nach oben

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Erschienen in:

18.01.2024 | Database Studies

Tinnitus: A Dimensionally Segregated, yet Perceptually Integrated Heterogeneous Disorder

verfasst von: Anusha Yasoda-Mohan, Katherine Adcock, Sook Ling Leong, Emma Meade, Berthold Langguth, Martin Schecklmann, Hubert Lim, Sven Vanneste

Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Tinnitus subtypes are proposed to lie on a continuum of different symptom dimensions rather than be categorical. However, there is no comprehensive empirical data showing this complex relationship between different tinnitus symptoms. The objective of this study is to provide empirical evidence for the dimensional nature of tinnitus and how different auditory and non-auditory symptoms interact with each other through complex interactions. We do this using graph theory, a mathematical tool that empirically maps this complex interaction. This way, graph theory can be utilised to highlight a new and possibly important outlook on how we can understand the heterogeneous nature of tinnitus.

Design

In the current study, we use the screening databases of the Treatment Evaluation of Neuromodulation for Tinnitus-Stage A1 (TENT-A1) and A2 (TENT-A2) randomised trials to delineate the dimensional relationship between different clinical measures of tinnitus as a secondary data analysis. We first calculate the empirical relationship by computing the partial correlation. Following this, we use different measures of centrality to describe the contribution of different clinical measures to the overall network. We also calculate the stability of the network and compare the similarity and differences between TENT-A1 and TENT-A2.

Results

Components of the auditory subnetwork (loudness discomfort level, sound sensitivity, average hearing loss and high frequency hearing loss) are highly inter-connected in both networks with sound sensitivity and loudness discomfort level being highly influential with high measures of centrality. Furthermore, the relationship between the densely connected auditory subnetwork with tinnitus-related distress seems to vary at different levels of distress, hearing loss, duration and age of the participants.

Conclusion

Our findings provide first-time evidence for tinnitus varying in a dimensional fashion illustrating the heterogeneity of this phantom percept and its ability to be perceptually integrated, yet behaviourally segregated on different symptomatic dimensions.

McCormack A et al (2016) A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity. Hear Res 337:70–79PubMedCrossRef

Nondahl DM et al (2012) Generational differences in the reporting of tinnitus. Ear Hear 33(5):640PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Martinez C et al (2015) Incidence rates of clinically significant tinnitus: 10-year trend from a cohort study in England. Ear Hear 36(3):e69PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Zeman F et al (2014) Which tinnitus-related aspects are relevant for quality of life and depression: results from a large international multicentre sample. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12(1):7PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Wang TC et al (2020) Noise induced hearing loss and tinnitus-new research developments and remaining gaps in disease assessment, treatment, and prevention. Brain Sci 10(10)

Song Z et al (2021) Tinnitus is associated with extended high-frequency hearing loss and hidden high-frequency damage in young patients. Otol Neurotol 42(3):377–383PubMedCrossRef

Ren J et al (2021) Prevalence of hyperacusis in the general and special populations: a scoping review. Front Neurol 12:706555PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Andersson G et al (2002) Hypersensitivity to sound (hyperacusis): a prevalence study conducted via the internet and post: Hipersensibilidad al sonido (hiperacusia): un estudio de prevalencia realizado por internet y por correo. Int J Audiol 41(8):545–554PubMedCrossRef

Vanneste S, Alsalman O, De Ridder D (2019) Top-down and bottom-up regulated auditory phantom perception. J Neurosci 39(2):364–378PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

10.

Vanneste S, De Ridder D (2016) Deafferentation-based pathophysiological differences in phantom sound: tinnitus with and without hearing loss. Neuroimage 129:80–94PubMedCrossRef

11.

Vanneste S et al (2010) The neural correlates of tinnitus-related distress. Neuroimage 52(2):470–480PubMedCrossRef

12.

Beukes EW et al (2021) Exploring tinnitus heterogeneity. Prog Brain Res 260:79–99PubMedCrossRef

13.

Genitsaridi E et al (2020) A review and a framework of variables for defining and characterizing tinnitus subphenotypes. Brain Sci 10(12):938PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

14.

Cederroth CR et al (2019) Editorial: towards an understanding of tinnitus heterogeneity. Front Aging Neurosci 11:53PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

15.

Mohan A et al (2022) Symptom dimensions to address heterogeneity in tinnitus. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 134:104542PubMedCrossRef

16.

Searchfield GD (2023) Specialty grand challenge: smarter solutions for tinnitus. Frontiers in Audiology and Otology 1:1101233CrossRef

17.

Santacruz JL, De Kleine E, Van Dijk P (2021) Investigating the relation between minimum masking levels and hearing thresholds for tinnitus subtyping. Prog Brain Res 263:81–94PubMedCrossRef

18.

Rodebaugh TL et al (2023) Investigating individual variation using dynamic structural equation modeling: a tutorial with tinnitus. Clin Psychol Sci 11(3):574–591PubMedCrossRef

19.

Riha C et al (2020) Accounting for heterogeneity: mixed-effects models in resting-state EEG data in a sample of tinnitus sufferers. Brain Topogr 33:413–424PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

20.

Rubinov M, Sporns O (2010) Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 52(3):1059–1069PubMedCrossRef

21.

Jones PJ et al (2018) A network perspective on comorbid depression in adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Anxiety Disord 53:1–8PubMedCrossRef

22.

Vainik U et al (2019) Obesity has limited behavioural overlap with addiction and psychiatric phenotypes. Nat Hum Behav 4:27–35

23.

Mohan A, De Ridder D, Vanneste S (2017) Robustness and dynamicity of functional networks in phantom sound. Neuroimage 146:171–187PubMedCrossRef

24.

Trevis KJ et al (2017) Identification of a neurocognitive mechanism underpinning awareness of chronic tinnitus. Sci Rep 7(1):15220PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

25.

Tyler R et al (2008) Identifying tinnitus subgroups with cluster analysis. Am J Audiol 17(2):S176–S184

26.

van den Berge MJ et al (2017) Cluster analysis to identify possible subgroups in tinnitus patients. Front Neurol 8:115PubMedPubMedCentral

27.

D’Arcy S et al (2017) Bi-modal stimulation in the treatment of tinnitus: a study protocol for an exploratory trial to optimise stimulation parameters and patient subtyping. BMJ Open 7(10):e018465PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

28.

Conlon B et al (2020) Bimodal neuromodulation combining sound and tongue stimulation reduces tinnitus symptoms in a large randomized clinical study. Sci Transl Med 12(564):eabb2830

29.

Conlon B et al (2019) Noninvasive bimodal neuromodulation for the treatment of tinnitus: protocol for a second large-scale double-blind randomized clinical trial to optimize stimulation parameters. JMIR Research Protocols 8(9):e13176PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

30.

Conlon B et al (2022) Different bimodal neuromodulation settings reduce tinnitus symptoms in a large randomized trial. Sci Rep 12(1):10845PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

31.

Newman CW, Sandridge SA, Jacobson GP (1998) Psychometric adequacy of the tinnitus handicap inventory (THI) for evaluating treatment outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 9:153–160

32.

Henry JA et al (2016) Tinnitus functional index: development, validation, outcomes research, and clinical application. Hear Res 334:58–64PubMedCrossRef

33.

Vidal JL et al (2022) Measurement of loudness discomfort levels as a test for hyperacusis: test-retest reliability and its clinical value. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 15(1):84–90PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

34.

Robinaugh DJ, Millner AJ, McNally RJ (2016) Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network. J Abnorm Psychol 125(6):747PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

35.

Peng J et al (2009) Partial correlation estimation by joint sparse regression models. J Am Stat Assoc 104(486):735–746PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

36.

Shannon P et al (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13(11):2498–2504PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

37.

Scholz M (2010) Node similarity as a basic principle behind connectivity in complex networks. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1010.0803

38.

Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Fried EI (2018) Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: a tutorial paper. Behav Res Methods 50(1):195–212PubMedCrossRef

39.

Epskamp S, Fried EI (2018) A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychol Methods 23(4):617–634PubMedCrossRef

40.

McNally RJ (2021) Network analysis of psychopathology: controversies and challenges. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 17:31–53PubMedCrossRef

41.

van Borkulo CD et al (2022) Comparing network structures on three aspects: a permutation test. Psychol Methods 26(6):1273–1285

42.

Gay NG et al (2020) Posttraumatic stress disorder symptom network structures: a comparison between men and women. J Trauma Stress 33(1):96–105PubMedCrossRef

43.

Hevey D (2018) Network analysis: a brief overview and tutorial. Health Psychol Behav Med 6(1):301–328PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

44.

Borsboom D et al (2021) Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science. Nat Rev Methods Primers 1(1)

45.

Herráiz C et al (2003) Study of hyperacusis at a tinnitus unit. Acta Otorrinolaringologica Espanola 54(9):617–622PubMedCrossRef

46.

Cederroth CR et al (2020) Association between hyperacusis and tinnitus. J Clin Med 9(8)

47.

Baguley DM et al (2013) Troublesome tinnitus in childhood and adolescence: data from expert centres. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 77(2):248–251PubMedCrossRef

48.

Sedley W et al (2016) An integrative tinnitus model based on sensory precision. Trends Neurosci 39(12):799–812PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

49.

Mohan A et al (2017) Evidence for behaviorally segregated, spatiotemporally overlapping subnetworks in phantom sound perception. Brain Connectivity 7(3):197–210PubMedCrossRef

50.

Vanneste S, Congedo M, De Ridder D (2014) Pinpointing a highly specific pathological functional connection that turns phantom sound into distress. Cereb Cortex 24(9):2268–2282PubMedCrossRef

51.

Schaette R, McAlpine D (2011) Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci 31(38):13452–13457PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

52.

Xiong B et al (2019) Missed hearing loss in tinnitus patients with normal audiograms. Hear Res 384:107826PubMedCrossRef

53.

González-Rodríguez G, Colubi A, Gil MÁ (2006) A fuzzy representation of random variables: an operational tool in exploratory analysis and hypothesis testing. Comput Stat Data Anal 51(1):163–176CrossRef

Titel: Tinnitus: A Dimensionally Segregated, yet Perceptually Integrated Heterogeneous Disorder
verfasst von: Anusha Yasoda-Mohan
Katherine Adcock
Sook Ling Leong
Emma Meade
Berthold Langguth
Martin Schecklmann
Hubert Lim
Sven Vanneste
Publikationsdatum: 18.01.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-023-00923-0

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Tinnitus: A Dimensionally Segregated, yet Perceptually Integrated Heterogeneous Disorder