Administrative information
Title {1} | Effectiveness of a mHealth Application as a Family Supportive Tool in Pediatric Otolaryngology Perioperative Process (TONAPP)". |
Trial registration {2a and 2b}. | NCT05460689 |
Protocol version {3} | 03/22 (March 2022) version 1 |
Funding {4} | The personalization of the device (mHealth app) in its contents and features, part of an information platform, was founded by ARGO system, a protocol agreement signed in 2018 among the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, the Italian Ministry of Education University and Research, and the Italian Ministry of Economic Development. Moreover, this work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health, through contributions given to the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy. |
Author details {5a} | RD, AC, SS, LB: Healthcare professions department, Institute for maternal and child health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy. MDC: Department of health prevention, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina; LR, MG: Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit, Institute for maternal and child health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy; SZ, AS: Area Science Park, Trieste, Italy; LB: University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy. LVB: Scientific Direction, Institute for maternal and child health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy |
Name and contact information for the trial sponsor {5b} | This work is supported by the Ministry of Health, Rome—Italy, in collaboration with the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste – Italy. |
Role of sponsor {5c} | This study is supported by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy, through the contribution from the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 03/22). Caregivers of patients are enrolled at the Institute of Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo. The role of the sponsor is to ensure that adequate arrangements are made for the initiation and management of the study and that liability insurance and legal liability are in place. In addition, the project underlying the study is funded by the Area Science Park as part of the complex project "ARGO System", a protocol agreement signed in 2018 between the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research and the Italian Ministry of Economic Development. |
Introduction
Background and rationale {6a}
Objectives {7}
-
Does an mHealth app designed to support caregivers of children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy with or without tympanostomy tube insertion in the perioperative process improve family-health related outcomes compared to standard care?
-
Does an mHealth app designed to support caregivers of children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy with or without insertion of a tympanostomy tube improve organisational issues of the surgical ward in the perioperative process compared to standard care?
Trial design {8}
Methods: participants, interventions, and outcomes
Study setting {9}
Eligibility criteria {10}
Who will take informed consent? {26a}
Additional consent provisions for collection and use of participant data and biological specimens {26b}
Interventions
Explanation for the choice of comparators {6b}
Intervention description {11a}
Criteria for discontinuing or modifying allocated interventions {11b}
Strategies to improve adherence to interventions {11c}
Relevant concomitant care permitted or prohibited during the trial {11d}
Provisions for post-trial care {30}
Outcomes {12}
-
The difference between the intervention and control groups in caregiver preparation for hospitalisation and surgery, evaluated at arrival at the hospital using a checklist completed by the administrative nurse (e.g. number of documents missing on arrival) approximately 5 days after enrolment;
-
The difference between the intervention and control groups in preparing children for surgery, evaluated by ORL surgical nurses on arrival at the surgical department, approximately 5 days after enrolment;
-
The difference between the intervention and control groups in terms of children’s distress. It is assessed by ORL surgical nurses in the surgical department using the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale [22];
-
The difference between the intervention and control groups in self-reported primary caregiver anxiety as measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory form Y questionnaire [21] on the day of follow-up, around the seventh day after surgery and 13 days after enrolment.
-
The difference between the intervention and control groups in terms of the social and health effects of the introduction of an mHealth app in a maternal and child hospital. It is evaluated on the day of follow-up, approximately 14 days after enrolment.
Participant timeline {13}
-
(T0) after enrolment and allocation, data collection at time zero—(a) demographic data and (b) caregiver anxiety trait and state; (c) caregiver health literacy. At T0, participants in group A receive the app (intervention), while group B continue to receive standard care;
-
(T1) at hospital admission on the day of surgery—IRCCS administrative office (“Punto benvenuto”)—documents required for hospital admission and surgery;
-
(T2) upon admission to the surgical department ORL—(a) caregiver’s state anxiety level; (b) child’s preparation for surgery; (c) child distress;
-
(T3) at follow-up—caregiver’s state anxiety; social impact.
Sample size {14}
Recruitment {15}
Assignment of interventions: allocation
Sequence generation {16a}
Concealment mechanism {16b}
Implementation {16c}
Assignment of interventions: blinding
Who will be blinded {17a}
Procedure for unblinding if needed {17b}
Data collection and management
Plans for assessment and collection of outcomes {18a}
Assessment tools (groups A and B)
-
A sociodemographic questionnaire is used to collect the following data at T0: age, sex, educational level of caregiver, current occupational status (employed, unemployed, retired, homemaker, student), relationship to child (mother, father, other guardian); being a healthcare professional; previous experience caring for others with health problems; age and sex of child; child’s planned surgery at this hospitalisation; child’s previous surgical experience.
-
The level of health literacy is evaluated at T0 using the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire [23]. The HLS-EU-Q16 is a 16-item self-assessment tool with five possible answers on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (very difficult to) 4 (very easy), with the fifth possible answer being “I don’t know.” To determine the score, the possible answers HLS-EU-Q16 are dichotomised (‘don’t know’ answers are coded as missing values). ‘Fairly difficult’ and ‘very difficult’ are both coded 0 (zero), while ‘fairly easy’ and ‘very easy’ are both coded 1. HLS-EU-Q16 is a summated score with a range of 0–16. Based on the final score, three levels of health literacy (HL) can be defined: insufficient HL (0–8), problematic HL (9–12), sufficient HL (13–16) [23].
-
The documents required for hospital admission and surgery is assessed at T1 using a checklist completed by administrative nurses (number of documents missing when the family arrives at the hospital, e.g. identity card, healthcare card).
-
The child’s preparation for surgery is assessed at T2 by the nurse in the surgical department using a checklist that evaluates whether the child has adequate hygiene, is not wearing nail polish, is fasting, and is not wearing jewellery as prescribed by staff for standard surgical preparation.
-
Caregivers’ anxiety is measured using the Italian version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaire [21]. The questionnaire consists of two self-report scales for measuring state anxiety and trait anxiety. The S-Anxiety scale (STAI Form Y-1) consists of twenty statements that evaluate how the respondent feels “now, at this moment,” on a 4 items Likert scale (from “not at all” to “very much”, attached). The T-Anxiety scale (STAI Form Y-2) consists of twenty statements that evaluate how the respondent feels “generally” on a four-point Likert scale, ranging from “almost never” to “almost always.” The total score ranges from 20 to 80 points, with lower scores indicating higher trait and state anxiety.
-
The modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS) [22] is used as an observational tool to measure anxiety in children in the preoperative period at T2. The mYPAS consists of 27 items that examine five domains, such as child activity, emotional expressiveness, arousal state, vocalisation, and caregiver engagement. Scores range from 23.33 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety. The tool is completed by nurses. Since there is no validated Italian version of the questionnaire, only English-speaking nurses are responsible for completing the instrument, according to Liguori and colleagues [24].
-
The social and health impact of the study is self-assessed by caregivers at follow-up (T3) through outcome measures, such as how often caregivers had to call the hospital for additional information, had to visit the paediatric Emergency department, or had other complications at home after surgery (e.g. bleeding, uncontrolled pain).
Other assessments (only group A)
-
Data on app usage (number of logins; quality of content consulted, time spent on app) will be collected during experimentation of the app.
-
At the end of the trial, participants are asked to provide an evaluation over the app’s content and features in digital form through the app itself.