Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 7/2023

21.03.2023 | Original Article

Simple foot an ankle value: a simple evaluation correlated to the existing PROMs

verfasst von: Vincent Marot, Arthur Justo, Elisa Guenego, Dorian Klein, Nicolas Reina, Etienne Cavaignac, Sophie Fayad, David Ancelin

Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Ausgabe 7/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The SFAV (Simple Foot and Ankle Value) consists in asking patients how they rate their joint function on the day of the examination, as a percentage of that of a normal joint (0–100% scale with 100% being normal). The main objective was to validate the SFAV by determining its correlation with validated foot and ankle function scores.

Methods

This was a prospective study. 90 patients were included in three groups: patients 16 to 54 years old with an acute or subacute ankle pathology (foot/ankle trauma patient group), patients more than 55 years old with ankle or foot osteoarthritis (foot/ankle degeneration patient group), and adults of any age without foot or ankle pathology (control group). A self-administered questionnaire with the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society, The European Foot and Ankle Society, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, the Visual Analogic Scale, and the SFAV was given at three different timepoints (enrollment, preoperative visit, and 6-month postoperative visit) to the patients. The validity of the SFAV was investigated by determining its correlation with the existing foot and ankle PROMs using Spearman’s correlation; test–retest reliability, the responsiveness to change, and the discriminative ability of the SFAV were also analyzed. The significance threshold was set at 0.05.

Results

The SFAV was significantly correlated with the AOFAS, EFAS, and FAOS at all tested time points, with all p values below 0.033. SFAV scoring was reliable over time, as p values resulting from the comparison between initial and preoperative SFAV were all above the significance threshold. SFAV scoring was responsive to change, based on the comparison between pre- and postoperative SFAV (p < 0.05). Like for the AOFAS, EFAS, and FAOS, SFAV provides good discrimination between a healthy subject and a patient. The control group scores and initial consultation scores of the pooled patient’s groups were statistically correlated (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The SFAV is a valid outcome measure correlated with the AOFAS, EFAS, FAOS, and VAS.

Level of evidence

Level of evidence III.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson I, Bohm E, Lübbeke A, Lyman S, Overgaard S, Rolfson O, W-Dahl A, Wilkinson M, Dunbar M (2019) Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures. EFORT Open Rev 4:357–367CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilson I, Bohm E, Lübbeke A, Lyman S, Overgaard S, Rolfson O, W-Dahl A, Wilkinson M, Dunbar M (2019) Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures. EFORT Open Rev 4:357–367CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J (2001) Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 22:788–794CrossRefPubMed Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J (2001) Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 22:788–794CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Casalino LP, Gans D, Weber R, Cea M, Tuchovsky A, Bishop TF, Miranda Y, Frankel BA, Ziehler KB, Wong MM, Evenson TB (2016) US Physician practices spend more than $15.4 billion annually to report quality measures. Health Aff (Millwood) 35:401–406CrossRefPubMed Casalino LP, Gans D, Weber R, Cea M, Tuchovsky A, Bishop TF, Miranda Y, Frankel BA, Ziehler KB, Wong MM, Evenson TB (2016) US Physician practices spend more than $15.4 billion annually to report quality measures. Health Aff (Millwood) 35:401–406CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams GN, Gangel TJ, Arciero RA, Uhorchak JM, Taylor DC (1999) Comparison of the single assessment numeric evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales. outcomes measures after shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med 27:214–221CrossRefPubMed Williams GN, Gangel TJ, Arciero RA, Uhorchak JM, Taylor DC (1999) Comparison of the single assessment numeric evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales. outcomes measures after shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med 27:214–221CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilbart MK, Gerber C (2007) Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:717–721CrossRefPubMed Gilbart MK, Gerber C (2007) Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:717–721CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Marot V, Vilette H, Dalmas Y, Justo A, Reina N, Cavaignac E, Berard E, Accadbled F (2021) Pediatric simple knee value: a simple patient-reported outcome measure for the knee. J Child Orthop 15:76–80CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marot V, Vilette H, Dalmas Y, Justo A, Reina N, Cavaignac E, Berard E, Accadbled F (2021) Pediatric simple knee value: a simple patient-reported outcome measure for the knee. J Child Orthop 15:76–80CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Parry JA, Peterson SL, Strage KE, Hadeed M, Heare A, Stacey SC, Mauffrey C (2021) Percent of normal: a pragmatic patient-reported outcome measure for the orthopaedic trauma clinic. J Orthop Trauma 35:e429–e432CrossRefPubMed Parry JA, Peterson SL, Strage KE, Hadeed M, Heare A, Stacey SC, Mauffrey C (2021) Percent of normal: a pragmatic patient-reported outcome measure for the orthopaedic trauma clinic. J Orthop Trauma 35:e429–e432CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dumont GD, Glenn RL, Battle NC, Thier ZT (2021) Correlation of the single-assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) score with hip-specific patient-reported outcome measures. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 3:e435–e440CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dumont GD, Glenn RL, Battle NC, Thier ZT (2021) Correlation of the single-assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) score with hip-specific patient-reported outcome measures. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 3:e435–e440CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Button G, Pinney S (2004) A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system? Foot Ankle Int 25:521–525CrossRefPubMed Button G, Pinney S (2004) A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system? Foot Ankle Int 25:521–525CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat SooHoo NF, Vyas R, Samimi D (2006) Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int 27:930–934CrossRefPubMed SooHoo NF, Vyas R, Samimi D (2006) Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int 27:930–934CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyton GP (2001) Theoretical limitations of the AOFAS scoring systems: an analysis using monte carlo modeling. Foot Ankle Int 22:779–787CrossRefPubMed Guyton GP (2001) Theoretical limitations of the AOFAS scoring systems: an analysis using monte carlo modeling. Foot Ankle Int 22:779–787CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinsker E, Daniels TR (2011) AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS clinical rating systems. Foot Ankle Int 32:841–842CrossRefPubMed Pinsker E, Daniels TR (2011) AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS clinical rating systems. Foot Ankle Int 32:841–842CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Richter M, Agren P-H, Besse J-L, Cöster M, Kofoed H, Maffulli N, Rosenbaum D, Steultjens M, Alvarez F, Boszczyk A, Buedts K, Guelfi M, Liszka H, Louwerens J-W, Repo JP, Samaila E, Stephens M, Witteveen AGH (2018) EFAS score - multilingual development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) by the score committee of the European foot and ankle society (EFAS). Foot Ankle Surg 24:185–204CrossRefPubMed Richter M, Agren P-H, Besse J-L, Cöster M, Kofoed H, Maffulli N, Rosenbaum D, Steultjens M, Alvarez F, Boszczyk A, Buedts K, Guelfi M, Liszka H, Louwerens J-W, Repo JP, Samaila E, Stephens M, Witteveen AGH (2018) EFAS score - multilingual development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) by the score committee of the European foot and ankle society (EFAS). Foot Ankle Surg 24:185–204CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kravitz RL, Callahan EJ, Paterniti D, Antonius D, Dunham M, Lewis CE (1996) Prevalence and sources of patients’ unmet expectations for care. Ann Intern Med 125:730–737CrossRefPubMed Kravitz RL, Callahan EJ, Paterniti D, Antonius D, Dunham M, Lewis CE (1996) Prevalence and sources of patients’ unmet expectations for care. Ann Intern Med 125:730–737CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Uhlmann RF, Inui TS, Carter WB (1984) Patient requests and expectations. Definitions and clinical applications. Med Care 22:681–685CrossRefPubMed Uhlmann RF, Inui TS, Carter WB (1984) Patient requests and expectations. Definitions and clinical applications. Med Care 22:681–685CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Flood AB, Lorence DP, Ding J, McPherson K, Black NA (1993) The role of expectations in patients’ reports of post-operative outcomes and improvement following therapy. Med Care 31:1043–1056CrossRefPubMed Flood AB, Lorence DP, Ding J, McPherson K, Black NA (1993) The role of expectations in patients’ reports of post-operative outcomes and improvement following therapy. Med Care 31:1043–1056CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Simple foot an ankle value: a simple evaluation correlated to the existing PROMs
verfasst von
Vincent Marot
Arthur Justo
Elisa Guenego
Dorian Klein
Nicolas Reina
Etienne Cavaignac
Sophie Fayad
David Ancelin
Publikationsdatum
21.03.2023
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Ausgabe 7/2023
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03527-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2023

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 7/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

TEP mit Roboterhilfe führt nicht zu größerer Zufriedenheit

15.05.2024 Knie-TEP Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Operationsrobotern für den Einbau von Totalendoprothesen des Kniegelenks hat die Präzision der Eingriffe erhöht. Für die postoperative Zufriedenheit der Patienten scheint das aber unerheblich zu sein, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.