Erschienen in:
30.03.2021 | Original Article
Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary second molar position in untreated patients with normal occlusion
Implications for preadjusted appliance prescriptions
verfasst von:
Associate Professor Cecilia Goracci, DDS, PhD, Associate Professsor Antonio C. Ruellas, DDS, PhD, Michele Nieri, DDS, PhD, Spencer Crouch, DDS, MS, James A. McNamara Jr, DDS, PhD, Dr., Associate Professor Lorenzo Franchi, DDS, PhD
Erschienen in:
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
|
Ausgabe 3/2022
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
The study was aimed at evaluating the sagittal and transversal inclinations of upper second molars in untreated adolescents with normal occlusion.
Methods
A sample of 41 subjects (16 females, 25 males) was selected from the University of Michigan Growth Study (UMGS). Digital dental casts with fully erupted second molars in occlusion were chosen (mean age 14.9 ± 1.3 years). Digital measurements were recorded with the open source software 3D Slicer (
www.slicer.org). The digital measurements of the UMGS sample were compared with the manual measurements collected by Andrews from his sample of untreated class I subjects with normal overbite and overjet. Two mixed effect models (sagittal and transversal inclinations) were performed. The “random effect” was represented by the subjects, while the “fixed effects” were the two compared groups, the side of the arch (right and left), and the group × side interaction. Outcome variables were sagittal and transversal inclinations of the upper second molars.
Results
The UMGS group showed a significantly greater distal crown angulation (−18.9°) with respect to the Andrews sample (0.4°, P < 0.0001). As for the transversal inclination, the UMGS group exhibited significantly greater lingual crown inclination (−10.6° versus −8.0°, P = 0.0118).
Conclusions
Fully erupted maxillary second molars in a sample of adolescent subjects with normal occlusion showed significantly greater distal and lingual inclinations when compared with Andrews’ values. The finding of a distal crown inclination in contrast with Andrews’ observation of a mesial crown inclination suggests that revision in tip prescription for preadjusted brackets may be considered.