Background
Cardiac troponin levels are sensitive and specific markers of myocardial injury [
1] and are routinely used to diagnose myocardial infarction [
1]. Troponin elevation can also be observed in 20–60% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (IS) and has been associated with IS of cardioembolic origin [
2], poor functional outcome [
3], and increased short- and long-term mortality [
4,
5]. The current American Heart Association guideline for the early management of patients with acute IS recommends routine troponin measurement [
6], although the independent association of troponin with poor outcome is inconsistent [
7].
Troponin elevation may be caused by a thrombotic acute coronary syndrome preceding or concomitant to acute IS. Postulated mechanisms of troponin elevation due to non-acute coronary causes comprise heart failure [
8,
9], impaired kidney function [
8], and autonomic dysfunction due to sympathovagal imbalance with a dominating sympathetic activation [
3,
10].
Comparability of prevalence and determinants of troponin elevation in IS patients between existing studies [
3,
8‐
12] is limited due to heterogeneous inclusion criteria and the variety of troponin assays employed, with differing sensitivities and upper reference limits (URL). Information on the correlates of troponin elevation is often derived from studies with limited sample size, precluding adequately powered multivariable analyses [
3,
11]. Further, the available evidence frequently relies on retrospective analyses of routinely collected data, where uptake of cardiac investigations is often incomplete [
8‐
10,
12].
Markers of autonomic function (e.g., plasma catecholamines) are not routinely measured in IS patients and may be influenced by environmental stress [
13]. Hence, this possible pathomechanism has not been well studied. The assessment of the heart rate variability (HRV) may provide a non-invasive and reproducible alternative to investigate the autonomic function in IS patients [
14]. Time domain variables provide an estimate of the amount of HRV at various time scales, reflecting fluctuation in autonomic input to the heart. Reduced HRV may indicate autonomic dysfunction resulting from both autonomic withdrawal or saturating sympathetic input [
15]. Inflammation has also been postulated as a potentially relevant pathomechanism in the heart-brain interaction [
16], although the clinical evidence is scarce.
Therefore, we examined determinants of troponin elevation >99th percentile using a high-sensitivity assay within prospectively collected data undergoing detailed cardiac phenotyping at baseline including HRV time domain variables.
Discussion
Our study reports determinants associated with elevated baseline troponin levels in a cohort of patients with acute IS undergoing extensive cardiac phenotyping. Here, we showed that hs-TnT elevation >99th percentile is independently associated with older age, male sex, decreasing eGFR, elevated hs-CRP, and cardiac disease (systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction in the absence of systolic dysfunction or atrial fibrillation). We did not find an independent association between the investigated HRV time domain variables and increased hs-TnT. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the association of reduced HRV with troponin elevation among IS patients.
Rates of elevated hs-TnT in our study are in line with previous publications in IS patients applying comparable kits, ranging between 30 and 60% [
5,
8,
28]. In accordance with a previous study [
8], age was independently associated with hs-TnT ≥14 ng/L. Reports lacking an association of age with increased troponin investigated either other assays (troponin I) [
9‐
11] or a higher URL of hs-TnT [
12]. Importantly, the definition of the upper 99th percentile used in this study (≥14 ng/L) is based on the assay’s validation study on a population of apparently healthy volunteers and blood donors (mean age 44 years, range 20–71 years) [
25]. It is unclear, how well this URL applies to a general elderly population. A large population-based study (
n = 19,501, age range 18–98 years) reported an URL for hs-TnT as high as 47.1 and 38.6 ng/L for men and women ≥70 years, even after exclusion of individuals with known cardiovascular disease [
29]. While increasing troponin levels may indeed reflect subclinical myocardial injury in the elderly [
30], caution is needed when interpreting the results of routine troponin testing in this population. The association of male sex with increased troponin in our cohort differs from a previous report on IS patients, probably explained by the use of a different kit with a different URL [
9], but is in line with previous studies from the general population [
29,
31]. This finding might be explained by a higher left ventricular mass in men, even after adjustment for body surface area [
32].
We found a strong correlation of eGFR with hs-TnT ≥14 ng/L, in line with previous reports [
8,
12]. Troponin appears to be catabolized in tissues with high metabolic rate, such as the kidney, and thus impaired clearance may lead to a higher baseline levels [
1]. Importantly, experimental evidence suggests that renal clearance dominates at low levels of troponin T (e.g. patients with chronic cardiac disease) [
33]. This might explain the lack of association of increased Troponin I with eGFR in other studies using higher upper reference limits (40 ng/L [
9] and 200 ng/L [
3]).
We found an association of both systolic and diastolic dysfunction with increased hs-TnT. Comparability with previous studies is limited, since most studies lacked structural and functional cardiac investigation [
3,
5,
8,
11], excluded patients with systolic dysfunction [
10], or echocardiographic data was available for < 60% of the population [
9]. In previous reports, heart failure was frequently associated with increased troponin levels [
8,
9]. However, the majority of IS patients with systolic or diastolic dysfunction are asymptomatic and therefore do not fulfill heart failure criteria [
17]. Thus, the sole adjustment for heart failure, either self-reported or from medical records, insufficiently depicts the extent of existing cardiac dysfunction among IS patients. Possible explanations for the association of systolic dysfunction and troponin elevation are manifold. We have previously reported an association between pre-stroke CAD and systolic dysfunction [
17]. Thus, both systolic dysfunction and troponin elevation might be correlates of previous myocardial ischemia. CAD is highly prevalent in IS patients [
34] and approximately 3.5% of them will suffer an acute myocardial infarction during the index hospitalization [
4]. However, only a quarter of IS patients undergoing coronary angiography presents a coronary culprit lesion [
35] and troponin elevation is associated with poor prognosis even after exclusion of concurrent myocardial infarction [
4]. We were not able to find an association of previous CAD with elevated troponin levels and < 40% of patients with systolic dysfunction in our cohort had a previous history of CAD [
17]. Troponin elevation may also reflect a subclinical myocardial infarction occurring shortly before or after symptoms onset. In addition, experimental evidence suggests that IS might induce systolic dysfunction [
36,
37]. Thus, systolic dysfunction and elevated troponin may be correlates of ongoing neurogenic myocardial injury. Alternatively, circulating troponin might indicate ongoing fibrosis in patients without known cardiac disease [
31], which might explain the association of troponin (even <99th percentile) with systolic dysfunction in the general population [
31]. Fibrosis is also involved in the development of diastolic dysfunction [
38] and might explain the association we observed.
Nearly all patients with atrial fibrillation have detectable troponin levels and increasing values are associated with increasing risk of stroke [
39]. Thus, IS patients might have increased troponin level at baseline correlating with increased baseline stroke risk. Furthermore, troponin release could be related to rapid ventricular response or the mechanical effects of fibrillation on the atria [
40]. Further, atrial fibrillation may lead to coronary macro or microembolism, although this phenomenon seems to be rare [
41]. This association barely missed statistical significance after adjustment for time point of blood sampling, thus suggests a potential role of time point of sampling and with the presence of elevated troponin after ischemic stroke.
Only one study has previously reported an association of an inflammation marker (tumor necrosis factor alpha) with troponin elevation [
11], although its modest sample size and lack of adjustment for relevant confounders are major limitations. The association of the inflammation marker hs-CRP with increased troponin levels could reflect a pro-inflammatory state associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors [
42]. However, this association remained significant after adjustment for atherogenic cardiovascular risk factors. Alternatively, it could represent a stroke-induced immune response, which in an experimental study was associated with the development of systolic dysfunction [
37].
Autonomic dysfunction with sympathetic overweight is another proposed mechanism to explain troponin elevation in IS patients [
3]. We are aware of only one study investigating this hypothesis at the mechanistic level, showing an independent association of epinephrine (not norepinephrine) levels with increased troponin [
3]. However, plasma epinephrine probably better reflects the adrenomedullary hormonal than the sympathetic noradrenergic system activation (reflected by plasma norepinephrine) [
13]. Furthermore, epinephrine levels increase more markedly than norepinephrine to a wide range of stressors [
13], which may limit their interpretability in conditions of environmental stress, such as a stroke unit. In our sensitivity analysis, only SDNN index was associated with elevated troponin levels in univariate analysis, although this association disappeared when adjusting for age. This finding was not unexpected, since SDNN index is the time domain variable most closely correlated with age, exhibiting a linearly declining pattern across the lifespan [
43]. Thus, this association seems not to provide additional clinically relevant information.
Overall, our results suggest that troponin elevation in IS patients is predominantly associated with some traditional cardiovascular risk factors and symptomatic or asymptomatic cardiac disease. Thus, the prognostic value of troponin in IS patients probably reflects an increased baseline cardiovascular risk and may explain the inconsistent association of troponin with poor outcome found in a recent systematic review, which was more often non-significant when adjusted for other relevant cardiac prognostic factors (such as cardiac comorbidities or biomarkers) [
7]. Our data does not support an association between reduced HRV and troponin elevation, at least among younger stroke patients with relatively few comorbidities. However, patients with low cardiovascular baseline risk represent a group where autonomic dysfunction could be especially important in explaining troponin elevation. Our data does not exclude an association of reduced HRV with troponin elevation in individuals with high cardiovascular baseline risk.
Strengths and limitations
The major strength of our study is the assessment of the determinants of hs-TnT elevation within a large, prospective study of IS patients undergoing detailed and standardized cardiac examination. Our study has, however, limitations. First, this analysis was not prespecified and we analyzed the determinants of hs-TnT levels only at baseline. Thus, we might have missed transient troponin elevation during the hyperacute phase. However, previous results using the same hs-TnT assay do not suggest a clear dynamic during the first four days after IS [
28]. We cannot extend our results to other troponin kits, since 99th percentiles of troponin I and T may not be biologically equivalent [
29]. Second, this cohort consisted of mostly mild strokes, since patients with severe stroke are often unable to provide informed consent [
44] and in the absence of a legal representative their recruitment is not possible during the acute phase. Therefore, the conclusions might not be extrapolated to more severely affected patients. Nonetheless, the primary analysis included a significant proportion of patients with insular involvement, a factor that has been repeatedly associated with cardiac complications. Third, we limited the analysis of HRV data to recordings fulfilling strict inclusion criteria, thus resulting in a smaller, healthier cohort. This limits the generalizability of our results. Further, this sensitivity analysis may lack power to detect subtle associations between time domain HRV variables and troponin elevation. Fourth, 24-hour ECG Holter records may be more suitable for cardiac risk stratification than detailed physiological investigation, since standardization of a 24-hour record is challenging [
45]. However, the vast majority of records were obtained during the stay of patients at the stroke unit, thus providing rather standardized environmental conditions in terms of e.g. physical activity. Fifth, CAD was not systematically investigated in our cohort. However, previous results suggest that most IS patients with troponin elevation, even well above the 99th percentile, do not present an angiographic coronary culprit lesion [
35]. Lastly, we do not report on patient’s outcomes. While a previous systematic review has shown that the association of troponin with poor functional outcome and mortality after ischemic stroke is mostly mediated by cardiac comorbidity [
7], the prediction of major cardiovascular events represents a potentially relevant clinical application of troponin measurement after acute stroke [
46], question that we will address in a separate study including a broader panel of cardiac biomarkers.
Declarations
Competing interests
F.A.M. is supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) within the UNION-CVD Clinician-Scientist Programme (project number 413657723) and has been previously supported by a MD/PhD Fellowship of the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, University Hospital Würzburg (project Z-1). E.J.K., V.R., K.U, D.M., T.D. and C.K. have nothing to disclose. S.W. reports grants from the German Ministry of Research and Education and Deutsche Herzstiftung e.V. C.M. reports a research cooperation with the University of Würzburg and Tomtec Imaging Systems funded by a research grant from the Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs, Regional Development and Energy, Germany; travel grants, advisory and speakers honoraria from Amgen, Tomtec, Orion Pharma, Alnylam, AKCEA, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, SOBI, and EBR Systems; principal investigator in trials sponsored by Alnylam and AstraZeneca; financial support from the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research - IZKF Würzburg (advanced clinician-scientist program). St.St. reports grants from the German Ministry of Research and Education during the conduct of the study; grants and other from Boehringer, Bayer, Thermo Fisher, and Pfizer; other from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Servier, Alnylam, Ionis, and Akcea; grants, personal fees, non-financial support, and other from Novartis, outside the submitted work. S.F. reports grants from the German Ministry of Research and Education; there is no industrial support competing with the study results. KGH reports speaker’s honoraria, consulting fees, lecture honoraria and/or study grants from Abbott, Amarin, Alexion, AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Pfizer, Portola, Premier Research, Sanofi, W.L. Gore and Associates. P.U.H. reports grants from the German Ministry of Education and Research, German Research Foundation, European Union, Berlin Chamber of Physicians, German Parkinson Society, University Hospital Würzburg, Robert Koch Institute, German Heart Foundation, Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) within the Innovationfond, University Hospital Heidelberg (within RASUNOA-prime; supported by an unrestricted research grant to the University Hospital Heidelberg from Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi Sankyo), Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin (within Mondafis; supported by an unrestricted research grant to the Charité from Bayer), and University Göttingen (within FIND-AF randomized; supported by an unrestricted research grant to the University Göttingen from Boehringer Ingelheim) outside the submitted work.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.