcers [26‐28]. There is however, little known about HIV-related parameters that may increase the risk of oral ulcers during the pandemic. This study attempted to address this gap by aiming to determine the associations between HIV viral load, antiretroviral adherence profile, co-morbidity status, SARS-CoV-2 infection and oral ulcers among PLHIV.

Methods

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee at the Institute of Public Health of the Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife, Nigeria (HREC No: IPHOAU/12/1557). Study participants provided consent before participating in the online survey.

Study design and study participants

This was a secondary analysis of data generated from 21,206 participants recruited from 152 countries in a cross-sectional study through an online survey between July and December 2020. The details of the parent study, including participants’ recruitment process [29, 30] and the tool used to collect the data [31] had been previously published. The overall Content Validity Index of the questionnaire was 0.83 [31].

Respondents had to be 18 years and above, understand the survey language (survey was conducted in English, French, Arabic, Portuguese and Spanish) and could access the survey using an electronic device and an internet connection. There were no exclusion criteria. The study population were respondents who reported living with HIV by checking a box to indicate that they had HIV on a checklist of 27 medical ailments [32].

Sample size

The data of 874 participants who indicated they were living with HIV were extracted for analysis. The sample was considered statistically adequate as there was a minimum of 10 participants with complete responses for each of the independent variables in the study. This enabled us to perform regression analysis with a minimum probability level of 0.05 [33].

Study participants recruitment

This was a non-probability sample of respondents recruited using an online survey tool (Survey Monkey®). Initial participants reached by 45 members of the MEHEWE Study Group (www.mehewe.org) were asked to share the survey link with their contacts around the world. The link to the survey questionnaire was posted on social media groups (Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram), network email lists, and WhatsApp groups. Respondents were encouraged to share the link further with their networks. Details on study participants’ recruitment process had been published [29, 30].

Study procedures

The survey was preceded by a brief introduction explaining the purpose of the study, assuring participants of their voluntary participation and confidentiality of their data. Before proceeding, participants were required to check a box that indicated consent. Indicating consent was required to take the survey and get access to the study questionnaire. The questionnaire took, on average, 11 min to complete. Multiple best-practice procedures were performed to increase the quality of data collected by the survey. Each participant could only complete a single questionnaire through IP address restrictions. They could edit their answers freely until they chose to submit. Full details of the methodology can be found elsewhere [29, 31].

Study variables

The dependent variable was reported history of oral ulcer during the pandemic. Participants were asked if they had had oral ulcers during the lockdown with the option responses of ‘yes’ or ‘no’. The method of enquiry about oral ulcers had been reported in prior studies [6, 31].

The independent variables were viral load, adherence to antiretroviral treatment, and a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants selected response to questions about viral load - What is your HIV viral load (undetectable, detectable and do not know); adherence - Some people find that they sometimes forget to take their medications to manage their HIV. Did you miss any doses of your HIV medications during COVID-19 (Yes, No); and SARS-CoV-2 infection- whether they had tested positive for COVID-19 (Yes, No).

Also, participants living with co-morbidities were identified. All participants who indicated they had any of the 23 listed health conditions presented on a checklist in addition to other health conditions not listed were identified as living with co-morbidities. These included medical conditions which put individuals at higher risk for severe COVID-19 disease (respiratory conditions, diabetes, cancer, heart condition) and those that might put people at moderate risk of COVID-19 disease (respiratory problems, hypertension, depression). The list of health conditions was adopted from Marg et al. [34].

The confounding variables were age at last birthday and sex at birth. Age is associated with viral load suppression and adherence to antiretroviral treatment [35], risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection [36] and risk of oral ulcers [37]. Similarly, sex is associated with viral load [38], adherence to antiretroviral treatment [39], risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection [40] and risk of oral ulcers [41].

Data analyses

A complete case approach was used, such that observations with missing data were removed from analysis [42]. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the associations between the dependent and independent variables after adjusting for the confounding variables. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 22 and the significance was set at 5%.

Results

Table 1 shows that of the 874 participants, 99 (11.3%) reported having oral ulcers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the 188 (21.5%) participants with detectable viral load, 22 (11.7%) had oral ulcers. Of the 202 (23.1%) participants who had poor adherence to ARV during the pandemic, 54 (26.7%) had oral ulcers. Of the 197 (22.5%) living with co-morbidities, 28 (14.2%) had oral ulcers. Also, of the 18 (2.1) participants who had SARS-CoV-2 infection, 12 (66.7%) had oral ulcers.

The odds of PLHIV having oral ulcers during the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly higher for people who did not know their viral load than those who had undetectable viral load (AOR: 2.036; 95% CI: 1.204–3.443; p = 0.008); and people who did not adhere to the use of antiretroviral than those who adhered (AOR: 4.113; 95% CI: 2.567–6.589; p < 0.001). Also, PLHIV who had SARS-CoV-2 infection had significantly higher odds of having oral ulcers than those who did not have the infection (AOR: 14.556; 95% CI: 4.500-47.078; p < 0.001). The presence of co-morbidities had a non-significant association with having oral ulcers (AOR: 1.170; 95% CI: 0.656–2.085; p = 0.595).

Table 1

Multivariable analysis for factors associated with oral ulcers in people living with HIV during the first wave of the pandemic (N = 874)

Variables	Total N = 874 n (%)	Oral ulcers		COR; 95% CI; p value	AOR; 95% CI; p value
Variables	Total N = 874 n (%)	Yes N = 99 (11.3%) n (%)	No N = 775 (88.7%) n (%)	COR; 95% CI; p value	AOR; 95% CI; p value
Viral load
Detectable	188 (21.5)	22 (11.7)	166 (88.3)	1.529; 0.876–2.670; p = 0.135	0.770; 0.396–1.498; p = 0.441
Undetectable	464 (53.1)	37 (8.0)	427 (92.0)		1.000
I don’t know	222 (25.4)	40 (18.0)	182 (82.0)	2.536; 1.570–4.097; p < 0.001	2.036; 1.204–3.443; p = 0.008
Adherence to ARV
Yes	672 (76.9)	45 (6.7)	627 (93.3)		1.000
No	202 (23.1)	54 (26.7)	148 (73.3)	3.992; 2.777–5.739; p < 0.001	4.113; 2.567–6.589; p < 0.001
Living with HIV and comorbidity
Comorbidity	197 (22.5)	28 (14.2)	169 (85.8)	1.414; 0.884–2.261; p = 0.160	1.170; 0.656–2.085; p = 0.595
No comorbidities	677 (77.5)	71 (10.5)	606 (89.5)		1.000
SARS-CoV-2 infection
Yes	18 (2.1)	12 (66.7)	6 (33.3)	17.678; 6.473–48.283; p < 0.001	14.556; 4.500-47.078; p < 0.001
No	856 (97.9)	87 (10.2)	769 (89.8)		1.000
Mean Age (SD)	39.2 (10.9)	34.6 (9.3)	39.8 (11.0)	0.954; 0.934–0.974; p = 0.001	0.964; 0.942–0.986; p = 0.001
Sex at birth
Female	492 (56.3)	39 (7.9)	453 (92.1)	0.505; 0.345–0.738; p < 0.001	0.459; 0.286–0.737; p = 0.001
Male	382 (43.7)	60 (15.7)	322 (84.3)		1.000

COR: crude odds ratios; AOR: adjusted odds ratios, CI: confidence interval

Discussion

The study findings indicate that PLHIV who do not know their viral load, do not adhere to the use of antiretrovirals and who had SARS-CoV-2 infection may have significantly higher likelihood of having oral ulcers during the pandemic. Having a co-morbidity did not seem to be associated with oral ulcers in PLHIV during the pandemic. Though oral ulcers are a common feature of COVID-19, we provide evidence to suggest that there may be differential risk for oral ulcers among PLHIV during the COVID-19 pandemic.

One of the strengths of the study is the population level analysis of the risk indicators of oral ulcers. There are, however, limitations associated with the study. First, this is a cross sectional study and so causal inferences cannot be made. Second, the convenience sampling and use of an online survey, with the unintended exclusion of persons without smartphones and people whose languages were not covered by the study instrument, limit the generalisability of findings. Third, the self-reported parameters are susceptible to recall and social desirability bias [43, 44], moreso the reporting of viral suppression [45], and less so the reporting of adherence [46]. Despite these limitations, the study generated important findings that may need to be explored further.

First, having an unknown viral load is suggestive of poor monitoring of one’s viral load. Reasons why an individual may not know their viral load range from poor access to viral load testing to lack of appropriate action on viral load results especially in low-resource settings [47]. Oral lesions are associated with high viral load among PLHIV [48]. Oral ulcers in PLHIV may therefore be an indicator of a deterioration of the health of the patient [49]. The finding of an association between oral ulcers and poor adherence to the use of antiretroviral therapy may also be a pointer to this. In effect, oral ulcers may indicate decreased cluster-differentiated (CD4+) T cell count and increased viral load and thus, may serve as a pointer to the diagnosis, progression, and prognosis of HIV infection [50].

Second, though very few PLHIV had SARS-CoV-2 infection, the odds of reporting oral ulcers by PLHIV who had SARS-CoV-2 infection was 14 times higher than those who did not report SARS-CoV-2 infection. Prior studies highlighted that PLHIV do not have higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but once exposed, have higher risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes [50]. The risk of severe outcomes in PLHIV who have SARS-CoV-2 infection is higher in persons with poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy, detectable viral load and with co-morbidities [51].

However, little is currently little understood about the pathophysiology of oral ulcers associated with COVID-19. Oral ulcers may result from the opportunistic infections due to prolonged use of steroids to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection. It also may result from immunosuppression and poor oral hygiene or due to direct infection of the oral tissues [52]. Studies on the pathophysiology of oral ulcers associated with COVID-19 will need to include exploration on the effects of the interactions with HIV as our study suggests that viral loads may interact with SARS-CoV-2 to produce an elevated response in the form of oral ulcers.

In conclusion, although the presence of oral ulcers are a pathognomonic feature of COVID-19, oral ulcer in PLHIV during the COVID-19 pandemic may be an indicator of poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy and unsuppressed viral load as suggested by individuals reporting they do not know their viral load status. It may also be an indicator of SARS-CoV-2 infection and a signal to take prompt and critical care of affected individuals because of the risk of severe COVID-19 for these individuals. Clearly there is scope for more work to be done to further understand these associations.

Acknowledgements

We appreciate all the participants who provided data and contributed their time to make this study possible.

Declarations

Ethical approval of the current study was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee at Institute of Public Health of the Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife, Nigeria (HREC No: IPHOAU/12/1557) as the lead partner for this study. The protocol was in accordance with international and national research guidelines. All participants provided written informed consent before taking the survey.

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Jorma Virtanen is an Associate Editor, BMC Public Health. Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan and Maha El Tantawi are Senior Editor Board members at BMC Oral Health. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Wu YH, Wu YC, Lang MJ, Lee YP, Jin YT, Chiang CP. Review of oral ulcerative lesions in COVID-19 patients: a comprehensive study of 51 cases. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(4):1066–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.07.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Brandão TB, Gueiros LA, Melo TS, Prado-Ribeiro AC, Nesrallah ACFA, Prado GVB, Santos-Silva AR, Migliorati CA. Oral lesions in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: could the oral cavity be a target organ? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021;131(2):e45–e51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2020.07.014.CrossRefPubMed

Aschbacher K, O’Donovan A, Wolkowitz OM, Dhabhar FS, Su Y, Epel E. Good stress, bad stress and oxidative stress: insights from anticipatory cortisol reactivity. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38(9):1698–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.02.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ince LM, Weber J, Scheiermann C. Control of leukocyte trafficking by Stress-Associated Hormones. Front Immunol. 2019;9:3143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.03143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kubo KY, Iinuma M, Chen H. Mastication as a stress-coping behavior. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:876409. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/876409.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Folayan MO, Zuniga RAA, Ezechi OC, et al. Associations between emotional distress, sleep changes, decreased tooth brushing frequency, self-reported oral ulcers and SARS-Cov-2 infection during the First Wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A Global Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(18):11550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811550.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Meyerowitz EA, Kim AY, Ard KL et al. Disproportionate burden of coronavirus disease 2019 among racial minorities and those in congregate settings among a large cohort of people with HIV. AIDS 2020; 34(12).

Mdodo R, Frazier EL, Dube SR, et al. Cigarette smoking prevalence among adults with HIV compared with the general adult population in the United States: cross-sectional surveys. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(5):335–44. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-0954.CrossRefPubMed

Goldstein ND, Webster JL, Robinson LF, Welles SL. Disparities of COVID-19 and HIV occurrence based on neighborhood infection incidence in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Am J Public Health. 2022;112(3):408–16. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306538.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Zlot AI, Capizzi J, Bush L, Menza TW. Impact of COVID-19 among immigrant and communities of color living with HIV in Oregon, 2020: two pandemics rooted in racism. J Immigr Minor Health. 2021;23(6):1348–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-021-01281-w.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Sheth AN, Althoff KN, Brooks JT. Influenza susceptibility, severity, and shedding in HIV-infected adults: a review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(2):219–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Silverberg MJ, Leyden W, Hernández-Ramírez RU, et al. Timing of antiretroviral therapy initiation and risk of cancer among persons living with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(11):1900–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1046.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Triant VA. Cardiovascular disease and HIV infection. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2013;10(3):199–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-013-0168-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Fitzpatrick ME, Kunisaki KM, Morris A. Pulmonary disease in HIV-infected adults in the era of antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2018;32(3):277–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001712.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Crothers K. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients who have HIV infection. Clin Chest Med. 2007;28(3):575–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2007.06.004. vi.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Hernandez-Romieu AC, Garg S, Rosenberg ES, Thompson-Paul AM, Skarbinski J. Is diabetes prevalence higher among HIV-infected individuals compared with the general population? Evidence from MMP and NHANES 2009–2010. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017;5(1):e000304. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000304.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Madhi SA, Nel J. Epidemiology of severe COVID-19 from South Africa. Lancet HIV. 2021;8(9):e524–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00183-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Brown TT, Cole SR, Li X, et al. Antiretroviral therapy and the prevalence and incidence of diabetes mellitus in the multicenter AIDS cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1179–84.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Brown TT, Li X, Cole SR, et al. Cumulative exposure to nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors is associated with insulin resistance markers in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. AIDS. 2005;19:1375–83.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Zandman-Goddard G, Shoenfeld Y. HIV and autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2002;1(6):329–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1568-9972(02)00086-1.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Alzahrani J, Hussain T, Simar D, et al. Inflammatory and immunometabolic consequences of gut dysfunction in HIV: parallels with IBD and implications for reservoir persistence and non-AIDS comorbidities. EBioMedicine. 2019;46:522–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.07.027.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Sakai E, Higurashi T, Ohkubo H, Hosono K, Ueda A, Matsuhashi N, Nakajima A. Investigation of small bowel abnormalities in HIV-Infected patients using Capsule Endoscopy. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:1932647. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1932647.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Siddiqui B, Fernandes D, Chaucer B, Chevenon M, Nandi M, Saverimuttu J, Nfonoyim J. Behcet’s disease in acquired immune deficiency syndrome. IDCases. 2015;3:3–4. https://www.healthline.com/health/throat-ulcers-covid.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Lee KW, Yap SF, Ngeow YF, Lye MS. COVID-19 in people living with HIV: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073554.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Kayabasi S, Hizli O, Cayir S. A novel predictor parameter for active recurrent aphthous stomatitis: C-Reactive protein to albumin ratio. Cureus. 2019;11(10):e5965. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5965.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Karakus N, Yigit S, Rustemoglu A, Kalkan G, Bozkurt N. Effects of interleukin (IL)-6 gene polymorphisms on recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Arch Dermatol Res. 2014;306(2):173–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-013-1406-x.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Sumathi K, Shanthi B, Palaneeswari MS, Devi AJM. Significance of ferritin in recurrent oral ulceration. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(3):14–5. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/7472.4091.CrossRef

28.

Nguyen AL, Brown B, Tantawi ME, et al. Time to Scale-up Research Collaborations to address the global impact of COVID-19 - a Commentary. Health Behav Policy Rev. 2021;8(3):277–80. https://doi.org/10.14485/hbpr.8.3.9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Ellakany P, Zuñiga RAA, El Tantawi M, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student’ sleep patterns, sexual activity, screen use, and food intake: a global survey. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(1):e0262617. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262617.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

El Tantawi M, Folayan MO, Nguyen AL, et al. Validation of a COVID-19 mental health and wellness survey questionnaire. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1509. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13825-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Marg LZ, Heidari O, Taylor J, et al. A multidimensional assessment of successful aging among older people living with HIV in Palm Springs, California. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2019;35(11–12):1174–80.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Wilson VanVoorhis CR, Morgan BL. Understanding power rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology. 2007;3(2):43–50.CrossRef

33.

Folayan MO, Ibigbami OI, Oloniniyi IO, Oginni O, Aloba O. Associations between psychological wellbeing, depression, general anxiety, perceived social support, tooth brushing frequency and oral ulcers among adults resident in Nigeria during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):520. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01871-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Yehia BR, Rebeiro P, Althoff KN, et al. Impact of age on retention in care and viral suppression. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;68(4):413–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000489.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Rahman MM, Bhattacharjee B, Farhana Z, et al. Age-related risk factors and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prev Med Hyg. 2021;62(2):E329–71. https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.2.1946.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Oyetola EO, Mogaji IK, Agho TO, Ayilara OA. Pattern of presentation of oral ulcerations in patients attending an oral medicine clinic in Nigeria. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2018;16(1):9–11.PubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Farzadegan H, Hoover DR, Astemborski J, et al. Sex differences in HIV-1 viral load and progression to AIDS. Lancet. 1998;352:1510–4.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Berg KM, Demas PA, Howard AA, Schoenbaum EE, Gourevitch MN, Arnsten JH. Gender differences in factors associated with adherence to antiretroviral therapy. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(11):1111–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30445.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Prinelli F, Trevisan C, Noale M, et al. Sex- and gender-related differences linked to SARS-CoV-2 infection among the participants in the web-based EPICOVID19 survey: the hormonal hypothesis. Maturitas. 2022;158:61–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.11.015.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Mortazavi H, Safi Y, Baharvand M, Rahmani S. Diagnostic features of common oral ulcerative lesions: an updated decision tree. Int J Dent. 2016;2016:7278925. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7278925.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Ehrenkranz PD, et al. The missed potential of CD4 and viral load testing to improve clinical outcomes for people living with HIV in lower-resource settings. PLoS Med. 2019;16(5):e1002820.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Little RJ. Regression with missing X’s: a review. J Am Stat Assoc. 1992;87(420):1227–37.

43.

Nieuwkerk PT, Oort FJ. Self-reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection and virologic treatment response: a meta-analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38(4):445–8.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Kalichman SC, Amaral CM, Swetzes C, et al. A simple single-item rating scale to measure medication adherence: further evidence for convergent validity. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2009;8(6):367–74.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Stephenson R, Bratcher A, Mimiaga MJ, Garofalo R, Hidalgo MA, Hoehnle S, Sullivan PS. Brief report: Accuracy in Self-Report of viral suppression among HIV-Positive men with HIV-Negative male partners. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020;83(3):210–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000002240.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Stirratt MJ, Dunbar-Jacob J, Crane HM, Simoni JM, Czajkowski S, Hilliard ME, et al. Self-report measures of medication adherence behavior: recommendations on optimal use. Transl Behav Med. 2015;5(4):470–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Greenspan D, Komaroff E, Redford M, et al. Oral mucosal lesions and HIV viral load in the women’s interagency HIV Study (WIHS). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000;25(1):44–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042560-200009010-00006.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Saini R. Oral lesions: a true clinical indicator in human immunodeficiency virus. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2011;2(2):145–50. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.92316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Spinelli MA, Jones BLH, Gandhi M. COVID-19 outcomes and risk factors among people living with HIV. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2022;19(5):425–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-022-00618-w.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Cooper TJ, Woodward BL, Alom S, Harky A. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes in HIV/AIDS patients: a systematic review. HIV Med. 2020;21(9):567–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12911.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Mirzaei H, McFarland W, Karamouzian M, Sharifi H. COVID-19 among people living with HIV: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2021;25(1):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02983-2.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Sharma P, Malik S, Wadhwan V, Gotur Palakshappa S, Singh R. Prevalence of oral manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic review. Rev Med Virol. 2022;32(6):e2345. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2345.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Risk indicators for oral ulcers among people living with HIV during the first wave of the pandemic: a cross sectional study
verfasst von: Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan
Roberto Ariel Abeldaño Zuñiga
Jorma I. Virtanen
Nourhan M. Aly
Oliver C Ezechi
Joanne Lusher
Maha El Tantawi
Annie L Nguyen
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2023
Verlag: BioMed Central
Erschienen in: BMC Oral Health / Ausgabe 1/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03330-2

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Risk indicators for oral ulcers among people living with HIV during the first wave of the pandemic: a cross sectional study