Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2022

Open Access 01.12.2022 | Research

The impact of current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity on health care-seeking behavior in China

verfasst von: Changle Li, Jing Sun

Erschienen in: BMC Health Services Research | Ausgabe 1/2022

Abstract

Background

People with lifestyle behaviors, such as current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity, may experience a lack of or delayed health care, leading to severe sickness and higher health care expenditures in the future. Hence, the current study aims to ascertain the effects of current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity on health care-seeking behavior among adults who report physical discomfort in China.

Methods

The data used in this study were obtained from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). The final sample consisted of 44,362 individuals who participated in all five waves of data collection. Logistic regression models were used for the analysis.

Results

The results of fixed effects logistic regression showed that among those who reported physical discomfort, adults who currently smoked cigarettes were 0.65 times less likely to seek health care than those who formerly smoked. Compared to nondrinkers, adults who regularly drank alcohol had a decreased likelihood of seeking health care. Adults who never engaged in physical exercise had 24% lower odds of seeking health care than those who engaged in physical exercise.

Conclusions

Current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity decreased the probability of seeking health care among adults who reported physical discomfort. Therefore, screening and brief advice programs should be delivered by primary-level care and should pay more attention to individuals who engage in lifestyle behaviors such as current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity, thus avoiding missed opportunities to treat chronic conditions and detect new diseases early.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Background

In 2015, a Chinese national nutrition and chronic disease report indicated that the prevalences of current smoking, harmful drinking, and physical inactivity among adults were 28.1, 9.3, and 71.3%, respectively [1]; these preventable risk factors have contributed to the increased rise in chronic diseases. Chronic diseases now account for approximately 80% of total deaths and 70% of total disability-adjusted life years lost in China [2].
Lifestyles have proven to be independent or synergistical causes of diseases, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and obesity [3]. Most people make lifestyle changes due to the health concerns and illnesses they experience. For example, in 2018, 38.7% of Chinese smokers stopped smoking because they were worried about their future health status, and 26.6% stopped smoking because they experienced severe sickness [4]. In addition, former smoking has been associated with higher health care utilization and increased health care expenditures [58]. People with lifestyle behaviors including current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity may not care about their health status or may be risk-tolerant individuals. As a result, they may experience a lack of or delayed health care, thereby leading to severe sickness and higher health care expenditures in the future [911].
To our knowledge, little is known about the association between lifestyle factors and health care-seeking behavior [12, 13]. Hence, the current study aims to ascertain the effects of current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity on health care-seeking behavior among adults who report physical discomfort in China. This knowledge will help better understand the associations between current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity and health care-seeking behavior, thus helping the government make health care resource allocation decisions and improve health education programs for target populations.

Methods

Data source and study sample

The data used in this study were obtained from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), conducted by the Institute of Social Science Survey of Peking University. The CFPS is a nationally representative, biennial survey designed to collect Chinese community-, family-, and individual-level longitudinal data; the data cover twenty-five provinces and their administrative equivalents, representing approximately 95% of the total population in mainland China. The CFPS uses multistage probability proportional-to-size sampling. More details of the data collection process were given in Xie and Lu [14]. The CFPS questionnaires include questions on demographic background, family structure/transfer, health status and physical functioning, health care utilization, insurance status, work, income, expenditure, asset ownership, community-level information, etc. [15].
The CFPS primarily conducts face-to-face interviews. Telephone or online interviews are used as a substitute only when the CFPS fails to complete face-to-face interviews. In the first wave in 2010, 14,960 households, including 33,600 adults (above 16 years old) and 8990 children, were successfully interviewed; in four waves of full sample follow-up surveys in 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018, 13,315 households (35,720 adults and 8624 children), 13,946 households (37,147 adults and 8617 children), 14,019 households (36,892 adults and 8427 children), and 14,218 households (37,354 adults and 8735 children) were successfully interviewed, respectively. More details about the CFPS are available from Xie and Hu [16].
From the full sample, only the adults (16 years old or older) who reported feeling any physical discomfort in the past 2 weeks prior to the survey interview were selected. The final sample consisted of 44,362 individuals who participated in all five waves of data collection.

Measures

Dependent variable

Health care-seeking behavior was set as a binary variable, indicating the decision to consult a doctor (or not) among the adults who reported feeling any physical discomfort in the past 2 weeks. The question in the CFPS that represent this variable is: ‘Have you seen a doctor within the past two weeks?’. Response options are: Yes or no.

Independent variables

The respondents completed a face-to-face interview about lifestyle factors, including current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity. In the CFPS, each respondent was asked, ‘Have you smoked in the past month?’. A respondent reporting ‘Yes’ was categorized as current smoking. Respondents who reported ‘No’ were then asked, ‘Have you ever smoked? Yes or No’. If the respondent reported ‘Yes’, the respondent was categorized as former smoking. If the respondent reported ‘No’ to both questions, the respondent was categorized as never smoking. Regular drinking was defined as a binary variable. The CFPS question supporting this variable was ‘Have you often drunk alcohol (at least three times a week) in the past month?’. Respondents reporting ‘Yes’ were coded as 1, and those reporting ‘No’ were coded as 0. In the CFPS, the respondents were asked how often they participated in physical exercise in the past week. The respondents were categorized as physical inactivity if they answered “Never”.
The other independent variables were selected based on previous studies and included the respondent’s age, gender, marital status, urban residency, household income, medical insurance status, educational attainment, employment status, self-reported health status, chronic conditions, and severity of physical discomfort (SPD). A single question was used to measured SPD, which was classified into three categories by asking the respondents how serious they thought their physical discomfort was: mild, moderate, or serious. Definitions of all relevant variables are provided in Table 1.
Table 1
Definitions of variables
Variable
Description
Dependent variable
 Health care-seeking behavior
Coded: 1 if the individual self-reported consulting a doctor; 0 otherwise
Independent variable
 Smoking status
  Current smoking
Coded: 1 if the individual currently smokes cigarettes; 0 otherwise
  Former smoking
Coded: 1 if the individual has quit smoking; 0 otherwise
  Never smoking
Coded: 1 if the individual has never smoked; 0 otherwise
  Regular drinking
Coded: 1 if the individual drank alcohol at least 3 times a week in past month; 0 otherwise
  Physical inactivity
Coded: 1 if the individual never participated in physical exercise in the past week; 0 otherwise
 Age group
  16–24
Coded: 1 if the individual is 16–24 years old; 0 otherwise
  25–64
Coded: 1 if the individual is 25–64 years old; 0 otherwise
   > =65
Coded: 1 if the individual is > = 65 years old; 0 otherwise
  Male
Coded: 1 if the individual is male; 0 for female
 Educational attainment
  Illiterate
Coded: 1 if the individual is illiterate; 0 otherwise
  Elementary school
Coded: 1 if the individual attends elementary school; 0 otherwise
  Middle school
Coded: 1 if the individual graduated from middle school; 0 otherwise
  High school
Coded: 1 if the individual graduated from high school; 0 otherwise
  Above three-year college
Coded: 1 if the individual graduated from above three-year college; 0 otherwise
  Married
Coded: 1 if the individual is married; 0 otherwise
  Urban residency
Coded: 1 if the individual is an urban resident; 0 for rural resident
 Medical insurance
  GMI
Coded: 1 if the individual is enrolled in the Government Medical Insurance; 0 otherwise
  UEMI
Coded: 1 if the individual is enrolled in the Urban Employee Medical Insurance; 0 otherwise
  URMI
Coded: 1 if the individual is enrolled in the Urban Resident Medical Insurance; 0 otherwise
  NRCMI
Coded: 1 if the individual is enrolled in the New Rural Cooperative Medical Insurance; 0 otherwise
  Other Insurance
Coded: 1 if the individual is enrolled in supplementary medical insurance; 0 otherwise
  No Insurance
Coded: 1 if the individual does not have medical insurance; 0 otherwise
  Household income
Net household income (10,000 Yuan)
  Economically active
Coded: 1 if the individual reports participating in agricultural jobs, working for wages for an employer, or working for oneself rather than an employer; 0 if the individual reports being a temporary worker, retired, unemployed, or a student;
 Health status
  Poor
Coded: 1 if the individual reports his or her health status to be poor; 0 otherwise
  Fair
Coded: 1 if the individual reports his or her health status to be fair; 0 otherwise
  Good
Coded: 1 if the individual reports his or her health status to be good, very good, or excellent; 0 otherwise
  Chronic conditions
Coded: 1 if the individual has had doctor-diagnosed chronic diseases in the past 6 months; 0 otherwise
 Severity of physical discomfort
  Mild
Coded: 1 if the individual perceives himself or herself to have had mild physical discomfort in the past 2 weeks; 0 otherwise
  Moderate
Coded: 1 if the individual perceives himself or herself to have had moderate physical discomfort in the past 2 weeks; 0 otherwise
  Serious
Coded: 1 if the individual perceives himself or herself to have had serious physical discomfort in the past 2 weeks; 0 otherwise

Statistical analysis

Bivariate analyses were used to examine differences between adults who consulted a doctor (seeking health care) and those who did not consult a doctor when they felt physical discomfort in each wave. Pearson’s chi-square test was used to analyze the categorical independent variables.
The current study examined the relationship between the dependent variable and independent variables using pooled and panel data estimation. Pooled estimation can increase the sample size, but it is often biased or at least inefficient [17]. Therefore, a pooled regression model can be a starting point. After the use of the pooled regression model, the data were treated as having a panel structure, and a choice between fixed and random effects models had to be made. The panel structure can increase the degrees of freedom and decrease the collinearity among independent variables. Based on Hausman’s specification test, fixed effects estimation should be preferred over random effects estimation. However, when estimating the fixed effects model, many pieces of information are lost. Therefore, a random effects model was also presented in this study [17, 18].
Since the dependent variable was a binary response variable, logistic regression was used to examine the impact of current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity on health care-seeking behavior in China. The final model was adjusted for all the confounding variables. The results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were carried out using the statistical software package STATA 15.

Results

A descriptive summary of all variables over time is shown in Table 2. Among those who reported physical discomfort, the proportion of people seeking health care increased from 68.8% in 2010 to 76.1% in 2018. Approximately 26.0% of adults currently smoked tobacco products from 2010 to 2018. Approximately 12.0% of adults regularly drank alcohol from 2010 to 2018. The prevalence of physical inactivity was 72.0% in 2010. This proportion decreased to 52.8% in 2018.
Table 2
Description of the selected variables in the five waves (percentage)
 
2010
N = 8358
2012
N = 9061
2014
N = 8774
2016
N = 9021
2018
N = 9148
Health care-seeking behavior
68.8
65.4
72.3
74.9
76.1
Current smoking
28.8
27.4
26.2
24.9
25.7
Former smoking
7.3
5.0
5.2
5.2
8.2
Never smoking
63.9
67.5
68.6
69.8
66.2
Regular drinking
12.9
13.2
13.1
11.7
12.5
Physical inactivity
72.0
56.9
63.2
58.8
52.8
Age group
 16–24
6.8
7.4
6.4
7.3
6.4
 25–64
76.0
74.5
73.7
70.9
69.9
  > =65
17.2
18.2
20.0
21.8
23.7
 Male
42.7
43.4
42.3
42.0
42.8
Educational attainment
 Illiteracy
36.1
35.4
35.4
34.5
30.4
 Elementary school
21.5
21.6
22.2
21.5
21.6
 Middle school
25.0
23.8
24.4
24.4
26.1
 High school
11.8
12.4
11.7
11.7
12.5
 Above three-year college
5.7
6.8
6.3
8.0
9.5
 Married
82.5
82.5
82.3
80.4
79.9
 Urban residency
44.8
45.4
47.1
47.5
47.7
Medical insurance
 GMI
4.7
3.7
2.9
1.9
2.4
 UEMI
9.5
12.2
12.6
12.4
13.1
 URMI
7.0
7.6
8.2
8.0
7.9
 NRCMI
58.1
64.6
67.5
68.2
67.7
 Other Insurance
0.5
0.3
0.6
0.4
0.3
 No Insurance
20.2
11.7
8.2
9.1
8.6
 Household income a
3.3 (5.3)
4.2 (5.0)
4.6 (6.1)
5.4 (12.5)
5.6 (8.5)
 Economically active
45.4
67.5
71.5
75.3
73.2
Health status
 Poor
38.9
41.0
36.1
36.2
36.4
 Fair
42.0
23.0
19.5
22.6
16.7
 Good
19.1
36.0
44.4
41.3
46.9
 Chronic conditions
29.0
22.1
34.6
34.0
32.7
Severity of physical discomfort
 Mild
22.2
24.1
20.8
20.9
17.3
 Moderate
40.1
39.7
47.2
42.3
44.4
 Serious
37.7
36.2
32.0
36.8
38.4
RMB: 1000 Chinese Renminbi is approximately 150 US$
aValues are expressed as the mean (standard deviation)
Table 3 compares adults who sought health care and those who did not seek health care when they felt physical discomfort based on a variety of lifestyle factors. Among those who reported physical discomfort, adults who currently smoked were less likely to seek health care, and a similar trend was observed for adults who regularly drank alcohol. In addition, the chi-square test found that current smoking and regular drinking were significantly associated with health care-seeking behavior in some or all five waves.
Table 3
Lifestyle behaviors of adults who sought health care and those who did not seek health care
 
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
N = 8358
N = 9061
N = 8774
N = 9021
N = 9148
Seeking health care
Seeking health care
Seeking health care
Seeking health care
Seeking health care
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Current smoking (%)
 Yes
67.7
32.3
61.3
38.7
69.6
30.4
72.7
27.3
73.1
26.9
 No
69.2
30.8
67.0
33.0
73.3
26.7
75.7
24.3
77.1
22.9
P value
0.185
< 0.001
0.001
0.005
< 0.001
Regular drinking (%)
 Yes
62.3
37.7
57.0
43.1
64.9
35.1
69.7
30.3
69.8
30.2
 No
69.7
30.3
66.7
33.3
73.4
26.6
75.6
24.4
77.0
23.1
P value
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
Physical inactivity (%)
 Yes
68.7
31.3
65.5
34.5
71.8
28.2
74.2
25.8
74.2
25.8
 No
69.0
31.0
65.3
34.8
73.1
26.9
76.0
24.0
78.1
21.9
P value
0.795
0.778
0.204
0.045
< 0.001
Table 4 presents the results of the regression analysis for the pooled logistic, random effects logistic, and fixed effects logistic models. The likelihood ratio test and Hausman’s specification test showed highly significant test statistics (LR = 569.63 and χ2(24) =162.32). These results further demonstrated that the fixed effects logistic model should be preferred over the random effects logistic model. The results of the logistic regression analysis are shown in Table 4 as ORs. An OR greater than one indicated a positive effect on the likelihood of seeking health care, while an OR less than one indicated a negative effect.
Table 4
Logistic regression analysis of health care-seeking behavior
 
Pooled logistic
Random effects logistic
Fixed effects logistic
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
Odds Ratios (95% CI)
Odds Ratios (95% CI)
Odds Ratios (95% CI)
Smoking status
 Current smoking
0.84*** (0.75, 0.93)
0.79*** (0.69, 0.89)
0.65*** (0.50, 0.84)
 Never smoking
0.90* (0.80, 1.00)
0.86** (0.75, 0.98)
0.79* (0.60, 1.04)
Former smoking (ref.)
 Regular drinking
0.76*** (0.71, 0.82)
0.72*** (0.67, 0.79)
0.77*** (0.65, 0.91)
 Physical inactivity
0.76*** (0.72, 0.79)
0.73*** (0.69, 0.77)
0.76*** (0.69, 0.83)
Age group
 16–24 (ref.)
   
  25–64
1.18*** (1.07, 1.31)
1.23*** (1.09, 1.39)
0.97 (0.69, 1.37)
   > =65
1.57*** (1.40, 1.75)
1.74*** (1.52, 2.00)
1.74*** (1.17, 2.59)
  Male
0.98 (0.92, 1.05)
0.97 (0.90, 1.06)
0.99 (0.32, 3.26)
Educational attainment
 Illiteracy (ref.)
   
  Elementary school
0.99 (0.93, 1.07)
1.01 (0.93, 1.10)
1.15 (0.86, 1.55)
  Middle school
0.98 (0.91, 1.06)
0.99 (0.91, 1.08)
1.23 (0.83,1.81)
  High school
0.79*** (0.73, 0.86)
0.76*** (0.68, 0.84)
1.18 (0.71, 1.96)
  Above three-year college
0.59*** (0.53, 0.66)
0.53*** (0.47, 0.61)
1.21 (0.67, 2.20)
  Married
1.24*** (1.16, 1.33)
1.30*** (1.19, 1.41)
0.91 (0.72, 1.16)
  Urban residency
0.83*** (0.79, 0.88)
0.80*** (0.75, 0.86)
1.25** (1.00, 1.56)
Medical insurance
 GMI
1.24*** (1.08, 1.43)
1.25** (1.05, 1.48)
1.01 (0.74, .139)
 UEMI
1.14*** (1.04, 1.26)
1.14** (1.01, 1.27)
1.08 (0.87, 1.35)
 URMI
1.14** (1.03, 1.27)
1.17** (1.03, 1.32)
1.19 (0.97, 1.46)
 NRCMI
1.51*** (1.40, 1.62)
1.57*** (1.44, 1.71)
1.09 (0.93, 1.28)
 Other Insurance
0.92 (0.67, 1.27)
0.87 (0.60, 1.27)
0.89 (0.51, 1.54)
No Insurance (ref.)
 Household income
1.01** (1.00, 1.01)
1.01*** (1.00, 1.01)
1.01** (1.00, 1.02)
 Economically active
1.01 (0.96, 1.07)
1.03 (0.97, 1.10)
1.04 (0.92, 1.17)
Health status
 Poor
1.38*** (1.29, 1.47)
1.46*** (1.36, 1.58)
1.42*** (1.26, 1.59)
Fair (ref.)
 Good
0.94** (0.89, 0.99)
0.94* (0.88, 1.00)
1.04 (0.93, 1.16)
 Chronic conditions
2.42*** (2.29, 2.57)
2.69*** (2.51, 2.88)
2.04*** (1.85, 2.25)
Severity of physical discomfort
 Mild
0.58*** (0.55, 0.61)
0.52*** (0.48, 0.55)
0.52*** (0.47, 0.58)
Moderate (ref.)
 Serious
1.87*** (1.76, 1.98)
2.09*** (1.95, 2.24)
1.94*** (1.75, 2.15)
 Constant
1.44*** (1.21, 1.72)
1.62*** (1.32, 1.99)
 
 Observations
44,362
44,362
13,036
Likelihood ratio test in random effects logistic model: LR = 569.63, p < 0.001
Hausman’s specification test is significant at the 1% level: χ2(24) = 162.32, p < 0.001
Asterisks*** indicate statistical significance at the 1% level, ** at the 5% level, and * at the 10% level
Column (iii) of Table 4 presents factors affecting health care-seeking behavior using the fixed effects logistic model. Among those who reported physical discomfort, adults who currently smoked cigarettes were 0.65 times less likely to seek health care than those who formerly smoked (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.84). Compared to nondrinkers, adults who regularly drank alcohol had a decreased likelihood of seeking health care (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.91). Adults who never engaged in physical exercise had 24% lower odds of seeking healthcare than those who engaged in physical exercise (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.69, 0.83).
Irrespective of the estimation method, adults who currently smoked cigarettes, regularly drank alcohol, and never engaged in physical exercise were less likely to seek health care when they felt physical discomfort (see Columns (i)- (iii) of Table 4).

Discussion

The current study examined the association between lifestyle factors and health care-seeking behavior among a Chinese adult general population using a five-wave longitudinal dataset. This study found that the proportion of individuals seeking health care increased from 68.8% in 2010 to 76.1% in 2018. This result is not unexpected. Since the launch of the new health reform of 2009, the Chinese government has made considerable investments in strengthening the accessibility and availability of health care facilities. As a result, almost every community (village) has at least one primary care facility. Moreover, China successfully achieved near-universal health insurance coverage, with 95% of the population covered in 2011, and proposed a zero-profit drug policy, compelling public hospitals nationwide to sell drugs at cost without mark-up fees to make health care facilities more attractive to patients [1921].
On the other hand, the proportion of people seeking health care in China is much higher than the findings in European studies. Elnegaard et al. [22] found that the proportion of the adult Danish population contacting a general practitioner with at least one symptom was 37%. Elliott, McAteer, and Hannaford [23] reported that 20% of respondents with symptoms consulted with a primary care health professional in the UK. Health care-seeking behavior in different countries may have been affected by degrees of access to care and levels of out-of-pocket payments. Both Demark and the UK have easy and free access to health care facilities. The gap in the proportion of people seeking health care may be because the formal referral system in China is now virtually absent. Patients have the freedom to choose any health care facilities they prefer to visit, regardless of their disease severity [24]. However, people with lifestyle behaviors including current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity had a lower proportion of seeking health care in China.
A fixed effects logistic regression model was used to identify the lifestyle factors affecting health care-seeking behavior. The results indicate that among those who reported physical discomfort, adults who currently smoked cigarettes, regularly drank alcohol, and never engaged in physical exercise were less likely to seek health care. Similar results have been discovered in China, England, and Australia. For example, Zhou et al. [25] observed that physical inactivity decreased the probability of seeking health care in China. Smith et al. [12] found that smokers were less likely to seek help than nonsmokers in England. Feng et al. [13] revealed that people with multiple lifestyle factors, including smoking, alcohol consumption, diet and physical inactivity, were less likely to see general practitioners in Australia.
Four possible reasons may explain the inverse relationship between lifestyle factors and health care-seeking behavior. First, people with lifestyle behaviors including current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity are more risk tolerant, and they may more willingly bear disease risk [26, 27]. A higher willingness to bear risk decreases the probability of seeking health care [28]. Second, lifestyle behaviors such as smoking, drinking, and physical inactivity, are linked with poor health conditions. People in poor health conditions are more likely to have negative experiences in the health care system and be less satisfied with it [29]. Lower patient satisfaction tends to decrease the probability of seeking health care [30]. Third, lifestyles result in chronic diseases, specifically heart disease, diabetes, and cancer [31]. People with lifestyle behaviors including current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity may suffer from long-term chronic conditions and more than one chronic condition, which often leads to normalization of symptoms and thus inhibits health care seeking [32]. Last, lifestyle factors contribute to productive losses at work and reduced ability to work [33, 34]. People with lifestyle behaviors including current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity may sacrifice some of their leisure time to perform unfinished work. Time constraints may delay some people from seeking health care [35].
Although the present study used a national survey to analyze the lifestyle factors affecting health care-seeking behavior among adults who reported physical discomfort, several limitations should be emphasized. First, the CFPS survey does not collect information on self-medication practice, so this study defined health care-seeking behavior as the seeking of professional help. Previous studies have shown that individuals who perceive themselves to have mild health problems are more likely to self-medicate in China [36, 37]. Second, data were obtained via a survey, and thus the limitations of all self-reported data such as recall bias and social desirability bias also apply here. Finally, although the present study adjusted for a large variety of control variables, it is possible that unknown or unmeasured confounders may explain the current findings.

Conclusions

This study estimated the effects of current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity on health care-seeking behavior among adults who reported physical discomfort in China. The empirical findings suggested that current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity decreased the probability of seeking health care among adults who reported physical discomfort. Therefore, primary-level care should deliver screening and brief advice programs and pay more attention to those with lifestyle behaviors such as current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity, thus avoiding missed opportunities to treat chronic conditions and detect new diseases early.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Zhengzhong Mao and Mariyam Suzana for the helpful comments.

Declarations

Permission and approval were obtained from the Peking University Biomedical Ethics Review Committee (IRB00001052–14010). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
No applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang L, Kong L, Wu F, Bai Y, Burton R. Preventing chronic diseases in China. Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1821–4.CrossRef Wang L, Kong L, Wu F, Bai Y, Burton R. Preventing chronic diseases in China. Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1821–4.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Steyn K, Damasceno A. Lifestyle and related risk factors for chronic diseases. Dis Mortal Sub-Saharan Africa. 2006;2:247–65. Steyn K, Damasceno A. Lifestyle and related risk factors for chronic diseases. Dis Mortal Sub-Saharan Africa. 2006;2:247–65.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner EH, Curry SJ, Grothaus L, Saunders KW, McBride CM. The impact of smoking and quitting on health care use. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(16):1789–95.CrossRef Wagner EH, Curry SJ, Grothaus L, Saunders KW, McBride CM. The impact of smoking and quitting on health care use. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(16):1789–95.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sturm R, An R, Maroba J, Patel D. The effects of obesity, smoking, and excessive alcohol intake on healthcare expenditure in a comprehensive medical scheme. S Afr Med J. 2013;103(11):840–4.CrossRef Sturm R, An R, Maroba J, Patel D. The effects of obesity, smoking, and excessive alcohol intake on healthcare expenditure in a comprehensive medical scheme. S Afr Med J. 2013;103(11):840–4.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wacker M, Holle R, Heinrich J, Ladwig KH, Peters A, Leidl R, et al. The association of smoking status with healthcare utilisation, productivity loss and resulting costs: results from the population-based KORA F4 study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):278.CrossRef Wacker M, Holle R, Heinrich J, Ladwig KH, Peters A, Leidl R, et al. The association of smoking status with healthcare utilisation, productivity loss and resulting costs: results from the population-based KORA F4 study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):278.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahende JW, Adhikari B, Maurice E, Rock V, Malarcher A. Disparities in health care utilization by smoking status–NHANES 1999-2004. Int J Environ Res Publich Health. 2009;6(3):1095–106.CrossRef Kahende JW, Adhikari B, Maurice E, Rock V, Malarcher A. Disparities in health care utilization by smoking status–NHANES 1999-2004. Int J Environ Res Publich Health. 2009;6(3):1095–106.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kraft AD, Quimbo SA, Solon O, Shimkhada R, Florentino J, Peabody JW. The health and cost impact of care delay and the experimental impact of insurance on reducing delays. J Pediatr. 2009;155(2):281–5.CrossRef Kraft AD, Quimbo SA, Solon O, Shimkhada R, Florentino J, Peabody JW. The health and cost impact of care delay and the experimental impact of insurance on reducing delays. J Pediatr. 2009;155(2):281–5.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen J, Rizzo JA, Rodriguez HP. The health effects of cost-related treatment delays. Am J Med Qual. 2011;26(4):261–71.CrossRef Chen J, Rizzo JA, Rodriguez HP. The health effects of cost-related treatment delays. Am J Med Qual. 2011;26(4):261–71.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas AW, Valero-Elizondo J, Khera R, Warraich HJ, Krumholz HM, Nasir K, et al. Foregone and delayed medical care is associated with increased health care costs and utilization among heart failure patients in the United States. Circulation. 2019;140(Suppl_1):A13991. Thomas AW, Valero-Elizondo J, Khera R, Warraich HJ, Krumholz HM, Nasir K, et al. Foregone and delayed medical care is associated with increased health care costs and utilization among heart failure patients in the United States. Circulation. 2019;140(Suppl_1):A13991.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith CF, Whitaker K, Winstanley K, Wardle J. Smokers are less likely than non-smokers to seek help for a lung cancer ‘alarm’symptom. Thorax. 2016;71(7):659–61.CrossRef Smith CF, Whitaker K, Winstanley K, Wardle J. Smokers are less likely than non-smokers to seek help for a lung cancer ‘alarm’symptom. Thorax. 2016;71(7):659–61.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng X, Girosi F, McRae IS. People with multiple unhealthy lifestyles are less likely to consult primary healthcare. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15(1):1–7.CrossRef Feng X, Girosi F, McRae IS. People with multiple unhealthy lifestyles are less likely to consult primary healthcare. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15(1):1–7.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie Y, Lu P. The sampling design of the China family panel studies (CFPS). Chin J Sociol. 2015;1(4):471–84.CrossRef Xie Y, Lu P. The sampling design of the China family panel studies (CFPS). Chin J Sociol. 2015;1(4):471–84.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie Y, Zhang X, Tu P, Ren Q, Sun Y, Lv P, et al. China family panel studies user’s manual. 3rd ed. Beijing: Institute of Social Science Survey, Peking University; 2017. Xie Y, Zhang X, Tu P, Ren Q, Sun Y, Lv P, et al. China family panel studies user’s manual. 3rd ed. Beijing: Institute of Social Science Survey, Peking University; 2017.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie Y, Hu J. An introduction to the China family panel studies (CFPS). Chin Sociol Rev. 2014;47(1):3–29. Xie Y, Hu J. An introduction to the China family panel studies (CFPS). Chin Sociol Rev. 2014;47(1):3–29.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Andreß HJ, Golsch K, Schmidt AW. Applied panel data analysis for economicand social surveys: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.CrossRef Andreß HJ, Golsch K, Schmidt AW. Applied panel data analysis for economicand social surveys: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Greene WH. Econometric analysis: Pearson Education India; 2003. Greene WH. Econometric analysis: Pearson Education India; 2003.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ta Y, Zhu Y, Fu H. Trends in access to health services, financial protection and satisfaction between 2010 and 2016: has China achieved the goals of its health system reform? Soc Sci Med. 2020;245:112715.CrossRef Ta Y, Zhu Y, Fu H. Trends in access to health services, financial protection and satisfaction between 2010 and 2016: has China achieved the goals of its health system reform? Soc Sci Med. 2020;245:112715.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Li L, Fu H. China's health care system reform: Progress and prospects. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2017;32:240–53.CrossRef Li L, Fu H. China's health care system reform: Progress and prospects. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2017;32:240–53.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Du J, Xie J, Qian Y, Wu M, Huang W, Yin J, et al. Impact of China’s zero mark-up drug policy on drug cost of NCDs’ outpatients: an interrupted time series analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:404.CrossRef Du J, Xie J, Qian Y, Wu M, Huang W, Yin J, et al. Impact of China’s zero mark-up drug policy on drug cost of NCDs’ outpatients: an interrupted time series analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:404.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Elnegaard S, Andersen RS, Pedersen AF, Larsen PV, Søndergaard J, Rasmussen S, et al. Self-reported symptoms and healthcare seeking in the general population-exploring “the symptom iceberg”. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1–11.CrossRef Elnegaard S, Andersen RS, Pedersen AF, Larsen PV, Søndergaard J, Rasmussen S, et al. Self-reported symptoms and healthcare seeking in the general population-exploring “the symptom iceberg”. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1–11.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Elliott AM, McAteer A, Hannaford PC. Revisiting the symptom iceberg in today's primary care: results from a UK population survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:1–11.CrossRef Elliott AM, McAteer A, Hannaford PC. Revisiting the symptom iceberg in today's primary care: results from a UK population survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:1–11.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Eggleston K, Ling L, Qingyue M, Lindelow M, Wagstaff A. Health service delivery in China: a literature review. Health Econ. 2008;17(2):149–65. Eggleston K, Ling L, Qingyue M, Lindelow M, Wagstaff A. Health service delivery in China: a literature review. Health Econ. 2008;17(2):149–65.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou J, Xu J, Zhang J, Duan Z. Effect of physical activity on healthcare seeking behavior in the general Chinese population: an urban-rural perspective. Glob Health J. 2020;4(3):107–12.CrossRef Zhou J, Xu J, Zhang J, Duan Z. Effect of physical activity on healthcare seeking behavior in the general Chinese population: an urban-rural perspective. Glob Health J. 2020;4(3):107–12.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Khwaja A, Sloan F, Salm M. Evidence on preferences and subjective beliefs of risk takers: the case of smokers. Int J Ind Organ. 2006;24(4):667–82.CrossRef Khwaja A, Sloan F, Salm M. Evidence on preferences and subjective beliefs of risk takers: the case of smokers. Int J Ind Organ. 2006;24(4):667–82.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Dave D, Saffer H. Alcohol demand and risk preference. J Econ Psychol. 2008;29(6):810–31.CrossRef Dave D, Saffer H. Alcohol demand and risk preference. J Econ Psychol. 2008;29(6):810–31.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lutter JI, Szentes B, Wacker ME, Winter J, Wichert S, Peters A, et al. Are health risk attitude and general risk attitude associated with healthcare utilization, costs and working ability? Results from the German KORA FF4 cohort study. Health Econ Rev. 2019;9(1):26.CrossRef Lutter JI, Szentes B, Wacker ME, Winter J, Wichert S, Peters A, et al. Are health risk attitude and general risk attitude associated with healthcare utilization, costs and working ability? Results from the German KORA FF4 cohort study. Health Econ Rev. 2019;9(1):26.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim AM, Bae J, Kang S, Kim YY, Lee JS. Patient factors that affect trust in physicians: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):187.CrossRef Kim AM, Bae J, Kang S, Kim YY, Lee JS. Patient factors that affect trust in physicians: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):187.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Fenton JJ, Jerant AF, Bertakis KD, Franks P. The cost of satisfaction: a national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(5):405–11.CrossRef Fenton JJ, Jerant AF, Bertakis KD, Franks P. The cost of satisfaction: a national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(5):405–11.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Galdas PM, Cheater F, Marshall P. Men and health help-seeking behaviour: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2005;49(6):616–23.CrossRef Galdas PM, Cheater F, Marshall P. Men and health help-seeking behaviour: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2005;49(6):616–23.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Robroek SJ, van den Berg TI, Plat JF, Burdorf A. The role of obesity and lifestyle behaviours in a productive workforce. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68(2):134–9.CrossRef Robroek SJ, van den Berg TI, Plat JF, Burdorf A. The role of obesity and lifestyle behaviours in a productive workforce. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68(2):134–9.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Rongen A, Robroek SJ, van Lenthe FJ, Burdorf A. Workplace health promotion: a meta-analysis of effectiveness. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(4):406–15.CrossRef Rongen A, Robroek SJ, van Lenthe FJ, Burdorf A. Workplace health promotion: a meta-analysis of effectiveness. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(4):406–15.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Taber JM, Leyva B, Persoskie A. Why do people avoid medical care? A qualitative study using national data. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(3):290–7.CrossRef Taber JM, Leyva B, Persoskie A. Why do people avoid medical care? A qualitative study using national data. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(3):290–7.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Lei X, Jiang H, Liu C, Ferrier A, Mugavin J. Self-medication practice and associated factors among residents in Wuhan, China. Int J Environ Res Publich Health. 2018;15(1):68.CrossRef Lei X, Jiang H, Liu C, Ferrier A, Mugavin J. Self-medication practice and associated factors among residents in Wuhan, China. Int J Environ Res Publich Health. 2018;15(1):68.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Li YF, Rao KQ, Ren XW. Use of and factors associated with self-treatment in China. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):995.CrossRef Li YF, Rao KQ, Ren XW. Use of and factors associated with self-treatment in China. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):995.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The impact of current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity on health care-seeking behavior in China
verfasst von
Changle Li
Jing Sun
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2022
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Health Services Research / Ausgabe 1/2022
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07462-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

BMC Health Services Research 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe