nach oben

Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Erschienen in:

08.11.2021 | Review Article

Coronary artery disease in aortic aneurysm and dissection

verfasst von: Joon Chul Jung, Kay-Hyun Park

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Sonderheft 1/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Coexisting coronary artery disease is a significant risk factor of untoward outcomes after surgical and endovascular aortic repair. This article reviewed the data, consensus, and remaining controversy about the diagnosis and management of coexisting coronary artery disease in the patients who require intervention for aortic aneurysm and dissection. It can be summarized as follows: (1) the current guidelines generally recommend the same diagnostic algorithm, including indications of coronary artery angiography, as one for non-surgical patients; (2) they also recommend the same indications of coronary revascularization; and (3) there are minor, but important, remaining issues regarding the details of management and surgical techniques most of which are still at the discretion of individual surgeons and institutions. Because it is not likely to get large-scale investigational data about these issues, the collection of individual experiences should be promoted in future scientific meetings to build up the consensus.

Olsson C, Thelin S, Ståhle E, Ekbom A, Granath F. Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection: increasing prevalence and improved outcomes reported in a nationwide population-based study of more than 14,000 cases from 1987 to 2002. Circulation. 2006;114:2611–2618. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.630400.

Bossone E, Eagle KA. Epidemiology and management of aortic disease: aortic aneurysms and acute aortic syndromes. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18:331–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-020-00472-6.

Van Kuijk JP, Flu WJ, Dunckelgrun M, Bax JJ, Poldermans D. Coronary artery disease in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: a review article. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2009;50:93–107.

Elkalioubie A, Haulon S, Duhamel A, et al. Meta-analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:1451–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.074.

Hołda MK, Iwaszczuk P, Wszołek K, et al. Coexistence and management of abdominal aortic aneurysm and coronary artery disease. Cardiol J. 2020;27:384–93. https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2018.0101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kieffer E, Chiche L, Baron JF, Godet G, Koskas F, Bahnini A. Coronary and carotid artery disease in patients with degenerative aneurysm of the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta: prevalence and impact on operative mortality. Ann Vasc Surg. 2002;16:679–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-001-0315-1.

Islamoğlu F, Atay Y, Can L, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of concomitant aortic and coronary disease: a retrospective study and brief review. Tex Heart Inst J. 1999;26:182–8.PubMedPubMedCentral

Chau K, Elefteriades JA. Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms protect against myocardial infarctions. Int J Angiol. 2014;23:177–82. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1382288.

Creswell LL, Kouchoukos NT, Cox JL, Rosenbloom M. Coronary artery disease in patients with type A aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:585–90.CrossRef

10.

Hashiyama N, Goda M, Uchida K, et al. Stanford type B aortic dissection is more frequently associated with coronary artery atherosclerosis than type A. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;13:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-018-0765-y.

11.

Nakashima Y, Kurozumi T, Sueishi K, Tanaka K. Dissecting aneurysm: a clinicopathologic and histopathologic study of 111 autopsied cases. Hum Pathol. 1990;21:291–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0046-8177(90)90229-x.

12.

Juo YY, Mantha A, Ebrahimi R, Ziaeian B, Benharash P. Incidence of myocardial infarction after high-risk vascular operations in adults. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:e173360. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3360.

13.

Khan FM, Naik A, Hameed I, et al. Open repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110:1941–9.CrossRef

14.

Stowe CL, Baertlein MA, Wierman MD, Rucker M, Ebra G. Surgical management of ascending and aortic arch disease: refined techniques with improved results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:388–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00535-9.

15.

Beaulieu RJ, Sutzko DC, Albright J, Jeruzal E, Osborne NH, Henke PK. Association of high mortality with postoperative myocardial infarction after major vascular surgery despite use of evidence-based therapies. JAMA Surg. 2020;155:131–137. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4908.

16.

Kristensen SD, Knuuti J, Saraste A, et al. 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: the Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2383–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu282.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130:2215–2245.

18.

Kyo S, Imanaka K, Masuda M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management for noncardiac surgery (JCS 2014)—digest version. Circ J. 2017;81:245–267. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-66-0135.

19.

McFalls EO, Ward HB, Moritz TE, et al. Coronary-artery revascularization before elective major vascular surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2795–804. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa041905.

20.

Schouten O, van Kuijk JP, Flu WJ, et al. Long-term outcome of prophylactic coronary revascularization in cardiac high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery (from the randomized DECREASE-V Pilot Study). Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:897–901.CrossRef

21.

Dewey M, Rief M, Martus P, et al. Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with atypical angina or chest pain clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2016;355:i5441. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5441.

22.

Chang HJ, Lin FY, Gebow D, et al. Selective referral using CCTA versus direct referral for individuals referred to invasive coronary angiography for suspected CAD: a randomized, controlled, open-label trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:1303–12.CrossRef

23.

Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, et al. Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1291–300.CrossRef

24.

Jørgensen ME, Andersson C, Nørgaard BL, et al. Functional testing or coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1761–70.CrossRef

25.

Hosokawa Y, Takano H, Aoki A, et al. Management of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm open repair. Clin Cardiol. 2008;31:580–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20335.

26.

Hassan SA, Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, et al. Outcomes of noncardiac surgery after coronary bypass surgery or coronary angioplasty in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Am J Med. 2001;110:260–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00717-8.

27.

Ward HB, Kelly RF, Thottapurathu L, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention in prevention of perioperative myocardial infarctions during subsequent vascular surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:795–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.074.

28.

Girardi LN, Rabotnikov Y, Avgerinos DV. Preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention in patients undergoing open thoracoabdominal and descending thoracic aneurysm repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:163–8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.008.

29.

Rajbanshi BG, Charilaou P, Ziganshin BA, Rajakaruna C, Maryann T, Elefteriades JA. Management of coronary artery disease in patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Card Surg. 2015;30:701–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12596.

30.

Fukui T, Shimokawa T, Tabata M, Takanashi S. Outcomes of total aortic arch replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;13:284–7. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2011.275685.

31.

Okada K, Omura A, Kano H, et al. Short and midterm outcomes of elective total aortic arch replacement combined with coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:530–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.034.

32.

Yamanaka K, Komiya T, Tsuneyoshi H, Shimamoto T. Outcomes of concomitant total aortic arch replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;22:251–7. https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00056.

33.

Williams AM, Watson J, Mansour MA, Sugiyama GT. Combined coronary artery bypass grafting and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: presentation of 3 cases and a review of the literature. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;30:321–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2015.06.072.

34.

Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1243–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.044.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:213–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:2–77.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044.

37.

Mannacio VA, Mannacio L, Monaco M, et al. Safety of aortic aneurysm repair 8 weeks after percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease: a cohort study. Updates Surg. 2020;72:1213–21.

38.

Quintana E, Bajona P, Schaff HV, et al. Open aortic arch reconstruction after coronary artery bypass surgery: worth the effort? Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;28:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2015.12.006.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Zhang P, Wang L, Zhai K, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Perfusion. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267659120960310.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Ramanath VS, Eagle KA, Nienaber CA, et al. The role of preoperative coronary angiography in the setting of type A acute aortic dissection: insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. Am Heart J. 2011;161:790–796.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.01.010.

41.

Penn MS, Smedira N, Lytle B, Brener SJ. Does coronary angiography before emergency aortic surgery affect in-hospital mortality? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:889–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00638-5.

42.

Motallebzadeh R, Batas D, Valencia O, et al. The role of coronary angiography in acute type A aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:231–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2003.11.014.

43.

Kawahito K, Adachi H, Murata S-i, Yamaguchi A, Ino T. Coronary malperfusion due to type A aortic dissection: mechanism and surgical management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1471–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00899-3.

44.

Eren E, Toker ME, Tunçer A, et al. Surgical management of coronary malperfusion due to type a aortic dissection. J Card Surg.2007;22:2–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.2007.00331.x.

45.

Imoto K, Uchida K, Karube N, et al. Risk analysis and improvement of strategies in patients who have acute type A aortic dissection with coronary artery dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44:419–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt060.

46.

Czerny M, Schoenhoff F, Etz C, et al. The impact of pre-operative malperfusion on outcome in acute type A aortic dissection: results from the GERAADA registry. J Am Coll Cardiol.2015;65:2628–2635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.030.

47.

Waterford SD, Di Eusanio M, Ehrlich MP, et al. Postoperative myocardial infarction in acute type A aortic dissection: A report from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:521–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.064.

48.

Neri E, Toscano T, Papalia U, et al. Proximal aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion: presentation, management, and outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:552–60. https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2001.112534.

49.

Kreibich M, Bavaria JE, Branchetti E, et al. Management of patients with coronary artery malperfusion secondary to type A aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107:1174–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.09.065.

50.

Uchida K, Karube N, Minami T, et al. Treatment of coronary malperfusion in type A acute aortic dissection. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2018;66:621–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-1014-y.

51.

Chemtob RA, Moeller-Soerensen H, Holmvang L, Olsen PS, Ravn HB. Outcome after surgery for acute aortic dissection: influence of preoperative antiplatelet therapy on prognosis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31:569–574. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2016.10.007.

52.

Hansson EC, Geirsson A, Hjortdal V, et al. Preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy increases bleeding and transfusions but not mortality in acute aortic dissection type A repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56:182–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy469.

53.

Paparella D, Rotunno C, Guida P, et al. Hemostasis alterations in patients with acute aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1364–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.01.058.

54.

Guan X, Li J, Gong M, Lan F, Zhang H. The hemostatic disturbance in patients with acute aortic dissection: A prospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e4710. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004710.

55.

Cabrol C, Pavie A, Gandjbakhch I, et al. Complete replacement of the ascending aorta with reimplantation of the coronary arteries: new surgical approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981;81:309–15.CrossRef

56.

Lin TW, Tsai MT, Wu HY. “Mantle-style” modification of Cabrol shunt for hemostasis after extended aortic reconstruction in acute type A aortic dissection. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67:1001–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-019-01151-1.

57.

Zhang H, Wu X, Fang G, Qiu Z, Chen LW. Is it justified to apply a modified Cabrol fistula in surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158:1307–1314.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.082.

Titel: Coronary artery disease in aortic aneurysm and dissection
verfasst von: Joon Chul Jung
Kay-Hyun Park
Publikationsdatum: 08.11.2021
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0970-9134
Elektronische ISSN: 0973-7723
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-021-01265-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2022

Tips and tricks in redo aortic ﻿surgery

“More or less”: management of type A aortic dissections in the endovascular era

Is the classical elephant trunk better than the frozen elephant trunk?

Management of penetrating aortic ulcer and intramural hematoma in the thoracic aorta

Alternative management of proximal aortic dissection: concept and application

Malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection: how we handle the challenge?

Update Chirurgie

Tips and tricks in redo aortic surgery